Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Predicting and Monitoring Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Treatment Response

Whether ADC value predicts the therapy response and outcomes of primary central system lymphoma remains controversial. This study assessed the minimum ADC correlated with treatment response in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma undergoing methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Thirty-fi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 2016-11, Vol.37 (11), p.2010-2018
Hauptverfasser: Huang, W-Y, Wen, J-B, Wu, G, Yin, B, Li, J-J, Geng, D-Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2018
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2010
container_title American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR
container_volume 37
creator Huang, W-Y
Wen, J-B
Wu, G
Yin, B
Li, J-J
Geng, D-Y
description Whether ADC value predicts the therapy response and outcomes of primary central system lymphoma remains controversial. This study assessed the minimum ADC correlated with treatment response in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma undergoing methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma underwent conventional MR imaging and DWI before chemotherapy and after 1 and 5 cycles of chemotherapy. Treatment response was determined according to the International PCNSL Collaborative Group criteria and was classified as a complete response, partial response, or progressive disease. Pretreatment minimum ADC, minimum ADC after 1 cycle, minimum ADC after 5 cycles, and change in minimum ADC were compared among the different response groups. The Pearson correlation test was calculated between these ADC parameters and tumor response. The pretreatment minimum ADC of the progressive disease group was lower than that of the complete response and partial response groups, but there was no significant difference among them. The minimum ADC after 1 cycle and minimum ADC after 5 cycles were statistically significantly higher than the pretreatment minimum ADC. A comparison among groups showed that minimum ADC after 1 cycle, minimum ADC after 5 cycles, minimum ADC change, and the percentage of minimum ADC change were all significantly different among the 3 groups. A significant positive correlation was observed between the percentage of minimum ADC after 1 cycle of chemotherapy and the size reduction percentage after 5 cycles of chemotherapy. The minimum ADC change and the percentage of minimum ADC change performed better in the differentiation of the final treatment response, specifically in complete response and partial response from progressive disease. The minimum ADC after 1 cycle and minimum ADC changes were better correlated with the treatment response than the pretreatment minimum ADC. Minimum ADC after early therapy may potentially to be used to predict and monitor the response of primary central nervous system lymphoma to chemotherapy.
doi_str_mv 10.3174/ajnr.A4867
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7963768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1846417630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a84c5b5ff917c48cd2eae38f6b88390a633cafda7f4349e49f38beb6db04d6c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LHDEYhUOx6NZ60x9QcinCaDLJ5ONGkLUfwtpKa2nvQibzZjeyk6zJrLD_vrNdlXrn1cvhfTicw0HoAyWnjEp-Zu9iPr3gSsg3aEI1E5Vu9J89NCFUN5WgRB2gd6XcEUIaLet9dFBLpgmjaoLKZfB-XUKK1W8I88UAHb7q7TzEOfYp45sMXXDDVtrY4esUw5DyVt7k0Nu8wVOIQ7ZL_A3yQ1oX_HNTBujxbNOvFqm3-DaDHfoRwj-grFIs8B699XZZ4OjxHqJfnz_dTr9Ws-9frqYXs8pxSofKKu6atvFeU-m4cl0NFpjyolVqjG8FY876zkrPGdfAtWeqhVZ0LeGdcA07ROc739W67aFzu6BmtQtukg3m5SeGhZmnByO1YFKo0eD40SCn-zWUwfShOFgubYSxqqGKC06lYOQVaC1kTZmoR_Rkh7qcSsngnxNRYraDmu2g5t-gI_zx_w7P6NOC7C-zo6BR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826721362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Predicting and Monitoring Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Treatment Response</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huang, W-Y ; Wen, J-B ; Wu, G ; Yin, B ; Li, J-J ; Geng, D-Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, W-Y ; Wen, J-B ; Wu, G ; Yin, B ; Li, J-J ; Geng, D-Y</creatorcontrib><description>Whether ADC value predicts the therapy response and outcomes of primary central system lymphoma remains controversial. This study assessed the minimum ADC correlated with treatment response in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma undergoing methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma underwent conventional MR imaging and DWI before chemotherapy and after 1 and 5 cycles of chemotherapy. Treatment response was determined according to the International PCNSL Collaborative Group criteria and was classified as a complete response, partial response, or progressive disease. Pretreatment minimum ADC, minimum ADC after 1 cycle, minimum ADC after 5 cycles, and change in minimum ADC were compared among the different response groups. The Pearson correlation test was calculated between these ADC parameters and tumor response. The pretreatment minimum ADC of the progressive disease group was lower than that of the complete response and partial response groups, but there was no