The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis

In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International wound journal 2017-02, Vol.14 (1), p.40-45
Hauptverfasser: Asten, Suzanne AV, Nichols, Adam, Fontaine, Javier, Bhavan, Kavita, Peters, Edgar JG, Lavery, Lawrence A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 40
container_title International wound journal
container_volume 14
creator Asten, Suzanne AV
Nichols, Adam
Fontaine, Javier
Bhavan, Kavita
Peters, Edgar JG
Lavery, Lawrence A
description In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP1α) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0·049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP‐1 increased (P = 0·002). TNFα and MIP1α levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iwj.12545
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7949900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826643389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2fa500491956c97b8b720b853ddcbdb0011af2add5ee42d1af594a540fd071483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PwjAYxxujEUUPfgHTox6AdmvZejExxBcMiReI3ppufQbFbcV1g_DtLQ6JHuylb7_8nifPH6ErSvrUr4HZLPs04IwfoTMasaDHYvp-fDgT2kHnzi0JCQTn0SnqBMNhyARnZ2g2XQBeq7wBbDNsyixXRaFqW21xoaoPqByuLdZGzUvrAKtS48KWxgO7xwRqk-LM2hpbV4MttpCb2rgLdJKp3MHlfu-i2ePDdPTcm7w-jUf3k17KKOe9IFOcECao4MNUREmcRAFJYh5qnSY6IYRSlQVKaw7AAu0vXDDFGck0iSiLwy66a72rJilAp1DWlcrlqjK--a20ysi_P6VZyLldy0gwIQjxgpu9oLKfDbhaFsalkOeqBNs4SWM_KhaGsfDobYumlXWuguxQhhK5i0H6GOR3DJ69_t3XgfyZuwcGLbAxOWz_N8nx20ur_AI365Qe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826643389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><creator>Asten, Suzanne AV ; Nichols, Adam ; Fontaine, Javier ; Bhavan, Kavita ; Peters, Edgar JG ; Lavery, Lawrence A</creator><creatorcontrib>Asten, Suzanne AV ; Nichols, Adam ; Fontaine, Javier ; Bhavan, Kavita ; Peters, Edgar JG ; Lavery, Lawrence A</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP1α) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0·049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP‐1 increased (P = 0·002). TNFα and MIP1α levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-4801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12545</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26634954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - blood ; Calcitonin - blood ; Cohort Studies ; Diabetic Foot - diagnosis ; Diabetic Foot - therapy ; Diabetic foot infection ; Erythrocyte sedimentation rate ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation - diagnosis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Osteomyelitis ; Osteomyelitis - diagnosis ; Procalcitonin ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>International wound journal, 2017-02, Vol.14 (1), p.40-45</ispartof><rights>2015 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2fa500491956c97b8b720b853ddcbdb0011af2add5ee42d1af594a540fd071483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2fa500491956c97b8b720b853ddcbdb0011af2add5ee42d1af594a540fd071483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949900/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7949900/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fiwj.12545$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26634954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asten, Suzanne AV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavan, Kavita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Edgar JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavery, Lawrence A</creatorcontrib><title>The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis</title><title>International wound journal</title><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><description>In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP1α) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0·049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP‐1 increased (P = 0·002). TNFα and MIP1α levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Calcitonin - blood</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - therapy</subject><subject>Diabetic foot infection</subject><subject>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Procalcitonin</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1742-4801</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PwjAYxxujEUUPfgHTox6AdmvZejExxBcMiReI3ppufQbFbcV1g_DtLQ6JHuylb7_8nifPH6ErSvrUr4HZLPs04IwfoTMasaDHYvp-fDgT2kHnzi0JCQTn0SnqBMNhyARnZ2g2XQBeq7wBbDNsyixXRaFqW21xoaoPqByuLdZGzUvrAKtS48KWxgO7xwRqk-LM2hpbV4MttpCb2rgLdJKp3MHlfu-i2ePDdPTcm7w-jUf3k17KKOe9IFOcECao4MNUREmcRAFJYh5qnSY6IYRSlQVKaw7AAu0vXDDFGck0iSiLwy66a72rJilAp1DWlcrlqjK--a20ysi_P6VZyLldy0gwIQjxgpu9oLKfDbhaFsalkOeqBNs4SWM_KhaGsfDobYumlXWuguxQhhK5i0H6GOR3DJ69_t3XgfyZuwcGLbAxOWz_N8nx20ur_AI365Qe</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Asten, Suzanne AV</creator><creator>Nichols, Adam</creator><creator>Fontaine, Javier</creator><creator>Bhavan, Kavita</creator><creator>Peters, Edgar JG</creator><creator>Lavery, Lawrence A</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis</title><author>Asten, Suzanne AV ; Nichols, Adam ; Fontaine, Javier ; Bhavan, Kavita ; Peters, Edgar JG ; Lavery, Lawrence A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4155-2fa500491956c97b8b720b853ddcbdb0011af2add5ee42d1af594a540fd071483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Calcitonin - blood</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - therapy</topic><topic>Diabetic foot infection</topic><topic>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Procalcitonin</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asten, Suzanne AV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontaine, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhavan, Kavita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Edgar JG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavery, Lawrence A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asten, Suzanne AV</au><au>Nichols, Adam</au><au>Fontaine, Javier</au><au>Bhavan, Kavita</au><au>Peters, Edgar JG</au><au>Lavery, Lawrence A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis</atitle><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>40-45</pages><issn>1742-4801</issn><eissn>1742-481X</eissn><abstract>In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), monocyte chemotactic protein‐1 (MCP‐1) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1 alpha (MIP1α) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0·049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP‐1 increased (P = 0·002). TNFα and MIP1α levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL‐6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26634954</pmid><doi>10.1111/iwj.12545</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1742-4801
ispartof International wound journal, 2017-02, Vol.14 (1), p.40-45
issn 1742-4801
1742-481X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7949900
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
subjects Adult
Biomarkers
Biomarkers - blood
Calcitonin - blood
Cohort Studies
Diabetic Foot - diagnosis
Diabetic Foot - therapy
Diabetic foot infection
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Female
Humans
Inflammation - diagnosis
Male
Middle Aged
Original
Osteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis - diagnosis
Procalcitonin
Prospective Studies
title The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20of%20inflammatory%20markers%20to%20diagnose%20and%20monitor%20diabetic%20foot%20osteomyelitis&rft.jtitle=International%20wound%20journal&rft.au=Asten,%20Suzanne%20AV&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=40-45&rft.issn=1742-4801&rft.eissn=1742-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iwj.12545&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E1826643389%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826643389&rft_id=info:pmid/26634954&rfr_iscdi=true