The Impact of Aerobic Training on Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Psychological and Orthostatic Challenge

Elevated cardiovascular reactivity to, and reduced recovery from, challenging events may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, and exercise training may reduce this reactivity. However, in a randomized controlled trial of aerobic versus strength training in sedentary, healthy young adults, we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychosomatic medicine 2021-02, Vol.83 (2), p.125-137
Hauptverfasser: Sloan, Richard P., Shapiro, Peter A., Lauriola, Vincenzo, McIntyre, Kathleen, Pavlicova, Martina, Choi, Chien-Wen Jean, Choo, Tse-Hwei, Scodes, Jennifer M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title Psychosomatic medicine
container_volume 83
creator Sloan, Richard P.
Shapiro, Peter A.
Lauriola, Vincenzo
McIntyre, Kathleen
Pavlicova, Martina
Choi, Chien-Wen Jean
Choo, Tse-Hwei
Scodes, Jennifer M.
description Elevated cardiovascular reactivity to, and reduced recovery from, challenging events may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, and exercise training may reduce this reactivity. However, in a randomized controlled trial of aerobic versus strength training in sedentary, healthy young adults, we found no training group differences in reactivity or recovery. Because strength training also may have a reactivity-reducing effect, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from another trial, this time with a wait-list control condition. One hundred nineteen healthy, young, sedentary adults were randomized to a 12-week aerobic training program or wait-list control. Before (T1) and after (T2) training and after 4 weeks of sedentary deconditioning (T3), we measured heart rate (HR), heart rate variability, and blood pressure at rest and in response to and recovery from psychological and orthostatic challenge. Data were analyzed using a group (aerobic versus wait-list) by session (T1, T2, and deconditioning) and by period (baseline, psychological challenge, recovery, standing) three-way analysis of variance with prespecified contrasts. Aerobic capacity significantly increased at T2 and decreased at T3 only in the aerobic training group. The groups did not differ on HR, heart rate variability, or blood pressure reactivity to or recovery from challenge. Without baseline adjustment, there were no significant treatment differences in response to challenges. With baseline adjustment, there were significant treatment by session effects for HR (Cohen d = 0.54, p = .002), systolic blood pressure (d = 0.44, p = .014), diastolic blood pressure (d = 0.74, p = .002), and root mean squared successive difference (d = 0.48, p = .006) reactivity from T1 to T2 only for orthostatic challenge: at T2, reactivity in the aerobic group was nonsignificantly reduced, compared with T1. In the wait-list group, reactivity significantly increased after T1. This study raises further doubt about attenuation of cardiovascular reactivity or enhancement of recovery as a cardioprotective mechanism of aerobic exercise training.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT01335737.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000896
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7858227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471458723</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4535-a0a6887aaa78461602c8325f19b8408b214a34acff7ff77dda2bfec0adc0ec5f2</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyDkI5cUfyV2LkjVikKlSq1gOXCyJo6zMTjxYjtb9t_jflAKo5FGM_POY0svQq8pOaGkle-uvnw7IY9Dtc0TtKI1F5WUbfMUrQjhvOJUiiP0IqXvRSNazp6jI15C1i1boV-b0eLzaQcm4zDgUxtD5wzeRHCzm7c4zHgNsXdhD8ksHiL-bIvW7V0-4BwwzH2ZmLC38YDPYpjwVTqYMfiwdQb87f4y5jGkDLmA1yN4b-etfYmeDeCTfXVfj9HXsw-b9afq4vLj-fr0ojKi5nUFBBqlJABIJRraEGYUZ_VA204JojpGBXABZhhkSdn3wLrBGgK9IdbUAztG7--4u6WbbG_snCN4vYtugnjQAZz-dzO7UW_DXktVK8ZkAby9B8Twc7Ep68klY72H2YYlaSYkFbWSjBepuJOaGFKKdnh4hhJ9Y5oupun_TStnbx5_8eHoj0t_udfBZxvTD79c26hHCz6Pt7xGCVYxwihhpatuRjX7DUL-pU4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471458723</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Impact of Aerobic Training on Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Psychological and Orthostatic Challenge</title><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Sloan, Richard P. ; Shapiro, Peter A. ; Lauriola, Vincenzo ; McIntyre, Kathleen ; Pavlicova, Martina ; Choi, Chien-Wen Jean ; Choo, Tse-Hwei ; Scodes, Jennifer M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sloan, Richard P. ; Shapiro, Peter A. ; Lauriola, Vincenzo ; McIntyre, Kathleen ; Pavlicova, Martina ; Choi, Chien-Wen Jean ; Choo, Tse-Hwei ; Scodes, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><description>Elevated cardiovascular reactivity to, and reduced recovery from, challenging events may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, and exercise training may reduce this reactivity. However, in a randomized controlled trial of aerobic versus strength training in sedentary, healthy young adults, we found no training group differences in reactivity or recovery. Because strength training also may have a reactivity-reducing effect, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from another trial, this time with a wait-list control condition. One hundred nineteen healthy, young, sedentary adults were randomized to a 12-week aerobic training program or wait-list control. Before (T1) and after (T2) training and after 4 weeks of sedentary deconditioning (T3), we measured heart rate (HR), heart rate variability, and blood pressure at rest and in response to and recovery from psychological