Comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine and clonidine in hemodynamic changes and block following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery: a randomized clinical trial

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) can prolong duration of anesthesia and shorten onset of sensory and motor block relative to clonidine. This study attempted to compare the efficacy of intravenous DEX and clonidine for hemodynamic changes and block after spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthoped...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical gas research 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Javahertalab, Maryam, Susanabadi, Alireza, Modir, Hesameddin, Kamali, Alireza, Amani, Alireza, Almasi-Hashiani, Amir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Medical gas research
container_volume 10
creator Javahertalab, Maryam
Susanabadi, Alireza
Modir, Hesameddin
Kamali, Alireza
Amani, Alireza
Almasi-Hashiani, Amir
description Dexmedetomidine (DEX) can prolong duration of anesthesia and shorten onset of sensory and motor block relative to clonidine. This study attempted to compare the efficacy of intravenous DEX and clonidine for hemodynamic changes and block after spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 120 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgery were recruited and divided into three groups using balanced block randomization: DEX group (n = 40; intravenous DEX 0.2 µg/kg), clonidine group (n = 40; intravenous clonidine 0.4 µg/kg), and placebo group (n = 40; intravenous normal saline 10 mL) in which pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scales (at recovery, and 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after surgery) and time to achieve and onset of sensory and motor block. Statistically significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure among the groups at all times except baseline (P = 0.001), with a less mean arterial pressure and a prolonged duration of sensory and motor block (P = 0.001) in the DEX group where pain relieved in patients immediately after surgery and at above mentioned time points (P = 0.001). Simultaneous administration of intravenous DEX with ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block and relieves postoperative pain, and however, can decrease blood pressure. Although intravenous DEX as an adjuvant can be helpful during spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine, it should be taken with caution owing to a lowering of mean arterial pressure in patients especially in the older adults. This study was approved by Ethical Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences (No. IR.Arakmu.Rec.1395.450) in March, 2017, and the trial was registered and approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT No. IRCT2017092020258N60) in 2017.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/2045-9912.279977
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7871933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2382299441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-4b25c766c9b501ede992f531ea152a848ff8259722c5c98dcaa88d1e425d0f043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks1u1DAUhSNERau2e1bIEhs2U2zHTmwWSGhEC1IlNrC2HOdm4uLYwU6mHV6ur1aHGUYFb_x37qd7j05RvCb4ihFcvqeY8ZWUhF7RWsq6flGcHZ9ePjufFpcp3eG8OKZ1JV8VpyUlQlZVeVY8rsMw6mj9Blk_Rb0FH-aEWngYoIUpDLa1HpD2LTIu-P3NetTDENqd14M1yPTabyD9ETUumJ-oC86F-wWaRuu1y1-Qph6S1ejeTj2KYbRbbfSBlsUQkbNDg0Kc-jBCm7lpjhuIuw9Io5jZuZffsLRhvTWZOUWr3UVx0mmX4PKwnxc_rj9_X39Z3X67-br-dLsyjLJpxRrKTV1VRjYckzyZlLTjJQFNONWCia4TlMuaUsONFK3RWoiWAKO8xR1m5Xnxcc8d5yY7Y2Axy6kx2kHHnQraqn9_vO3VJmxVLWoiyzID3h0AMfyasxtqsMmAc9ma7LiiZS0xYZLiLH37n_QuzDHbuKgEpVIyRrIK71UmhpQidMdmCFZLQNSSALUkQO0DkkvePB_iWPA3DuUTApC7_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2382299441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine and clonidine in hemodynamic changes and block following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery: a randomized clinical trial</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Javahertalab, Maryam ; Susanabadi, Alireza ; Modir, Hesameddin ; Kamali, Alireza ; Amani, Alireza ; Almasi-Hashiani, Amir</creator><creatorcontrib>Javahertalab, Maryam ; Susanabadi, Alireza ; Modir, Hesameddin ; Kamali, Alireza ; Amani, Alireza ; Almasi-Hashiani, Amir</creatorcontrib><description>Dexmedetomidine (DEX) can prolong duration of anesthesia and shorten onset of sensory and motor block relative to clonidine. This study attempted to compare the efficacy of intravenous DEX and clonidine for hemodynamic changes and block after spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 120 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgery were recruited and divided into three groups using balanced block randomization: DEX group (n = 40; intravenous DEX 0.2 µg/kg), clonidine group (n = 40; intravenous clonidine 0.4 µg/kg), and placebo group (n = 40; intravenous normal saline 10 mL) in which pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scales (at recovery, and 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after surgery) and time to achieve and onset of sensory and motor block. Statistically significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure among the groups at all times except baseline (P = 0.001), with a less mean arterial pressure and a prolonged duration of sensory and motor block (P = 0.001) in the DEX group where pain relieved in patients immediately after surgery and at above mentioned time points (P = 0.001). Simultaneous administration of intravenous DEX with ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block and relieves postoperative pain, and however, can decrease blood pressure. Although intravenous DEX as an adjuvant can be helpful during spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine, it should be taken with caution owing to a lowering of mean arterial pressure in patients especially in the older adults. This study was approved by Ethical Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences (No. IR.Arakmu.Rec.1395.450) in March, 2017, and the trial was registered and approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT No. IRCT2017092020258N60) in 2017.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-9912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-9912</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/2045-9912.279977</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32189663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Body mass index ; Bone surgery ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Clinical trials ; Orthopedics ; Pain ; Patients ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Medical gas research, 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2020. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2020 Medical Gas Research 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-4b25c766c9b501ede992f531ea152a848ff8259722c5c98dcaa88d1e425d0f043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-4b25c766c9b501ede992f531ea152a848ff8259722c5c98dcaa88d1e425d0f043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871933/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7871933/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32189663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Javahertalab, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susanabadi, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modir, Hesameddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amani, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almasi-Hashiani, Amir</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine and clonidine in hemodynamic changes and block following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery: a randomized clinical trial</title><title>Medical gas research</title><addtitle>Med Gas Res</addtitle><description>Dexmedetomidine (DEX) can prolong duration of anesthesia and shorten onset of sensory and motor block relative to clonidine. This study attempted to compare the efficacy of intravenous DEX and clonidine for hemodynamic changes and block after spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 120 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgery were recruited and divided into three groups using balanced block randomization: DEX group (n = 40; intravenous DEX 0.2 µg/kg), clonidine group (n = 40; intravenous clonidine 0.4 µg/kg), and placebo group (n = 40; intravenous normal saline 10 mL) in which pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scales (at recovery, and 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after surgery) and time to achieve and onset of sensory and motor block. Statistically significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure among the groups at all times except baseline (P = 0.001), with a less mean arterial pressure and a prolonged duration of sensory and motor block (P = 0.001) in the DEX group where pain relieved in patients immediately after surgery and at above mentioned time points (P = 0.001). Simultaneous administration of intravenous DEX with ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block and relieves postoperative pain, and however, can decrease blood pressure. Although intravenous DEX as an adjuvant can be helpful during spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine, it should be taken with caution owing to a lowering of mean arterial pressure in patients especially in the older adults. This study was approved by Ethical Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences (No. IR.Arakmu.Rec.1395.450) in March, 2017, and the trial was registered and approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT No. IRCT2017092020258N60) in 2017.