Membrane distillation for concentrated blackwater: Influence of configuration (air gap, direct contact, vacuum) on selectivity and water productivity
•Membrane distillation configuration studied for water recovery from blackwater.•Selectivity altered by differences in vapour pressure and water flux.•Wetting by organics limited by smaller pore size but decreases mass transfer.•Organics fouling more severe for vacuum configuration.•Air gap provides...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Separation and purification technology 2021-05, Vol.263, p.118390-118390, Article 118390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 118390 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 118390 |
container_title | Separation and purification technology |
container_volume | 263 |
creator | Davey, C.J. Liu, P. Kamranvand, F. Williams, L. Jiang, Y. Parker, A. Tyrrel, S. McAdam, E.J. |
description | •Membrane distillation configuration studied for water recovery from blackwater.•Selectivity altered by differences in vapour pressure and water flux.•Wetting by organics limited by smaller pore size but decreases mass transfer.•Organics fouling more severe for vacuum configuration.•Air gap provides more robust separation over temperature range studied.
Water recovery from concentrated blackwater has been studied using air gap (AGMD), direct contact (DCMD) and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) to deliver decentralised sanitation. Whilst good water quality was achieved with each configuration, differences in the rejection of volatile compounds was observed. VMD exhibited the highest rejection of volatiles, specifically ammoniacal nitrogen, of all the configurations but fouling inhibited total flux. DCMD exhibited a temperature dependent volatile rejection which resulted in poor rejection at lower feed temperatures (≤40 °C). AGMD was identified as the most promising configuration for application within decentralised sanitation, since the rejection of volatiles was consistent over a range of operating temperatures with ammonia rejection directly related to solution pH. An increase in organic colloids and particles due to faecal contamination reduced COD removal due to the induction of wetting, but was shown to be offset by adoption of a smaller pore size (0.1 μm), and when complemented with upstream solid-liquid separation within a fully integrated system, will provide a robust sanitation solution. Importantly, this work has shown that AGMD can recover water from concentrated blackwater close to international discharge and reuse regulations in a single stage process; this is significant as blackwater consists of only urine and faeces, and is thus 40 times more concentrated than municipal sewage. It is proposed that the water quality produced reflects a step change to delivering safe sanitation, and is complemented by a simple method for heat recovery integration this is similarly advantageous for resource constrained environments common to decentralised sanitation solutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118390 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7965860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1383586621000927</els_id><sourcerecordid>2528819697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc98c18d2f872759be3fb45d19573d84eebd7f1ed24a000334276ea47ee1f34f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIlsIfIORlkZqpHTuxwwIJVZRWasUG1pZjXw8ekjjYzqB-CP-L0wwtbFj5yudxH6coXhO8IZg057tNhGmaw6bCFdkQImiLnxTHRHBaUt6yp7mmgpa1aJqj4kWMO4wJJ6J6XhxRhrMIt8fFr1sYuqBGQMbF5PpeJedHZH1A2o8axhRUAoO6XunvP3MZ3qHr0fYzZBB5u7Cs285h1Z0qF9BWTWfZLoBOC5yUTmdor_Q8D29RJkXoM-T2Lt0hNRp0b4um4M18-H5ZPLOqj_Dq8J4UXy8_frm4Km8-f7q--HBTatbQVGrdCk2EqazgFa_bDqjtWG1IW3NqBAPoDLcETMUUxphSVvEGFOMAxFJm6UnxfvWd5m4As67byym4QYU76ZWT_yKj-ya3fi952-S74mxwejAI_scMMcnBRQ35jCP4OcqqroQgbdPyTGUrVQcfYwD70IZguSQqd3JNVC6JyjXRLHvz94gPoj8RPu4A-VB7B0FG7ZZ01gSk8e7_HX4D-xa5QA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528819697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Membrane distillation for concentrated blackwater: Influence of configuration (air gap, direct contact, vacuum) on selectivity and water productivity</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Davey, C.J. ; Liu, P. ; Kamranvand, F. ; Williams, L. ; Jiang, Y. ; Parker, A. ; Tyrrel, S. ; McAdam, E.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davey, C.J. ; Liu, P. ; Kamranvand, F. ; Williams, L. ; Jiang, Y. ; Parker, A. ; Tyrrel, S. ; McAdam, E.J.</creatorcontrib><description>•Membrane distillation configuration studied for water recovery from blackwater.•Selectivity altered by differences in vapour pressure and water flux.•Wetting by organics limited by smaller pore size but decreases mass transfer.•Organics fouling more severe for vacuum configuration.•Air gap provides more robust separation over temperature range studied.