and orthostatic challenge. Data were analyzed using a group (aerobic versus wait-list) by session (T1, T2, and deconditioning) and by period (baseline, psychological challenge, recovery, standing) three-way analysis of variance with prespecified contrasts. Aerobic capacity significantly increased at T2 and decreased at T3 only in the aerobic training group. The groups did not differ on HR, heart rate variability, or blood pressure reactivity to or recovery from challenge. Without baseline adjustment, there were no significant treatment differences in response to challenges. With baseline adjustment, there were significant treatment by session effects for HR (Cohen d = 0.54, p = .002), systolic blood pressure (d = 0.44, p = .014), diastolic blood pressure (d = 0.74, p = .002), and root mean squared successive difference (d = 0.48, p = .006) reactivity from T1 to T2 only for orthostatic challenge: at T2, reactivity in the aerobic group was nonsignificantly reduced, compared with T1. In the wait-list group, reactivity significantly increased after T1. This study raises further doubt about attenuation of cardiovascular reactivity or enhancement of recovery as a cardioprotective mechanism of aerobic exercise training.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT01335737.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7796</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000896</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33337592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Blood Pressure ; Exercise ; Exercise Test ; Female ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Male ; Resistance Training ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychosomatic medicine, 2021-02, Vol.83 (2), p.125-137</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the American Psychosomatic Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4535-a0a6887aaa78461602c8325f19b8408b214a34acff7ff77dda2bfec0adc0ec5f2</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4535-a0a6887aaa78461602c8325f19b8408b214a34acff7ff77dda2bfec0adc0ec5f2</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>778,883</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33337592$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sloan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauriola, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlicova, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Chien-Wen Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, Tse-Hwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scodes, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Impact of Aerobic Training on Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Psychological and Orthostatic Challenge</title><title>Psychosomatic medicine</title><addtitle>Psychosom Med</addtitle><description>Elevated cardiovascular reactivity to, and reduced recovery from, challenging events may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, and exercise training may reduce this reactivity. However, in a randomized controlled trial of aerobic versus strength training in sedentary, healthy young adults, we found no training group differences in reactivity or recovery. Because strength training also may have a reactivity-reducing effect, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from another trial, this time with a wait-list control condition. One hundred nineteen healthy, young, sedentary adults were randomized to a 12-week aerobic training program or wait-list control. Before (T1) and after (T2) training and after 4 weeks of sedentary deconditioning (T3), we measured heart rate (HR), heart rate variability, and blood pressure at rest and in response to and recovery from psychological and orthostatic challenge. Data were analyzed using a group (aerobic versus wait-list) by session (T1, T2, and deconditioning) and by period (baseline, psychological challenge, recovery, standing) three-way analysis of variance with prespecified contrasts. Aerobic capacity significantly increased at T2 and decreased at T3 only in the aerobic training group. The groups did not differ on HR, heart rate variability, or blood pressure reactivity to or recovery from challenge. Without baseline adjustment, there were no significant treatment differences in response to challenges. With baseline adjustment, there were significant treatment by session effects for HR (Cohen d = 0.54, p = .002), systolic blood pressure (d = 0.44, p = .014), diastolic blood pressure (d = 0.74, p = .002), and root mean squared successive difference (d = 0.48, p = .006) reactivity from T1 to T2 only for orthostatic challenge: at T2, reactivity in the aerobic group was nonsignificantly reduced, compared with T1. In the wait-list group, reactivity significantly increased after T1. This study raises further doubt about attenuation of cardiovascular reactivity or enhancement of recovery as a cardioprotective mechanism of aerobic exercise training.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT01335737.</description><subject>Blood Pressure</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Resistance Training</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0033-3174</issn><issn>1534-7796</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhHyDkI5cUfyV2LkjVikKlSq1gOXCyJo6zMTjxYjtb9t_jflAKo5FGM_POY0svQq8pOaGkle-uvnw7IY9Dtc0TtKI1F5WUbfMUrQjhvOJUiiP0IqXvRSNazp6jI15C1i1boV-b0eLzaQcm4zDgUxtD5wzeRHCzm7c4zHgNsXdhD8ksHiL-bIvW7V0-4BwwzH2ZmLC38YDPYpjwVTqYMfiwdQb87f4y5jGkDLmA1yN4b-etfYmeDeCTfXVfj9HXsw-b9afq4vLj-fr0ojKi5nUFBBqlJABIJRraEGYUZ_VA204JojpGBXABZhhkSdn3wLrBGgK9IdbUAztG7--4u6WbbG_snCN4vYtugnjQAZz-dzO7UW_DXktVK8ZkAby9B8Twc7Ep68klY72H2YYlaSYkFbWSjBepuJOaGFKKdnh4hhJ9Y5oupun_TStnbx5_8eHoj0t_udfBZxvTD79c26hHCz6Pt7xGCVYxwihhpatuRjX7DUL-pU4</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Sloan, Richard P.