An Eight Amino Acid Segment Controls Oligomerization and Preferred Conformation of the two Non-visual Arrestins

[Display omitted] •In the presence of IP6 arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 form different oligomers.•IP6 activates arrestin-3, but does not activate arrestin-2.•An eight-residue insertion in arrestin-2 controls differential oligomerization. G protein coupled receptors signal through G proteins or arrestins...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of molecular biology 2021-02, Vol.433 (4), p.166790-166790, Article 166790
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Qiuyan, Zhuo, Ya, Sharma, Pankaj, Perez, Ivette, Francis, Derek J., Chakravarthy, Srinivas, Vishnivetskiy, Sergey A., Berndt, Sandra, Hanson, Susan M., Zhan, Xuanzhi, Brooks, Evan K., Altenbach, Christian, Hubbell, Wayne L., Klug, Candice S., Iverson, T.M., Gurevich, Vsevolod V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •In the presence of IP6 arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 form different oligomers.•IP6 activates arrestin-3, but does not activate arrestin-2.•An eight-residue insertion in arrestin-2 controls differential oligomerization. G protein coupled receptors signal through G proteins or arrestins. A long-standing mystery in the field is why vertebrates have two non-visual arrestins, arrestin-2 and arrestin-3. These isoforms are ~75% identical and 85% similar; each binds numerous receptors, and appear to have many redundant functions, as demonstrated by studies of knockout mice. We previously showed that arrestin-3 can be activated by inositol-hexakisphosphate (IP6). IP6 interacts with the receptor-binding surface of arrestin-3, induces arrestin-3 oligomerization, and this oligomer stabilizes the active conformation of arrestin-3. Here, we compared the impact of IP6 on oligomerization and conformational equilibrium of the highly homologous arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 and found that these two isoforms are regulated differently. In the presence of IP6, arrestin-2 forms “infinite” chains, where each promoter remains in the basal conformation. In contrast, full length and truncated arrestin-3 form trimers and higher-order oligomers in the presence of IP6; we showed previously that trimeric state induces arrestin-3 activation (Chen et al., 2017). Thus, in response to IP6, the two non-visual arrestins oligomerize in different ways in distinct conformations. We identified an insertion of eight residues that is conserved across arrestin-2 homologs, but absent in arrestin-3 that likely accounts for the differences in the IP6 effect. Because IP6 is ubiquitously present in cells, this suggests physiological consequences, including differences in arrestin-2/3 trafficking and JNK3 activation. The functional differences between two non-visual arrestins are in part determined by distinct modes of their oligomerization. The mode of oligomerization might regulate the function of other signaling proteins.
ISSN:0022-2836
1089-8638
1089-8638
DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2020.166790