Water recovery from concentrated blackwater has been studied using air gap (AGMD), direct contact (DCMD) and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) to deliver decentralised sanitation. Whilst good water quality was achieved with each configuration, differences in the rejection of volatile compounds was observed. VMD exhibited the highest rejection of volatiles, specifically ammoniacal nitrogen, of all the configurations but fouling inhibited total flux. DCMD exhibited a temperature dependent volatile rejection which resulted in poor rejection at lower feed temperatures (≤40 °C). AGMD was identified as the most promising configuration for application within decentralised sanitation, since the rejection of volatiles was consistent over a range of operating temperatures with ammonia rejection directly related to solution pH. An increase in organic colloids and particles due to faecal contamination reduced COD removal due to the induction of wetting, but was shown to be offset by adoption of a smaller pore size (0.1 μm), and when complemented with upstream solid-liquid separation within a fully integrated system, will provide a robust sanitation solution. Importantly, this work has shown that AGMD can recover water from concentrated blackwater close to international discharge and reuse regulations in a single stage process; this is significant as blackwater consists of only urine and faeces, and is thus 40 times more concentrated than municipal sewage. It is proposed that the water quality produced reflects a step change to delivering safe sanitation, and is complemented by a simple method for heat recovery integration this is similarly advantageous for resource constrained environments common to decentralised sanitation solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1383-5866</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118390</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34002109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Air gap ; Direct contact ; Faeces ; Membrane distillation ; Sanitation ; Urine ; Vacuum ; Wastewater</subject><ispartof>Separation and purification technology, 2021-05, Vol.263, p.118390-118390, Article 118390</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc98c18d2f872759be3fb45d19573d84eebd7f1ed24a000334276ea47ee1f34f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc98c18d2f872759be3fb45d19573d84eebd7f1ed24a000334276ea47ee1f34f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118390$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002109$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davey, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamranvand, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAdam, E.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Membrane distillation for concentrated blackwater: Influence of configuration (air gap, direct contact, vacuum) on selectivity and water productivity</title><title>Separation and purification technology</title><addtitle>Sep Purif Technol</addtitle><description>•Membrane distillation configuration studied for water recovery from blackwater.•Selectivity altered by differences in vapour pressure and water flux.•Wetting by organics limited by smaller pore size but decreases mass transfer.•Organics fouling more severe for vacuum configuration.•Air gap provides more robust separation over temperature range studied.
Water recovery from concentrated blackwater has been studied using air gap (AGMD), direct contact (DCMD) and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) to deliver decentralised sanitation. Whilst good water quality was achieved with each configuration, differences in the rejection of volatile compounds was observed. VMD exhibited the highest rejection of volatiles, specifically ammoniacal nitrogen, of all the configurations but fouling inhibited total flux. DCMD exhibited a temperature dependent volatile rejection which resulted in poor rejection at lower feed temperatures (≤40 °C). AGMD was identified as the most promising configuration for application within decentralised sanitation, since the rejection of volatiles was consistent over a range of operating temperatures with ammonia rejection directly related to solution pH. An increase in organic colloids and particles due to faecal contamination reduced COD removal due to the induction of wetting, but was shown to be offset by adoption of a smaller pore size (0.1 μm), and when complemented with upstream solid-liquid separation within a fully integrated system, will provide a robust sanitation solution. Importantly, this work has shown that AGMD can recover water from concentrated blackwater close to international discharge and reuse regulations in a single stage process; this is significant as blackwater consists of only urine and faeces, and is thus 40 times more concentrated than municipal sewage. It is proposed that the water quality produced reflects a step change to delivering safe sanitation, and is complemented by a simple method for heat recovery integration this is similarly advantageous for resource constrained environments common to decentralised sanitation solutions.</description><subject>Air gap</subject><subject>Direct contact</subject><subject>Faeces</subject><subject>Membrane distillation</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><issn>1383-5866</issn><issn>1873-3794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctu1DAUjRCIlsIfIORlkZqpHTuxwwIJVZRWasUG1pZjXw8ekjjYzqB-CP-L0wwtbFj5yudxH6coXhO8IZg057tNhGmaw6bCFdkQImiLnxTHRHBaUt6yp7mmgpa1aJqj4kWMO4wJJ6J6XhxRhrMIt8fFr1sYuqBGQMbF5PpeJedHZH1A2o8axhRUAoO6XunvP3MZ3qHr0fYzZBB5u7Cs285h1Z0qF9BWTWfZLoBOC5yUTmdor_Q8D29RJkXoM-T2Lt0hNRp0b4um4M18-H5ZPLOqj_Dq8J4UXy8_frm4Km8-f7q--HBTatbQVGrdCk2EqazgFa_bDqjtWG1IW3NqBAPoDLcETMUUxphSVvEGFOMAxFJm6UnxfvWd5m4As67byym4QYU76ZWT_yKj-ya3fi952-S74mxwejAI_scMMcnBRQ35jCP4OcqqroQgbdPyTGUrVQcfYwD70IZguSQqd3JNVC6JyjXRLHvz94gPoj8RPu4A-VB7B0FG7ZZ01gSk8e7_HX4D-xa5QA</recordid><startdate>20210515</startdate><enddate>20210515</enddate><creator>Davey, C.J.