Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review
Introduction Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2021-04, Vol.27 (2), p.464-471 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 471 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 464 |
container_title | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Alberto, Emily C. Jagannath, Swathi McCusker, Maureen E. Keller, Susan Marsic, Ivan Sarcevic, Aleksandra O'Connell, Karen J. Burd, Randall S. |
description | Introduction
Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies.
Methods
We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high‐risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature.
Results
We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real‐time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, “cause” was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by “impact,” “type,” “domain,” and “prevention and mitigation.”
Conclusions
NREs are frequent in high‐risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jep.13456 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7961264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497947118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-cfc58c9b55146e8900b198b7f1251e93c544ccf0222b2e1687b817dccda9285b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9rFDEYBvAgFlurB7-ABLzoYdr8mSQTD4Wy1Gop6EHPIZN9ZzbrbDImM1t68yP4Gf0kZru1qGAuCeSXhzc8CL2g5ISWdbqG8YTyWshH6IhyKSqmBH-8OwtZUabrQ_Q05zUhlBOhnqBDzlmtpSZHKC8Gm7PvvLOTjwHnKdkJeg8ZdzHhEMPP7z9SnCcfAMMWwpRxdG5OyYce-4BXvl_tiM9f8VgyisDOJsAZpvKoz2_xOc4ujjufYOvh5hk66OyQ4fn9foy-vLv4vHhfXX-8_LA4v64cF42sXOdE43QrBK0lNJqQluqmVR1lgoLmTtS1cx1hjLUMqGxU21C1dG5pNWtEy4_R2T53nNsNLF0ZLdnBjMlvbLo10Xrz903wK9PHrVFaUibrEvD6PiDFbzPkyWx8djAMNkCcs2G1FEooxmWhr_6h6zinUL5XlFa6VpQ2Rb3ZK5dizgm6h2EoMbsqTanS3FVZ7Ms_p3-Qv7sr4HQPbvwAt_9PMlcXn_aRvwDA7qyN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497947118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Alberto, Emily C. ; Jagannath, Swathi ; McCusker, Maureen E. ; Keller, Susan ; Marsic, Ivan ; Sarcevic, Aleksandra ; O'Connell, Karen J. ; Burd, Randall S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alberto, Emily C. ; Jagannath, Swathi ; McCusker, Maureen E. ; Keller, Susan ; Marsic, Ivan ; Sarcevic, Aleksandra ; O'Connell, Karen J. ; Burd, Randall S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies.
Methods
We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high‐risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature.
Results
We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real‐time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, “cause” was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by “impact,” “type,” “domain,” and “prevention and mitigation.”
Conclusions
NREs are frequent in high‐risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.13456</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33249690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Classification ; clinical safety ; Documentation ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; healthcare ; Humans ; Inpatient care ; medical error ; Medical records ; Patient Care ; Patient safety ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; structured reviews ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2021-04, Vol.27 (2), p.464-471</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-cfc58c9b55146e8900b198b7f1251e93c544ccf0222b2e1687b817dccda9285b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-cfc58c9b55146e8900b198b7f1251e93c544ccf0222b2e1687b817dccda9285b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7187-9230 ; 0000-0003-4465-9117 ; 0000-0001-6773-4496</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjep.13456$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjep.13456$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33249690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alberto, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagannath, Swathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCusker, Maureen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarcevic, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burd, Randall S.</creatorcontrib><title>Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Introduction
Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies.
Methods
We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high‐risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature.
Results
We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real‐time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, “cause” was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by “impact,” “type,” “domain,” and “prevention and mitigation.”
Conclusions
NREs are frequent in high‐risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>clinical safety</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>healthcare</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>medical error</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Patient Care</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>structured reviews</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U9rFDEYBvAgFlurB7-ABLzoYdr8mSQTD4Wy1Gop6EHPIZN9ZzbrbDImM1t68yP4Gf0kZru1qGAuCeSXhzc8CL2g5ISWdbqG8YTyWshH6IhyKSqmBH-8OwtZUabrQ_Q05zUhlBOhnqBDzlmtpSZHKC8Gm7PvvLOTjwHnKdkJeg8ZdzHhEMPP7z9SnCcfAMMWwpRxdG5OyYce-4BXvl_tiM9f8VgyisDOJsAZpvKoz2_xOc4ujjufYOvh5hk66OyQ4fn9foy-vLv4vHhfXX-8_LA4v64cF42sXOdE43QrBK0lNJqQluqmVR1lgoLmTtS1cx1hjLUMqGxU21C1dG5pNWtEy4_R2T53nNsNLF0ZLdnBjMlvbLo10Xrz903wK9PHrVFaUibrEvD6PiDFbzPkyWx8djAMNkCcs2G1FEooxmWhr_6h6zinUL5XlFa6VpQ2Rb3ZK5dizgm6h2EoMbsqTanS3FVZ7Ms_p3-Qv7sr4HQPbvwAt_9PMlcXn_aRvwDA7qyN</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Alberto, Emily C.</creator><creator>Jagannath, Swathi</creator><creator>McCusker, Maureen E.</creator><creator>Keller, Susan</creator><creator>Marsic, Ivan</creator><creator>Sarcevic, Aleksandra</creator><creator>O'Connell, Karen J.</creator><creator>Burd, Randall S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-9230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-9117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-4496</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review</title><author>Alberto, Emily C. ; Jagannath, Swathi ; McCusker, Maureen E. ; Keller, Susan ; Marsic, Ivan ; Sarcevic, Aleksandra ; O'Connell, Karen J. ; Burd, Randall S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-cfc58c9b55146e8900b198b7f1251e93c544ccf0222b2e1687b817dccda9285b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>clinical safety</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>healthcare</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>medical error</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Patient Care</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>structured reviews</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alberto, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagannath, Swathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCusker, Maureen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarcevic, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burd, Randall S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alberto, Emily C.</au><au>Jagannath, Swathi</au><au>McCusker, Maureen E.</au><au>Keller, Susan</au><au>Marsic, Ivan</au><au>Sarcevic, Aleksandra</au><au>O'Connell, Karen J.</au><au>Burd, Randall S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>464-471</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies.
Methods
We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high‐risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature.
Results
We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real‐time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, “cause” was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by “impact,” “type,” “domain,” and “prevention and mitigation.”
Conclusions
NREs are frequent in high‐risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33249690</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.13456</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-9230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-9117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-4496</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-1294 |
ispartof | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2021-04, Vol.27 (2), p.464-471 |
issn | 1356-1294 1365-2753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7961264 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Classification clinical safety Documentation Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions healthcare Humans Inpatient care medical error Medical records Patient Care Patient safety Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies structured reviews Taxonomy |
title | Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20strategies%20for%20non%E2%80%90routine%20events%20occurring%20in%20high%E2%80%90risk%20patient%20care%20settings:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Alberto,%20Emily%20C.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=464-471&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.13456&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2497947118%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497947118&rft_id=info:pmid/33249690&rfr_iscdi=true |