Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests

•The sensitivity of commercial SARS CoV-2 IgG antibody tests was 64.4–93.2 %.•Positivity rate was higher with sera obtained 4 weeks than 2−3 weeks after RNA testing.•Antibody tests based on nucleoprotein and glycoprotein showed similar sensitivity.•Nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based antibody test...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical virology 2020-08, Vol.129, p.104544-104544, Article 104544
Hauptverfasser: Schnurra, Carolin, Reiners, Nina, Biemann, Ronald, Kaiser, Thorsten, Trawinski, Henning, Jassoy, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104544
container_issue
container_start_page 104544
container_title Journal of clinical virology
container_volume 129
creator Schnurra, Carolin
Reiners, Nina
Biemann, Ronald
Kaiser, Thorsten
Trawinski, Henning
Jassoy, Christian
description •The sensitivity of commercial SARS CoV-2 IgG antibody tests was 64.4–93.2 %.•Positivity rate was higher with sera obtained 4 weeks than 2−3 weeks after RNA testing.•Antibody tests based on nucleoprotein and glycoprotein showed similar sensitivity.•Nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based antibody tests reacted with different sera. The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has been followed by the rapid development of antibody tests. To assess the utility of the tests for clinical use and seroepidemiologic studies, we examined the sensitivity of commercial antibody tests from Roche, Abbott, Novatec, Virotech Siemens, Euroimmun, and Mediagnost in a prospective diagnostic study. The tests were evaluated with 73 sera from SARS CoV-2 RNA positive individuals with mild to moderate disease or asymptomatic infection. Sera were obtained at 2−3 weeks (N = 25) or > 4 weeks (N = 48) after symptom onset and viral RNA test. The overall sensitivity of the tests ranged from 64.4–93.2%. The most sensitive assays recognized 95.8–100 % of the sera obtained after 4 weeks or later. Sera drawn at 2−3 weeks were recognized with lower sensitivity indicating that the optimal time point for serologic testing is later than 3 weeks after onset of the disease. Nucleoprotein- and glycoproteinbased assays had similar sensitivity indicating that tests with both antigens are suitable for serological diagnostics. Breakdown of the test results showed that nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests of comparable sensitivity reacted with different sets of sera. The observation indicates that a combination of nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests would increase the percentage of positive results.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104544
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7836838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1386653220302869</els_id><sourcerecordid>2424101845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-93a5298d0e9993127c5a61590ca86a5c62466853c05f02ddc32b40a90840c0b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVpab76A3IJe-xlXX2vlkAgmDYtBAr56FVopbGjZS05kmzwv6-Mk5BeehrNzDuvhnkQOid4RjCR38bZaLcziuk-54LzD-iYqI61opfdx_pmSrZSMHqETnIeMSaC8e4zOmJUStYpdYzGeVytTfI5hiYumvIEjfNmGWIu3jYZQvbFb33Z7bv313f37Tz-aWkTNnaCuE6xgA-NCa5ZTjv7WmgHk8HVcvFDdLumQC75DH1amCnDl5d4ih5_fH-Y_2xvf9_8ml_ftlaQrrQ9M4L2ymHo-54R2llhJBE9tkZJI6ykXEolmMVigalzltGBY9NjxbHFQ8dO0dXBd70ZVuAshJLMpNfJr0za6Wi8_rcT_JNexq3uFJOKqWrw9cUgxedNXV2vfLYwTSZA3GRNOeX1_oqLKiUHqU0x5wSLt28I1ntGetSVkd4z0gdGdebi_X5vE69QquDyIIB6pa2HpLP1ECw4n8AW7aL_j_1f842jRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424101845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schnurra, Carolin ; Reiners, Nina ; Biemann, Ronald ; Kaiser, Thorsten ; Trawinski, Henning ; Jassoy, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Schnurra, Carolin ; Reiners, Nina ; Biemann, Ronald ; Kaiser, Thorsten ; Trawinski, Henning ; Jassoy, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>•The sensitivity of commercial SARS CoV-2 IgG antibody tests was 64.4–93.2 %.•Positivity rate was higher with sera obtained 4 weeks than 2−3 weeks after RNA testing.•Antibody tests based on nucleoprotein and glycoprotein showed similar sensitivity.•Nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based antibody tests reacted with different sera. The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has been followed by the rapid development of antibody tests. To assess the utility of the tests for clinical use and seroepidemiologic studies, we examined the sensitivity of commercial antibody tests from Roche, Abbott, Novatec, Virotech Siemens, Euroimmun, and Mediagnost in a prospective diagnostic study. The tests were evaluated with 73 sera from SARS CoV-2 RNA positive individuals with mild to moderate disease or asymptomatic infection. Sera were obtained at 2−3 weeks (N = 25) or &gt; 4 weeks (N = 48) after symptom onset and viral RNA test. The overall sensitivity of the tests ranged from 64.4–93.2%. The most sensitive assays recognized 95.8–100 % of the sera obtained after 4 weeks or later. Sera drawn at 2−3 weeks were recognized with lower sensitivity indicating that the optimal time point for serologic testing is later than 3 weeks after onset of the disease. Nucleoprotein- and glycoproteinbased assays had similar sensitivity indicating that tests with