Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP): an Underestimated Devil in Pancreatic Surgery—Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report

Introduction Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an anatomic variation due to aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein. In this article, we present a case report with a systematic review of literature of patient s undergoing major pancreatic surgery with associat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2021-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1332-1339
Hauptverfasser: Pandrowala, Saneya, Parray, Aamir, Chaudhari, Vikram, Shrikhande, Shailesh V., Bhandare, Manish S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1339
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1332
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 25
creator Pandrowala, Saneya
Parray, Aamir
Chaudhari, Vikram
Shrikhande, Shailesh V.
Bhandare, Manish S.
description Introduction Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an anatomic variation due to aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein. In this article, we present a case report with a systematic review of literature of patient s undergoing major pancreatic surgery with associated PAP. We also intend to discuss and suggest possible surgical strategies to minimise major postoperative complications. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using the terms “circumportal,” “periportal,” “pancreas,” “annular pancreas,” “portal annular pancreas” and “pancreas anomaly.” All articles describing portal annular pancreas with surgical resection were included. Results We identified a total of 53 patients of PAP from 29 articles, who underwent pancreatic resection with a median age of 65 years. POPF (postoperative pancreatic fistula) was demonstrated in 42.55% of patients and 34% had CR (clinically relevant)-POPF. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stump was reconstructed in all patients with either pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy. Standard line of pancreatic transection, i.e., division of anteportal portion at the pancreatic neck and stapling of the retroportal process, resulted in 71% incidence of CR-POPF, whereas it was only 16% when extended resection was performed to achieve single pancreatic stump and 12.5% when retroportal portion was sutured or ligated. Amongst distal pancreatic resections, 66% had POPF and 33% developed CR-POPF. Conclusion It is of utmost importance for pancreatic surgeons to diligently look for and identify PAP in the preoperative imaging. Additional imaging in the form of MRCP helps to define abnormal pancreatic ductal anatomy. Surgeons need to be cognisant of pancreatic stump management in patients with PAP to reduce associated higher rates of POPF.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11605-021-04927-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7869770</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487430084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-53125b225941cae832b0a820b19be599f98f999b34a1dbe63b5517cccaca1c3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqXwAiyQJTZlEerf2GaBNBpoQRqpI0oldpbj3JRUGWewnaLZIB6CJ-yT1O205WeBN7Z8Pp97rw9Czyl5TQlRB4nSmsiKMFoRYZiqyAO0S7XilahZ_bCciaEVk_LLDnqS0jkhVBGqH6MdzmVZTOyiH8sxZjfgWQjT4CJeuuAjuIT3l7PlqzfYBXwaWoiQcr9yGVr8Di76AffhDs29xydTPIO4ufz562STMqxuLj8VEL7jscOLPkN0eYpQ_Fo8dwmKui6Vn6JHnRsSPLvd99Dp4fvP8w_V4vjo43y2qLwUJFeSUyYbxqQR1DvQnDXEaUYaahqQxnRGd8aYhgtH2wZq3khJlffeeUc9b_geerv1XU_NCloPIUc32HUsQ8WNHV1v_1ZC_9WejRdW6dooRYrB_q1BHL9N5Tfsqk8ehsEFGKdkmdBKcEK0KOjLf9DzcYqhjGeZZFRTpURdKLalfBxTitDdN0OJvY7XbuO1JV57E6-97uLFn2PcP7nLswB8C6QihZLJ79r_sb0CiSWykQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521817746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP): an Underestimated Devil in Pancreatic Surgery—Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pandrowala, Saneya ; Parray, Aamir ; Chaudhari, Vikram ; Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ; Bhandare, Manish S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pandrowala, Saneya ; Parray, Aamir ; Chaudhari, Vikram ; Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ; Bhandare, Manish S.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an anatomic variation due to aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein. In this article, we present a case report with a systematic review of literature of patient s undergoing major pancreatic surgery with associated PAP. We also intend to discuss and suggest possible surgical strategies to minimise major postoperative complications. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using the terms “circumportal,” “periportal,” “pancreas,” “annular pancreas,” “portal annular pancreas” and “pancreas anomaly.” All articles describing portal annular pancreas with surgical resection were included. Results We identified a total of 53 patients of PAP from 29 articles, who underwent pancreatic resection with a median age of 65 years. POPF (postoperative pancreatic fistula) was demonstrated in 42.55% of patients and 34% had CR (clinically relevant)-POPF. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stump was reconstructed in all patients with either pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy. Standard line of pancreatic transection, i.e., division of anteportal portion at the pancreatic neck and stapling of the retroportal process, resulted in 71% incidence of CR-POPF, whereas it was only 16% when extended resection was performed to achieve single pancreatic stump and 12.5% when retroportal portion was sutured or ligated. Amongst distal pancreatic resections, 66% had POPF and 33% developed CR-POPF. Conclusion It is of utmost importance for pancreatic surgeons to diligently look for and identify PAP in the preoperative imaging. Additional imaging in the form of MRCP helps to define abnormal pancreatic ductal anatomy. Surgeons need to be cognisant of pancreatic stump management in patients with PAP to reduce associated higher rates of POPF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-04927-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33555524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biopsy ; Case reports ; Chemotherapy ; Fistula ; Gastroenterology ; Humans ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ostomy ; Pancreas ; Pancreas - abnormalities ; Pancreas - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreas - surgery ; Pancreatic Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Pancreatic Diseases - surgery ; Pancreatic Fistula ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects ; Pancreaticojejunostomy ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications ; Review ; Review Article ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2021-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1332-1339</ispartof><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2021</rights><rights>The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-53125b225941cae832b0a820b19be599f98f999b34a1dbe63b5517cccaca1c3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-53125b225941cae832b0a820b19be599f98f999b34a1dbe63b5517cccaca1c3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5390-130X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11605-021-04927-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11605-021-04927-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33555524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pandrowala, Saneya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parray, Aamir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Vikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrikhande, Shailesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandare, Manish S.</creatorcontrib><title>Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP): an Underestimated Devil in Pancreatic Surgery—Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an anatomic variation due to aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein. In this article, we present a case report with a systematic review of literature of patient s undergoing major pancreatic surgery with associated PAP. We also intend to discuss and suggest possible surgical strategies to minimise major postoperative complications. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using the terms “circumportal,” “periportal,” “pancreas,” “annular pancreas,” “portal annular pancreas” and “pancreas anomaly.” All articles describing portal annular pancreas with surgical resection were included. Results We identified a total of 53 patients of PAP from 29 articles, who underwent pancreatic resection with a median age of 65 years. POPF (postoperative pancreatic fistula) was demonstrated in 42.55% of patients and 34% had CR (clinically relevant)-POPF. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stump was reconstructed in all patients with either pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy. Standard line of pancreatic transection, i.e., division of anteportal portion at the pancreatic neck and stapling of the retroportal process, resulted in 71% incidence of CR-POPF, whereas it was only 16% when extended resection was performed to achieve single pancreatic stump and 12.5% when retroportal portion was sutured or ligated. Amongst distal pancreatic resections, 66% had POPF and 33% developed CR-POPF. Conclusion It is of utmost importance for pancreatic surgeons to diligently look for and identify PAP in the preoperative imaging. Additional imaging in the form of MRCP helps to define abnormal pancreatic ductal anatomy. Surgeons need to be cognisant of pancreatic stump management in patients with PAP to reduce associated higher rates of POPF.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pancreas</subject><subject>Pancreas - abnormalities</subject><subject>Pancreas - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreas - surgery</subject><subject>Pancreatic Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pancreatic Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Pancreatic Fistula</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pancreaticojejunostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EoqXwAiyQJTZlEerf2GaBNBpoQRqpI0oldpbj3JRUGWewnaLZIB6CJ-yT1O205WeBN7Z8Pp97rw9Czyl5TQlRB4nSmsiKMFoRYZiqyAO0S7XilahZ_bCciaEVk_LLDnqS0jkhVBGqH6MdzmVZTOyiH8sxZjfgWQjT4CJeuuAjuIT3l7PlqzfYBXwaWoiQcr9yGVr8Di76AffhDs29xydTPIO4ufz562STMqxuLj8VEL7jscOLPkN0eYpQ_Fo8dwmKui6Vn6JHnRsSPLvd99Dp4fvP8w_V4vjo43y2qLwUJFeSUyYbxqQR1DvQnDXEaUYaahqQxnRGd8aYhgtH2wZq3khJlffeeUc9b_geerv1XU_NCloPIUc32HUsQ8WNHV1v_1ZC_9WejRdW6dooRYrB_q1BHL9N5Tfsqk8ehsEFGKdkmdBKcEK0KOjLf9DzcYqhjGeZZFRTpURdKLalfBxTitDdN0OJvY7XbuO1JV57E6-97uLFn2PcP7nLswB8C6QihZLJ79r_sb0CiSWykQ</recordid><startdate>20210501</startdate><enddate>20210501</enddate><creator>Pandrowala, Saneya</creator><creator>Parray, Aamir</creator><creator>Chaudhari, Vikram</creator><creator>Shrikhande, Shailesh V.