significant difference among them. The minimum ADC after 1 cycle and minimum ADC after 5 cycles were statistically significantly higher than the pretreatment minimum ADC. A comparison among groups showed that minimum ADC after 1 cycle, minimum ADC after 5 cycles, minimum ADC change, and the percentage of minimum ADC change were all significantly different among the 3 groups. A significant positive correlation was observed between the percentage of minimum ADC after 1 cycle of chemotherapy and the size reduction percentage after 5 cycles of chemotherapy. The minimum ADC change and the percentage of minimum ADC change performed better in the differentiation of the final treatment response, specifically in complete response and partial response from progressive disease. The minimum ADC after 1 cycle and minimum ADC changes were better correlated with the treatment response than the pretreatment minimum ADC. Minimum ADC after early therapy may potentially to be used to predict and monitor the response of primary central nervous system lymphoma to chemotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4867</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27390318</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Adult Brain</subject><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2016-11, Vol.37 (11), p.2010-2018</ispartof><rights>2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.</rights><rights>2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 American Journal of Neuroradiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a84c5b5ff917c48cd2eae38f6b88390a633cafda7f4349e49f38beb6db04d6c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a84c5b5ff917c48cd2eae38f6b88390a633cafda7f4349e49f38beb6db04d6c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3269-2449 ; 0000-0002-2500-1603 ; 0000-0003-1606-4845 ; 0000-0001-7416-716X ; 0000-0002-1289-2005 ; 0000-0002-3556-029X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7963768/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7963768/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27390318$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, W-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, J-B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, J-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, D-Y</creatorcontrib><title>Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Predicting and Monitoring Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Treatment Response</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>Whether ADC value predicts the therapy response and outcomes of primary central system lymphoma remains controversial. This study assessed the minimum ADC correlated with treatment response in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma undergoing methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma underwent conventional MR imaging and DWI before chemotherapy and after 1 and 5 cycles of chemotherapy. Treatment response was determined according to the International PCNSL Collaborative Group criteria and was classified as a complete response, partial response, or progressive disease. Pretreatment minimum ADC, minimum ADC after 1 cycle, minimum ADC after 5 cycles, and change in minimum ADC were compared among the different response groups. The Pearson correlation test was calculated between these ADC parameters and tumor response. The pretreatment minimum ADC of the progressive disease group was lower than that of the complete response and partial response groups, but there was no significant difference among them. The minimum ADC after 1 cycle and minimum ADC after 5 cycles were statistically significantly higher than the pretreatment minimum ADC. A comparison among groups showed that minimum ADC after 1 cycle, minimum ADC after 5 cycles, minimum ADC change, and the percentage of minimum ADC change were all significantly different among the 3 groups. A significant positive correlation was observed between the percentage of minimum ADC after 1 cycle of chemotherapy and the size reduction percentage after 5 cycles of chemotherapy. The minimum ADC change and the percentage of minimum ADC change performed better in the differentiation of the final treatment response, specifically in complete response and partial response from progressive disease. The minimum ADC after 1 cycle and minimum ADC changes were better correlated with the treatment response than the pretreatment minimum ADC. Minimum ADC after early therapy may potentially to be used to predict and monitor the response of primary central nervous system lymphoma to chemotherapy.