Effects of Varying Levels of Inspiratory Assistance with Pressure Support Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist on Driving Pressure in Patients Recovering from Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Background Driving pressure can be readily measured during assisted modes of ventilation such as pressure support ventilation (PSV) and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). The present prospective randomized crossover study aimed to assess the changes in driving pressure in response to varia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.419-427
Hauptverfasser: Cammarota, Gianmaria, Verdina, Federico, De Vita, Nello, Boniolo, Ester, Tarquini, Riccardo, Messina, Antonio, Zanoni, Marta, Navalesi, Paolo, Vetrugno, Luigi, Bignami, Elena, Corte, Francesco Della, De Robertis, Edoardo, Santangelo, Erminio, Vaschetto, Rosanna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 427
container_issue 2
container_start_page 419
container_title Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
container_volume 36
creator Cammarota, Gianmaria
Verdina, Federico
De Vita, Nello
Boniolo, Ester
Tarquini, Riccardo
Messina, Antonio
Zanoni, Marta
Navalesi, Paolo
Vetrugno, Luigi
Bignami, Elena
Corte, Francesco Della
De Robertis, Edoardo
Santangelo, Erminio
Vaschetto, Rosanna
description Background Driving pressure can be readily measured during assisted modes of ventilation such as pressure support ventilation (PSV) and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). The present prospective randomized crossover study aimed to assess the changes in driving pressure in response to variations in the level of assistance delivered by PSV vs NAVA. Methods 16 intubated adult patients, recovering from hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) and undergoing assisted ventilation, were randomly subjected to six 30-min-lasting trials. At baseline, PSV (PSV100) was set with the same regulation present at patient enrollment. The corresponding level of NAVA (NAVA100) was set to match the same inspiratory peak of airway pressure obtained in PSV100. Therefore, the level of assistance was reduced and increased by 50% in both ventilatory modes (PSV50, NAVA50; PSV150, NAVA150). At the end of each trial, driving pressure obtained in response to four short (2–3 s) end-expiratory and end-inspiratory occlusions was analyzed. Results Driving pressure at PSV50 (6.6 [6.1–7.8] cmH 2 O) was lower than that recorded at PSV100 (7.9 [7.2–9.1] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.005) and PSV150 (9.9 [9.1–13.2] cmH 2 O, P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10877-021-00668-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7871131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487748876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3e2483d574532a9b2486f27036e448624b621a439a50a31900a7f6f559a028ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktv1DAQxyMEog_4AhyQJS5cAn4ktnNBqkpLK62g4tGr5U0mrVdZO9jO0v2OfChmu2UXOHDyY37znxn7XxQvGH3DKFVvE6NaqZJyVlIqpS75o-KQ1UqUXLLqMe6FViUTVB0URyktKKWNFuxpcSBEXTdaVofFz7O-hzYnEnpybePa-RsygxUM9zeXPo0u2hzimpyk5FK2vgXyw-VbchUhpSkC-TKNY4iZXIPPbrDZBU-s78hHmKIdBszsFlPK0O2IvRxB9n10q03ZnaDz5AplEE7kM7RhBXET72NYkov1GO5g6VqM7Hs7t27AzGfFk94OCZ4_rMfFt_Ozr6cX5ezTh8vTk1nZVqrKpQBeadHVqqoFt80cT7LnigoJFW55NZec2Uo0tqZWsIZSq3rZ45NZyjW04rh4t9Udp_kSuhY7xUnNGN0Sn9AE68zfEe9uzU1YGaUVY4KhwOsHgRi-T5CyWbrUwjBYD2FKBjtSqtJaSURf_YMuwhQ9jme4lIpqprRAim-pNoaUIvS7Zhg1G7OYrVkMmsXcm8VwTHr55xi7lN_uQEBsgTRufgDivvZ_ZH8B_mXPqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667081783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Varying Levels of Inspiratory Assistance with Pressure Support Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist on Driving Pressure in Patients Recovering from Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cammarota, Gianmaria ; Verdina, Federico ; De Vita, Nello ; Boniolo, Ester ; Tarquini, Riccardo ; Messina, Antonio ; Zanoni, Marta ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vetrugno, Luigi ; Bignami, Elena ; Corte, Francesco Della ; De Robertis, Edoardo ; Santangelo, Erminio ; Vaschetto, Rosanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Cammarota, Gianmaria ; Verdina, Federico ; De Vita, Nello ; Boniolo, Ester ; Tarquini, Riccardo ; Messina, Antonio ; Zanoni, Marta ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vetrugno, Luigi ; Bignami, Elena ; Corte, Francesco Della ; De Robertis, Edoardo ; Santangelo, Erminio ; Vaschetto, Rosanna</creatorcontrib><description>Background Driving pressure can be readily measured during assisted modes of ventilation such as pressure support ventilation (PSV) and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). The present prospective randomized crossover study aimed to assess the changes in driving pressure in response to variations in the level of assistance delivered by PSV vs NAVA. Methods 16 intubated adult patients, recovering from hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) and undergoing assisted ventilation, were randomly subjected to six 30-min-lasting trials. At baseline, PSV (PSV100) was set with the same regulation present at patient enrollment. The corresponding level of NAVA (NAVA100) was set to match the same inspiratory peak of airway pressure obtained in PSV100. Therefore, the level of assistance was reduced and increased by 50% in both ventilatory modes (PSV50, NAVA50; PSV150, NAVA150). At the end of each trial, driving pressure obtained in response to four short (2–3 s) end-expiratory and end-inspiratory occlusions was analyzed. Results Driving pressure at PSV50 (6.6 [6.1–7.8] cmH 2 O) was lower than that recorded at PSV100 (7.9 [7.2–9.1] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.005) and PSV150 (9.9 [9.1–13.2] cmH 2 O, P  &lt; 0.0001). In NAVA, driving pressure at NAVA50 was reduced compared to NAVA150 (7.7 [5.1–8.1] cmH 2 O vs 8.3 [6.4–11.4] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.013), whereas there were no changes between baseline and NAVA150 (8.5 [6.3–9.8] cmH 2 O vs 8.3 [6.4–11.4] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.331, respectively). Driving pressure at PSV150 was higher than that observed in NAVA150 ( P  = 0.011). Conclusions NAVA delivers better lung-protective ventilation compared to PSV in hypoxemic ARF patients. Trial registration number and date of registration The present trial was prospectively registered at www.clinicatrials.gov (NCT03719365) on 24 October 2018</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00668-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33559864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesiology ; Critical Care Medicine ; Cross-Over Studies ; Health Sciences ; Humans ; Intensive ; Intensive care ; Interactive Ventilatory Support ; Lung ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mortality ; Original Research ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Respiration ; Respiratory failure ; Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics for Life Sciences ; Ventilation ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.419-427</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3e2483d574532a9b2486f27036e448624b621a439a50a31900a7f6f559a028ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3e2483d574532a9b2486f27036e448624b621a439a50a31900a7f6f559a028ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9112-2705</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10877-021-00668-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10877-021-00668-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559864$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cammarota, Gianmaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdina, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vita, Nello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boniolo, Ester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarquini, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messina, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanoni, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navalesi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetrugno, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bignami, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corte, Francesco Della</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Robertis, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Erminio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Varying Levels of Inspiratory Assistance with Pressure Support Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist on Driving Pressure in Patients Recovering from Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure</title><title>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><description>Background Driving pressure can be readily measured during assisted modes of ventilation such as pressure support ventilation (PSV) and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). The present prospective randomized crossover study aimed to assess the changes in driving pressure in response to variations in the level of assistance delivered by PSV vs NAVA. Methods 16 intubated adult patients, recovering from hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) and undergoing assisted ventilation, were randomly subjected to six 30-min-lasting trials. At