The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis
In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International wound journal 2017-02, Vol.14 (1), p.40-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 40 |
container_title | International wound journal |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Asten, Suzanne AV Nichols, Adam Fontaine, Javier Bhavan, Kavita Peters, Edgar JG Lavery, Lawrence A |
description | In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP1α) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0·049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP‐1 increased (P = 0·002). TNFα and MIP1α levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/iwj.12545 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7949900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826643389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2fa500491956c97b8b720b853ddcbdb0011af2add5ee42d1af594a540fd071483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PwjAYxxujEUUPfgHTox6AdmvZejExxBcMiReI3ppufQbFbcV1g_DtLQ6JHuylb7_8nifPH6ErSvrUr4HZLPs04IwfoTMasaDHYvp-fDgT2kHnzi0JCQTn0SnqBMNhyARnZ2g2XQBeq7wBbDNsyixXRaFqW21xoaoPqByuLdZGzUvrAKtS48KWxgO7xwRqk-LM2hpbV4MttpCb2rgLdJKp3MHlfu-i2ePDdPTcm7w-jUf3k17KKOe9IFOcECao4MNUREmcRAFJYh5qnSY6IYRSlQVKaw7AAu0vXDDFGck0iSiLwy66a72rJilAp1DWlcrlqjK--a20ysi_P6VZyLldy0gwIQjxgpu9oLKfDbhaFsalkOeqBNs4SWM_KhaGsfDobYumlXWuguxQhhK5i0H6GOR3DJ69_t3XgfyZuwcGLbAxOWz_N8nx20ur_AI365Qe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826643389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Asten, Suzanne AV ; Nichols, Adam ; Fontaine, Javier ; Bhavan, Kavita ; Peters, Edgar JG ; Lavery, Lawrence A</creator><creatorcontrib>Asten, Suzanne AV ; Nichols, Adam ; Fontaine, Javier ; Bhavan, Kavita ; Peters, Edgar JG ; Lavery, Lawrence A</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP1α) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0·049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP‐1 increased (P = 0·002). TNFα and MIP1α levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-4801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12545</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26634954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - blood ; Calcitonin - blood ; Cohort Studies ; Diabetic Foot - diagnosis ; Diabetic Foot - therapy ; Diabetic foot infection ; Erythrocyte sedimentation rate ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation - diagnosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Osteomyelitis ; Osteomyelitis - diagnosis ; Procalcitonin ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>International wound journal, 2017-02, Vol.14 (1), p.40-45</ispartof><rights>2015 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2fa500491956c97b8b720b853ddcbdb0011af2add5ee42d1af594a540fd071483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2fa500491956c97b8b720b853ddcbdb0011af2add5ee42d1af594a540fd071483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949900/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949900/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fiwj.12545$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26634954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asten, Suzanne AV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavan, Kavita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Edgar JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavery, Lawrence A</creatorcontrib><title>The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis</title><title>International wound journal</title><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><description>In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP1α) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0·049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP‐1 increased (P = 0·002). TNFα and MIP1α levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Calcitonin - blood</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - therapy</subject><subject>Diabetic foot infection</subject><subject>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Procalcitonin</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1742-4801</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PwjAYxxujEUUPfgHTox6AdmvZejExxBcMiReI3ppufQbFbcV1g_DtLQ6JHuylb7_8nifPH6ErSvrUr4HZLPs04IwfoTMasaDHYvp-fDgT2kHnzi0JCQTn0SnqBMNhyARnZ2g2XQBeq7wBbDNsyixXRaFqW21xoaoPqByuLdZGzUvrAKtS48KWxgO7xwRqk-LM2hpbV4MttpCb2rgLdJKp3MHlfu-i2ePDdPTcm7w-jUf3k17KKOe9IFOcECao4MNUREmcRAFJYh5qnSY6IYRSlQVKaw7AAu0vXDDFGck0iSiLwy66a72rJilAp1DWlcrlqjK--a20ysi_P6VZyLldy0gwIQjxgpu9oLKfDbhaFsalkOeqBNs4SWM_KhaGsfDobYumlXWuguxQhhK5i0H6GOR3DJ69_t3XgfyZuwcGLbAxOWz_N8nx20ur_AI365Qe</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Asten, Suzanne AV</creator><creator>Nichols, Adam</creator><creator>Fontaine, Javier</creator><creator>Bhavan, Kavita</creator><creator>Peters, Edgar JG</creator><creator>Lavery, Lawrence A</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis</title><author>Asten, Suzanne AV ; Nichols, Adam ; Fontaine, Javier ; Bhavan, Kavita ; Peters, Edgar JG ; Lavery, Lawrence A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2fa500491956c97b8b720b853ddcbdb0011af2add5ee42d1af594a540fd071483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Calcitonin - blood</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - therapy</topic><topic>Diabetic foot infection</topic><topic>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Procalcitonin</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asten, Suzanne AV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavan, Kavita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Edgar JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavery, Lawrence A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asten, Suzanne AV</au><au>Nichols, Adam</au><au>Fontaine, Javier</au><au>Bhavan, Kavita</au><au>Peters, Edgar JG</au><au>Lavery, Lawrence A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis</atitle><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>40-45</pages><issn>1742-4801</issn><eissn>1742-481X</eissn><abstract>In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP1α) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0·049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP‐1 increased (P = 0·002). TNFα and MIP1α levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26634954</pmid><doi>10.1111/iwj.12545</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-4801 |
ispartof | International wound journal, 2017-02, Vol.14 (1), p.40-45 |
issn | 1742-4801 1742-481X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7949900 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles |
subjects | Adult Biomarkers Biomarkers - blood Calcitonin - blood Cohort Studies Diabetic Foot - diagnosis Diabetic Foot - therapy Diabetic foot infection Erythrocyte sedimentation rate Female Humans Inflammation - diagnosis Male Middle Aged Original Osteomyelitis Osteomyelitis - diagnosis Procalcitonin Prospective Studies |
title | The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20of%20inflammatory%20markers%20to%20diagnose%20and%20monitor%20diabetic%20foot%20osteomyelitis&rft.jtitle=International%20wound%20journal&rft.au=Asten,%20Suzanne%20AV&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=40-45&rft.issn=1742-4801&rft.eissn=1742-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iwj.12545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E1826643389%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826643389&rft_id=info:pmid/26634954&rfr_iscdi=true |