Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve

Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a pe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity surgery 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.746-754
Hauptverfasser: Giudicelli, Guillaume, Diana, Michele, Chevallay, Mickael, Blaser, Benjamin, Darbellay, Chloé, Guarino, Laetitia, Jung, Minoa K., Worreth, Marc, Gero, Daniel, Saadi, Alend
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 754
container_issue 2
container_start_page 746
container_title Obesity surgery
container_volume 31
creator Giudicelli, Guillaume
Diana, Michele
Chevallay, Mickael
Blaser, Benjamin
Darbellay, Chloé
Guarino, Laetitia
Jung, Minoa K.
Worreth, Marc
Gero, Daniel
Saadi, Alend
description Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures. Results The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively. Conclusion Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7847869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2450648165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-57063238df3d35bfab1b7c03b4199d495bf205fbc88b28da3e799e34bd0f55373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQtRCILgt_gAOyxAUOgbEdxzaHSu0KtpUiQHxJnCzHcXZTsnGwk4WKP4-XlAI9cLGlmTdv3sw8hB4SeEYAxPNISKF4BhQy4MDSewstiACZQU7lbbQAVUAmFWVH6F6MFwCUFJTeRUeMQS6pFAv0Y935ynT41PV2uzPhC_5kuslF3PiASzOY4KP1Q2vxOz99z1yffc7WJo4hRU4vBxPjC2zwWz-6fmwTz2v3DZ_3dWvNmAh8g8etw--nsEmRDpfOhL7tN3g1hb27j-40povuwdW_RB9fvfywOsvKN-vz1UmZWQ5yzLiAglEm64bVjFeNqUglLLAqJ0rVuUohCryprJQVlbVhTijlWF7V0HDOBFui45l3mKqdq22SGkynh9CmgS-1N63-N9O3W73xey1kLmShEsHTmWB7o-zspNSHGDChhGT5niTsk6tmwX9Nixz1ro3WdZ3pnZ-ipjmHIpek4An6-Ab0wk-hT6tIKJkTrgg_qKczyqZTxOCaawUE9MEHevaBTj7Qv3yQ5CzRo79Hvi75ffgEYDMgplS_ceFP7__Q_gT92b3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2484159157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Giudicelli, Guillaume ; Diana, Michele ; Chevallay, Mickael ; Blaser, Benjamin ; Darbellay, Chloé ; Guarino, Laetitia ; Jung, Minoa K. ; Worreth, Marc ; Gero, Daniel ; Saadi, Alend</creator><creatorcontrib>Giudicelli, Guillaume ; Diana, Michele ; Chevallay, Mickael ; Blaser, Benjamin ; Darbellay, Chloé ; Guarino, Laetitia ; Jung, Minoa K. ; Worreth, Marc ; Gero, Daniel ; Saadi, Alend</creatorcontrib><description>Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures. Results The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively. Conclusion Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33048287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Engineering Sciences ; Gastric Bypass ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Learning Curve ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Morbidity ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Optics ; Original Contributions ; Photonic ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.746-754</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-57063238df3d35bfab1b7c03b4199d495bf205fbc88b28da3e799e34bd0f55373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-57063238df3d35bfab1b7c03b4199d495bf205fbc88b28da3e799e34bd0f55373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0213-9335 ; 0000-0003-2941-9801</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33048287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03797834$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giudicelli, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevallay, Mickael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaser, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darbellay, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarino, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Minoa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worreth, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gero, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadi, Alend</creatorcontrib><title>Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures. Results The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively. Conclusion Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Gastric Bypass</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Learning Curve</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original Contributions</subject><subject>Photonic</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAQtRCILgt_gAOyxAUOgbEdxzaHSu0KtpUiQHxJnCzHcXZTsnGwk4WKP4-XlAI9cLGlmTdv3sw8hB4SeEYAxPNISKF4BhQy4MDSewstiACZQU7lbbQAVUAmFWVH6F6MFwCUFJTeRUeMQS6pFAv0Y935ynT41PV2uzPhC_5kuslF3PiASzOY4KP1Q2vxOz99z1yffc7WJo4hRU4vBxPjC2zwWz-6fmwTz2v3DZ_3dWvNmAh8g8etw--nsEmRDpfOhL7tN3g1hb27j-40povuwdW_RB9fvfywOsvKN-vz1UmZWQ5yzLiAglEm64bVjFeNqUglLLAqJ0rVuUohCryprJQVlbVhTijlWF7V0HDOBFui45l3mKqdq22SGkynh9CmgS-1N63-N9O3W73xey1kLmShEsHTmWB7o-zspNSHGDChhGT5niTsk6tmwX9Nixz1ro3WdZ3pnZ-ipjmHIpek4An6-Ab0wk-hT6tIKJkTrgg_qKczyqZTxOCaawUE9MEHevaBTj7Qv3yQ5CzRo79Hvi75ffgEYDMgplS_ceFP7__Q_gT92b3Q</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Giudicelli, Guillaume</creator><creator>Diana, Michele</creator><creator>Chevallay, Mickael</creator><creator>Blaser, Benjamin</creator><creator>Darbellay, Chloé</creator><creator>Guarino, Laetitia</creator><creator>Jung, Minoa K.