Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities

Objectives While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvemen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of emergency medicine 2021-05, Vol.23 (3), p.303-309
Hauptverfasser: Chartier, Lucas B., Douglas, Stuart L., Tawadrous, Davy, Stang, Antonia S., Vaillancourt, Samuel, Nasser, Laila, Hrymak, Carmen, Calder, Lisa, Perry, Jeffrey J., McRae, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 309
container_issue 3
container_start_page 303
container_title Canadian journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 23
creator Chartier, Lucas B.
Douglas, Stuart L.
Tawadrous, Davy
Stang, Antonia S.
Vaillancourt, Samuel
Nasser, Laila
Hrymak, Carmen
Calder, Lisa
Perry, Jeffrey J.
McRae, Andrew
description Objectives While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities. Methods An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms. Results The final six recommendations include that all emergency medicine providers should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that academic emergency medicine physicians should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that academic leaders should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both. Conclusion Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7871128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487748882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-765fb99c5fab1e8514d300cb7cbb0f04c0dbd0df64551e0bcb3a142d0419ae253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzggS1y4BPwZOxcktKIFqRISgrPlj8muq8Te2kmrvfLL8e6W5ePAyfbMM-_M-G2alwS_JRjLd4WzTqoWU9zi-u5b9qg5J1yRVmHOHp_uTJw1z0q5wZhQQdTT5owxIXrVdefNj6_g0jRB9GYOKRY0pIwgbkx0Ia6RS-NobMqHJLIw3wNENG8ArUw0PpiIYIK8huh2yMPW5Llqzeh2MWOYdyhM25zu4BAz0aMMBUx2G7RvusQwByjPmyeDGQu8eDgvmu-XH7-tPrXXX64-rz5ct45LPreyE4PteycGYwkoQbhnGDsrnbV4wNxhbz32Q8eFIICts8wQTj3mpDdABbto3h91t4udwLs6Uzaj3uYwmbzTyQT9dyaGjV6nOy2VJISqKvDmQSCn2wXKrKdQHNQfipCWoilXUnKlFK3o63_Qm7TkWNfTVBJFqeCKVYoeKZdTKRmG0zAE673F-mixrhbrg8V6X_TqzzVOJb88rQA7AqWm4hry797_kf0JQx62tQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718225483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Chartier, Lucas B. ; Douglas, Stuart L. ; Tawadrous, Davy ; Stang, Antonia S. ; Vaillancourt, Samuel ; Nasser, Laila ; Hrymak, Carmen ; Calder, Lisa ; Perry, Jeffrey J. ; McRae, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Chartier, Lucas B. ; Douglas, Stuart L. ; Tawadrous, Davy ; Stang, Antonia S. ; Vaillancourt, Samuel ; Nasser, Laila ; Hrymak, Carmen ; Calder, Lisa ; Perry, Jeffrey J. ; McRae, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities. Methods An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms. Results The final six recommendations include that all emergency medicine providers should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that academic emergency medicine physicians should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that academic leaders should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both. Conclusion Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-8035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1481-8043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33559866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>CAEP Academic Symposium Paper ; Collaboration ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Public Health ; Quality improvement</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2021-05, Vol.23 (3), p.303-309</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU) 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-765fb99c5fab1e8514d300cb7cbb0f04c0dbd0df64551e0bcb3a142d0419ae253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-765fb99c5fab1e8514d300cb7cbb0f04c0dbd0df64551e0bcb3a142d0419ae253</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9716-1684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chartier, Lucas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Stuart L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawadrous, Davy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stang, Antonia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillancourt, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasser, Laila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hrymak, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calder, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRae, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities</title><title>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Can J Emerg Med</addtitle><addtitle>CJEM</addtitle><description>Objectives While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities. Methods An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms. Results The final six recommendations include that all emergency medicine providers should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that academic emergency medicine physicians should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that academic leaders should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both. Conclusion Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes.</description><subject>CAEP Academic Symposium Paper</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><issn>1481-8035</issn><issn>1481-8043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzggS1y4BPwZOxcktKIFqRISgrPlj8muq8Te2kmrvfLL8e6W5ePAyfbMM-_M-G2alwS_JRjLd4WzTqoWU9zi-u5b9qg5J1yRVmHOHp_uTJw1z0q5wZhQQdTT5owxIXrVdefNj6_g0jRB9GYOKRY0pIwgbkx0Ia6RS-NobMqHJLIw3wNENG8ArUw0PpiIYIK8huh2yMPW5Llqzeh2MWOYdyhM25zu4BAz0aMMBUx2G7RvusQwByjPmyeDGQu8eDgvmu-XH7-tPrXXX64-rz5ct45LPreyE4PteycGYwkoQbhnGDsrnbV4wNxhbz32Q8eFIICts8wQTj3mpDdABbto3h91t4udwLs6Uzaj3uYwmbzTyQT9dyaGjV6nOy2VJISqKvDmQSCn2wXKrKdQHNQfipCWoilXUnKlFK3o63_Qm7TkWNfTVBJFqeCKVYoeKZdTKRmG0zAE673F-mixrhbrg8V6X_TqzzVOJb88rQA7AqWm4hry797_kf0JQx62tQ</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Chartier, Lucas B.</creator><creator>Douglas, Stuart L.</creator><creator>Tawadrous, Davy</creator><creator>Stang, Antonia S.</creator><creator>Vaillancourt, Samuel</creator><creator>Nasser, Laila</creator><creator>Hrymak, Carmen</creator><creator>Calder, Lisa</creator><creator>Perry, Jeffrey J.</creator><creator>McRae, Andrew</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-1684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities</title><author>Chartier, Lucas B. ; Douglas, Stuart L. ; Tawadrous, Davy ; Stang, Antonia S. ; Vaillancourt, Samuel ; Nasser, Laila ; Hrymak, Carmen ; Calder, Lisa ; Perry, Jeffrey J. ; McRae, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-765fb99c5fab1e8514d300cb7cbb0f04c0dbd0df64551e0bcb3a142d0419ae253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>CAEP Academic Symposium Paper</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chartier, Lucas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Stuart L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawadrous, Davy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stang, Antonia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillancourt, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasser, Laila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hrymak, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calder, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRae, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chartier, Lucas B.</au><au>Douglas, Stuart L.</au><au>Tawadrous, Davy</au><au>Stang, Antonia S.</au><au>Vaillancourt, Samuel</au><au>Nasser, Laila</au><au>Hrymak, Carmen</au><au>Calder, Lisa</au><au>Perry, Jeffrey J.</au><au>McRae, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><stitle>Can J Emerg Med</stitle><addtitle>CJEM</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>303-309</pages><issn>1481-8035</issn><eissn>1481-8043</eissn><abstract>Objectives While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities. Methods An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms. Results The final six recommendations include that all emergency medicine providers should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that academic emergency medicine physicians should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that academic leaders should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both. Conclusion Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33559866</pmid><doi>10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-1684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1481-8035
ispartof Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2021-05, Vol.23 (3), p.303-309
issn 1481-8035
1481-8043
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7871128
source SpringerLink (Online service); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects CAEP Academic Symposium Paper
Collaboration
Emergency medical care
Emergency Medicine
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Public Health
Quality improvement
title Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommendations%20for%20enhancing%20collaboration%20between%20the%20Canadian%20emergency%20department%20quality%20improvement%20and%20research%20communities&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Chartier,%20Lucas%20B.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=303-309&rft.issn=1481-8035&rft.eissn=1481-8043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2487748882%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718225483&rft_id=info:pmid/33559866&rfr_iscdi=true