baseline, PSV (PSV100) was set with the same regulation present at patient enrollment. The corresponding level of NAVA (NAVA100) was set to match the same inspiratory peak of airway pressure obtained in PSV100. Therefore, the level of assistance was reduced and increased by 50% in both ventilatory modes (PSV50, NAVA50; PSV150, NAVA150). At the end of each trial, driving pressure obtained in response to four short (2–3 s) end-expiratory and end-inspiratory occlusions was analyzed. Results Driving pressure at PSV50 (6.6 [6.1–7.8] cmH 2 O) was lower than that recorded at PSV100 (7.9 [7.2–9.1] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.005) and PSV150 (9.9 [9.1–13.2] cmH 2 O, P  &lt; 0.0001). In NAVA, driving pressure at NAVA50 was reduced compared to NAVA150 (7.7 [5.1–8.1] cmH 2 O vs 8.3 [6.4–11.4] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.013), whereas there were no changes between baseline and NAVA150 (8.5 [6.3–9.8] cmH 2 O vs 8.3 [6.4–11.4] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.331, respectively). Driving pressure at PSV150 was higher than that observed in NAVA150 ( P  = 0.011). Conclusions NAVA delivers better lung-protective ventilation compared to PSV in hypoxemic ARF patients. Trial registration number and date of registration The present trial was prospectively registered at www.clinicatrials.gov (NCT03719365) on 24 October 2018</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Health Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Interactive Ventilatory Support</subject><subject>Lung</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Respiratory failure</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics for Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>1387-1307</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktv1DAQxyMEog_4AhyQJS5cAn4ktnNBqkpLK62g4tGr5U0mrVdZO9jO0v2OfChmu2UXOHDyY37znxn7XxQvGH3DKFVvE6NaqZJyVlIqpS75o-KQ1UqUXLLqMe6FViUTVB0URyktKKWNFuxpcSBEXTdaVofFz7O-hzYnEnpybePa-RsygxUM9zeXPo0u2hzimpyk5FK2vgXyw-VbchUhpSkC-TKNY4iZXIPPbrDZBU-s78hHmKIdBszsFlPK0O2IvRxB9n10q03ZnaDz5AplEE7kM7RhBXET72NYkov1GO5g6VqM7Hs7t27AzGfFk94OCZ4_rMfFt_Ozr6cX5ezTh8vTk1nZVqrKpQBeadHVqqoFt80cT7LnigoJFW55NZec2Uo0tqZWsIZSq3rZ45NZyjW04rh4t9Udp_kSuhY7xUnNGN0Sn9AE68zfEe9uzU1YGaUVY4KhwOsHgRi-T5CyWbrUwjBYD2FKBjtSqtJaSURf_YMuwhQ9jme4lIpqprRAim-pNoaUIvS7Zhg1G7OYrVkMmsXcm8VwTHr55xi7lN_uQEBsgTRufgDivvZ_ZH8B_mXPqw</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Cammarota, Gianmaria</creator><creator>Verdina, Federico</creator><creator>De Vita, Nello</creator><creator>Boniolo, Ester</creator><creator>Tarquini, Riccardo</creator><creator>Messina, Antonio</creator><creator>Zanoni, Marta</creator><creator>Navalesi, Paolo</creator><creator>Vetrugno, Luigi</creator><creator>Bignami, Elena</creator><creator>Corte, Francesco Della</creator><creator>De Robertis, Edoardo</creator><creator>Santangelo, Erminio</creator><creator>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-2705</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Effects of Varying Levels of Inspiratory Assistance with Pressure Support Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist on Driving Pressure in Patients Recovering from Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure</title><author>Cammarota, Gianmaria ; Verdina, Federico ; De Vita, Nello ; Boniolo, Ester ; Tarquini, Riccardo ; Messina, Antonio ; Zanoni, Marta ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vetrugno, Luigi ; Bignami, Elena ; Corte, Francesco Della ; De Robertis, Edoardo ; Santangelo, Erminio ; Vaschetto, Rosanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-3e2483d574532a9b2486f27036e448624b621a439a50a31900a7f6f559a028ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Health Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Interactive Ventilatory Support</topic><topic>Lung</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Respiratory failure</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics for Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cammarota, Gianmaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verdina, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vita, Nello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boniolo, Ester</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarquini, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messina, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanoni, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navalesi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetrugno, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bignami, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corte, Francesco