both antigens are suitable for serological diagnostics. Breakdown of the test results showed that nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests of comparable sensitivity reacted with different sets of sera. The observation indicates that a combination of nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests would increase the percentage of positive results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6532</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104544</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32663788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Antibody test ; Antigens, Viral - immunology ; Betacoronavirus - immunology ; Betacoronavirus - isolation &amp; purification ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods ; Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 Testing ; Glycoprotein ; Glycoproteins - immunology ; Humans ; Nucleoprotein ; Nucleoproteins - immunology ; Pandemics ; Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis ; Prospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Serologic Tests - methods ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 ; Time Factors ; Viral Structural Proteins - immunology</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical virology, 2020-08, Vol.129, p.104544-104544, Article 104544</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-93a5298d0e9993127c5a61590ca86a5c62466853c05f02ddc32b40a90840c0b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-93a5298d0e9993127c5a61590ca86a5c62466853c05f02ddc32b40a90840c0b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0820-8231</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653220302869$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schnurra, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiners, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biemann, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trawinski, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jassoy, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests</title><title>Journal of clinical virology</title><addtitle>J Clin Virol</addtitle><description>•The sensitivity of commercial SARS CoV-2 IgG antibody tests was 64.4–93.2 %.•Positivity rate was higher with sera obtained 4 weeks than 2−3 weeks after RNA testing.•Antibody tests based on nucleoprotein and glycoprotein showed similar sensitivity.•Nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based antibody tests reacted with different sera. The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has been followed by the rapid development of antibody tests. To assess the utility of the tests for clinical use and seroepidemiologic studies, we examined the sensitivity of commercial antibody tests from Roche, Abbott, Novatec, Virotech Siemens, Euroimmun, and Mediagnost in a prospective diagnostic study. The tests were evaluated with 73 sera from SARS CoV-2 RNA positive individuals with mild to moderate disease or asymptomatic infection. Sera were obtained at 2−3 weeks (N = 25) or &gt; 4 weeks (N = 48) after symptom onset and viral RNA test. The overall sensitivity of the tests ranged from 64.4–93.2%. The most sensitive assays recognized 95.8–100 % of the sera obtained after 4 weeks or later. Sera drawn at 2−3 weeks were recognized with lower sensitivity indicating that the optimal time point for serologic testing is later than 3 weeks after onset of the disease. Nucleoprotein- and glycoproteinbased assays had similar sensitivity indicating that tests with both antigens are suitable for serological diagnostics. Breakdown of the test results showed that nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests of comparable sensitivity reacted with different sets of sera. The observation indicates that a combination of nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests would increase the percentage of positive results.</description><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Antibody test</subject><subject>Antigens, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus - immunology</subject><subject>Betacoronavirus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing</subject><subject>Glycoprotein</subject><subject>Glycoproteins - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nucleoprotein</subject><subject>Nucleoproteins - immunology</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Serologic Tests - methods</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Viral Structural Proteins - immunology</subject><issn>1386-6532</issn><issn>1873-5967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVpab76A3IJe-xlXX2vlkAgmDYtBAr56FVopbGjZS05kmzwv6-Mk5BeehrNzDuvhnkQOid4RjCR38bZaLcziuk-54LzD-iYqI61opfdx_pmSrZSMHqETnIeMSaC8e4zOmJUStYpdYzGeVytTfI5hiYumvIEjfNmGWIu3jYZQvbFb33Z7bv313f37Tz-aWkTNnaCuE6xgA-NCa5ZTjv7WmgHk8HVcvFDdLumQC75DH1amCnDl5d4ih5_fH-Y_2xvf9_8ml_ftlaQrrQ9M4L2ymHo-54R2llhJBE9tkZJI6ykXEolmMVigalzltGBY9NjxbHFQ8dO0dXBd70ZVuAshJLMpNfJr0za6Wi8_rcT_JNexq3uFJOKqWrw9cUgxedNXV2vfLYwTSZA3GRNOeX1_oqLKiUHqU0x5wSLt28I1ntGetSVkd4z0gdGdebi_X5vE69QquDyIIB6pa2HpLP1ECw4n8AW7aL_j_1f842jRg</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Schnurra, Carolin</creator><creator>Reiners, Nina</creator><creator>Biemann, Ronald</creator><creator>Kaiser, Thorsten</creator><creator>Trawinski, Henning</creator><creator>Jassoy, Christian</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0820-8231</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests</title><author>Schnurra, Carolin ; Reiners, Nina ; Biemann, Ronald ; Kaiser, Thorsten ; Trawinski, Henning ; Jassoy, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-93a5298d0e9993127c5a61590ca86a5c62466853c05f02ddc32b40a90840c0b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Antibody test</topic><topic>Antigens, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus - immunology</topic><topic>Betacoronavirus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing</topic><topic>Glycoprotein</topic><topic>Glycoproteins - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nucleoprotein</topic><topic>Nucleoproteins - immunology</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Serologic Tests - methods</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Viral Structural Proteins - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schnurra, Carolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiners, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biemann, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trawinski, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jassoy, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schnurra, Carolin</au><au>Reiners, Nina</au><au>Biemann, Ronald</au><au>Kaiser, Thorsten</au><au>Trawinski, Henning</au><au>Jassoy, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical virology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Virol</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>129</volume><spage>104544</spage><epage>104544</epage><pages>104544-104544</pages><artnum>104544</artnum><issn>1386-6532</issn><eissn>1873-5967</eissn><abstract>•The sensitivity of commercial SARS CoV-2 IgG antibody tests was 64.4–93.2 %.•Positivity rate was higher with sera obtained 4 weeks than 2−3 weeks after RNA testing.•Antibody tests based on nucleoprotein and glycoprotein showed similar sensitivity.•Nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based antibody tests reacted with different sera. The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2) has been followed by the rapid development of antibody tests. To assess the utility of the tests for clinical use and seroepidemiologic studies, we examined the sensitivity of commercial antibody tests from Roche, Abbott, Novatec, Virotech Siemens, Euroimmun, and Mediagnost in a prospective diagnostic study. The tests were evaluated with 73 sera from SARS CoV-2 RNA positive individuals with mild to moderate disease or asymptomatic infection. Sera were obtained at 2−3 weeks (N = 25) or &gt; 4 weeks (N = 48) after symptom onset and viral RNA test. The overall sensitivity of the tests ranged from 64.4–93.2%. The most sensitive assays recognized 95.8–100 % of the sera obtained after 4 weeks or later. Sera drawn at 2−3 weeks were recognized with lower sensitivity indicating that the optimal time point for serologic testing is later than 3 weeks after onset of the disease. Nucleoprotein- and glycoproteinbased assays had similar sensitivity indicating that tests with both antigens are suitable for serological diagnostics. Breakdown of the test results showed that nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests of comparable sensitivity reacted with different sets of sera. The observation indicates that a combination of nucleoprotein- and glycoprotein-based tests would increase the percentage of positive results.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32663788</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104544</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0820-8231</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-6532
ispartof Journal of clinical virology, 2020-08, Vol.129, p.104544-104544, Article 104544
issn 1386-6532
1873-5967
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7836838
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Antibodies, Viral - blood
Antibody test
Antigens, Viral - immunology
Betacoronavirus - immunology
Betacoronavirus - isolation & purification
Clinical Laboratory Techniques - methods
Coronavirus Infections - diagnosis
COVID-19
COVID-19 Testing
Glycoprotein
Glycoproteins - immunology
Humans
Nucleoprotein
Nucleoproteins - immunology
Pandemics
Pneumonia, Viral - diagnosis
Prospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Serologic Tests - methods
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2
Time Factors
Viral Structural Proteins - immunology
title Comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and glycoprotein-based antibody tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20diagnostic%20sensitivity%20of%20SARS-CoV-2%20nucleoprotein%20and%20glycoprotein-based%20antibody%20tests&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20virology&rft.au=Schnurra,%20Carolin&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=129&rft.spage=104544&rft.epage=104544&rft.pages=104544-104544&rft.artnum=104544&rft.issn=1386-6532&rft.eissn=1873-5967&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104544&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2424101845%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424101845&rft_id=info:pmid/32663788&rft_els_id=S1386653220302869&rfr_iscdi=true