Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVEThe aim of the current study was to explore the hypothesis that earlier administration of acute gabapentoids is beneficial to motor recovery after spinal cord injury in humans. METHODSThis is an observational study using a cohort from the European Multi-Centre Study about Spinal Cord Injury...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurology 2020-12, Vol.95 (24), p.e3412-e3419
Hauptverfasser: Warner, Freda M., Cragg, Jacquelyn J., Jutzeler, Catherine R., Grassner, Lukas, Mach, Orpheus, Maier, Doris D., Mach, Benedikt, Schwab, Jan M., Kopp, Marcel A., Kramer, John L.K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e3419
container_issue 24
container_start_page e3412
container_title Neurology
container_volume 95
creator Warner, Freda M.
Cragg, Jacquelyn J.
Jutzeler, Catherine R.
Grassner, Lukas
Mach, Orpheus
Maier, Doris D.
Mach, Benedikt
Schwab, Jan M.
Kopp, Marcel A.
Kramer, John L.K.
description OBJECTIVEThe aim of the current study was to explore the hypothesis that earlier administration of acute gabapentoids is beneficial to motor recovery after spinal cord injury in humans. METHODSThis is an observational study using a cohort from the European Multi-Centre Study about Spinal Cord Injury. Patient charts were reviewed to extract information regarding the administration and timing of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants. The primary outcome measure was motor scores, as measured by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, collected longitudinally in the first year after injury. Sensory scores (light touch and pin prick) and functional measures (Spinal Cord Independence Measure) were secondary outcomes. Linear mixed effects regression models included a drug-by-time interaction to determine if exposure to gabapentinoids altered recovery of muscle strength in the first year post injury. RESULTSA total of 201 participants were included in the study and had a median age of 46, and baseline motor score of 50. Participants were mostly males (85%) with sensory and motor complete injuries (50%). Seventy individuals (35%) were administered gabapentinoids within the first 30 days after injury, and presented with similar demographics. In the longitudinal model, the administration of gabapentinoids within 30 days after injury was associated with improved motor recovery when compared to those who did not receive gabapentinoids during this time (3.69 additional motor points from 4 to 48 weeks after injury, p = 0.03). This effect size increased as administration occurred earlier after injury (i.e., a benefit of 4.68 points when administered within 5 days). CONCLUSIONSThis retrospective, observational study has provided evidence of the beneficial effect of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants on motor recovery after spinal cord injury. More critically, it has highlighted a potential time-dependence, suggesting earlier intervention is associated with better outcomes. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class IV evidence that gabapentinoids improve motor recovery for individuals with acute spinal cord injury.
doi_str_mv 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010950
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7836656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447312427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5020-af89dd81e9d6c5b330cf4f231e1dd1f2b69ba32a79a6ec1cbc80e5eee0a42dbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtP4zAUha0RCArDP0DISzYBPxLH2SAhxEuqYDMjZmc59k1rSOJiJ1T997gqMMwswJtr-X7n-OoehA4pOaGMstOHu-kJ-XsoqQryA01owUQmOPuzhSaEMJlxWcpdtBfjY4IKVlY7aJezSlaU0Al6OI_RG6cH53vsGzy4zvWz9W2ma72AfnC9dxaPEfDSDXPc-cEHHMD4FwgrrJsBAo4L1-sWGx8sdv3jGFY_0Xaj2wgHb3Uf_b66_HVxk03vr28vzqeZKQgjmW5kZa2kUFlhippzYpq8YZwCtZY2rBZVrTnTZaUFGGpqIwkUAEB0zmwNfB-dbXwXY92BNWngoFu1CK7TYaW8durfTu_mauZfVCm5EIVIBsdvBsE_jxAH1blooG11D36MiuV5ySnLWZnQfIOa4GMM0Hx8Q4laZ6JSJur_TJLs6POIH6L3EBIgN8DSt2mb8akdlxDUHHQ7zL_zzr-QrjlBaZ6xtOtkUpAsvXDCXwGE0auc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2447312427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Warner, Freda M. ; Cragg, Jacquelyn J. ; Jutzeler, Catherine R. ; Grassner, Lukas ; Mach, Orpheus ; Maier, Doris D. ; Mach, Benedikt ; Schwab, Jan M. ; Kopp, Marcel A. ; Kramer, John L.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Warner, Freda M. ; Cragg, Jacquelyn J. ; Jutzeler, Catherine R. ; Grassner, Lukas ; Mach, Orpheus ; Maier, Doris D. ; Mach, Benedikt ; Schwab, Jan M. ; Kopp, Marcel A. ; Kramer, John L.K.