Outcome of Flow Diverters with Surface Modifications in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Newer flow diverters are enhanced with antithrombogenic surface modifications like the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology and the Derivo Embolization Device and are purported to facilitate deployment and reduce ischemic events. Our aim was to review the safety and efficacy of surfac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 2021-02, Vol.42 (2), p.327-333 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 333 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 327 |
container_title | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Li, Y-L Roalfe, A Chu, E Y-L Lee, R Tsang, A C O |
description | Newer flow diverters are enhanced with antithrombogenic surface modifications like the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology and the Derivo Embolization Device and are purported to facilitate deployment and reduce ischemic events.
Our aim was to review the safety and efficacy of surface-modified flow diverters in treating patients with cerebral aneurysms.
We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis covering 3 major data bases and gray literature between 2014 and 2019.
Two reviewers independently reviewed human studies of surface-modified flow diverters for eligibility based on predetermined criteria.
The random effects model and Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation were used to pool efficacy outcomes (technical success, aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months) and safety outcomes (mortality, morbidity, all ischemia, and serious ischemia). Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between 2 different flow diverters.
Eight single-arm case series involving 911 patients and 1060 aneurysms were included. The median follow-up was 8.24 months. Pooled estimate for technical success was 99.6%, while the aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months were 80.5%, and 85.6%, respectively. Pooled estimates for mortality, morbidity, total ischemia, and serious ischemia rates were 0.7%, 6.0%, 6.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. Most studies were of good quality, and no significant heterogeneity was observed.
Limitations include a retrospective, observational design in some studies; heterogeneous and underreported antiplatelet therapy; and potential performance and ecologic bias.
Early-to-midterm safety and efficacy for surface-modified flow diverters appear comparable with older devices, especially for small, unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Long-term clinical data are required to further corroborate these results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3174/ajnr.A6919 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7872173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2474502528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-d77e08ec03879910fc2a9725486c34f47079bdcb0d79d2152686d1946ced2ce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV9rFDEUxYModq2--AEkjyJMzb-ZJD4Iy7ZVoaXQVvAtZJM7NmUmqUlmlwU_vLO2Fvt0H-45557LD6G3lBxxKsVHexvz0bLTVD9DC6p51-hW_3iOFoTqtukoUQfoVSm3hJBWS_YSHXDOlWCaLdDvi6m6NAJOPT4d0hYfhw3kCrngbag3-GrKvXWAz5MPfXC2hhQLDhFfZ7B1hFj3zhVkWGc74GWEKe_KWD7hq12pMM4Ghy9hE2CLbfT4HKptbLTDroTyGr3o7VDgzcM8RN9PT65XX5uziy_fVsuzxnGpauOlBKLAEa6k1pT0jtn5j1aoznHRC0mkXnu3Jl5qz2jLOtV5qkXnwDMHgh-iz_e5d9N6BO_m1nNZc5fDaPPOJBvM000MN-Zn2hipJKOSzwHvHwJy-jVBqWYMxcEw2AhpKoYJKVrCWqZm6Yd7qcuplAz94xlKzB6X2eMyf3HN4nf_F3uU_uPD_wCMiJPi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474502528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome of Flow Diverters with Surface Modifications in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Li, Y-L ; Roalfe, A ; Chu, E Y-L ; Lee, R ; Tsang, A C O</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Y-L ; Roalfe, A ; Chu, E Y-L ; Lee, R ; Tsang, A C O</creatorcontrib><description>Newer flow diverters are enhanced with antithrombogenic surface modifications like the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology and the Derivo Embolization Device and are purported to facilitate deployment and reduce ischemic events.
Our aim was to review the safety and efficacy of surface-modified flow diverters in treating patients with cerebral aneurysms.
We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis covering 3 major data bases and gray literature between 2014 and 2019.
Two reviewers independently reviewed human studies of surface-modified flow diverters for eligibility based on predetermined criteria.
The random effects model and Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation were used to pool efficacy outcomes (technical success, aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months) and safety outcomes (mortality, morbidity, all ischemia, and serious ischemia). Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between 2 different flow diverters.
Eight single-arm case series involving 911 patients and 1060 aneurysms were included. The median follow-up was 8.24 months. Pooled estimate for technical success was 99.6%, while the aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months were 80.5%, and 85.6%, respectively. Pooled estimates for mortality, morbidity, total ischemia, and serious ischemia rates were 0.7%, 6.0%, 6.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. Most studies were of good quality, and no significant heterogeneity was observed.
Limitations include a retrospective, observational design in some studies; heterogeneous and underreported antiplatelet therapy; and potential performance and ecologic bias.
Early-to-midterm safety and efficacy for surface-modified flow diverters appear comparable with older devices, especially for small, unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Long-term clinical data are required to further corroborate these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6919</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33384292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation ; Embolization, Therapeutic - methods ; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation ; Endovascular Procedures - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Interventional ; Intracranial Aneurysm - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2021-02, Vol.42 (2), p.327-333</ispartof><rights>2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.</rights><rights>2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology 2021 American Journal of Neuroradiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-d77e08ec03879910fc2a9725486c34f47079bdcb0d79d2152686d1946ced2ce43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-d77e08ec03879910fc2a9725486c34f47079bdcb0d79d2152686d1946ced2ce43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6831-6966 ; 0000-0003-1622-2639 ; 0000-0002-1722-4188 ; 0000-0003-2758-3253 ; 0000-0002-2734-0895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7872173/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7872173/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384292$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Y-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roalfe, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, E Y-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, A C O</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome of Flow Diverters with Surface Modifications in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>Newer flow diverters are enhanced with antithrombogenic surface modifications like the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology and the Derivo Embolization Device and are purported to facilitate deployment and reduce ischemic events.
