Clinician involvement in research on machine learning–based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review
Abstract Objective The study sought to describe the prevalence and nature of clinical expert involvement in the development, evaluation, and implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) that utilize machine learning to analyze electronic health record data to assist nurses and physici...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 2021-03, Vol.28 (3), p.653-663 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 663 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 653 |
container_title | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Schwartz, Jessica M Moy, Amanda J Rossetti, Sarah C Elhadad, Noémie Cato, Kenrick D |
description | Abstract
Objective
The study sought to describe the prevalence and nature of clinical expert involvement in the development, evaluation, and implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) that utilize machine learning to analyze electronic health record data to assist nurses and physicians in prognostic and treatment decision making (ie, predictive CDSSs) in the hospital.
Materials and Methods
A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore and hand-searching of relevant conference proceedings were conducted to identify eligible articles. Empirical studies of predictive CDSSs using electronic health record data for nurses or physicians in the hospital setting published in the last 5 years in peer-reviewed journals or conference proceedings were eligible for synthesis. Data from eligible studies regarding clinician involvement, stage in system design, predictive CDSS intention, and target clinician were charted and summarized.
Results
Eighty studies met eligibility criteria. Clinical expert involvement was most prevalent at the beginning and late stages of system design. Most articles (95%) described developing and evaluating machine learning models, 28% of which described involving clinical experts, with nearly half functioning to verify the clinical correctness or relevance of the model (47%).
Discussion
Involvement of clinical experts in predictive CDSS design should be explicitly reported in publications and evaluated for the potential to overcome predictive CDSS adoption challenges.
Conclusions
If present, clinical expert involvement is most prevalent when predictive CDSS specifications are made or when system implementations are evaluated. However, clinical experts are less prevalent in developmental stages to verify clinical correctness, select model features, preprocess data, or serve as a gold standard. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jamia/ocaa296 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7936403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jamia/ocaa296</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2470626400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-228ff8bc85b19f8fab55bd3c4f6062443330a54aa3a49d6784fe7a100d5d67f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1jAQhS0EohdYskVesgl1YjsXFkjVr3KRKrEBiZ01ccaNq8QOtpOKHS_QFW_Ik-C2P6WsWPl4_PnMjA4hL0r2umQdP7mE2cKJ1wBVVz8ih6WsmqJrxNfHD_QBOYrxkrGyrrh8Sg4455WUTByS691kndUWHLVu89OGM7qUNQ0YEYIeqXd0Bj1ah3TKFWfdxa8fP3uIONAl4GB1shtSfWsEEx1Q22jzr7guiw-JGh9oGpGOPi42ZSJiStnlDT2lUfsly9xts3j1jDwxMEV8vj-PyZd3Z593H4rzT-8_7k7PCy1qkYqqao1pe93KvuxMa6CXsh-4FqZmdSVEXo-BFAAcRDfUTSsMNlAyNsh8M4Ifk7d3vsvazzjovHKASS3BzhC-Kw9W_fvi7Kgu_KaajteC8Wzwam8Q_LcVY1KzjRqnCRz6NapKNHmSjLKMFneoDj7GgOa-TcnUTYTqNkK1jzDzLx_Odk__yexvb78u__H6DQoErRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470626400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinician involvement in research on machine learning–based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schwartz, Jessica M ; Moy, Amanda J ; Rossetti, Sarah C ; Elhadad, Noémie ; Cato, Kenrick D</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Jessica M ; Moy, Amanda J ; Rossetti, Sarah C ; Elhadad, Noémie ; Cato, Kenrick D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Objective
The study sought to describe the prevalence and nature of clinical expert involvement in the development, evaluation, and implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) that utilize machine learning to analyze electronic health record data to assist nurses and physicians in prognostic and treatment decision making (ie, predictive CDSSs) in the hospital.
