Imaging expression of prostate‐specific membrane antigen and response to PSMA‐targeted β‐emitting radionuclide therapies in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer

Background Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability with a dose–response effect in phase I/II trials in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The need for positive PSMA imaging before PSMA‐TRT...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Prostate 2021-04, Vol.81 (5), p.279-285
Hauptverfasser: Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J., Niaz, Muhammad Junaid, Skafida, Myrto, Mosallaie, Seyed Ali, Thomas, Charlene, Christos, Paul J., Osborne, Joseph R., Molina, Ana M., Nanus, David M., Bander, Neil Harrison, Tagawa, Scott T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 285
container_issue 5
container_start_page 279
container_title The Prostate
container_volume 81
creator Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.
Niaz, Muhammad Junaid
Skafida, Myrto
Mosallaie, Seyed Ali
Thomas, Charlene
Christos, Paul J.
Osborne, Joseph R.
Molina, Ana M.
Nanus, David M.
Bander, Neil Harrison
Tagawa, Scott T.
description Background Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability with a dose–response effect in phase I/II trials in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The need for positive PSMA imaging before PSMA‐TRT to select patients is largely practiced, but its utility is not proven. Given target heterogeneity, developing a biomarker to identify the optimal patient population remains an unmet need. The aim of this study was to assess PSMA uptake by imaging and response to PSMA‐TRT. Methods We performed an analysis of men with mCRPC enrolled in sequential prospective phase I/II trials of PSMA‐TRT. Each patient had baseline PSMA imaging by planar 111In and/or 177Lu SPECT (N = 171) or 68Ga‐PSMA‐11 PET/CT (N = 44), but the results were not used to include/exclude treatment. Semiquantitative imaging scores (IS) on a 0‐4 scale were assigned based on PSMA uptake in tumors compared to liver uptake. We compared the ≥50% PSA decline response proportions between low (0–1) and high (2–4) PSMA IS using the χ2‐test. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to understand the relationship between independent and dependent variables, including IS, radionuclide activity (dose) administered, CALGB (Halabi) prognostic risk score, prior taxane use. Results 215 men with progressive mCRPC received PSMA‐TRT as follows: 177Lu‐J591 (n = 137), 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (n = 44), 90Y‐J591 (n = 28), 177Lu‐J591 + 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (n = 6). High PSMA expression (IS 2–4) was found in 160 (74.4%) patients and was significantly associated with more frequent ≥ 50% PSA reduction (26.2 vs. 7.3%, p = .006). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher IS was associated with a ≥50% decrease in PSA, even after accounting for CALGB (Halabi) prognostic score, the dose administered, and previous taxane use (OR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.71−16.85; p = .006). Patients with low PSMA expression (N = 55, 24.7%) were less likely to respond. Thirteen of 26 (50%) with no PSMA uptake (IS = 0) had post‐PSMA‐TRT PSA decline with 2 (7.7%) having ≥ 50% PSA declines. Conclusion Collectively, the data provide evidence in favor of the hypothesis that patients with high PSMA uptake and high administered radionuclide dose correlate with a higher chance of response.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pros.24104
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7904644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2479423429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-e99c70f8249166bd55a4507cbba1203869d7eb3e855de6b656b5c10a058ec0513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktu1jAQgCMEoj-FDQdAlthUSCm2Y-exQaoqHpWKWlFYW44zSV0ldrAdoDuOwFkQ5-AQnIQJf_kFLFj59c0347Gz7CGjh4xS_nQOPh5ywai4lW0YbaqcUiFvZxvKK5oLVlR72b0YryhFnPK72V5RiFJyyTfZt5NJD9YNBD7NAWK03hHfk1WZdIIfn7_EGYztrSETTG3QDoh2yQ7gcOwIxszeRSDJk_OL10cYkHQYIEFHvn_FFUw2pTVB0B3KFzPaDulLCHq2EIl1KE56zYY5DE4CzrzDUHRb3HdpVw6eOwPhfnan12OEBzfjfvbuxfO3x6_y07OXJ8dHp7kRohY5NI2paF9z0bCybDsptZC0Mm2rGadFXTZdBW0BtZQdlG0py1YaRjWVNRgqWbGfPdt656WdoDPgsLhRzcFOOlwrr636-8TZSzX4D6pqqCiFQMHBjSD49wvEpCYbDYwjttEvUXFRNYIXgjeIPv4HvfJLcHg9pBrOK3zYAqknW8pgR2KAflcMo2r9DGptlfr1GRB-9Gf5O_T36yPAtsBHO8L1f1Tq_M3ZxVb6E6Mnyeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2492271093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging expression of prostate‐specific membrane antigen and response to PSMA‐targeted β‐emitting radionuclide therapies in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J. ; Niaz, Muhammad Junaid ; Skafida, Myrto ; Mosallaie, Seyed Ali ; Thomas, Charlene ; Christos, Paul J. ; Osborne, Joseph R. ; Molina, Ana M. ; Nanus, David M. ; Bander, Neil Harrison ; Tagawa, Scott T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J. ; Niaz, Muhammad Junaid ; Skafida, Myrto ; Mosallaie, Seyed Ali ; Thomas, Charlene ; Christos, Paul J. ; Osborne, Joseph R. ; Molina, Ana M. ; Nanus, David M. ; Bander, Neil Harrison ; Tagawa, Scott T.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability with a dose–response effect in phase I/II trials in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The need for positive PSMA imaging before PSMA‐TRT to select patients is largely practiced, but its utility is not proven. Given target heterogeneity, developing a biomarker to identify the optimal patient population remains an unmet need. The aim of this study was to assess PSMA uptake by imaging and response to PSMA‐TRT. Methods We performed an analysis of men with mCRPC enrolled in sequential prospective phase I/II trials of PSMA‐TRT. Each patient had baseline PSMA imaging by planar 111In and/or 177Lu SPECT (N = 171) or 68Ga‐PSMA‐11 PET/CT (N = 44), but the results were not used to include/exclude treatment. Semiquantitative imaging scores (IS) on a 0‐4 scale were assigned based on PSMA uptake in tumors compared to liver uptake. We compared the ≥50% PSA decline response proportions between low (0–1) and high (2–4) PSMA IS using the χ2‐test. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to understand the relationship between independent and dependent variables, including IS, radionuclide activity (dose) administered, CALGB (Halabi) prognostic risk score, prior taxane use. Results 215 men with progressive mCRPC received PSMA‐TRT as follows: 177Lu‐J591 (n = 137), 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (n = 44), 90Y‐J591 (n = 28), 177Lu‐J591 + 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (n = 6). High PSMA expression (IS 2–4) was found in 160 (74.4%) patients and was significantly associated with more frequent ≥ 50% PSA reduction (26.2 vs. 7.3%, p = .006). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher IS was associated with a ≥50% decrease in PSA, even after accounting for CALGB (Halabi) prognostic score, the dose administered, and previous taxane use (OR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.71−16.85; p = .006). Patients with low PSMA expression (N = 55, 24.7%) were less likely to respond. Thirteen of 26 (50%) with no PSMA uptake (IS = 0) had post‐PSMA‐TRT PSA decline with 2 (7.7%) having ≥ 50% PSA declines. Conclusion Collectively, the data provide evidence in favor of the hypothesis that patients with high PSMA uptake and high administered radionuclide dose correlate with a higher chance of response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pros.24104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33465252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antigens ; Antigens, Surface - analysis ; Antigens, Surface - metabolism ; Castration ; Clinical trials ; Computed tomography ; Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II - analysis ; Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II - metabolism ; Humans ; Lutetium - administration &amp; dosage ; Lutetium - metabolism ; Lutetium - therapeutic use ; Male ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm Metastasis - radiotherapy ; Patients ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate cancer ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - metabolism ; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - radiotherapy ; Radiation therapy ; Radioisotopes - therapeutic use ; Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use ; Radiotherapy - methods ; Regression analysis ; Single photon emission computed tomography ; Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography - methods ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The Prostate, 2021-04, Vol.81 (5), p.279-285</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-e99c70f8249166bd55a4507cbba1203869d7eb3e855de6b656b5c10a058ec0513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-e99c70f8249166bd55a4507cbba1203869d7eb3e855de6b656b5c10a058ec0513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1704-1517</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpros.24104$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpros.24104$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niaz, Muhammad Junaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skafida, Myrto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosallaie, Seyed Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christos, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanus, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bander, Neil Harrison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagawa, Scott T.</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging expression of prostate‐specific membrane antigen and response to PSMA‐targeted β‐emitting radionuclide therapies in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer</title><title>The Prostate</title><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><description>Background Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability with a dose–response effect in phase I/II trials in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The need for positive PSMA imaging before PSMA‐TRT to select patients is largely practiced, but its utility is not proven. Given target heterogeneity, developing a biomarker to identify the optimal patient population remains an unmet need. The aim of this study was to assess PSMA uptake by imaging and response to PSMA‐TRT. Methods We performed an analysis of men with mCRPC enrolled in sequential prospective phase I/II trials of PSMA‐TRT. Each patient had baseline PSMA imaging by planar 111In and/or 177Lu SPECT (N = 171) or 68Ga‐PSMA‐11 PET/CT (N = 44), but the results were not used to include/exclude treatment. Semiquantitative imaging scores (IS) on a 0‐4 scale were assigned based on PSMA uptake in tumors compared to liver uptake. We compared the ≥50% PSA decline response proportions between low (0–1) and high (2–4) PSMA IS using the χ2‐test. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to understand the relationship between independent and dependent variables, including IS, radionuclide activity (dose) administered, CALGB (Halabi) prognostic risk score, prior taxane use. Results 215 men with progressive mCRPC received PSMA‐TRT as follows: 177Lu‐J591 (n = 137), 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (n = 44), 90Y‐J591 (n = 28), 177Lu‐J591 + 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (n = 6). High PSMA expression (IS 2–4) was found in 160 (74.4%) patients and was significantly associated with more frequent ≥ 50% PSA reduction (26.2 vs. 7.3%, p = .006). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher IS was associated with a ≥50% decrease in PSA, even after accounting for CALGB (Halabi) prognostic score, the dose administered, and previous taxane use (OR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.71−16.85; p = .006). Patients with low PSMA expression (N = 55, 24.7%) were less likely to respond. Thirteen of 26 (50%) with no PSMA uptake (IS = 0) had post‐PSMA‐TRT PSA decline with 2 (7.7%) having ≥ 50% PSA declines. Conclusion Collectively, the data provide evidence in favor of the hypothesis that patients with high PSMA uptake and high administered radionuclide dose correlate with a higher chance of response.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Surface - analysis</subject><subject>Antigens, Surface - metabolism</subject><subject>Castration</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II - analysis</subject><subject>Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II - metabolism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lutetium - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Lutetium - metabolism</subject><subject>Lutetium - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - metabolism</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Single photon emission computed tomography</subject><subject>Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0270-4137</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktu1jAQgCMEoj-FDQdAlthUSCm2Y-exQaoqHpWKWlFYW44zSV0ldrAdoDuOwFkQ5-AQnIQJf_kFLFj59c0347Gz7CGjh4xS_nQOPh5ywai4lW0YbaqcUiFvZxvKK5oLVlR72b0YryhFnPK72V5RiFJyyTfZt5NJD9YNBD7NAWK03hHfk1WZdIIfn7_EGYztrSETTG3QDoh2yQ7gcOwIxszeRSDJk_OL10cYkHQYIEFHvn_FFUw2pTVB0B3KFzPaDulLCHq2EIl1KE56zYY5DE4CzrzDUHRb3HdpVw6eOwPhfnan12OEBzfjfvbuxfO3x6_y07OXJ8dHp7kRohY5NI2paF9z0bCybDsptZC0Mm2rGadFXTZdBW0BtZQdlG0py1YaRjWVNRgqWbGfPdt656WdoDPgsLhRzcFOOlwrr636-8TZSzX4D6pqqCiFQMHBjSD49wvEpCYbDYwjttEvUXFRNYIXgjeIPv4HvfJLcHg9pBrOK3zYAqknW8pgR2KAflcMo2r9DGptlfr1GRB-9Gf5O_T36yPAtsBHO8L1f1Tq_M3ZxVb6E6Mnyeg</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.</creator><creator>Niaz, Muhammad Junaid</creator><creator>Skafida, Myrto</creator><creator>Mosallaie, Seyed Ali</creator><creator>Thomas, Charlene</creator><creator>Christos, Paul J.</creator><creator>Osborne, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Molina, Ana M.</creator><creator>Nanus, David M.</creator><creator>Bander, Neil Harrison</creator><creator>Tagawa, Scott T.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-1517</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Imaging expression of prostate‐specific membrane antigen and response to PSMA‐targeted β‐emitting radionuclide therapies in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer</title><author>Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J. ; Niaz, Muhammad Junaid ; Skafida, Myrto ; Mosallaie, Seyed Ali ; Thomas, Charlene ; Christos, Paul J. ; Osborne, Joseph R. ; Molina, Ana M. ; Nanus, David M. ; Bander, Neil Harrison ; Tagawa, Scott T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4484-e99c70f8249166bd55a4507cbba1203869d7eb3e855de6b656b5c10a058ec0513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Surface - analysis</topic><topic>Antigens, Surface - metabolism</topic><topic>Castration</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II - analysis</topic><topic>Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II - metabolism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lutetium - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Lutetium - metabolism</topic><topic>Lutetium - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - metabolism</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Single photon emission computed tomography</topic><topic>Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niaz, Muhammad Junaid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skafida, Myrto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosallaie, Seyed Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christos, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, Ana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanus, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bander, Neil Harrison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tagawa, Scott T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.