How Americans used their COVID‐19 economic impact payments
This study investigates how Americans used their CARES Act Economic Impact Payments (EIP) for their spending needs, spending wants, and financial transactions. The results from a sample of 1,172 Amazon MTurk users collected in July 2020 suggest that EIP use varied across spending and financial trans...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Financial planning review (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2020-12, Vol.3 (4), p.n/a |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Financial planning review (Hoboken, N.J.) |
| container_volume | 3 |
| creator | Asebedo, Sarah D. Liu, Yi Gray, Blake Quadria, Taufiq Hasan |
| description | This study investigates how Americans used their CARES Act Economic Impact Payments (EIP) for their spending needs, spending wants, and financial transactions. The results from a sample of 1,172 Amazon MTurk users collected in July 2020 suggest that EIP use varied across spending and financial transaction categories. Those with job instability, less financial resources, and more people to care for received essential support. A smaller proportion of the population spent at least some of their EIP on their wants. Americans' primarily focused their EIP spending on housing, food, and hobbies. In addition, people were able to improve their financial situation through investing and debt reduction. Decisions to save the EIP were related to economic recovery concerns; a broad policy package and public messaging strategy that offers assurance of economic recovery and stability might enhance policy effectiveness for boosting immediate economic growth through EIP spending. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cfp2.1101 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7883179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CFP21101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-cde9fcbd7458b2361a61d70282b8c15ddef0b3d594d6f5a9051a19b46888b8193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWGoXvkG2LqbNSZqZBEQoo7UFoS7UbchtbKRzYdJauvMRfEafxI4V0YWrc-B8_3_gQ-gcyBAIoSNbNHQIQOAI9SjPWCJS4Me_9lM0iPGFEAIiZVTyHrqc1Vs8KX0brK4i3kTv8HrpQ4vzxdP8-uPtHST2tq7qMlgcykbbNW70rvTVOp6hk0Kvoh98zz56nN485LPkbnE7zyd3iWWEQmKdl4U1LhtzYShLQafgMkIFNcICd84XxDDH5dilBdeScNAgzTgVQhgBkvXR1aG32ZjSO7v_3eqVatpQ6nanah3U30sVluq5flWZEAyyruDiUGDbOsbWFz9ZIKpTpzp1qlO3Z0cHdhtWfvc_qPLpPf1KfAIA03DD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Americans used their COVID‐19 economic impact payments</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Asebedo, Sarah D. ; Liu, Yi ; Gray, Blake ; Quadria, Taufiq Hasan</creator><creatorcontrib>Asebedo, Sarah D. ; Liu, Yi ; Gray, Blake ; Quadria, Taufiq Hasan</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates how Americans used their CARES Act Economic Impact Payments (EIP) for their spending needs, spending wants, and financial transactions. The results from a sample of 1,172 Amazon MTurk users collected in July 2020 suggest that EIP use varied across spending and financial transaction categories. Those with job instability, less financial resources, and more people to care for received essential support. A smaller proportion of the population spent at least some of their EIP on their wants. Americans' primarily focused their EIP spending on housing, food, and hobbies. In addition, people were able to improve their financial situation through investing and debt reduction. Decisions to save the EIP were related to economic recovery concerns; a broad policy package and public messaging strategy that offers assurance of economic recovery and stability might enhance policy effectiveness for boosting immediate economic growth through EIP spending.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2573-8615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cfp2.1101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>behavioral life cycle hypothesis ; CARES Act ; COVID‐19 ; economic impact payments ; marginal propensity to consume ; Special Issue ; spending</subject><ispartof>Financial planning review (Hoboken, N.J.), 2020-12, Vol.3 (4), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-cde9fcbd7458b2361a61d70282b8c15ddef0b3d594d6f5a9051a19b46888b8193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-cde9fcbd7458b2361a61d70282b8c15ddef0b3d594d6f5a9051a19b46888b8193</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5683-0538 ; 0000-0002-8680-5031</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcfp2.1101$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcfp2.1101$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asebedo, Sarah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quadria, Taufiq Hasan</creatorcontrib><title>How Americans used their COVID‐19 economic impact payments</title><title>Financial planning review (Hoboken, N.J.)