Receipt of Telepsychiatry and Emergency Department Visit Outcomes in New York State

Telepsychiatry has made psychiatric care more accessible to emergency department (ED) patients. To date, most telepsychiatry studies have focused on specific populations or small groups of EDs. This study sought to examine the potential role of telepsychiatry across a wider range of EDs by comparing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychiatric quarterly 2021-09, Vol.92 (3), p.1109-1127
Hauptverfasser: Zhong, Cordelia, Freeman, Rain E., Boggs, Krislyn M., Zachrison, Kori S., Gao, Jingya, Espinola, Janice A., Camargo, Carlos A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1127
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1109
container_title Psychiatric quarterly
container_volume 92
creator Zhong, Cordelia
Freeman, Rain E.
Boggs, Krislyn M.
Zachrison, Kori S.
Gao, Jingya
Espinola, Janice A.
Camargo, Carlos A.
description Telepsychiatry has made psychiatric care more accessible to emergency department (ED) patients. To date, most telepsychiatry studies have focused on specific populations or small groups of EDs. This study sought to examine the potential role of telepsychiatry across a wider range of EDs by comparing visit dispositions for psychiatric visits in EDs that did (versus did not) receive telepsychiatry services. ED telepsychiatry service status was identified from the 2016 National ED Inventory-USA and then linked to psychiatric visits from the 2016 New York State Emergency Department Databases/State Inpatient Databases. Unadjusted analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between an ED’s telepsychiatry service status and two clinical outcomes: use of observation services and ED visit disposition. Across all psychiatric ED visits, 712,236 were in EDs without telepsychiatry while 101,025 were in EDs with telepsychiatry. Most (99.8%) visits were in urban EDs. In multivariable logistic regression models, psychiatric visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services had lower odds (adjusted odds ratio 0.30) of using observation services compared to visits in EDs without telepsychiatry. The receipt of ED telepsychiatry is associated with lower usage of observation services for psychiatric visits, likely reducing the amount of time spent in the ED and mitigating the ongoing problem of ED crowding. An overwhelming majority of visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services were in urban hospitals with existing psychiatric services. Factors affecting the delivery and effectiveness of telepsychiatry services to hospitals lacking in psychiatric resources merit further investigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11126-021-09886-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7882855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2489602533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-b5118f0ad12d484600e49ea6e6e09eee6bdd05e0ac00e699bfdc29fe9bc09bcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERS-FF2CBLLFhEzq2E8feIKFSoFJFJVqQWFmOM7lNSeLUdkB5e1xuW34WLEazOGe-mdEh5BmDVwygPoyMMS4L4KwArZQs1gdkw6paFLIG_ZBsAIQoeM1hnzyO8QqAMSn4I7IvRKVqXtUbcv4JHfZzor6jFzjgHFd32dsUVmqnlh6PGLY4uZW-xdmGNOKU6Jc-9omeLcn5ESPtJ_oRf9CvPnyj58kmfEL2OjtEfHrbD8jnd8cXRx-K07P3J0dvTgtX1mUqmoox1YFtGW9LVUoALDVaiRJBI6Js2hYqBOuyIrVuutZx3aFuHORqxAF5vePOSzNi6_JtwQ5mDv1ow2q87c3fytRfmq3_bmqluKqqDHh5Cwj-esGYzNhHh8NgJ_RLNLxUWgKvhMjWF_9Yr_wSpvye4ZUUILlmN0C-c7ngYwzY3R_DwNxkZnaZmZyZ-ZWZWfPQ8z_fuB-5CykbxM4QszRtMfze_R_sTzq-pHU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563062915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Receipt of Telepsychiatry and Emergency Department Visit Outcomes in New York State</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><creator>Zhong, Cordelia ; Freeman, Rain E. ; Boggs, Krislyn M. ; Zachrison, Kori S. ; Gao, Jingya ; Espinola, Janice A. ; Camargo, Carlos A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Cordelia ; Freeman, Rain E. ; Boggs, Krislyn M. ; Zachrison, Kori S. ; Gao, Jingya ; Espinola, Janice A. ; Camargo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><description>Telepsychiatry has made psychiatric care more accessible to emergency department (ED) patients. To date, most telepsychiatry studies have focused on specific populations or small groups of EDs. This study sought to examine the potential role of telepsychiatry across a wider range of EDs by comparing visit dispositions for psychiatric visits in EDs that did (versus did not) receive telepsychiatry services. ED telepsychiatry service status was identified from the 2016 National ED Inventory-USA and then linked to psychiatric visits from the 2016 New York State Emergency Department Databases/State Inpatient Databases. Unadjusted analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between an ED’s telepsychiatry service status and two clinical outcomes: use of observation services and ED visit disposition. Across all psychiatric ED visits, 712,236 were in EDs without telepsychiatry while 101,025 were in EDs with telepsychiatry. Most (99.8%) visits were in urban EDs. In multivariable logistic regression models, psychiatric visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services had lower odds (adjusted odds ratio 0.30) of using observation services compared to visits in EDs without telepsychiatry. The receipt of ED telepsychiatry is associated with lower usage of observation services for psychiatric visits, likely reducing the amount of time spent in the ED and mitigating the ongoing