Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review

Introduction Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2021-04, Vol.27 (2), p.464-471
Hauptverfasser: Alberto, Emily C., Jagannath, Swathi, McCusker, Maureen E., Keller, Susan, Marsic, Ivan, Sarcevic, Aleksandra, O'Connell, Karen J., Burd, Randall S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 471
container_issue 2
container_start_page 464
container_title Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
container_volume 27
creator Alberto, Emily C.
Jagannath, Swathi
McCusker, Maureen E.
Keller, Susan
Marsic, Ivan
Sarcevic, Aleksandra
O'Connell, Karen J.
Burd, Randall S.
description Introduction Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies. Methods We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high‐risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature. Results We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real‐time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, “cause” was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by “impact,” “type,” “domain,” and “prevention and mitigation.” Conclusions NREs are frequent in high‐risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jep.13456
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7961264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497947118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-cfc58c9b55146e8900b198b7f1251e93c544ccf0222b2e1687b817dccda9285b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9rFDEYBvAgFlurB7-ABLzoYdr8mSQTD4Wy1Gop6EHPIZN9ZzbrbDImM1t68yP4Gf0kZru1qGAuCeSXhzc8CL2g5ISWdbqG8YTyWshH6IhyKSqmBH-8OwtZUabrQ_Q05zUhlBOhnqBDzlmtpSZHKC8Gm7PvvLOTjwHnKdkJeg8ZdzHhEMPP7z9SnCcfAMMWwpRxdG5OyYce-4BXvl_tiM9f8VgyisDOJsAZpvKoz2_xOc4ujjufYOvh5hk66OyQ4fn9foy-vLv4vHhfXX-8_LA4v64cF42sXOdE43QrBK0lNJqQluqmVR1lgoLmTtS1cx1hjLUMqGxU21C1dG5pNWtEy4_R2T53nNsNLF0ZLdnBjMlvbLo10Xrz903wK9PHrVFaUibrEvD6PiDFbzPkyWx8djAMNkCcs2G1FEooxmWhr_6h6zinUL5XlFa6VpQ2Rb3ZK5dizgm6h2EoMbsqTanS3FVZ7Ms_p3-Qv7sr4HQPbvwAt_9PMlcXn_aRvwDA7qyN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497947118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Alberto, Emily C. ; Jagannath, Swathi ; McCusker, Maureen E. ; Keller, Susan ; Marsic, Ivan ; Sarcevic, Aleksandra ; O'Connell, Karen J. ; Burd, Randall S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alberto, Emily C. ; Jagannath, Swathi ; McCusker, Maureen E. ; Keller, Susan ; Marsic, Ivan ; Sarcevic, Aleksandra ; O'Connell, Karen J. ; Burd, Randall S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies. Methods We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high‐risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature. Results We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real‐time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, “cause” was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by “impact,” “type,” “domain,” and “prevention and mitigation.” Conclusions NREs are frequent in high‐risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.13456</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33249690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Classification ; clinical safety ; Documentation ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; healthcare ; Humans ; Inpatient care ; medical error ; Medical records ; Patient Care ; Patient safety ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; structured reviews ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2021-04, Vol.27 (2), p.464-471</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-cfc58c9b55146e8900b198b7f1251e93c544ccf0222b2e1687b817dccda9285b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-cfc58c9b55146e8900b198b7f1251e93c544ccf0222b2e1687b817dccda9285b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7187-9230 ; 0000-0003-4465-9117 ; 0000-0001-6773-4496</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjep.13456$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjep.13456$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33249690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alberto, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagannath, Swathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCusker, Maureen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarcevic, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burd, Randall S.</creatorcontrib><title>Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Introduction Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies. Methods We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high‐risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature. Results We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real‐time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, “cause” was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by “impact,” “type,” “domain,” and “prevention and mitigation.” Conclusions NREs are frequent in high‐risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>clinical safety</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>healthcare</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>medical error</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Patient Care</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>structured reviews</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U9rFDEYBvAgFlurB7-ABLzoYdr8mSQTD4Wy1Gop6EHPIZN9ZzbrbDImM1t68yP4Gf0kZru1qGAuCeSXhzc8CL2g5ISWdbqG8YTyWshH6IhyKSqmBH-8OwtZUabrQ_Q05zUhlBOhnqBDzlmtpSZHKC8Gm7PvvLOTjwHnKdkJeg8ZdzHhEMPP7z9SnCcfAMMWwpRxdG5OyYce-4BXvl_tiM9f8VgyisDOJsAZpvKoz2_xOc4ujjufYOvh5hk66OyQ4fn9foy-vLv4vHhfXX-8_LA4v64cF42sXOdE43QrBK0lNJqQluqmVR1lgoLmTtS1cx1hjLUMqGxU21C1dG5pNWtEy4_R2T53nNsNLF0ZLdnBjMlvbLo10Xrz903wK9PHrVFaUibrEvD6PiDFbzPkyWx8djAMNkCcs2G1FEooxmWhr_6h6zinUL5XlFa6VpQ2Rb3ZK5dizgm6h2EoMbsqTanS3FVZ7Ms_p3-Qv7sr4HQPbvwAt_9PMlcXn_aRvwDA7qyN</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Alberto, Emily C.