Our aim was to review the safety and efficacy of surface-modified flow diverters in treating patients with cerebral aneurysms.
We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis covering 3 major data bases and gray literature between 2014 and 2019.
Two reviewers independently reviewed human studies of surface-modified flow diverters for eligibility based on predetermined criteria.
The random effects model and Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation were used to pool efficacy outcomes (technical success, aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months) and safety outcomes (mortality, morbidity, all ischemia, and serious ischemia). Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between 2 different flow diverters.
Eight single-arm case series involving 911 patients and 1060 aneurysms were included. The median follow-up was 8.24 months. Pooled estimate for technical success was 99.6%, while the aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months were 80.5%, and 85.6%, respectively. Pooled estimates for mortality, morbidity, total ischemia, and serious ischemia rates were 0.7%, 6.0%, 6.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. Most studies were of good quality, and no significant heterogeneity was observed.
Limitations include a retrospective, observational design in some studies; heterogeneous and underreported antiplatelet therapy; and potential performance and ecologic bias.
Early-to-midterm safety and efficacy for surface-modified flow diverters appear comparable with older devices, especially for small, unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Long-term clinical data are required to further corroborate these results.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Embolization, Therapeutic - methods</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interventional</subject><subject>Intracranial Aneurysm - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkV9rFDEUxYModq2--AEkjyJMzb-ZJD4Iy7ZVoaXQVvAtZJM7NmUmqUlmlwU_vLO2Fvt0H-45557LD6G3lBxxKsVHexvz0bLTVD9DC6p51-hW_3iOFoTqtukoUQfoVSm3hJBWS_YSHXDOlWCaLdDvi6m6NAJOPT4d0hYfhw3kCrngbag3-GrKvXWAz5MPfXC2hhQLDhFfZ7B1hFj3zhVkWGc74GWEKe_KWD7hq12pMM4Ghy9hE2CLbfT4HKptbLTDroTyGr3o7VDgzcM8RN9PT65XX5uziy_fVsuzxnGpauOlBKLAEa6k1pT0jtn5j1aoznHRC0mkXnu3Jl5qz2jLOtV5qkXnwDMHgh-iz_e5d9N6BO_m1nNZc5fDaPPOJBvM000MN-Zn2hipJKOSzwHvHwJy-jVBqWYMxcEw2AhpKoYJKVrCWqZm6Yd7qcuplAz94xlKzB6X2eMyf3HN4nf_F3uU_uPD_wCMiJPi</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Li, Y-L</creator><creator>Roalfe, A</creator><creator>Chu, E Y-L</creator><creator>Lee, R</creator><creator>Tsang, A C O</creator><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-6966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1622-2639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-4188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2758-3253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-0895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Outcome of Flow Diverters with Surface Modifications in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Li, Y-L ; Roalfe, A ; Chu, E Y-L ; Lee, R ; Tsang, A C O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-d77e08ec03879910fc2a9725486c34f47079bdcb0d79d2152686d1946ced2ce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Embolization, Therapeutic - methods</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interventional</topic><topic>Intracranial Aneurysm - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Y-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roalfe, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, E Y-L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, A C O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Y-L</au><au>Roalfe, A</au><au>Chu, E Y-L</au><au>Lee, R</au><au>Tsang, A C O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome of Flow Diverters with Surface Modifications in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>327</spage><epage>333</epage><pages>327-333</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><abstract>Newer flow diverters are enhanced with antithrombogenic surface modifications like the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology and the Derivo Embolization Device and are purported to facilitate deployment and reduce ischemic events.
Our aim was to review the safety and efficacy of surface-modified flow diverters in treating patients with cerebral aneurysms.
We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis covering 3 major data bases and gray literature between 2014 and 2019.
Two reviewers independently reviewed human studies of surface-modified flow diverters for eligibility based on predetermined criteria.
The random effects model and Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation were used to pool efficacy outcomes (technical success, aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months) and safety outcomes (mortality, morbidity, all ischemia, and serious ischemia). Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between 2 different flow diverters.
Eight single-arm case series involving 911 patients and 1060 aneurysms were included. The median follow-up was 8.24 months. Pooled estimate for technical success was 99.6%, while the aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months were 80.5%, and 85.6%, respectively. Pooled estimates for mortality, morbidity, total ischemia, and serious ischemia rates were 0.7%, 6.0%, 6.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. Most studies were of good quality, and no significant heterogeneity was observed.
Limitations include a retrospective, observational design in some studies; heterogeneous and underreported antiplatelet therapy; and potential performance and ecologic bias.
Early-to-midterm safety and efficacy for surface-modified flow diverters appear comparable with older devices, especially for small, unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Long-term clinical data are required to further corroborate these results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>33384292</pmid><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A6919</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-6966</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1622-2639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-4188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2758-3253</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-0895</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6108 |
ispartof | American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2021-02, Vol.42 (2), p.327-333 |
issn | 0195-6108 1936-959X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7872173 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Blood Vessel Prosthesis - adverse effects Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation Embolization, Therapeutic - methods Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation Endovascular Procedures - methods Female Humans Interventional Intracranial Aneurysm - therapy Male Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome |
title | Outcome of Flow Diverters with Surface Modifications in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20of%20Flow%20Diverters%20with%20Surface%20Modifications%20in%20Treatment%20of%20Cerebral%20Aneurysms:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=Li,%20Y-L&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=327&rft.epage=333&rft.pages=327-333&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174/ajnr.A6919&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2474502528%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474502528&rft_id=info:pmid/33384292&rfr_iscdi=true |