problem of ED crowding. An overwhelming majority of visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services were in urban hospitals with existing psychiatric services. Factors affecting the delivery and effectiveness of telepsychiatry services to hospitals lacking in psychiatric resources merit further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2720</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11126-021-09886-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33587257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Crowding ; Drug use ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Emergency services ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Inpatient care ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mental disorders ; Mental health care ; Mental health services ; New York ; Original Paper ; Patient satisfaction ; Psychiatric hospitals ; Psychiatric services ; Psychiatry ; Psychotherapy ; Public Health ; Regression analysis ; Small groups ; Sociology ; Substance abuse treatment ; Teaching hospitals ; Telemedicine ; Treatment outcomes ; Urban areas ; Visits</subject><ispartof>Psychiatric quarterly, 2021-09, Vol.92 (3), p.1109-1127</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-b5118f0ad12d484600e49ea6e6e09eee6bdd05e0ac00e699bfdc29fe9bc09bcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-b5118f0ad12d484600e49ea6e6e09eee6bdd05e0ac00e699bfdc29fe9bc09bcb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5071-7654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11126-021-09886-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11126-021-09886-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33587257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Cordelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Rain E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Krislyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zachrison, Kori S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jingya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinola, Janice A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camargo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><title>Receipt of Telepsychiatry and Emergency Department Visit Outcomes in New York State</title><title>Psychiatric quarterly</title><addtitle>Psychiatr Q</addtitle><addtitle>Psychiatr Q</addtitle><description>Telepsychiatry has made psychiatric care more accessible to emergency department (ED) patients. To date, most telepsychiatry studies have focused on specific populations or small groups of EDs. This study sought to examine the potential role of telepsychiatry across a wider range of EDs by comparing visit dispositions for psychiatric visits in EDs that did (versus did not) receive telepsychiatry services. ED telepsychiatry service status was identified from the 2016 National ED Inventory-USA and then linked to psychiatric visits from the 2016 New York State Emergency Department Databases/State Inpatient Databases. Unadjusted analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between an ED’s telepsychiatry service status and two clinical outcomes: use of observation services and ED visit disposition. Across all psychiatric ED visits, 712,236 were in EDs without telepsychiatry while 101,025 were in EDs with telepsychiatry. Most (99.8%) visits were in urban EDs. In multivariable logistic regression models, psychiatric visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services had lower odds (adjusted odds ratio 0.30) of using observation services compared to visits in EDs without telepsychiatry. The receipt of ED telepsychiatry is associated with lower usage of observation services for psychiatric visits, likely reducing the amount of time spent in the ED and mitigating the ongoing problem of ED crowding. An overwhelming majority of visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services were in urban hospitals with existing psychiatric services. Factors affecting the delivery and effectiveness of telepsychiatry services to hospitals lacking in psychiatric resources merit further investigation.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Crowding</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental health services</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Psychiatric hospitals</subject><subject>Psychiatric services</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Small groups</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Teaching hospitals</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Treatment outcomes</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Visits</subject><issn>0033-2720</issn><issn>1573-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS1ERS-FF2CBLLFhEzq2E8feIKFSoFJFJVqQWFmOM7lNSeLUdkB5e1xuW34WLEazOGe-mdEh5BmDVwygPoyMMS4L4KwArZQs1gdkw6paFLIG_ZBsAIQoeM1hnzyO8QqAMSn4I7IvRKVqXtUbcv4JHfZzor6jFzjgHFd32dsUVmqnlh6PGLY4uZW-xdmGNOKU6Jc-9omeLcn5ESPtJ_oRf9CvPnyj58kmfEL2OjtEfHrbD8jnd8cXRx-K07P3J0dvTgtX1mUqmoox1YFtGW9LVUoALDVaiRJBI6Js2hYqBOuyIrVuutZx3aFuHORqxAF5vePOSzNi6_JtwQ5mDv1ow2q87c3fytRfmq3_bmqluKqqDHh5Cwj-esGYzNhHh8NgJ_RLNLxUWgKvhMjWF_9Yr_wSpvye4ZUUILlmN0C-c7ngYwzY3R_DwNxkZnaZmZyZ-ZWZWfPQ8z_fuB-5CykbxM4QszRtMfze_R_sTzq-pHU</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Zhong, Cordelia</creator><creator>Freeman, Rain E.</creator><creator>Boggs, Krislyn M.</creator><creator>Zachrison, Kori S.</creator><creator>Gao, Jingya</creator><creator>Espinola, Janice A.