</creator><creator>Worreth, Marc</creator><creator>Gero, Daniel</creator><creator>Saadi, Alend</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-9335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-9801</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve</title><author>Giudicelli, Guillaume ; Diana, Michele ; Chevallay, Mickael ; Blaser, Benjamin ; Darbellay, Chloé ; Guarino, Laetitia ; Jung, Minoa K. ; Worreth, Marc ; Gero, Daniel ; Saadi, Alend</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-57063238df3d35bfab1b7c03b4199d495bf205fbc88b28da3e799e34bd0f55373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Gastric Bypass</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Learning Curve</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original Contributions</topic><topic>Photonic</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giudicelli, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevallay, Mickael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaser, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darbellay, Chloé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarino, Laetitia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Minoa K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worreth, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gero, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saadi, Alend</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giudicelli, Guillaume</au><au>Diana, Michele</au><au>Chevallay, Mickael</au><au>Blaser, Benjamin</au><au>Darbellay, Chloé</au><au>Guarino, Laetitia</au><au>Jung, Minoa K.</au><au>Worreth, Marc</au><au>Gero, Daniel</au><au>Saadi, Alend</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>746</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>746-754</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Background Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a technically demanding procedure. The learning curve of LRYGB is challenging and potentially associated with increased morbidity. This study evaluates whether a general laparoscopic surgeon can be safely trained in performing LRYGB in a peripheral setting, by comparing perioperative outcomes to global benchmarks and to those of a senior surgeon. Methods All consecutive patients undergoing primary LRYGB between January 2014 and December 2017 were operated on by a senior (A) or a trainee (B) bariatric surgeon and were prospectively included. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity at 90 days. Perioperative outcomes were compared with global benchmarks pooled from 19 international high-volume centers and between surgeons A and B for their first and last 30 procedures. Results The 213 included patients had a mean all-cause morbidity rate at 90 days of 8% (17/213). 95.3% (203/213) of the patients were uneventfully discharged after surgery. Perioperative outcomes of surgeon B were all within the global benchmark cutoffs. Mean operative time for the first 30 procedures was significantly shorter for surgeon A compared with surgeon B, with 108.6 min (± 21.7) and 135.1 min (± 28.1) respectively and decreased significantly for the last 30 procedures to 95 min (± 33.7) and 88.8 min (± 26.9) for surgeons A and B respectively. Conclusion Training of a new bariatric surgeon did not increase morbidity and operative time improved for both surgeons. Perioperative outcomes within global benchmarks suggest that it may be safe to teach bariatric surgery in peripheral setting.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33048287</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-9335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-9801</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8923
ispartof Obesity surgery, 2021-02, Vol.31 (2), p.746-754
issn 0960-8923
1708-0428
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7847869
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Benchmarking
Engineering Sciences
Gastric Bypass
Gastrointestinal surgery
Humans
Laparoscopy
Learning Curve
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Morbidity
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Optics
Original Contributions
Photonic
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Global Benchmark Values for Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-Gastric Bypass: a Potential New Indicator of the Surgical Learning Curve
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Benchmark%20Values%20for%20Laparoscopic%20Roux-en-Y-Gastric%20Bypass:%20a%20Potential%20New%20Indicator%20of%20the%20Surgical%20Learning%20Curve&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Giudicelli,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=746&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=746-754&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2450648165%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2484159157&rft_id=info:pmid/33048287&rfr_iscdi=true