</title><description>This study investigates how Americans used their CARES Act Economic Impact Payments (EIP) for their spending needs, spending wants, and financial transactions. The results from a sample of 1,172 Amazon MTurk users collected in July 2020 suggest that EIP use varied across spending and financial transaction categories. Those with job instability, less financial resources, and more people to care for received essential support. A smaller proportion of the population spent at least some of their EIP on their wants. Americans' primarily focused their EIP spending on housing, food, and hobbies. In addition, people were able to improve their financial situation through investing and debt reduction. Decisions to save the EIP were related to economic recovery concerns; a broad policy package and public messaging strategy that offers assurance of economic recovery and stability might enhance policy effectiveness for boosting immediate economic growth through EIP spending.</description><subject>behavioral life cycle hypothesis</subject><subject>CARES Act</subject><subject>COVID‐19</subject><subject>economic impact payments</subject><subject>marginal propensity to consume</subject><subject>Special Issue</subject><subject>spending</subject><issn>2573-8615</issn><issn>2573-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWGoXvkG2LqbNSZqZBEQoo7UFoS7UbchtbKRzYdJauvMRfEafxI4V0YWrc-B8_3_gQ-gcyBAIoSNbNHQIQOAI9SjPWCJS4Me_9lM0iPGFEAIiZVTyHrqc1Vs8KX0brK4i3kTv8HrpQ4vzxdP8-uPtHST2tq7qMlgcykbbNW70rvTVOp6hk0Kvoh98zz56nN485LPkbnE7zyd3iWWEQmKdl4U1LhtzYShLQafgMkIFNcICd84XxDDH5dilBdeScNAgzTgVQhgBkvXR1aG32ZjSO7v_3eqVatpQ6nanah3U30sVluq5flWZEAyyruDiUGDbOsbWFz9ZIKpTpzp1qlO3Z0cHdhtWfvc_qPLpPf1KfAIA03DD</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Asebedo, Sarah D.</creator><creator>Liu, Yi</creator><creator>Gray, Blake</creator><creator>Quadria, Taufiq Hasan</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5683-0538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-5031</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>How Americans used their COVID‐19 economic impact payments</title><author>Asebedo, Sarah D. ; Liu, Yi ; Gray, Blake ; Quadria, Taufiq Hasan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-cde9fcbd7458b2361a61d70282b8c15ddef0b3d594d6f5a9051a19b46888b8193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>behavioral life cycle hypothesis</topic><topic>CARES Act</topic><topic>COVID‐19</topic><topic>economic impact payments</topic><topic>marginal propensity to consume</topic><topic>Special Issue</topic><topic>spending</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asebedo, Sarah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gray, Blake</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quadria, Taufiq Hasan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Financial planning review (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asebedo, Sarah D.</au><au>Liu, Yi</au><au>Gray, Blake</au><au>Quadria, Taufiq Hasan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Americans used their COVID‐19 economic impact payments</atitle><jtitle>Financial planning review (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2573-8615</issn><eissn>2573-8615</eissn><abstract>This study investigates how Americans used their CARES Act Economic Impact Payments (EIP) for their spending needs, spending wants, and financial transactions. The results from a sample of 1,172 Amazon MTurk users collected in July 2020 suggest that EIP use varied across spending and financial transaction categories. Those with job instability, less financial resources, and more people to care for received essential support. A smaller proportion of the population spent at least some of their EIP on their wants. Americans' primarily focused their EIP spending on housing, food, and hobbies. In addition, people were able to improve their financial situation through investing and debt reduction. Decisions to save the EIP were related to economic recovery concerns; a broad policy package and public messaging strategy that offers assurance of economic recovery and stability might enhance policy effectiveness for boosting immediate economic growth through EIP spending.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/cfp2.1101</doi><tpages>47</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5683-0538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8680-5031</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2573-8615 |
| ispartof | Financial planning review (Hoboken, N.J.), 2020-12, Vol.3 (4), p.n/a |
| issn | 2573-8615 2573-8615 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7883179 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | behavioral life cycle hypothesis CARES Act COVID‐19 economic impact payments marginal propensity to consume Special Issue spending |
| title | How Americans used their COVID‐19 economic impact payments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A54%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Americans%20used%20their%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20economic%20impact%20payments&rft.jtitle=Financial%20planning%20review%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Asebedo,%20Sarah%20D.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2573-8615&rft.eissn=2573-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cfp2.1101&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3ECFP21101%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |