Comparison of Variations Between Spectral Doppler and Gaussian Surface Integration Methods for Umbilical Vein Blood Volume Flow

Objectives We are studying a new method for estimating blood volume flow that uses 3‐dimensional ultrasound to measure the total integrated flux through an ultrasound‐generated Gaussian surface that intersects the umbilical cord. This method makes none of the assumptions typically required with stan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2021-02, Vol.40 (2), p.369-376
Hauptverfasser: Rubin, Jonathan M., Li, Sibo, Fowlkes, J. Brian, Sethuraman, Shriram, Kripfgans, Oliver D., Shi, William, Treadwell, Marjorie C., Jago, James R., Leichner, Ronald D., Pinter, Stephen Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 376
container_issue 2
container_start_page 369
container_title Journal of ultrasound in medicine
container_volume 40
creator Rubin, Jonathan M.
Li, Sibo
Fowlkes, J. Brian
Sethuraman, Shriram
Kripfgans, Oliver D.
Shi, William
Treadwell, Marjorie C.
Jago, James R.
Leichner, Ronald D.
Pinter, Stephen Z.
description Objectives We are studying a new method for estimating blood volume flow that uses 3‐dimensional ultrasound to measure the total integrated flux through an ultrasound‐generated Gaussian surface that intersects the umbilical cord. This method makes none of the assumptions typically required with standard 1‐dimensional spectral Doppler volume flow estimates. We compared the variations in volume flow estimates between techniques in the umbilical vein. Methods The study was Institutional Review Board approved, and all 12 patients gave informed consent. Because we had no reference standard for the true umbilical vein volume flow, we compared the variations of the measurements for the flow measurement techniques. At least 3 separate spectral Doppler and 3 separate Gaussian surface measurements were made along the umbilical vein. Means, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation (standard deviation/mean) for the flow estimation techniques were calculated for each patient. P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jum.15411
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7924168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2431807629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4151-e21fd3012bd43257a19a01f0cb3faf4638acf9dc7853312ad891980104e00bab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgH-GQ1mMncXJBogstRa04wO7Vcpxx68qJg52w6olXx-2WCg6cxtJ8881YPyGvgR0BY_z4ZhmOoCoBnpAVVBUr2hrEU7JiXDZFyVt5QF6kdJNRBrJ8Tg4El5JVdbsiv9ZhmHR0KYw0WLrNTz27MCZ6gvMOcaTfJjRz1J5-DNPkMVI99vRMLyk5nbtLtNogPR9nvIr3o_QS5-vQJ2pDpJuhc96ZPL5FN9ITH0JPt8EvA9JTH3YvyTOrfcJXD_WQbE4_fV9_Li6-np2vP1wUpoQKCuRge8GAd30peCU1tJqBZaYTVtuyFo02tu2NbCohgOu-aaFtGLASGet0Jw7J-713WroBe4Pj3Z_UFN2g460K2ql_O6O7Vlfhp5ItL6FusuDtgyCGHwumWQ0uGfRejxiWpHgpoGGy5m1G3-1RE0NKEe3jGmDqLjCVA1P3gWX2zd93PZJ_EsrA8R7YOY-3_zepL5vLvfI3r4aiRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2431807629</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Variations Between Spectral Doppler and Gaussian Surface Integration Methods for Umbilical Vein Blood Volume Flow</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Rubin, Jonathan M. ; Li, Sibo ; Fowlkes, J. Brian ; Sethuraman, Shriram ; Kripfgans, Oliver D. ; Shi, William ; Treadwell, Marjorie C. ; Jago, James R. ; Leichner, Ronald D. ; Pinter, Stephen Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Jonathan M. ; Li, Sibo ; Fowlkes, J. Brian ; Sethuraman, Shriram ; Kripfgans, Oliver D. ; Shi, William ; Treadwell, Marjorie C. ; Jago, James R. ; Leichner, Ronald D. ; Pinter, Stephen Z.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives We are studying a new method for estimating blood volume flow that uses 3‐dimensional ultrasound to measure the total integrated flux through an ultrasound‐generated Gaussian surface that intersects the umbilical cord. This method makes none of the assumptions typically required with standard 1‐dimensional spectral Doppler volume flow estimates. We compared the variations in volume flow estimates between techniques in the umbilical vein. Methods The study was Institutional Review Board approved, and all 12 patients gave informed consent. Because we had no reference standard for the true umbilical vein volume flow, we compared the variations of the measurements for the flow measurement techniques. At least 3 separate spectral Doppler and 3 separate Gaussian surface measurements were made along the umbilical vein. Means, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation (standard deviation/mean) for the flow estimation techniques were calculated for each patient. P &lt; .05 was considered significant. Results The ranges of the mean volume flow estimates were 174 to 577 mL/min for the spectral Doppler method and 100 to 341 mL/min for the Gaussian surface integration (GSI) method. The mean standard deviations (mean ± SD) were 161 ± 95 and 45 ± 48 mL/min for the spectral Doppler and GSI methods, respectively (P &lt; .003). The mean coefficients of variation were 0.46 ± 0.17 and 0.18 ± 0.14 for the spectral Doppler and GSI methods respectively (P &lt; 0.002). Conclusions The new volume