Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve
Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obesity surgery 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.746-754 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 754 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 746 |
container_title | Obesity surgery |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Giudicelli, Guillaume Diana, Michele Chevallay, Mickael Blaser, Benjamin Darbellay, Chloé Guarino, Laetitia Jung, Minoa K. Worreth, Marc Gero, Daniel Saadi, Alend |
description | Background
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon.
Methods
All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures.
Results
The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively.
Conclusion
Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7847869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2450648165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-57063238df3d35bfab1b7c03b4199d495bf205fbc88b28da3e799e34bd0f55373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQtRCILgt_gAOyxAUOgbEdxzaHSu0KtpUiQHxJnCzHcXZTsnGwk4WKP4-XlAI9cLGlmTdv3sw8hB4SeEYAxPNISKF4BhQy4MDSewstiACZQU7lbbQAVUAmFWVH6F6MFwCUFJTeRUeMQS6pFAv0Y935ynT41PV2uzPhC_5kuslF3PiASzOY4KP1Q2vxOz99z1yffc7WJo4hRU4vBxPjC2zwWz-6fmwTz2v3DZ_3dWvNmAh8g8etw--nsEmRDpfOhL7tN3g1hb27j-40povuwdW_RB9fvfywOsvKN-vz1UmZWQ5yzLiAglEm64bVjFeNqUglLLAqJ0rVuUohCryprJQVlbVhTijlWF7V0HDOBFui45l3mKqdq22SGkynh9CmgS-1N63-N9O3W73xey1kLmShEsHTmWB7o-zspNSHGDChhGT5niTsk6tmwX9Nixz1ro3WdZ3pnZ-ipjmHIpek4An6-Ab0wk-hT6tIKJkTrgg_qKczyqZTxOCaawUE9MEHevaBTj7Qv3yQ5CzRo79Hvi75ffgEYDMgplS_ceFP7__Q_gT92b3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2484159157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Giudicelli, Guillaume ; Diana, Michele ; Chevallay, Mickael ; Blaser, Benjamin ; Darbellay, Chloé ; Guarino, Laetitia ; Jung, Minoa K. ; Worreth, Marc ; Gero, Daniel ; Saadi, Alend</creator><creatorcontrib>Giudicelli, Guillaume ; Diana, Michele ; Chevallay, Mickael ; Blaser, Benjamin ; Darbellay, Chloé ; Guarino, Laetitia ; Jung, Minoa K. ; Worreth, Marc ; Gero, Daniel ; Saadi, Alend</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon.
Methods
All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures.
Results
The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively.
Conclusion
Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33048287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Engineering Sciences ; Gastric Bypass ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Learning Curve ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morbidity ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Optics ; Original Contributions ; Photonic ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.746-754</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-57063238df3d35bfab1b7c03b4199d495bf205fbc88b28da3e799e34bd0f55373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-57063238df3d35bfab1b7c03b4199d495bf205fbc88b28da3e799e34bd0f55373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0213-9335 ; 0000-0003-2941-9801</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03797834$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giudicelli, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevallay, Mickael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaser, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darbellay, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarino, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Minoa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worreth, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gero, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadi, Alend</creatorcontrib><title>Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon.
Methods
All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures.
Results
The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively.
Conclusion
Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Learning Curve</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Photonic</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQtRCILgt_gAOyxAUOgbEdxzaHSu0KtpUiQHxJnCzHcXZTsnGwk4WKP4-XlAI9cLGlmTdv3sw8hB4SeEYAxPNISKF4BhQy4MDSewstiACZQU7lbbQAVUAmFWVH6F6MFwCUFJTeRUeMQS6pFAv0Y935ynT41PV2uzPhC_5kuslF3PiASzOY4KP1Q2vxOz99z1yffc7WJo4hRU4vBxPjC2zwWz-6fmwTz2v3DZ_3dWvNmAh8g8etw--nsEmRDpfOhL7tN3g1hb27j-40povuwdW_RB9fvfywOsvKN-vz1UmZWQ5yzLiAglEm64bVjFeNqUglLLAqJ0rVuUohCryprJQVlbVhTijlWF7V0HDOBFui45l3mKqdq22SGkynh9CmgS-1N63-N9O3W73xey1kLmShEsHTmWB7o-zspNSHGDChhGT5niTsk6tmwX9Nixz1ro3WdZ3pnZ-ipjmHIpek4An6-Ab0wk-hT6tIKJkTrgg_qKczyqZTxOCaawUE9MEHevaBTj7Qv3yQ5CzRo79Hvi75ffgEYDMgplS_ceFP7__Q_gT92b3Q</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Giudicelli, Guillaume</creator><creator>Diana, Michele</creator><creator>Chevallay, Mickael</creator><creator>Blaser, Benjamin</creator><creator>Darbellay, Chloé</creator><creator>Guarino, Laetitia</creator><creator>Jung, Minoa K.</creator><creator>Worreth, Marc</creator><creator>Gero, Daniel</creator><creator>Saadi, Alend</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-9335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-9801</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve</title><author>Giudicelli, Guillaume ; Diana, Michele ; Chevallay, Mickael ; Blaser, Benjamin ; Darbellay, Chloé ; Guarino, Laetitia ; Jung, Minoa K. ; Worreth, Marc ; Gero, Daniel ; Saadi, Alend</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-57063238df3d35bfab1b7c03b4199d495bf205fbc88b28da3e799e34bd0f55373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Learning Curve</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Photonic</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giudicelli, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevallay, Mickael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaser, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darbellay, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarino, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Minoa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worreth, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gero, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadi, Alend</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giudicelli, Guillaume</au><au>Diana, Michele</au><au>Chevallay, Mickael</au><au>Blaser, Benjamin</au><au>Darbellay, Chloé</au><au>Guarino, Laetitia</au><au>Jung, Minoa K.</au><au>Worreth, Marc</au><au>Gero, Daniel</au><au>Saadi, Alend</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>746</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>746-754</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Background
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon.
Methods
All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures.
Results
The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively.
Conclusion
Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33048287</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-9335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-9801</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8923 |
ispartof | Obesity surgery, 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.746-754 |
issn | 0960-8923 1708-0428 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7847869 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Benchmarking Engineering Sciences Gastric Bypass Gastrointestinal surgery Humans Laparoscopy Learning Curve Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morbidity Obesity, Morbid - surgery Optics Original Contributions Photonic Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Benchmark%20Values%20for%20Laparoscopic%20Roux-en-Y-Gastric%20Bypass:%20a%20Potential%20New%20Indicator%20of%20the%20Surgical%20Learning%20Curve&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Giudicelli,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=746&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=746-754&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2450648165%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2484159157&rft_id=info:pmid/33048287&rfr_iscdi=true |