The Gross National Happiness Framework and the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bhutan
Bhutan is a lower-middle-income country with limited tertiary-care health infrastructure and shortage of human resources. The country's response to the COVID-19 pandemic is guided by the principle of Gross National Happiness (GNH), which prioritizes the well-being and happiness of people over c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene 2020-12, Vol.104 (2), p.441-445 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 445 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 441 |
container_title | The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Dorji, Thinley |
description | Bhutan is a lower-middle-income country with limited tertiary-care health infrastructure and shortage of human resources. The country's response to the COVID-19 pandemic is guided by the principle of Gross National Happiness (GNH), which prioritizes the well-being and happiness of people over conventional socioeconomic indicators. The king's leadership and government's decisions based on public health science helped in the control of the pandemic and reduce economic losses. The government implemented some unique and unconventional public health measures such as facility quarantine for those with high-risk exposure, an increase in quarantine period to 21 days, free testing and treatment, and population-based screening tests. Early and extensive contact tracing, extensive testing, effective communications, zoned travel restrictions, and adoption of physical distancing and hygiene measures limited COVID-19 transmissions within the country. Community participation from voluntary groups and civil society organizations helped deliver non-health services while hospitals provided uninterrupted routine health services through its primary healthcare network. All COVID-19 cases were treated in hospitals, and the country has had zero reported COVID-19 deaths. This article describes how the concept of GNH provided the framework for the government to respond to this pandemic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1416 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7866366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2531344989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2606-b128b6ce63ddd52efa48145b598031815c555670336dd87e25d675021909984f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c9rFDEUB_Agil1Xj14l4MXL1Pye5CLY1XYLxUpbvYbszFtn1plkTDJK_3uz_YUVAoG8D4-890XoNSWHginz3u3y2B0yUlFB1RO0oKJWFVVCPkULQgirjOL1AXqR0o4Qqhmlz9EB51xKoswCdVcd4JMYUsJfXO6DdwNeu2nqPZSn4-hG-BPiT-x8i3Oha3BD7vDldcow4gtIU_AJcA431dX599NPFTX4a_Ew9g3uPT7q5uz8S_Rs64YEr-7uJfp2_Plqta7Ozk9OVx_PqoYpoqoNZXqjGlC8bVvJYOuEpkJupNGEU01lI6VUNeFcta2ugclW1ZIwaogxWmz5En247TvNmxHaBnyObrBT7EcXr21wvX1c8X1nf4TfttZK8XKW6N1dgxh-zZCyHfvUwDA4D2FOlomaC6prpQt9-x_dhTmWFRYlOeVCGG2Kqm5Vs19zhO3DZyix-wztTYaWEbvPsPg3_07woO9D438BjSOWlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2531344989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Gross National Happiness Framework and the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bhutan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dorji, Thinley</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Thinley</creatorcontrib><description>Bhutan is a lower-middle-income country with limited tertiary-care health infrastructure and shortage of human resources. The country's response to the COVID-19 pandemic is guided by the principle of Gross National Happiness (GNH), which prioritizes the well-being and happiness of people over conventional socioeconomic indicators. The king's leadership and government's decisions based on public health science helped in the control of the pandemic and reduce economic losses. The government implemented some unique and unconventional public health measures such as facility quarantine for those with high-risk exposure, an increase in quarantine period to 21 days, free testing and treatment, and population-based screening tests. Early and extensive contact tracing, extensive testing, effective communications, zoned travel restrictions, and adoption of physical distancing and hygiene measures limited COVID-19 transmissions within the country. Community participation from voluntary groups and civil society organizations helped deliver non-health services while hospitals provided uninterrupted routine health services through its primary healthcare network. All COVID-19 cases were treated in hospitals, and the country has had zero reported COVID-19 deaths. This article describes how the concept of GNH provided the framework for the government to respond to this pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9637</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-1645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1416</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33355069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Institute of Tropical Medicine</publisher><subject>Bhutan - epidemiology ; Contact Tracing ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 - prevention & control ; Delivery of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence ; Delivery of Health Care - standards ; Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Happiness ; Health services ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Piece ; Public Health ; Quarantine ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Well being</subject><ispartof>The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020-12, Vol.104 (2), p.441-445</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Tropical Medicine Feb 2021</rights><rights>The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2606-b128b6ce63ddd52efa48145b598031815c555670336dd87e25d675021909984f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866366/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7866366/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Thinley</creatorcontrib><title>The Gross National Happiness Framework and the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bhutan</title><title>The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene</title><addtitle>Am J Trop Med Hyg</addtitle><description>Bhutan is a lower-middle-income country with limited tertiary-care health infrastructure and shortage of human resources. The country's response to the COVID-19 pandemic is guided by the principle of Gross