Midwives' views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature
There are many mobile telephone apps to help women self-monitor aspects of pregnancy and maternal health. This literature review aims to understand midwives' perspectives on women self-monitoring their pregnancy using eHealth and mHealth, and establish gaps in research. MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of midwifery 2020, Vol.4 (September), p.36-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | September |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | European journal of midwifery |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Vickery, Michelle van Teijlingen, Edwin Hundley, Vanora Smith, Gary B Way, Susan Westwood, Greta |
description | There are many mobile telephone apps to help women self-monitor aspects of pregnancy and maternal health. This literature review aims to understand midwives' perspectives on women self-monitoring their pregnancy using eHealth and mHealth, and establish gaps in research.
MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched on midwifery, eHealth/mHealth and perspectives. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published in English were considered for inclusion in the review, without geographical limitations. Relevant articles were critically appraised and narrative synthesis was conducted.
Twelve relevant papers covering midwives' perspectives of the use of eHealth and mHealth by pregnant women were obtained for inclusion in this review. Seven of these publications focused on midwives' views of eHealth, and five on their perspectives of mHealth interventions. The studies included demonstrate that midwives generally hold ambivalent views towards the use of eHealth and mHealth technologies in antenatal care. Often, midwives acknowledged the potential benefits of such technologies, such as their ability to modernise antenatal care and to help women make more informed decisions about their pregnancy. However, midwives were quick to point out the risks and limitations of these, such as the accuracy of conveyed information, and negative impacts on the patient-professional relationship.
Post-COVID-19, where technology is continuously developing, there is a compelling need for studies that investigate the role of eHealth and mHealth in self-monitoring pregnancy, and the consequences this has for pregnant women, health professionals and organisations, as well as midwifery curricula. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18332/ejm/126625 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7839093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486467788</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-817f853b38fc3cf45a6792e652b8ae6075990ab539e06ab6b34f6365fe36a5fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUFrGzEQRkVpiEOSU-5FtxbCJlqNpdX2UAihrQMOubRnoV2PbIVdyZW0Nr70t3cTu8E56QO9eTPwEXJVsptSAfBbfO5vSy4lFx_IGRdKFLxm8uNRnpDLlJ4ZY5yXUEl1SiYAYkxQnZG_j26xdRtMn-nG4TbRHLYmLhLdhh49HZLzS9rP0HR5RY1fUDzkHGjCzhZ98C6HSPMKXaTriEtvfLv7Su9o2qWMvcmupRFf7DTYF452LmM0eYh4QU6s6RJeHt5z8vvH91_3s2L-9PPh_m5etKDKXKiyskpAA8q20NqpMLKqOUrBG2VQskrUNTONgBqZNI1sYGolSGERpBHjzDn5tveuh6bHRYs-R9PpdXS9iTsdjNPvf7xb6WXY6EpBzWoYBV8Oghj-DJiy7l1qseuMxzAkzadKTmVVKTWi13u0jSGliPZtTcn0a2l6LE3vSxvpT8eXvbH_K4J_tieVig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486467788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Midwives' views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Vickery, Michelle ; van Teijlingen, Edwin ; Hundley, Vanora ; Smith, Gary B ; Way, Susan ; Westwood, Greta</creator><creatorcontrib>Vickery, Michelle ; van Teijlingen, Edwin ; Hundley, Vanora ; Smith, Gary B ; Way, Susan ; Westwood, Greta</creatorcontrib><description>There are many mobile telephone apps to help women self-monitor aspects of pregnancy and maternal health. This literature review aims to understand midwives' perspectives on women self-monitoring their pregnancy using eHealth and mHealth, and establish gaps in research.
MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched on midwifery, eHealth/mHealth and perspectives. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published in English were considered for inclusion in the review, without geographical limitations. Relevant articles were critically appraised and narrative synthesis was conducted.
Twelve relevant papers covering midwives' perspectives of the use of eHealth and mHealth by pregnant women were obtained for inclusion in this review. Seven of these publications focused on midwives' views of eHealth, and five on their perspectives of mHealth interventions. The studies included demonstrate that midwives generally hold ambivalent views towards the use of eHealth and mHealth technologies in antenatal care. Often, midwives acknowledged the potential benefits of such technologies, such as their ability to modernise antenatal care and to help women make more informed decisions about their pregnancy. However, midwives were quick to point out the risks and limitations of these, such as the accuracy of conveyed information, and negative impacts on the patient-professional relationship.
Post-COVID-19, where technology is continuously developing, there is a compelling need for studies that investigate the role of eHealth and mHealth in self-monitoring pregnancy, and the consequences this has for pregnant women, health professionals and organisations, as well as midwifery curricula.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2585-2906</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2585-2906</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18332/ejm/126625</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33537637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>European Publishing</publisher><subject>Review Paper</subject><ispartof>European journal of midwifery, 2020, Vol.4 (September), p.36-11</ispartof><rights>2020 Cutajar L. et al.</rights><rights>2020 Cutajar L. et al. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-817f853b38fc3cf45a6792e652b8ae6075990ab539e06ab6b34f6365fe36a5fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-817f853b38fc3cf45a6792e652b8ae6075990ab539e06ab6b34f6365fe36a5fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5523-8583 ; 0000-0003-3578-4135 ; 0000-0001-8606-7991 ; 0000-0003-2070-8455</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839093/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7839093/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4014,27914,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vickery, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Teijlingen, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hundley, Vanora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gary B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Way, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Greta</creatorcontrib><title>Midwives' views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature</title><title>European journal of midwifery</title><addtitle>Eur J Midwifery</addtitle><description>There are many mobile telephone apps to help women self-monitor aspects of pregnancy and maternal health. This literature review aims to understand midwives' perspectives on women self-monitoring their pregnancy using eHealth and mHealth, and establish gaps in research.
MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched on midwifery, eHealth/mHealth and perspectives. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published in English were considered for inclusion in the review, without geographical limitations. Relevant articles were critically appraised and narrative synthesis was conducted.
Twelve relevant papers covering midwives' perspectives of the use of eHealth and mHealth by pregnant women were obtained for inclusion in this review. Seven of these publications focused on midwives' views of eHealth, and five on their perspectives of mHealth interventions. The studies included demonstrate that midwives generally hold ambivalent views towards the use of eHealth and mHealth technologies in antenatal care. Often, midwives acknowledged the potential benefits of such technologies, such as their ability to modernise antenatal care and to help women make more informed decisions about their pregnancy. However, midwives were quick to point out the risks and limitations of these, such as the accuracy of conveyed information, and negative impacts on the patient-professional relationship.
Post-COVID-19, where technology is continuously developing, there is a compelling need for studies that investigate the role of eHealth and mHealth in self-monitoring pregnancy, and the consequences this has for pregnant women, health professionals and organisations, as well as midwifery curricula.</description><subject>Review Paper</subject><issn>2585-2906</issn><issn>2585-2906</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUFrGzEQRkVpiEOSU-5FtxbCJlqNpdX2UAihrQMOubRnoV2PbIVdyZW0Nr70t3cTu8E56QO9eTPwEXJVsptSAfBbfO5vSy4lFx_IGRdKFLxm8uNRnpDLlJ4ZY5yXUEl1SiYAYkxQnZG_j26xdRtMn-nG4TbRHLYmLhLdhh49HZLzS9rP0HR5RY1fUDzkHGjCzhZ98C6HSPMKXaTriEtvfLv7Su9o2qWMvcmupRFf7DTYF452LmM0eYh4QU6s6RJeHt5z8vvH91_3s2L-9PPh_m5etKDKXKiyskpAA8q20NqpMLKqOUrBG2VQskrUNTONgBqZNI1sYGolSGERpBHjzDn5tveuh6bHRYs-R9PpdXS9iTsdjNPvf7xb6WXY6EpBzWoYBV8Oghj-DJiy7l1qseuMxzAkzadKTmVVKTWi13u0jSGliPZtTcn0a2l6LE3vSxvpT8eXvbH_K4J_tieVig</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Vickery, Michelle</creator><creator>van Teijlingen, Edwin</creator><creator>Hundley, Vanora</creator><creator>Smith, Gary B</creator><creator>Way, Susan</creator><creator>Westwood, Greta</creator><general>European Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-8583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-4135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-7991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-8455</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Midwives' views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature</title><author>Vickery, Michelle ; van Teijlingen, Edwin ; Hundley, Vanora ; Smith, Gary B ; Way, Susan ; Westwood, Greta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-817f853b38fc3cf45a6792e652b8ae6075990ab539e06ab6b34f6365fe36a5fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Review Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vickery, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Teijlingen, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hundley, Vanora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gary B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Way, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westwood, Greta</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>European journal of midwifery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vickery, Michelle</au><au>van Teijlingen, Edwin</au><au>Hundley, Vanora</au><au>Smith, Gary B</au><au>Way, Susan</au><au>Westwood, Greta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Midwives' views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>European journal of midwifery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Midwifery</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>September</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>36-11</pages><issn>2585-2906</issn><eissn>2585-2906</eissn><abstract>There are many mobile telephone apps to help women self-monitor aspects of pregnancy and maternal health. This literature review aims to understand midwives' perspectives on women self-monitoring their pregnancy using eHealth and mHealth, and establish gaps in research.
MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO were systematically searched on midwifery, eHealth/mHealth and perspectives. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies published in English were considered for inclusion in the review, without geographical limitations. Relevant articles were critically appraised and narrative synthesis was conducted.
Twelve relevant papers covering midwives' perspectives of the use of eHealth and mHealth by pregnant women were obtained for inclusion in this review. Seven of these publications focused on midwives' views of eHealth, and five on their perspectives of mHealth interventions. The studies included demonstrate that midwives generally hold ambivalent views towards the use of eHealth and mHealth technologies in antenatal care. Often, midwives acknowledged the potential benefits of such technologies, such as their ability to modernise antenatal care and to help women make more informed decisions about their pregnancy. However, midwives were quick to point out the risks and limitations of these, such as the accuracy of conveyed information, and negative impacts on the patient-professional relationship.
Post-COVID-19, where technology is continuously developing, there is a compelling need for studies that investigate the role of eHealth and mHealth in self-monitoring pregnancy, and the consequences this has for pregnant women, health professionals and organisations, as well as midwifery curricula.</abstract><pub>European Publishing</pub><pmid>33537637</pmid><doi>10.18332/ejm/126625</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5523-8583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-4135</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-7991</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-8455</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2585-2906 |
ispartof | European journal of midwifery, 2020, Vol.4 (September), p.36-11 |
issn | 2585-2906 2585-2906 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7839093 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Review Paper |
title | Midwives' views towards women using mHealth and eHealth to self-monitor their pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T07%3A32%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Midwives'%20views%20towards%20women%20using%20mHealth%20and%20eHealth%20to%20self-monitor%20their%20pregnancy:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20midwifery&rft.au=Vickery,%20Michelle&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=September&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=36-11&rft.issn=2585-2906&rft.eissn=2585-2906&rft_id=info:doi/10.18332/ejm/126625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2486467788%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486467788&rft_id=info:pmid/33537637&rfr_iscdi=true |