</description><subject>Adult Brain</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV1LHDEYhUOx6NZ60x9QcinCaDLJ5ONGkLUfwtpKa2nvQibzZjeyk6zJrLD_vrNdlXrn1cvhfTicw0HoAyWnjEp-Zu9iPr3gSsg3aEI1E5Vu9J89NCFUN5WgRB2gd6XcEUIaLet9dFBLpgmjaoLKZfB-XUKK1W8I88UAHb7q7TzEOfYp45sMXXDDVtrY4esUw5DyVt7k0Nu8wVOIQ7ZL_A3yQ1oX_HNTBujxbNOvFqm3-DaDHfoRwj-grFIs8B699XZZ4OjxHqJfnz_dTr9Ws-9frqYXs8pxSofKKu6atvFeU-m4cl0NFpjyolVqjG8FY876zkrPGdfAtWeqhVZ0LeGdcA07ROc739W67aFzu6BmtQtukg3m5SeGhZmnByO1YFKo0eD40SCn-zWUwfShOFgubYSxqqGKC06lYOQVaC1kTZmoR_Rkh7qcSsngnxNRYraDmu2g5t-gI_zx_w7P6NOC7C-zo6BR</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Huang, W-Y</creator><creator>Wen, J-B</creator><creator>Wu, G</creator><creator>Yin, B</creator><creator>Li, J-J</creator><creator>Geng, D-Y</creator><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-2449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-1603</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1606-4845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-716X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-2005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-029X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Predicting and Monitoring Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Treatment Response</title><author>Huang, W-Y ; Wen, J-B ; Wu, G ; Yin, B ; Li, J-J ; Geng, D-Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a84c5b5ff917c48cd2eae38f6b88390a633cafda7f4349e49f38beb6db04d6c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult Brain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, W-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, J-B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, J-J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, D-Y</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, W-Y</au><au>Wen, J-B</au><au>Wu, G</au><au>Yin, B</au><au>Li, J-J</au><au>Geng, D-Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Predicting and Monitoring Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Treatment Response</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2010</spage><epage>2018</epage><pages>2010-2018</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><abstract>Whether ADC value predicts the therapy response and outcomes of primary central system lymphoma remains controversial. This study assessed the minimum ADC correlated with treatment response in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma undergoing methotrexate-based chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma underwent conventional MR imaging and DWI before chemotherapy and after 1 and 5 cycles of chemotherapy. Treatment response was determined according to the International PCNSL Collaborative Group criteria and was classified as a complete response, partial response, or progressive disease. Pretreatment minimum ADC, minimum ADC after 1 cycle, minimum ADC after 5 cycles, and change in minimum ADC were compared among the different response groups. The Pearson correlation test was calculated between these ADC parameters and tumor response. The pretreatment minimum ADC of the progressive disease group was lower than that of the complete response and partial response groups, but there was no significant difference among them. The minimum ADC after 1 cycle and minimum ADC after 5 cycles were statistically significantly higher than the pretreatment minimum ADC. A comparison among groups showed that minimum ADC after 1 cycle, minimum ADC after 5 cycles, minimum ADC change, and the percentage of minimum ADC change were all significantly different among the 3 groups. A significant positive correlation was observed between the percentage of minimum ADC after 1 cycle of chemotherapy and the size reduction percentage after 5 cycles of chemotherapy. The minimum ADC change and the percentage of minimum ADC change performed better in the differentiation of the final treatment response, specifically in complete response and partial response from progressive disease. The minimum ADC after 1 cycle and minimum ADC changes were better correlated with the treatment response than the pretreatment minimum ADC. Minimum ADC after early therapy may potentially to be used to predict and monitor the response of primary central nervous system lymphoma to chemotherapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>27390318</pmid><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A4867</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-2449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-1603</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1606-4845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7416-716X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-2005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-029X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6108
ispartof American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2016-11, Vol.37 (11), p.2010-2018
issn 0195-6108
1936-959X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7963768
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult Brain
title Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Predicting and Monitoring Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Treatment Response
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T14%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diffusion-Weighted%20Imaging%20for%20Predicting%20and%20Monitoring%20Primary%20Central%20Nervous%20System%20Lymphoma%20Treatment%20Response&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=Huang,%20W-Y&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2010&rft.epage=2018&rft.pages=2010-2018&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174/ajnr.A4867&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1846417630%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826721362&rft_id=info:pmid/27390318&rfr_iscdi=true