flow estimation method using 3‐dimensional ultrasound appears to have significantly less variation in estimates than the standard 1‐dimensional spectral Doppler method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jum.15411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32770569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Blood Flow Velocity ; Blood Volume ; color Doppler ; Doppler ; Female ; Humans ; power Doppler ; Pregnancy ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; umbilical cord blood flow ; umbilical vein volume flow ; Umbilical Veins - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2021-02, Vol.40 (2), p.369-376</ispartof><rights>2020 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine</rights><rights>2020 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4151-e21fd3012bd43257a19a01f0cb3faf4638acf9dc7853312ad891980104e00bab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4151-e21fd3012bd43257a19a01f0cb3faf4638acf9dc7853312ad891980104e00bab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2905-1496 ; 0000-0001-7736-2323 ; 0000-0002-6643-486X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjum.15411$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjum.15411$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Sibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowlkes, J. Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethuraman, Shriram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kripfgans, Oliver D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treadwell, Marjorie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jago, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leichner, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinter, Stephen Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Variations Between Spectral Doppler and Gaussian Surface Integration Methods for Umbilical Vein Blood Volume Flow</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>Objectives We are studying a new method for estimating blood volume flow that uses 3‐dimensional ultrasound to measure the total integrated flux through an ultrasound‐generated Gaussian surface that intersects the umbilical cord. This method makes none of the assumptions typically required with standard 1‐dimensional spectral Doppler volume flow estimates. We compared the variations in volume flow estimates between techniques in the umbilical vein. Methods The study was Institutional Review Board approved, and all 12 patients gave informed consent. Because we had no reference standard for the true umbilical vein volume flow, we compared the variations of the measurements for the flow measurement techniques. At least 3 separate spectral Doppler and 3 separate Gaussian surface measurements were made along the umbilical vein. Means, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation (standard deviation/mean) for the flow estimation techniques were calculated for each patient. P &lt; .05 was considered significant. Results The ranges of the mean volume flow estimates were 174 to 577 mL/min for the spectral Doppler method and 100 to 341 mL/min for the Gaussian surface integration (GSI) method. The mean standard deviations (mean ± SD) were 161 ± 95 and 45 ± 48 mL/min for the spectral Doppler and GSI methods, respectively (P &lt; .003). The mean coefficients of variation were 0.46 ± 0.17 and 0.18 ± 0.14 for the spectral Doppler and GSI methods respectively (P &lt; 0.002). Conclusions The new volume flow estimation method using 3‐dimensional ultrasound appears to have significantly less variation in estimates than the standard 1‐dimensional spectral Doppler method.</description><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Blood Volume</subject><subject>color Doppler</subject><subject>Doppler</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>power Doppler</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>umbilical cord blood flow</subject><subject>umbilical vein volume flow</subject><subject>Umbilical Veins - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgH-GQ1mMncXJBogstRa04wO7Vcpxx68qJg52w6olXx-2WCg6cxtJ8881YPyGvgR0BY_z4ZhmOoCoBnpAVVBUr2hrEU7JiXDZFyVt5QF6kdJNRBrJ8Tg4El5JVdbsiv9ZhmHR0KYw0WLrNTz27MCZ6gvMOcaTfJjRz1J5-DNPkMVI99vRMLyk5nbtLtNogPR9nvIr3o_QS5-vQJ2pDpJuhc96ZPL5FN9ITH0JPt8EvA9JTH3YvyTOrfcJXD_WQbE4_fV9_Li6-np2vP1wUpoQKCuRge8GAd30peCU1tJqBZaYTVtuyFo02tu2NbCohgOu-aaFtGLASGet0Jw7J-713WroBe4Pj3Z_UFN2g460K2ql_O6O7Vlfhp5ItL6FusuDtgyCGHwumWQ0uGfRejxiWpHgpoGGy5m1G3-1RE0NKEe3jGmDqLjCVA1P3gWX2zd93PZJ_EsrA8R7YOY-3_zepL5vLvfI3r4aiRQ</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Rubin, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>Li, Sibo</creator><creator>Fowlkes, J. Brian</creator><creator>Sethuraman, Shriram</creator><creator>Kripfgans, Oliver D.</creator><creator>Shi, William</creator><creator>Treadwell, Marjorie C.</creator><creator>Jago, James R.</creator><creator>Leichner, Ronald D.</creator><creator>Pinter, Stephen Z.