</creator><creator>Bhandare, Manish S.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5390-130X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210501</creationdate><title>Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP): an Underestimated Devil in Pancreatic Surgery—Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report</title><author>Pandrowala, Saneya ; Parray, Aamir ; Chaudhari, Vikram ; Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ; Bhandare, Manish S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-53125b225941cae832b0a820b19be599f98f999b34a1dbe63b5517cccaca1c3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pancreas</topic><topic>Pancreas - abnormalities</topic><topic>Pancreas - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreas - surgery</topic><topic>Pancreatic Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pancreatic Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Pancreatic Fistula</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pancreaticojejunostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pandrowala, Saneya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parray, Aamir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhari, Vikram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrikhande, Shailesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandare, Manish S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pandrowala, Saneya</au><au>Parray, Aamir</au><au>Chaudhari, Vikram</au><au>Shrikhande, Shailesh V.</au><au>Bhandare, Manish S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP): an Underestimated Devil in Pancreatic Surgery—Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Gastrointest Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2021-05-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1332</spage><epage>1339</epage><pages>1332-1339</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Introduction Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is an anatomic variation due to aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein. In this article, we present a case report with a systematic review of literature of patient s undergoing major pancreatic surgery with associated PAP. We also intend to discuss and suggest possible surgical strategies to minimise major postoperative complications. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using the terms “circumportal,” “periportal,” “pancreas,” “annular pancreas,” “portal annular pancreas” and “pancreas anomaly.” All articles describing portal annular pancreas with surgical resection were included. Results We identified a total of 53 patients of PAP from 29 articles, who underwent pancreatic resection with a median age of 65 years. POPF (postoperative pancreatic fistula) was demonstrated in 42.55% of patients and 34% had CR (clinically relevant)-POPF. Following pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreatic stump was reconstructed in all patients with either pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy. Standard line of pancreatic transection, i.e., division of anteportal portion at the pancreatic neck and stapling of the retroportal process, resulted in 71% incidence of CR-POPF, whereas it was only 16% when extended resection was performed to achieve single pancreatic stump and 12.5% when retroportal portion was sutured or ligated. Amongst distal pancreatic resections, 66% had POPF and 33% developed CR-POPF. Conclusion It is of utmost importance for pancreatic surgeons to diligently look for and identify PAP in the preoperative imaging. Additional imaging in the form of MRCP helps to define abnormal pancreatic ductal anatomy. Surgeons need to be cognisant of pancreatic stump management in patients with PAP to reduce associated higher rates of POPF.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33555524</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11605-021-04927-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5390-130X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-255X
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2021-05, Vol.25 (5), p.1332-1339
issn 1091-255X
1873-4626
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7869770
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Biopsy
Case reports
Chemotherapy
Fistula
Gastroenterology
Humans
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ostomy
Pancreas
Pancreas - abnormalities
Pancreas - diagnostic imaging
Pancreas - surgery
Pancreatic Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Pancreatic Diseases - surgery
Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects
Pancreaticojejunostomy
Patients
Postoperative Complications
Review
Review Article
Surgery
Systematic review
Veins & arteries
title Portal Annular Pancreas (PAP): an Underestimated Devil in Pancreatic Surgery—Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A49%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Portal%20Annular%20Pancreas%20(PAP):%20an%20Underestimated%20Devil%20in%20Pancreatic%20Surgery%E2%80%94Systematic%20Review%20of%20Literature%20and%20Case%20Report&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Pandrowala,%20Saneya&rft.date=2021-05-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1332&rft.epage=1339&rft.pages=1332-1339&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11605-021-04927-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2487430084%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521817746&rft_id=info:pmid/33555524&rfr_iscdi=true