Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities
Objectives While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvemen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of emergency medicine 2021-05, Vol.23 (3), p.303-309 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 309 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 303 |
container_title | Canadian journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Chartier, Lucas B. Douglas, Stuart L. Tawadrous, Davy Stang, Antonia S. Vaillancourt, Samuel Nasser, Laila Hrymak, Carmen Calder, Lisa Perry, Jeffrey J. McRae, Andrew |
description | Objectives
While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities.
Methods
An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms.
Results
The final six recommendations include that all
emergency medicine providers
should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that
academic emergency medicine physicians
should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that
academic leaders
should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both.
Conclusion
Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7871128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487748882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-765fb99c5fab1e8514d300cb7cbb0f04c0dbd0df64551e0bcb3a142d0419ae253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzggS1y4BPwZOxcktKIFqRISgrPlj8muq8Te2kmrvfLL8e6W5ePAyfbMM-_M-G2alwS_JRjLd4WzTqoWU9zi-u5b9qg5J1yRVmHOHp_uTJw1z0q5wZhQQdTT5owxIXrVdefNj6_g0jRB9GYOKRY0pIwgbkx0Ia6RS-NobMqHJLIw3wNENG8ArUw0PpiIYIK8huh2yMPW5Llqzeh2MWOYdyhM25zu4BAz0aMMBUx2G7RvusQwByjPmyeDGQu8eDgvmu-XH7-tPrXXX64-rz5ct45LPreyE4PteycGYwkoQbhnGDsrnbV4wNxhbz32Q8eFIICts8wQTj3mpDdABbto3h91t4udwLs6Uzaj3uYwmbzTyQT9dyaGjV6nOy2VJISqKvDmQSCn2wXKrKdQHNQfipCWoilXUnKlFK3o63_Qm7TkWNfTVBJFqeCKVYoeKZdTKRmG0zAE673F-mixrhbrg8V6X_TqzzVOJb88rQA7AqWm4hry797_kf0JQx62tQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718225483</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Chartier, Lucas B. ; Douglas, Stuart L. ; Tawadrous, Davy ; Stang, Antonia S. ; Vaillancourt, Samuel ; Nasser, Laila ; Hrymak, Carmen ; Calder, Lisa ; Perry, Jeffrey J. ; McRae, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Chartier, Lucas B. ; Douglas, Stuart L. ; Tawadrous, Davy ; Stang, Antonia S. ; Vaillancourt, Samuel ; Nasser, Laila ; Hrymak, Carmen ; Calder, Lisa ; Perry, Jeffrey J. ; McRae, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities.
Methods
An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms.
Results
The final six recommendations include that all
emergency medicine providers
should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that
academic emergency medicine physicians
should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that
academic leaders
should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both.
Conclusion
Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-8035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1481-8043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33559866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>CAEP Academic Symposium Paper ; Collaboration ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Public Health ; Quality improvement</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2021-05, Vol.23 (3), p.303-309</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU) 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-765fb99c5fab1e8514d300cb7cbb0f04c0dbd0df64551e0bcb3a142d0419ae253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-765fb99c5fab1e8514d300cb7cbb0f04c0dbd0df64551e0bcb3a142d0419ae253</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9716-1684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33559866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chartier, Lucas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Stuart L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawadrous, Davy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stang, Antonia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillancourt, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasser, Laila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hrymak, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calder, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRae, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities</title><title>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Can J Emerg Med</addtitle><addtitle>CJEM</addtitle><description>Objectives
While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities.
Methods
An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms.
Results
The final six recommendations include that all
emergency medicine providers
should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that
academic emergency medicine physicians
should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that
academic leaders
should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both.
