Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security

Global cropland expansion over the last century caused wide-spread habitat loss and degradation. Establishment of protected areas aims to counteract the loss of habitats and to slow species extinctions. However, many protected areas also include high levels of habitat disturbance and conversion for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2021-01, Vol.118 (4), p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Vijay, Varsha, Armsworth, Paul R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS
container_volume 118
creator Vijay, Varsha
Armsworth, Paul R.
description Global cropland expansion over the last century caused wide-spread habitat loss and degradation. Establishment of protected areas aims to counteract the loss of habitats and to slow species extinctions. However, many protected areas also include high levels of habitat disturbance and conversion for uses such as cropland. Understanding where and why this occurs may realign conservation priorities and inform protected area policy in light of competing priorities such as food security. Here, we use our global synthesis cropland dataset to quantify cropland in protected areas globally and assess their relationship to conservation aims and socio-environmental context. We estimate that cropland occupies 1.4 million km² or 6% of global protected area. Cropland occurs across all protected area management types, with 22% occurring in strictly protected areas. Cropland inside protected areas is more prevalent in countries with higher population density, lower income inequality, and with higher agricultural suitability of protected lands. While this phenomenon is dominant inmidnorthern latitudes, areas of cropland in protected areas of the tropics and subtropics may present greater trade-offs due to higher levels of both biodiversity and food insecurity. Although area-based targets are prominent in biodiversity goal-setting, our results show that they can mask persistent anthropogenic land uses detrimental to native ecosystem conservation. To ensure the long-term efficacy of protected areas, post-2020 goal setting must link aims for biodiversity and human health and improve monitoring of conservation outcomes in cropland-impacted protected areas.
doi_str_mv 10.1073/pnas.2010121118
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7848742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27006056</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27006056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-d4222eb9004b7441ff1e48b8a08439d74f79cab8a46d297a7b3e4182a61ec0973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotlbPnpT8gW0n2TQfF0GKX1DQg56X7O5su6XdLEla6b93l2rVQxjCvPPM8BByzWDMQKWTtrFhzIEB44wxfUKGDAxLpDBwSoYAXCVacDEgFyGsAMBMNZyTQZoKqaWUQ2Lf0O9sqHdIC-_atW1KWje09S5iEbGk1qMNdFkvluvuRRq9LTFxVRVojvETsaGFa0JPibVraA-onCtpwGLr67i_JGeVXQe8-q4j8vH48D57TuavTy-z-3lSCDaNSSk455gbAJErIVhVMRQ61xa0SE2pRKVMYbu_kCU3yqo8RcE0t5JhAUalI3J34LbbfINlgU136jprfb2xfp85W2f_O029zBZulykttBK8A0wOgE5ECB6r4yyDrLed9bazX9vdxO3flcf8j94ucHMIrEJ0_tjnCkDCVKZfWh-IOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Vijay, Varsha ; Armsworth, Paul R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vijay, Varsha ; Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><description>Global cropland expansion over the last century caused wide-spread habitat loss and degradation. Establishment of protected areas aims to counteract the loss of habitats and to slow species extinctions. However, many protected areas also include high levels of habitat disturbance and conversion for uses such as cropland. Understanding where and why this occurs may realign conservation priorities and inform protected area policy in light of competing priorities such as food security. Here, we use our global synthesis cropland dataset to quantify cropland in protected areas globally and assess their relationship to conservation aims and socio-environmental context. We estimate that cropland occupies 1.4 million km² or 6% of global protected area. Cropland occurs across all protected area management types, with 22% occurring in strictly protected areas. Cropland inside protected areas is more prevalent in countries with higher population density, lower income inequality, and with higher agricultural suitability of protected lands. While this phenomenon is dominant inmidnorthern latitudes, areas of cropland in protected areas of the tropics and subtropics may present greater trade-offs due to higher levels of both biodiversity and food insecurity. Although area-based targets are prominent in biodiversity goal-setting, our results show that they can mask persistent anthropogenic land uses detrimental to native ecosystem conservation. To ensure the long-term efficacy of protected areas, post-2020 goal setting must link aims for biodiversity and human health and improve monitoring of conservation outcomes in cropland-impacted protected areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2010121118</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33468666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2021-01, Vol.118 (4), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-d4222eb9004b7441ff1e48b8a08439d74f79cab8a46d297a7b3e4182a61ec0973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-d4222eb9004b7441ff1e48b8a08439d74f79cab8a46d297a7b3e4182a61ec0973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27006056$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27006056$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33468666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vijay, Varsha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><title>Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><description>Global