</creator><creator>Camargo, Carlos A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5071-7654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Receipt of Telepsychiatry and Emergency Department Visit Outcomes in New York State</title><author>Zhong, Cordelia ; Freeman, Rain E. ; Boggs, Krislyn M. ; Zachrison, Kori S. ; Gao, Jingya ; Espinola, Janice A. ; Camargo, Carlos A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-b5118f0ad12d484600e49ea6e6e09eee6bdd05e0ac00e699bfdc29fe9bc09bcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Crowding</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental health services</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Psychiatric hospitals</topic><topic>Psychiatric services</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Small groups</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Teaching hospitals</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Treatment outcomes</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Visits</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Cordelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Rain E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Krislyn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zachrison, Kori S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Jingya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinola, Janice A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camargo, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychiatric quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhong, Cordelia</au><au>Freeman, Rain E.</au><au>Boggs, Krislyn M.</au><au>Zachrison, Kori S.</au><au>Gao, Jingya</au><au>Espinola, Janice A.</au><au>Camargo, Carlos A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Receipt of Telepsychiatry and Emergency Department Visit Outcomes in New York State</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatric quarterly</jtitle><stitle>Psychiatr Q</stitle><addtitle>Psychiatr Q</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1127</epage><pages>1109-1127</pages><issn>0033-2720</issn><eissn>1573-6709</eissn><abstract>Telepsychiatry has made psychiatric care more accessible to emergency department (ED) patients. To date, most telepsychiatry studies have focused on specific populations or small groups of EDs. This study sought to examine the potential role of telepsychiatry across a wider range of EDs by comparing visit dispositions for psychiatric visits in EDs that did (versus did not) receive telepsychiatry services. ED telepsychiatry service status was identified from the 2016 National ED Inventory-USA and then linked to psychiatric visits from the 2016 New York State Emergency Department Databases/State Inpatient Databases. Unadjusted analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between an ED’s telepsychiatry service status and two clinical outcomes: use of observation services and ED visit disposition. Across all psychiatric ED visits, 712,236 were in EDs without telepsychiatry while 101,025 were in EDs with telepsychiatry. Most (99.8%) visits were in urban EDs. In multivariable logistic regression models, psychiatric visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services had lower odds (adjusted odds ratio 0.30) of using observation services compared to visits in EDs without telepsychiatry. The receipt of ED telepsychiatry is associated with lower usage of observation services for psychiatric visits, likely reducing the amount of time spent in the ED and mitigating the ongoing problem of ED crowding. An overwhelming majority of visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services were in urban hospitals with existing psychiatric services. Factors affecting the delivery and effectiveness of telepsychiatry services to hospitals lacking in psychiatric resources merit further investigation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33587257</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11126-021-09886-y</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5071-7654</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-2720
ispartof Psychiatric quarterly, 2021-09, Vol.92 (3), p.1109-1127
issn 0033-2720
1573-6709
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7882855
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink_现刊
subjects Clinical outcomes
Crowding
Drug use
Emergency medical care
Emergency Service, Hospital
Emergency services
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Humans
Inpatient care
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental disorders
Mental health care
Mental health services
New York
Original Paper
Patient satisfaction
Psychiatric hospitals
Psychiatric services
Psychiatry
Psychotherapy
Public Health
Regression analysis
Small groups
Sociology
Substance abuse treatment
Teaching hospitals
Telemedicine
Treatment outcomes
Urban areas
Visits
title Receipt of Telepsychiatry and Emergency Department Visit Outcomes in New York State
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T14%3A10%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Receipt%20of%20Telepsychiatry%20and%20Emergency%20Department%20Visit%20Outcomes%20in%20New%20York%20State&rft.jtitle=Psychiatric%20quarterly&rft.au=Zhong,%20Cordelia&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1127&rft.pages=1109-1127&rft.issn=0033-2720&rft.eissn=1573-6709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11126-021-09886-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2489602533%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563062915&rft_id=info:pmid/33587257&rfr_iscdi=true