Immediate action effects motivate actions based on the stimulus–response relationship
The theory of event coding, an influential framework for action planning, suggests that humans first integrate stimulus, response, and action effect into representation (an event file) via their contingencies, and then, the activation of expected action effects drives the associated response. While...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2021-01, Vol.239 (1), p.67-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Experimental brain research |
container_volume | 239 |
creator | Tanaka, Takumi Watanabe, Katsumi Tanaka, Kanji |
description | The theory of event coding, an influential framework for action planning, suggests that humans first integrate stimulus, response, and action effect into representation (an event file) via their contingencies, and then, the activation of expected action effects drives the associated response. While previous studies have typically examined such functions of action effects after, rather than before or during, the acquirement of the representation, Eitam et al. (Exp Brain Res 229:475–484, 2013a) demonstrated that the presence of immediate feedback to action (i.e., action effects) can instantly elicit faster responses than delayed feedback. However, the underlying mechanism of this faciliatory effect remains unclear. Specifically, while the response–effect relationship has been highlighted, the role of stimuli has not been investigated. To address this issue, the present study conducted four experiments. We first reproduced the faciliatory effects of immediate action effects with between- and within-participants design (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). Then, we assessed whether immediate action effects facilitate response speed, when stimuli (Experiment 3) and a combination of stimuli and responses (Experiment 4) determined the delay of action effects. The identical response was executed faster when driven by stimuli associated with immediate effects than by those associated with lagged effects. This result indicates that immediate action effects do not reinforce the execution of specific motor actions itself, but facilitate actions depending on the stimulus–response relationship. We discuss the potential mechanism of the facilitation effect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-020-05955-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7884369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A651957206</galeid><sourcerecordid>A651957206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c672t-b8b3b66d6b2e204bf88b6dbbbc0ff7dc3ea7e08517af3a889beb08b479cd1b753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuKFDEUhgtRnHb0BVxIgSC6qDG3SlIbYRi8NAwIXnAZktSprgxVlTZJDTor38E39ElMd4_T0yKSRcg53_-HnPxF8RijE4yQeBkRIgRXiKAK1U1dV1d3igVmlFQYI363WCCEWcUkbo6KBzFebI5UoPvFEaWokbwmi-LLchyhdTpBqW1yfiqh68CmWI4-uct9PZZGR2jLTKQeypjcOA9z_PXjZ4C4zn0oAwx6i_Zu_bC41-khwqPr_bj4_Ob1p7N31fn7t8uz0_PKckFSZaShhvOWGwIEMdNJaXhrjLGo60RrKWgBSNZY6I5qKRsDBknDRGNbbERNj4tXO9_1bPJDLEwp6EGtgxt1-K68duqwM7lerfylElIyypts8PzaIPivM8SkRhctDIOewM9REVYzjGrWbNCnf6EXfg5Tfl6mZMNow4nYUys9gHJT5_O9dmOqTnmNm1oQxDN18g8qrxZGZ_0Encv1A8GLA0FmEnxLKz3HqJYfPxyyz26xPegh9dEP8_ZzDkGyA23wMQbobgaHkdpkTO0ypnLG1DZj6iqLntwe-Y3kT6gyQHdAzK1pBWE_p__Y_gZfQN3k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489439627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Immediate action effects motivate actions based on the stimulus–response relationship</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tanaka, Takumi ; Watanabe, Katsumi ; Tanaka, Kanji</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Takumi ; Watanabe, Katsumi ; Tanaka, Kanji</creatorcontrib><description>The theory of event coding, an influential framework for action planning, suggests that humans first integrate stimulus, response, and action effect into representation (an event file) via their contingencies, and then, the activation of expected action effects drives the associated response. While previous studies have typically examined such functions of action effects after, rather than before or during, the acquirement of the representation, Eitam et al. (Exp Brain Res 229:475–484, 2013a) demonstrated that the presence of immediate feedback to action (i.e., action effects) can instantly elicit faster responses than delayed feedback. However, the underlying mechanism of this faciliatory effect remains unclear. Specifically, while the response–effect relationship has been highlighted, the role of stimuli has not been investigated. To address this issue, the present study conducted four experiments. We first reproduced the faciliatory effects of immediate action effects with between- and within-participants design (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). Then, we assessed whether immediate action effects facilitate response speed, when stimuli (Experiment 3) and a combination of stimuli and responses (Experiment 4) determined the delay of action effects. The identical response was executed faster when driven by stimuli associated with immediate effects than by those associated with lagged effects. This result indicates that immediate action effects do not reinforce the execution of specific motor actions itself, but facilitate actions depending on the stimulus–response relationship. We discuss the potential mechanism of the facilitation effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05955-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33098652</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Brain research ; Feedback ; Human acts ; Human behavior ; Humans ; Motivation ; Motivation (Psychology) ; Neural coding ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Psychological research ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reaction Time ; Research Article ; Stimuli (Psychology)</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2021-01, Vol.239 (1), p.67-78</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c672t-b8b3b66d6b2e204bf88b6dbbbc0ff7dc3ea7e08517af3a889beb08b479cd1b753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c672t-b8b3b66d6b2e204bf88b6dbbbc0ff7dc3ea7e08517af3a889beb08b479cd1b753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3625-2096</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-020-05955-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-020-05955-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33098652$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Takumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Kanji</creatorcontrib><title>Immediate action effects motivate actions based on the stimulus–response relationship</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>The theory of event coding, an influential framework for action planning, suggests that humans first integrate stimulus, response, and action effect