Della</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Robertis, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Erminio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cammarota, Gianmaria</au><au>Verdina, Federico</au><au>De Vita, Nello</au><au>Boniolo, Ester</au><au>Tarquini, Riccardo</au><au>Messina, Antonio</au><au>Zanoni, Marta</au><au>Navalesi, Paolo</au><au>Vetrugno, Luigi</au><au>Bignami, Elena</au><au>Corte, Francesco Della</au><au>De Robertis, Edoardo</au><au>Santangelo, Erminio</au><au>Vaschetto, Rosanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Varying Levels of Inspiratory Assistance with Pressure Support Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist on Driving Pressure in Patients Recovering from Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Monit Comput</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>419-427</pages><issn>1387-1307</issn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><abstract>Background Driving pressure can be readily measured during assisted modes of ventilation such as pressure support ventilation (PSV) and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA). The present prospective randomized crossover study aimed to assess the changes in driving pressure in response to variations in the level of assistance delivered by PSV vs NAVA. Methods 16 intubated adult patients, recovering from hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) and undergoing assisted ventilation, were randomly subjected to six 30-min-lasting trials. At baseline, PSV (PSV100) was set with the same regulation present at patient enrollment. The corresponding level of NAVA (NAVA100) was set to match the same inspiratory peak of airway pressure obtained in PSV100. Therefore, the level of assistance was reduced and increased by 50% in both ventilatory modes (PSV50, NAVA50; PSV150, NAVA150). At the end of each trial, driving pressure obtained in response to four short (2–3 s) end-expiratory and end-inspiratory occlusions was analyzed. Results Driving pressure at PSV50 (6.6 [6.1–7.8] cmH 2 O) was lower than that recorded at PSV100 (7.9 [7.2–9.1] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.005) and PSV150 (9.9 [9.1–13.2] cmH 2 O, P  &lt; 0.0001). In NAVA, driving pressure at NAVA50 was reduced compared to NAVA150 (7.7 [5.1–8.1] cmH 2 O vs 8.3 [6.4–11.4] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.013), whereas there were no changes between baseline and NAVA150 (8.5 [6.3–9.8] cmH 2 O vs 8.3 [6.4–11.4] cmH 2 O, P  = 0.331, respectively). Driving pressure at PSV150 was higher than that observed in NAVA150 ( P  = 0.011). Conclusions NAVA delivers better lung-protective ventilation compared to PSV in hypoxemic ARF patients. Trial registration number and date of registration The present trial was prospectively registered at www.clinicatrials.gov (NCT03719365) on 24 October 2018</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>33559864</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10877-021-00668-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-2705</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-1307
ispartof Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.419-427
issn 1387-1307
1573-2614
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7871131
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Anesthesiology
Critical Care Medicine
Cross-Over Studies
Health Sciences
Humans
Intensive
Intensive care
Interactive Ventilatory Support
Lung
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mortality
Original Research
Patients
Prospective Studies
Respiration
Respiratory failure
Respiratory Insufficiency - therapy
Statistical analysis
Statistics for Life Sciences
Ventilation
Ventilators
title Effects of Varying Levels of Inspiratory Assistance with Pressure Support Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist on Driving Pressure in Patients Recovering from Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A19%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Varying%20Levels%20of%20Inspiratory%20Assistance%20with%20Pressure%20Support%20Ventilation%20and%20Neurally%20Adjusted%20Ventilatory%20Assist%20on%20Driving%20Pressure%20in%20Patients%20Recovering%20from%20Hypoxemic%20Respiratory%20Failure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20monitoring%20and%20computing&rft.au=Cammarota,%20Gianmaria&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=419-427&rft.issn=1387-1307&rft.eissn=1573-2614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10877-021-00668-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2487748876%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667081783&rft_id=info:pmid/33559864&rfr_iscdi=true