cropland expansion over the last century caused wide-spread habitat loss and degradation. Establishment of protected areas aims to counteract the loss of habitats and to slow species extinctions. However, many protected areas also include high levels of habitat disturbance and conversion for uses such as cropland. Understanding where and why this occurs may realign conservation priorities and inform protected area policy in light of competing priorities such as food security. Here, we use our global synthesis cropland dataset to quantify cropland in protected areas globally and assess their relationship to conservation aims and socio-environmental context. We estimate that cropland occupies 1.4 million km² or 6% of global protected area. Cropland occurs across all protected area management types, with 22% occurring in strictly protected areas. Cropland inside protected areas is more prevalent in countries with higher population density, lower income inequality, and with higher agricultural suitability of protected lands. While this phenomenon is dominant inmidnorthern latitudes, areas of cropland in protected areas of the tropics and subtropics may present greater trade-offs due to higher levels of both biodiversity and food insecurity. Although area-based targets are prominent in biodiversity goal-setting, our results show that they can mask persistent anthropogenic land uses detrimental to native ecosystem conservation. To ensure the long-term efficacy of protected areas, post-2020 goal setting must link aims for biodiversity and human health and improve monitoring of conservation outcomes in cropland-impacted protected areas.</description><subject>Biological Sciences</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE1LAzEQhoMotlbPnpT8gW0n2TQfF0GKX1DQg56X7O5su6XdLEla6b93l2rVQxjCvPPM8BByzWDMQKWTtrFhzIEB44wxfUKGDAxLpDBwSoYAXCVacDEgFyGsAMBMNZyTQZoKqaWUQ2Lf0O9sqHdIC-_atW1KWje09S5iEbGk1qMNdFkvluvuRRq9LTFxVRVojvETsaGFa0JPibVraA-onCtpwGLr67i_JGeVXQe8-q4j8vH48D57TuavTy-z-3lSCDaNSSk455gbAJErIVhVMRQ61xa0SE2pRKVMYbu_kCU3yqo8RcE0t5JhAUalI3J34LbbfINlgU136jprfb2xfp85W2f_O029zBZulykttBK8A0wOgE5ECB6r4yyDrLed9bazX9vdxO3flcf8j94ucHMIrEJ0_tjnCkDCVKZfWh-IOQ</recordid><startdate>20210126</startdate><enddate>20210126</enddate><creator>Vijay, Varsha</creator><creator>Armsworth, Paul R.</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210126</creationdate><title>Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security</title><author>Vijay, Varsha ; Armsworth, Paul R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-d4222eb9004b7441ff1e48b8a08439d74f79cab8a46d297a7b3e4182a61ec0973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biological Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vijay, Varsha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armsworth, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vijay, Varsha</au><au>Armsworth, Paul R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><addtitle>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A</addtitle><date>2021-01-26</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Global cropland expansion over the last century caused wide-spread habitat loss and degradation. Establishment of protected areas aims to counteract the loss of habitats and to slow species extinctions. However, many protected areas also include high levels of habitat disturbance and conversion for uses such as cropland. Understanding where and why this occurs may realign conservation priorities and inform protected area policy in light of competing priorities such as food security. Here, we use our global synthesis cropland dataset to quantify cropland in protected areas globally and assess their relationship to conservation aims and socio-environmental context. We estimate that cropland occupies 1.4 million km² or 6% of global protected area. Cropland occurs across all protected area management types, with 22% occurring in strictly protected areas. Cropland inside protected areas is more prevalent in countries with higher population density, lower income inequality, and with higher agricultural suitability of protected lands. While this phenomenon is dominant inmidnorthern latitudes, areas of cropland in protected areas of the tropics and subtropics may present greater trade-offs due to higher levels of both biodiversity and food insecurity. Although area-based targets are prominent in biodiversity goal-setting, our results show that they can mask persistent anthropogenic land uses detrimental to native ecosystem conservation. To ensure the long-term efficacy of protected areas, post-2020 goal setting must link aims for biodiversity and human health and improve monitoring of conservation outcomes in cropland-impacted protected areas.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>33468666</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.2010121118</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-8424
ispartof Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2021-01, Vol.118 (4), p.1-7
issn 0027-8424
1091-6490
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7848742
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Biological Sciences
title Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A19%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pervasive%20cropland%20in%20protected%20areas%20highlight%20trade-offs%20between%20conservation%20and%20food%20security&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Vijay,%20Varsha&rft.date=2021-01-26&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.2010121118&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E27006056%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33468666&rft_jstor_id=27006056&rfr_iscdi=true