</creator><creator>Shapiro, Peter A.</creator><creator>Lauriola, Vincenzo</creator><creator>McIntyre, Kathleen</creator><creator>Pavlicova, Martina</creator><creator>Choi, Chien-Wen Jean</creator><creator>Choo, Tse-Hwei</creator><creator>Scodes, Jennifer M.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>The Impact of Aerobic Training on Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Psychological and Orthostatic Challenge</title><author>Sloan, Richard P. ; Shapiro, Peter A. ; Lauriola, Vincenzo ; McIntyre, Kathleen ; Pavlicova, Martina ; Choi, Chien-Wen Jean ; Choo, Tse-Hwei ; Scodes, Jennifer M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4535-a0a6887aaa78461602c8325f19b8408b214a34acff7ff77dda2bfec0adc0ec5f2</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blood Pressure</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Resistance Training</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sloan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Peter A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauriola, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlicova, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Chien-Wen Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, Tse-Hwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scodes, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychosomatic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sloan, Richard P.</au><au>Shapiro, Peter A.</au><au>Lauriola, Vincenzo</au><au>McIntyre, Kathleen</au><au>Pavlicova, Martina</au><au>Choi, Chien-Wen Jean</au><au>Choo, Tse-Hwei</au><au>Scodes, Jennifer M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Impact of Aerobic Training on Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Psychological and Orthostatic Challenge</atitle><jtitle>Psychosomatic medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Psychosom Med</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>125-137</pages><issn>0033-3174</issn><eissn>1534-7796</eissn><abstract>Elevated cardiovascular reactivity to, and reduced recovery from, challenging events may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, and exercise training may reduce this reactivity. However, in a randomized controlled trial of aerobic versus strength training in sedentary, healthy young adults, we found no training group differences in reactivity or recovery. Because strength training also may have a reactivity-reducing effect, we conducted a secondary analysis of data from another trial, this time with a wait-list control condition. One hundred nineteen healthy, young, sedentary adults were randomized to a 12-week aerobic training program or wait-list control. Before (T1) and after (T2) training and after 4 weeks of sedentary deconditioning (T3), we measured heart rate (HR), heart rate variability, and blood pressure at rest and in response to and recovery from psychological and orthostatic challenge. Data were analyzed using a group (aerobic versus wait-list) by session (T1, T2, and deconditioning) and by period (baseline, psychological challenge, recovery, standing) three-way analysis of variance with prespecified contrasts. Aerobic capacity significantly increased at T2 and decreased at T3 only in the aerobic training group. The groups did not differ on HR, heart rate variability, or blood pressure reactivity to or recovery from challenge. Without baseline adjustment, there were no significant treatment differences in response to challenges. With baseline adjustment, there were significant treatment by session effects for HR (Cohen d = 0.54, p = .002), systolic blood pressure (d = 0.44, p = .014), diastolic blood pressure (d = 0.74, p = .002), and root mean squared successive difference (d = 0.48, p = .006) reactivity from T1 to T2 only for orthostatic challenge: at T2, reactivity in the aerobic group was nonsignificantly reduced, compared with T1. In the wait-list group, reactivity significantly increased after T1. This study raises further doubt about attenuation of cardiovascular reactivity or enhancement of recovery as a cardioprotective mechanism of aerobic exercise training.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT01335737.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>33337592</pmid><doi>10.1097/PSY.0000000000000896</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext no_fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3174
ispartof Psychosomatic medicine, 2021-02, Vol.83 (2), p.125-137
issn 0033-3174
1534-7796
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7858227
source MEDLINE
subjects Blood Pressure
Exercise
Exercise Test
Female
Heart Rate
Humans
Male
Resistance Training
Young Adult
title The Impact of Aerobic Training on Cardiovascular Reactivity to and Recovery From Psychological and Orthostatic Challenge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A03%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Impact%20of%20Aerobic%20Training%20on%20Cardiovascular%20Reactivity%20to%20and%20Recovery%20From%20Psychological%20and%20Orthostatic%20Challenge&rft.jtitle=Psychosomatic%20medicine&rft.au=Sloan,%20Richard%20P.&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=125-137&rft.issn=0033-3174&rft.eissn=1534-7796&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000896&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2471458723%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471458723&rft_id=info:pmid/33337592&rfr_iscdi=true