Materials and Methods
A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore and hand-searching of relevant conference proceedings were conducted to identify eligible articles. Empirical studies of predictive CDSSs using electronic health record data for nurses or physicians in the hospital setting published in the last 5 years in peer-reviewed journals or conference proceedings were eligible for synthesis. Data from eligible studies regarding clinician involvement, stage in system design, predictive CDSS intention, and target clinician were charted and summarized.
Results
Eighty studies met eligibility criteria. Clinical expert involvement was most prevalent at the beginning and late stages of system design. Most articles (95%) described developing and evaluating machine learning models, 28% of which described involving clinical experts, with nearly half functioning to verify the clinical correctness or relevance of the model (47%).
Discussion
Involvement of clinical experts in predictive CDSS design should be explicitly reported in publications and evaluated for the potential to overcome predictive CDSS adoption challenges.
Conclusions
If present, clinical expert involvement is most prevalent when predictive CDSS specifications are made or when system implementations are evaluated. However, clinical experts are less prevalent in developmental stages to verify clinical correctness, select model features, preprocess data, or serve as a gold standard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-974X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1067-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-974X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa296</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33325504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Decision Making, Computer-Assisted ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Electronic Health Records ; Hospital Administration ; Humans ; Machine Learning ; Medical Staff, Hospital ; Nursing Staff, Hospital ; Review ; Software Design</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021-03, Vol.28 (3), p.653-663</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-228ff8bc85b19f8fab55bd3c4f6062443330a54aa3a49d6784fe7a100d5d67f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-228ff8bc85b19f8fab55bd3c4f6062443330a54aa3a49d6784fe7a100d5d67f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2632-8867 ; 0000-0002-1457-5724 ; 0000-0003-2756-452X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936403/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7936403/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1578,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33325504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Jessica M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Amanda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhadad, Noémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cato, Kenrick D</creatorcontrib><title>Clinician involvement in research on machine learning–based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</title><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><description>Abstract
Objective
The study sought to describe the prevalence and nature of clinical expert involvement in the development, evaluation, and implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) that utilize machine learning to analyze electronic health record data to assist nurses and physicians in prognostic and treatment decision making (ie, predictive CDSSs) in the hospital.
Materials and Methods
A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore and hand-searching of relevant conference proceedings were conducted to identify eligible articles. Empirical studies of predictive CDSSs using electronic health record data for nurses or physicians in the hospital setting published in the last 5 years in peer-reviewed journals or conference proceedings were eligible for synthesis. Data from eligible studies regarding clinician involvement, stage in system design, predictive CDSS intention, and target clinician were charted and summarized.
Results
Eighty studies met eligibility criteria. Clinical expert involvement was most prevalent at the beginning and late stages of system design. Most articles (95%) described developing and evaluating machine learning models, 28% of which described involving clinical experts, with nearly half functioning to verify the clinical correctness or relevance of the model (47%).
Discussion
Involvement of clinical experts in predictive CDSS design should be explicitly reported in publications and evaluated for the potential to overcome predictive CDSS adoption challenges.