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-1496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-2323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6643-486X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Comparison of Variations Between Spectral Doppler and Gaussian Surface Integration Methods for Umbilical Vein Blood Volume Flow</title><author>Rubin, Jonathan M. ; Li, Sibo ; Fowlkes, J. Brian ; Sethuraman, Shriram ; Kripfgans, Oliver D. ; Shi, William ; Treadwell, Marjorie C. ; Jago, James R. ; Leichner, Ronald D. ; Pinter, Stephen Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4151-e21fd3012bd43257a19a01f0cb3faf4638acf9dc7853312ad891980104e00bab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Blood Volume</topic><topic>color Doppler</topic><topic>Doppler</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>power Doppler</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>umbilical cord blood flow</topic><topic>umbilical vein volume flow</topic><topic>Umbilical Veins - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Sibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowlkes, J. Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sethuraman, Shriram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kripfgans, Oliver D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treadwell, Marjorie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jago, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leichner, Ronald D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinter, Stephen Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rubin, Jonathan M.</au><au>Li, Sibo</au><au>Fowlkes, J. Brian</au><au>Sethuraman, Shriram</au><au>Kripfgans, Oliver D.</au><au>Shi, William</au><au>Treadwell, Marjorie C.</au><au>Jago, James R.</au><au>Leichner, Ronald D.</au><au>Pinter, Stephen Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Variations Between Spectral Doppler and Gaussian Surface Integration Methods for Umbilical Vein Blood Volume Flow</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>369-376</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><abstract>Objectives We are studying a new method for estimating blood volume flow that uses 3‐dimensional ultrasound to measure the total integrated flux through an ultrasound‐generated Gaussian surface that intersects the umbilical cord. This method makes none of the assumptions typically required with standard 1‐dimensional spectral Doppler volume flow estimates. We compared the variations in volume flow estimates between techniques in the umbilical vein. Methods The study was Institutional Review Board approved, and all 12 patients gave informed consent. Because we had no reference standard for the true umbilical vein volume flow, we compared the variations of the measurements for the flow measurement techniques. At least 3 separate spectral Doppler and 3 separate Gaussian surface measurements were made along the umbilical vein. Means, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation (standard deviation/mean) for the flow estimation techniques were calculated for each patient. P &lt; .05 was considered significant. Results The ranges of the mean volume flow estimates were 174 to 577 mL/min for the spectral Doppler method and 100 to 341 mL/min for the Gaussian surface integration (GSI) method. The mean standard deviations (mean ± SD) were 161 ± 95 and 45 ± 48 mL/min for the spectral Doppler and GSI methods, respectively (P &lt; .003). The mean coefficients of variation were 0.46 ± 0.17 and 0.18 ± 0.14 for the spectral Doppler and GSI methods respectively (P &lt; 0.002). Conclusions The new volume flow estimation method using 3‐dimensional ultrasound appears to have significantly less variation in estimates than the standard 1‐dimensional spectral Doppler method.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>32770569</pmid><doi>10.1002/jum.15411</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-1496</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-2323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6643-486X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4297
ispartof Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2021-02, Vol.40 (2), p.369-376
issn 0278-4297
1550-9613
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7924168
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Blood Flow Velocity
Blood Volume
color Doppler
Doppler
Female
Humans
power Doppler
Pregnancy
Ultrasonography, Doppler
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
umbilical cord blood flow
umbilical vein volume flow
Umbilical Veins - diagnostic imaging
title Comparison of Variations Between Spectral Doppler and Gaussian Surface Integration Methods for Umbilical Vein Blood Volume Flow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A20%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Variations%20Between%20Spectral%20Doppler%20and%20Gaussian%20Surface%20Integration%20Methods%20for%20Umbilical%20Vein%20Blood%20Volume%20Flow&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Rubin,%20Jonathan%20M.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=369-376&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jum.15411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2431807629%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2431807629&rft_id=info:pmid/32770569&rfr_iscdi=true