</creator><creator>Liu, P.</creator><creator>Kamranvand, F.</creator><creator>Williams, L.</creator><creator>Jiang, Y.</creator><creator>Parker, A.</creator><creator>Tyrrel, S.</creator><creator>McAdam, E.J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210515</creationdate><title>Membrane distillation for concentrated blackwater: Influence of configuration (air gap, direct contact, vacuum) on selectivity and water productivity</title><author>Davey, C.J. ; Liu, P. ; Kamranvand, F. ; Williams, L. ; Jiang, Y. ; Parker, A. ; Tyrrel, S. ; McAdam, E.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-cc98c18d2f872759be3fb45d19573d84eebd7f1ed24a000334276ea47ee1f34f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air gap</topic><topic>Direct contact</topic><topic>Faeces</topic><topic>Membrane distillation</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davey, C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamranvand, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrel, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAdam, E.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Separation and purification technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davey, C.J.</au><au>Liu, P.</au><au>Kamranvand, F.</au><au>Williams, L.</au><au>Jiang, Y.</au><au>Parker, A.</au><au>Tyrrel, S.</au><au>McAdam, E.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Membrane distillation for concentrated blackwater: Influence of configuration (air gap, direct contact, vacuum) on selectivity and water productivity</atitle><jtitle>Separation and purification technology</jtitle><addtitle>Sep Purif Technol</addtitle><date>2021-05-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>263</volume><spage>118390</spage><epage>118390</epage><pages>118390-118390</pages><artnum>118390</artnum><issn>1383-5866</issn><eissn>1873-3794</eissn><abstract>•Membrane distillation configuration studied for water recovery from blackwater.•Selectivity altered by differences in vapour pressure and water flux.•Wetting by organics limited by smaller pore size but decreases mass transfer.•Organics fouling more severe for vacuum configuration.•Air gap provides more robust separation over temperature range studied.
Water recovery from concentrated blackwater has been studied using air gap (AGMD), direct contact (DCMD) and vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) to deliver decentralised sanitation. Whilst good water quality was achieved with each configuration, differences in the rejection of volatile compounds was observed. VMD exhibited the highest rejection of volatiles, specifically ammoniacal nitrogen, of all the configurations but fouling inhibited total flux. DCMD exhibited a temperature dependent volatile rejection which resulted in poor rejection at lower feed temperatures (≤40 °C). AGMD was identified as the most promising configuration for application within decentralised sanitation, since the rejection of volatiles was consistent over a range of operating temperatures with ammonia rejection directly related to solution pH. An increase in organic colloids and particles due to faecal contamination reduced COD removal due to the induction of wetting, but was shown to be offset by adoption of a smaller pore size (0.1 μm), and when complemented with upstream solid-liquid separation within a fully integrated system, will provide a robust sanitation solution. Importantly, this work has shown that AGMD can recover water from concentrated blackwater close to international discharge and reuse regulations in a single stage process; this is significant as blackwater consists of only urine and faeces, and is thus 40 times more concentrated than municipal sewage. It is proposed that the water quality produced reflects a step change to delivering safe sanitation, and is complemented by a simple method for heat recovery integration this is similarly advantageous for resource constrained environments common to decentralised sanitation solutions.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34002109</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118390</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1383-5866 |
ispartof | Separation and purification technology, 2021-05, Vol.263, p.118390-118390, Article 118390 |
issn | 1383-5866 1873-3794 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7965860 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Air gap Direct contact Faeces Membrane distillation Sanitation Urine Vacuum Wastewater |
title | Membrane distillation for concentrated blackwater: Influence of configuration (air gap, direct contact, vacuum) on selectivity and water productivity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T08%3A14%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Membrane%20distillation%20for%20concentrated%20blackwater:%20Influence%20of%20configuration%20(air%20gap,%20direct%20contact,%20vacuum)%20on%20selectivity%20and%20water%20productivity&rft.jtitle=Separation%20and%20purification%20technology&rft.au=Davey,%20C.J.&rft.date=2021-05-15&rft.volume=263&rft.spage=118390&rft.epage=118390&rft.pages=118390-118390&rft.artnum=118390&rft.issn=1383-5866&rft.eissn=1873-3794&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2528819697%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528819697&rft_id=info:pmid/34002109&rft_els_id=S1383586621000927&rfr_iscdi=true |