into representation (an event file) via their contingencies, and then, the activation of expected action effects drives the associated response. While previous studies have typically examined such functions of action effects after, rather than before or during, the acquirement of the representation, Eitam et al. (Exp Brain Res 229:475–484, 2013a) demonstrated that the presence of immediate feedback to action (i.e., action effects) can instantly elicit faster responses than delayed feedback. However, the underlying mechanism of this faciliatory effect remains unclear. Specifically, while the response–effect relationship has been highlighted, the role of stimuli has not been investigated. To address this issue, the present study conducted four experiments. We first reproduced the faciliatory effects of immediate action effects with between- and within-participants design (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). Then, we assessed whether immediate action effects facilitate response speed, when stimuli (Experiment 3) and a combination of stimuli and responses (Experiment 4) determined the delay of action effects. The identical response was executed faster when driven by stimuli associated with immediate effects than by those associated with lagged effects. This result indicates that immediate action effects do not reinforce the execution of specific motor actions itself, but facilitate actions depending on the stimulus–response relationship. We discuss the potential mechanism of the facilitation effect.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Human acts</subject><subject>Human behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Motivation (Psychology)</subject><subject>Neural coding</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Stimuli (Psychology)</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuKFDEUhgtRnHb0BVxIgSC6qDG3SlIbYRi8NAwIXnAZktSprgxVlTZJDTor38E39ElMd4_T0yKSRcg53_-HnPxF8RijE4yQeBkRIgRXiKAK1U1dV1d3igVmlFQYI363WCCEWcUkbo6KBzFebI5UoPvFEaWokbwmi-LLchyhdTpBqW1yfiqh68CmWI4-uct9PZZGR2jLTKQeypjcOA9z_PXjZ4C4zn0oAwx6i_Zu_bC41-khwqPr_bj4_Ob1p7N31fn7t8uz0_PKckFSZaShhvOWGwIEMdNJaXhrjLGo60RrKWgBSNZY6I5qKRsDBknDRGNbbERNj4tXO9_1bPJDLEwp6EGtgxt1-K68duqwM7lerfylElIyypts8PzaIPivM8SkRhctDIOewM9REVYzjGrWbNCnf6EXfg5Tfl6mZMNow4nYUys9gHJT5_O9dmOqTnmNm1oQxDN18g8qrxZGZ_0Encv1A8GLA0FmEnxLKz3HqJYfPxyyz26xPegh9dEP8_ZzDkGyA23wMQbobgaHkdpkTO0ypnLG1DZj6iqLntwe-Y3kT6gyQHdAzK1pBWE_p__Y_gZfQN3k</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Tanaka, Takumi</creator><creator>Watanabe, Katsumi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Kanji</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-2096</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Immediate action effects motivate actions based on the stimulus–response relationship</title><author>Tanaka, Takumi ; Watanabe, Katsumi ; Tanaka, Kanji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c672t-b8b3b66d6b2e204bf88b6dbbbc0ff7dc3ea7e08517af3a889beb08b479cd1b753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Human acts</topic><topic>Human behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Motivation (Psychology)</topic><topic>Neural coding</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Stimuli (Psychology)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Takumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Kanji</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanaka, Takumi</au><au>Watanabe, Katsumi</au><au>Tanaka, Kanji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Immediate action effects motivate actions based on the stimulus–response relationship</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>239</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>67-78</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>The theory of event coding, an influential framework for action planning, suggests that humans first integrate stimulus, response, and action effect into representation (an event file) via their contingencies, and then, the activation of expected action effects drives the associated response. While previous studies have typically examined such functions of action effects after, rather than before or during, the acquirement of the representation, Eitam et al. (Exp Brain Res 229:475–484, 2013a) demonstrated that the presence of immediate feedback to action (i.e., action effects) can instantly elicit faster responses than delayed feedback. However, the underlying mechanism of this faciliatory effect remains unclear. Specifically, while the response–effect relationship has been highlighted, the role of stimuli has not been investigated. To address this issue, the present study conducted four experiments. We first reproduced the faciliatory effects of immediate action effects with between- and within-participants design (Experiments 1 and 2, respectively). Then, we assessed whether immediate action effects facilitate response speed, when stimuli (Experiment 3) and a combination of stimuli and responses (Experiment 4) determined the delay of action effects. The identical response was executed faster when driven by stimuli associated with immediate effects than by those associated with lagged effects. This result indicates that immediate action effects do not reinforce the execution of specific motor actions itself, but facilitate actions depending on the stimulus–response relationship. We discuss the potential mechanism of the facilitation effect.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33098652</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-020-05955-z</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-2096</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2021-01, Vol.239 (1), p.67-78 |
issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 1432-1106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7884369 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Brain research Feedback Human acts Human behavior Humans Motivation Motivation (Psychology) Neural coding Neurology Neurosciences Psychological research Psychomotor Performance Reaction Time Research Article Stimuli (Psychology) |
title | Immediate action effects motivate actions based on the stimulus–response relationship |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A04%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immediate%20action%20effects%20motivate%20actions%20based%20on%20the%20stimulus%E2%80%93response%20relationship&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Tanaka,%20Takumi&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=239&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=67-78&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-020-05955-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA651957206%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489439627&rft_id=info:pmid/33098652&rft_galeid=A651957206&rfr_iscdi=true |