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>2045-9912</issn><issn>2045-9912</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks1u1DAUhSNERau2e1bIEhs2U2zHTmwWSGhEC1IlNrC2HOdm4uLYwU6mHV6ur1aHGUYFb_x37qd7j05RvCb4ihFcvqeY8ZWUhF7RWsq6flGcHZ9ePjufFpcp3eG8OKZ1JV8VpyUlQlZVeVY8rsMw6mj9Blk_Rb0FH-aEWngYoIUpDLa1HpD2LTIu-P3NetTDENqd14M1yPTabyD9ETUumJ-oC86F-wWaRuu1y1-Qph6S1ejeTj2KYbRbbfSBlsUQkbNDg0Kc-jBCm7lpjhuIuw9Io5jZuZffsLRhvTWZOUWr3UVx0mmX4PKwnxc_rj9_X39Z3X67-br-dLsyjLJpxRrKTV1VRjYckzyZlLTjJQFNONWCia4TlMuaUsONFK3RWoiWAKO8xR1m5Xnxcc8d5yY7Y2Axy6kx2kHHnQraqn9_vO3VJmxVLWoiyzID3h0AMfyasxtqsMmAc9ma7LiiZS0xYZLiLH37n_QuzDHbuKgEpVIyRrIK71UmhpQidMdmCFZLQNSSALUkQO0DkkvePB_iWPA3DuUTApC7_g</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Javahertalab, Maryam</creator><creator>Susanabadi, Alireza</creator><creator>Modir, Hesameddin</creator><creator>Kamali, Alireza</creator><creator>Amani, Alireza</creator><creator>Almasi-Hashiani, Amir</creator><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine and clonidine in hemodynamic changes and block following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery: a randomized clinical trial</title><author>Javahertalab, Maryam ; Susanabadi, Alireza ; Modir, Hesameddin ; Kamali, Alireza ; Amani, Alireza ; Almasi-Hashiani, Amir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-4b25c766c9b501ede992f531ea152a848ff8259722c5c98dcaa88d1e425d0f043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Javahertalab, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susanabadi, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modir, Hesameddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamali, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amani, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almasi-Hashiani, Amir</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical gas research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Javahertalab, Maryam</au><au>Susanabadi, Alireza</au><au>Modir, Hesameddin</au><au>Kamali, Alireza</au><au>Amani, Alireza</au><au>Almasi-Hashiani, Amir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine and clonidine in hemodynamic changes and block following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery: a randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Medical gas research</jtitle><addtitle>Med Gas Res</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>2045-9912</issn><eissn>2045-9912</eissn><abstract>Dexmedetomidine (DEX) can prolong duration of anesthesia and shorten onset of sensory and motor block relative to clonidine. This study attempted to compare the efficacy of intravenous DEX and clonidine for hemodynamic changes and block after spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery. In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 120 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgery were recruited and divided into three groups using balanced block randomization: DEX group (n = 40; intravenous DEX 0.2 µg/kg), clonidine group (n = 40; intravenous clonidine 0.4 µg/kg), and placebo group (n = 40; intravenous normal saline 10 mL) in which pain scores were assessed using visual analogue scales (at recovery, and 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after surgery) and time to achieve and onset of sensory and motor block. Statistically significant differences were found in mean arterial pressure among the groups at all times except baseline (P = 0.001), with a less mean arterial pressure and a prolonged duration of sensory and motor block (P = 0.001) in the DEX group where pain relieved in patients immediately after surgery and at above mentioned time points (P = 0.001). Simultaneous administration of intravenous DEX with ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia prolongs the duration of sensory and motor block and relieves postoperative pain, and however, can decrease blood pressure. Although intravenous DEX as an adjuvant can be helpful during spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine, it should be taken with caution owing to a lowering of mean arterial pressure in patients especially in the older adults. This study was approved by Ethical Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences (No. IR.Arakmu.Rec.1395.450) in March, 2017, and the trial was registered and approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT No. IRCT2017092020258N60) in 2017.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>32189663</pmid><doi>10.4103/2045-9912.279977</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-9912
ispartof Medical gas research, 2020-01, Vol.10 (1), p.1-7
issn 2045-9912
2045-9912
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7871933
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Anesthesia
Body mass index
Bone surgery
Cardiac arrhythmia
Clinical trials
Orthopedics
Pain
Patients
Variance analysis
title Comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine and clonidine in hemodynamic changes and block following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine in lower limb orthopedic surgery: a randomized clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A19%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20intravenous%20dexmedetomidine%20and%20clonidine%20in%20hemodynamic%20changes%20and%20block%20following%20spinal%20anesthesia%20with%20ropivacaine%20in%20lower%20limb%20orthopedic%20surgery:%20a%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Medical%20gas%20research&rft.au=Javahertalab,%20Maryam&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=2045-9912&rft.eissn=2045-9912&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/2045-9912.279977&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2382299441%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2382299441&rft_id=info:pmid/32189663&rfr_iscdi=true