Conclusions
If present, clinical expert involvement is most prevalent when predictive CDSS specifications are made or when system implementations are evaluated. However, clinical experts are less prevalent in developmental stages to verify clinical correctness, select model features, preprocess data, or serve as a gold standard.</description><subject>Decision Making, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records</subject><subject>Hospital Administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Software Design</subject><issn>1527-974X</issn><issn>1067-5027</issn><issn>1527-974X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctu1jAQhS0EohdYskVesgl1YjsXFkjVr3KRKrEBiZ01ccaNq8QOtpOKHS_QFW_Ik-C2P6WsWPl4_PnMjA4hL0r2umQdP7mE2cKJ1wBVVz8ih6WsmqJrxNfHD_QBOYrxkrGyrrh8Sg4455WUTByS691kndUWHLVu89OGM7qUNQ0YEYIeqXd0Bj1ah3TKFWfdxa8fP3uIONAl4GB1shtSfWsEEx1Q22jzr7guiw-JGh9oGpGOPi42ZSJiStnlDT2lUfsly9xts3j1jDwxMEV8vj-PyZd3Z593H4rzT-8_7k7PCy1qkYqqao1pe93KvuxMa6CXsh-4FqZmdSVEXo-BFAAcRDfUTSsMNlAyNsh8M4Ifk7d3vsvazzjovHKASS3BzhC-Kw9W_fvi7Kgu_KaajteC8Wzwam8Q_LcVY1KzjRqnCRz6NapKNHmSjLKMFneoDj7GgOa-TcnUTYTqNkK1jzDzLx_Odk__yexvb78u__H6DQoErRA</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Schwartz, Jessica M</creator><creator>Moy, Amanda J</creator><creator>Rossetti, Sarah C</creator><creator>Elhadad, Noémie</creator><creator>Cato, Kenrick D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-8867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-5724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-452X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Clinician involvement in research on machine learning–based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review</title><author>Schwartz, Jessica M ; Moy, Amanda J ; Rossetti, Sarah C ; Elhadad, Noémie ; Cato, Kenrick D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-228ff8bc85b19f8fab55bd3c4f6062443330a54aa3a49d6784fe7a100d5d67f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Decision Making, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records</topic><topic>Hospital Administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Software Design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Jessica M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Amanda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhadad, Noémie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cato, Kenrick D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwartz, Jessica M</au><au>Moy, Amanda J</au><au>Rossetti, Sarah C</au><au>Elhadad, Noémie</au><au>Cato, Kenrick D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinician involvement in research on machine learning–based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>663</epage><pages>653-663</pages><issn>1527-974X</issn><issn>1067-5027</issn><eissn>1527-974X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Objective
The study sought to describe the prevalence and nature of clinical expert involvement in the development, evaluation, and implementation of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) that utilize machine learning to analyze electronic health record data to assist nurses and physicians in prognostic and treatment decision making (ie, predictive CDSSs) in the hospital.
Materials and Methods
A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore and hand-searching of relevant conference proceedings were conducted to identify eligible articles. Empirical studies of predictive CDSSs using electronic health record data for nurses or physicians in the hospital setting published in the last 5 years in peer-reviewed journals or conference proceedings were eligible for synthesis. Data from eligible studies regarding clinician involvement, stage in system design, predictive CDSS intention, and target clinician were charted and summarized.
Results
Eighty studies met eligibility criteria. Clinical expert involvement was most prevalent at the beginning and late stages of system design. Most articles (95%) described developing and evaluating machine learning models, 28% of which described involving clinical experts, with nearly half functioning to verify the clinical correctness or relevance of the model (47%).
Discussion
Involvement of clinical experts in predictive CDSS design should be explicitly reported in publications and evaluated for the potential to overcome predictive CDSS adoption challenges.
Conclusions
If present, clinical expert involvement is most prevalent when predictive CDSS specifications are made or when system implementations are evaluated. However, clinical experts are less prevalent in developmental stages to verify clinical correctness, select model features, preprocess data, or serve as a gold standard.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33325504</pmid><doi>10.1093/jamia/ocaa296</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-8867</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-5724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-452X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-974X |
ispartof | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021-03, Vol.28 (3), p.653-663 |
issn | 1527-974X 1067-5027 1527-974X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7936403 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Decision Making, Computer-Assisted Decision Support Systems, Clinical Electronic Health Records Hospital Administration Humans Machine Learning Medical Staff, Hospital Nursing Staff, Hospital Review Software Design |
title | Clinician involvement in research on machine learning–based predictive clinical decision support for the hospital setting: A scoping review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinician%20involvement%20in%20research%20on%20machine%20learning%E2%80%93based%20predictive%20clinical%20decision%20support%20for%20the%20hospital%20setting:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Informatics%20Association%20:%20JAMIA&rft.au=Schwartz,%20Jessica%20M&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=663&rft.pages=653-663&rft.issn=1527-974X&rft.eissn=1527-974X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jamia/ocaa296&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2470626400%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470626400&rft_id=info:pmid/33325504&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jamia/ocaa296&rfr_iscdi=true |