</au><au>Niaz, Muhammad Junaid</au><au>Skafida, Myrto</au><au>Mosallaie, Seyed Ali</au><au>Thomas, Charlene</au><au>Christos, Paul J.</au><au>Osborne, Joseph R.</au><au>Molina, Ana M.</au><au>Nanus, David M.</au><au>Bander, Neil Harrison</au><au>Tagawa, Scott T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging expression of prostate‐specific membrane antigen and response to PSMA‐targeted β‐emitting radionuclide therapies in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>279-285</pages><issn>0270-4137</issn><eissn>1097-0045</eissn><abstract>Background Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has demonstrated efficacy and tolerability with a dose–response effect in phase I/II trials in men with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The need for positive PSMA imaging before PSMA‐TRT to select patients is largely practiced, but its utility is not proven. Given target heterogeneity, developing a biomarker to identify the optimal patient population remains an unmet need. The aim of this study was to assess PSMA uptake by imaging and response to PSMA‐TRT. Methods We performed an analysis of men with mCRPC enrolled in sequential prospective phase I/II trials of PSMA‐TRT. Each patient had baseline PSMA imaging by planar 111In and/or 177Lu SPECT (N = 171) or 68Ga‐PSMA‐11 PET/CT (N = 44), but the results were not used to include/exclude treatment. Semiquantitative imaging scores (IS) on a 0‐4 scale were assigned based on PSMA uptake in tumors compared to liver uptake. We compared the ≥50% PSA decline response proportions between low (0–1) and high (2–4) PSMA IS using the χ2‐test. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to understand the relationship between independent and dependent variables, including IS, radionuclide activity (dose) administered, CALGB (Halabi) prognostic risk score, prior taxane use. Results 215 men with progressive mCRPC received PSMA‐TRT as follows: 177Lu‐J591 (n = 137), 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (n = 44), 90Y‐J591 (n = 28), 177Lu‐J591 + 177Lu‐PSMA‐617 (n = 6). High PSMA expression (IS 2–4) was found in 160 (74.4%) patients and was significantly associated with more frequent ≥ 50% PSA reduction (26.2 vs. 7.3%, p = .006). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher IS was associated with a ≥50% decrease in PSA, even after accounting for CALGB (Halabi) prognostic score, the dose administered, and previous taxane use (OR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.71−16.85; p = .006). Patients with low PSMA expression (N = 55, 24.7%) were less likely to respond. Thirteen of 26 (50%) with no PSMA uptake (IS = 0) had post‐PSMA‐TRT PSA decline with 2 (7.7%) having ≥ 50% PSA declines. Conclusion Collectively, the data provide evidence in favor of the hypothesis that patients with high PSMA uptake and high administered radionuclide dose correlate with a higher chance of response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33465252</pmid><doi>10.1002/pros.24104</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-1517</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-4137
ispartof The Prostate, 2021-04, Vol.81 (5), p.279-285
issn 0270-4137
1097-0045
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7904644
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antigens
Antigens, Surface - analysis
Antigens, Surface - metabolism
Castration
Clinical trials
Computed tomography
Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II - analysis
Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II - metabolism
Humans
Lutetium - administration & dosage
Lutetium - metabolism
Lutetium - therapeutic use
Male
Metastases
Metastasis
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Metastasis - radiotherapy
Patients
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
Prospective Studies
Prostate cancer
Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - metabolism
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant - radiotherapy
Radiation therapy
Radioisotopes - therapeutic use
Radiopharmaceuticals - therapeutic use
Radiotherapy - methods
Regression analysis
Single photon emission computed tomography
Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography - methods
Tumors
title Imaging expression of prostate‐specific membrane antigen and response to PSMA‐targeted β‐emitting radionuclide therapies in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A31%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20expression%20of%20prostate%E2%80%90specific%20membrane%20antigen%20and%20response%20to%20PSMA%E2%80%90targeted%20%CE%B2%E2%80%90emitting%20radionuclide%20therapies%20in%20metastatic%20castration%E2%80%90resistant%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20Prostate&rft.au=Vlachostergios,%20Panagiotis%20J.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=279-285&rft.issn=0270-4137&rft.eissn=1097-0045&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pros.24104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2479423429%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2492271093&rft_id=info:pmid/33465252&rfr_iscdi=true