National Happiness (GNH), which prioritizes the well-being and happiness of people over conventional socioeconomic indicators. The king's leadership and government's decisions based on public health science helped in the control of the pandemic and reduce economic losses. The government implemented some unique and unconventional public health measures such as facility quarantine for those with high-risk exposure, an increase in quarantine period to 21 days, free testing and treatment, and population-based screening tests. Early and extensive contact tracing, extensive testing, effective communications, zoned travel restrictions, and adoption of physical distancing and hygiene measures limited COVID-19 transmissions within the country. Community participation from voluntary groups and civil society organizations helped deliver non-health services while hospitals provided uninterrupted routine health services through its primary healthcare network. All COVID-19 cases were treated in hospitals, and the country has had zero reported COVID-19 deaths. This article describes how the concept of GNH provided the framework for the government to respond to this pandemic.</description><subject>Bhutan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Contact Tracing</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention & control</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Piece</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quarantine</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0002-9637</issn><issn>1476-1645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c9rFDEUB_Agil1Xj14l4MXL1Pye5CLY1XYLxUpbvYbszFtn1plkTDJK_3uz_YUVAoG8D4-890XoNSWHginz3u3y2B0yUlFB1RO0oKJWFVVCPkULQgirjOL1AXqR0o4Qqhmlz9EB51xKoswCdVcd4JMYUsJfXO6DdwNeu2nqPZSn4-hG-BPiT-x8i3Oha3BD7vDldcow4gtIU_AJcA431dX599NPFTX4a_Ew9g3uPT7q5uz8S_Rs64YEr-7uJfp2_Plqta7Ozk9OVx_PqoYpoqoNZXqjGlC8bVvJYOuEpkJupNGEU01lI6VUNeFcta2ugclW1ZIwaogxWmz5En247TvNmxHaBnyObrBT7EcXr21wvX1c8X1nf4TfttZK8XKW6N1dgxh-zZCyHfvUwDA4D2FOlomaC6prpQt9-x_dhTmWFRYlOeVCGG2Kqm5Vs19zhO3DZyix-wztTYaWEbvPsPg3_07woO9D438BjSOWlw</recordid><startdate>20201222</startdate><enddate>20201222</enddate><creator>Dorji, Thinley</creator><general>Institute of Tropical Medicine</general><general>The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201222</creationdate><title>The Gross National Happiness Framework and the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bhutan</title><author>Dorji, Thinley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2606-b128b6ce63ddd52efa48145b598031815c555670336dd87e25d675021909984f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bhutan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Contact Tracing</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention & control</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Piece</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quarantine</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorji, Thinley</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorji, Thinley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Gross National Happiness Framework and the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bhutan</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Trop Med Hyg</addtitle><date>2020-12-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>441-445</pages><issn>0002-9637</issn><eissn>1476-1645</eissn><abstract>Bhutan is a lower-middle-income country with limited tertiary-care health infrastructure and shortage of human resources. The country's response to the COVID-19 pandemic is guided by the principle of Gross National Happiness (GNH), which prioritizes the well-being and happiness of people over conventional socioeconomic indicators. The king's leadership and government's decisions based on public health science helped in the control of the pandemic and reduce economic losses. The government implemented some unique and unconventional public health measures such as facility quarantine for those with high-risk exposure, an increase in quarantine period to 21 days, free testing and treatment, and population-based screening tests. Early and extensive contact tracing, extensive testing, effective communications, zoned travel restrictions, and adoption of physical distancing and hygiene measures limited COVID-19 transmissions within the country. Community participation from voluntary groups and civil society organizations helped deliver non-health services while hospitals provided uninterrupted routine health services through its primary healthcare network. All COVID-19 cases were treated in hospitals, and the country has had zero reported COVID-19 deaths. This article describes how the concept of GNH provided the framework for the government to respond to this pandemic.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Institute of Tropical Medicine</pub><pmid>33355069</pmid><doi>10.4269/ajtmh.20-1416</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9637 |
ispartof | The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2020-12, Vol.104 (2), p.441-445 |
issn | 0002-9637 1476-1645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7866366 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bhutan - epidemiology Contact Tracing Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 - prevention & control Delivery of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence Delivery of Health Care - standards Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Happiness Health services Humans Pandemics Piece Public Health Quarantine Socioeconomic Factors Well being |
title | The Gross National Happiness Framework and the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Bhutan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A17%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Gross%20National%20Happiness%20Framework%20and%20the%20Health%20System%20Response%20to%20the%20COVID-19%20Pandemic%20in%20Bhutan&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20tropical%20medicine%20and%20hygiene&rft.au=Dorji,%20Thinley&rft.date=2020-12-22&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=441-445&rft.issn=0002-9637&rft.eissn=1476-1645&rft_id=info:doi/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1416&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2531344989%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2531344989&rft_id=info:pmid/33355069&rfr_iscdi=true |