Conclusion
Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes.</description><subject>CAEP Academic Symposium Paper</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><issn>1481-8035</issn><issn>1481-8043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoqXwBzggS1y4BPwZOxcktKIFqRISgrPlj8muq8Te2kmrvfLL8e6W5ePAyfbMM-_M-G2alwS_JRjLd4WzTqoWU9zi-u5b9qg5J1yRVmHOHp_uTJw1z0q5wZhQQdTT5owxIXrVdefNj6_g0jRB9GYOKRY0pIwgbkx0Ia6RS-NobMqHJLIw3wNENG8ArUw0PpiIYIK8huh2yMPW5Llqzeh2MWOYdyhM25zu4BAz0aMMBUx2G7RvusQwByjPmyeDGQu8eDgvmu-XH7-tPrXXX64-rz5ct45LPreyE4PteycGYwkoQbhnGDsrnbV4wNxhbz32Q8eFIICts8wQTj3mpDdABbto3h91t4udwLs6Uzaj3uYwmbzTyQT9dyaGjV6nOy2VJISqKvDmQSCn2wXKrKdQHNQfipCWoilXUnKlFK3o63_Qm7TkWNfTVBJFqeCKVYoeKZdTKRmG0zAE673F-mixrhbrg8V6X_TqzzVOJb88rQA7AqWm4hry797_kf0JQx62tQ</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Chartier, Lucas B.</creator><creator>Douglas, Stuart L.</creator><creator>Tawadrous, Davy</creator><creator>Stang, Antonia S.</creator><creator>Vaillancourt, Samuel</creator><creator>Nasser, Laila</creator><creator>Hrymak, Carmen</creator><creator>Calder, Lisa</creator><creator>Perry, Jeffrey J.</creator><creator>McRae, Andrew</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-1684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities</title><author>Chartier, Lucas B. ; Douglas, Stuart L. ; Tawadrous, Davy ; Stang, Antonia S. ; Vaillancourt, Samuel ; Nasser, Laila ; Hrymak, Carmen ; Calder, Lisa ; Perry, Jeffrey J. ; McRae, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-765fb99c5fab1e8514d300cb7cbb0f04c0dbd0df64551e0bcb3a142d0419ae253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>CAEP Academic Symposium Paper</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chartier, Lucas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, Stuart L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawadrous, Davy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stang, Antonia S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaillancourt, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasser, Laila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hrymak, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calder, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McRae, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chartier, Lucas B.</au><au>Douglas, Stuart L.</au><au>Tawadrous, Davy</au><au>Stang, Antonia S.</au><au>Vaillancourt, Samuel</au><au>Nasser, Laila</au><au>Hrymak, Carmen</au><au>Calder, Lisa</au><au>Perry, Jeffrey J.</au><au>McRae, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><stitle>Can J Emerg Med</stitle><addtitle>CJEM</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>303-309</pages><issn>1481-8035</issn><eissn>1481-8043</eissn><abstract>Objectives
While quality improvement (QI) and clinical research embody two distinct scientific approaches, they have the same ultimate goal—to improve health and patient care outcomes. By leveraging their respective strengths there is a higher likelihood of achieving and sustaining health improvements. Our objective was to create recommendations to enhance the collaboration of the Canadian emergency medicine QI and clinical research communities.
Methods
An expert panel of eight ED clinicians with diverse QI and clinical research expertise drafted a list of recommendations based on their professional expertise and a scoping review of the literature. These recommendations were refined through consultation with national stakeholders and reviewed at the 2020 CAEP Virtual Academic Symposium, where feedback was received through several virtual platforms.
Results
The final six recommendations include that all
emergency medicine providers
should: (1) understand the role and application of both clinical research and QI science; that
academic emergency medicine physicians
should: (2) contribute to both local adoption and broad dissemination of project findings, (3) leverage QI methodologies in research projects to improve knowledge translation, and (4) ensure that project outcomes prioritize patient care; and that
academic leaders
should: (5) enhance the infrastructure for oversight of research and QI projects, and (6) encourage collaboration between researchers and QI experts by ensuring that academic and operational infrastructures align and support both.
Conclusion
Six recommendations are presented to help the Canadian emergency medicine community achieve greater collaboration between researchers and QI experts with the ultimate goal of improving patient care outcomes.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33559866</pmid><doi>10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9716-1684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1481-8035 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2021-05, Vol.23 (3), p.303-309 |
issn | 1481-8035 1481-8043 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7871128 |
source | SpringerLink (Online service); EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | CAEP Academic Symposium Paper Collaboration Emergency medical care Emergency Medicine Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Public Health Quality improvement |
title | Recommendations for enhancing collaboration between the Canadian emergency department quality improvement and research communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommendations%20for%20enhancing%20collaboration%20between%20the%20Canadian%20emergency%20department%20quality%20improvement%20and%20research%20communities&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Chartier,%20Lucas%20B.&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=303-309&rft.issn=1481-8035&rft.eissn=1481-8043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s43678-020-00079-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2487748882%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718225483&rft_id=info:pmid/33559866&rfr_iscdi=true |