</creator><creator>Jagannath, Swathi</creator><creator>McCusker, Maureen E.</creator><creator>Keller, Susan</creator><creator>Marsic, Ivan</creator><creator>Sarcevic, Aleksandra</creator><creator>O'Connell, Karen J.</creator><creator>Burd, Randall S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-9230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-9117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-4496</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review</title><author>Alberto, Emily C. ; Jagannath, Swathi ; McCusker, Maureen E. ; Keller, Susan ; Marsic, Ivan ; Sarcevic, Aleksandra ; O'Connell, Karen J. ; Burd, Randall S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3586-cfc58c9b55146e8900b198b7f1251e93c544ccf0222b2e1687b817dccda9285b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>clinical safety</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>healthcare</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>medical error</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Patient Care</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>structured reviews</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alberto, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagannath, Swathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCusker, Maureen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarcevic, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burd, Randall S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alberto, Emily C.</au><au>Jagannath, Swathi</au><au>McCusker, Maureen E.</au><au>Keller, Susan</au><au>Marsic, Ivan</au><au>Sarcevic, Aleksandra</au><au>O'Connell, Karen J.</au><au>Burd, Randall S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>464</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>464-471</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Introduction Non‐routine events (NREs) are atypical or unusual occurrences in a pre‐defined process. Although some NREs in high‐risk clinical settings have no adverse effects on patient care, others can potentially cause serious patient harm. A unified strategy for identifying and describing NREs in these domains will facilitate the comparison of results between studies. Methods We conducted a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE to identify studies related to NREs in high‐risk domains and evaluated the methods used for event observation and description. We applied The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO) taxonomy (cause, impact, domain, type, prevention, and mitigation) to the descriptions of NREs from the literature. Results We selected 25 articles that met inclusion criteria for review. Real‐time documentation of NREs was more common than a retrospective video review. Thirteen studies used domain experts as observers and seven studies validated observations with interrater reliability. Using the JCAHO taxonomy, “cause” was the most frequently applied classification method, followed by “impact,” “type,” “domain,” and “prevention and mitigation.” Conclusions NREs are frequent in high‐risk medical settings. Strengths identified in several studies included the use of multiple observers with domain expertise and validation of the event ascertainment approach using interrater reliability. By applying the JCAHO taxonomy to the current literature, we provide an example of a structured approach that can be used for future analyses of NREs.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33249690</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.13456</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-9230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-9117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-4496</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-1294
ispartof Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2021-04, Vol.27 (2), p.464-471
issn 1356-1294
1365-2753
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7961264
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Classification
clinical safety
Documentation
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
healthcare
Humans
Inpatient care
medical error
Medical records
Patient Care
Patient safety
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
structured reviews
Taxonomy
title Classification strategies for non‐routine events occurring in high‐risk patient care settings: A scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Classification%20strategies%20for%20non%E2%80%90routine%20events%20occurring%20in%20high%E2%80%90risk%20patient%20care%20settings:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Alberto,%20Emily%20C.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=464&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=464-471&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.13456&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2497947118%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497947118&rft_id=info:pmid/33249690&rfr_iscdi=true