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVEThe aim of the current study was to explore the hypothesis that earlier administration of acute gabapentoids is beneficial to motor recovery after spinal cord injury in humans. METHODSThis is an observational study using a cohort from the European Multi-Centre Study about Spinal Cord Injury. Patient charts were reviewed to extract information regarding the administration and timing of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants. The primary outcome measure was motor scores, as measured by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, collected longitudinally in the first year after injury. Sensory scores (light touch and pin prick) and functional measures (Spinal Cord Independence Measure) were secondary outcomes. Linear mixed effects regression models included a drug-by-time interaction to determine if exposure to gabapentinoids altered recovery of muscle strength in the first year post injury. RESULTSA total of 201 participants were included in the study and had a median age of 46, and baseline motor score of 50. Participants were mostly males (85%) with sensory and motor complete injuries (50%). Seventy individuals (35%) were administered gabapentinoids within the first 30 days after injury, and presented with similar demographics. In the longitudinal model, the administration of gabapentinoids within 30 days after injury was associated with improved motor recovery when compared to those who did not receive gabapentinoids during this time (3.69 additional motor points from 4 to 48 weeks after injury, p = 0.03). This effect size increased as administration occurred earlier after injury (i.e., a benefit of 4.68 points when administered within 5 days). CONCLUSIONSThis retrospective, observational study has provided evidence of the beneficial effect of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants on motor recovery after spinal cord injury. More critically, it has highlighted a potential time-dependence, suggesting earlier intervention is associated with better outcomes. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class IV evidence that gabapentinoids improve motor recovery for individuals with acute spinal cord injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-632X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32989101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Neurology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anticonvulsants - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; GABA Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Recovery of Function - drug effects ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spinal Cord Injuries - drug therapy ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Neurology, 2020-12, Vol.95 (24), p.e3412-e3419</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Neurology</rights><rights>2020 American Academy of Neurology</rights><rights>2020 American Academy of Neurology.</rights><rights>2020 American Academy of Neurology 2020 American Academy of Neurology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5020-af89dd81e9d6c5b330cf4f231e1dd1f2b69ba32a79a6ec1cbc80e5eee0a42dbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5020-af89dd81e9d6c5b330cf4f231e1dd1f2b69ba32a79a6ec1cbc80e5eee0a42dbe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6784-4919 ; 0000-0001-6832-9599</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32989101$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warner, Freda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cragg, Jacquelyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jutzeler, Catherine R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, Orpheus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maier, Doris D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopp, Marcel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, John L.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury</title><title>Neurology</title><addtitle>Neurology</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVEThe aim of the current study was to explore the hypothesis that earlier administration of acute gabapentoids is beneficial to motor recovery after spinal cord injury in humans. METHODSThis is an observational study using a cohort from the European Multi-Centre Study about Spinal Cord Injury. Patient charts were reviewed to extract information regarding the administration and timing of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants. The primary outcome measure was motor scores, as measured by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, collected longitudinally in the first year after injury. Sensory scores (light touch and pin prick) and functional measures (Spinal Cord Independence Measure) were secondary outcomes. Linear mixed effects regression models included a drug-by-time interaction to determine if exposure to gabapentinoids altered recovery of muscle strength in the first year post injury. RESULTSA total of 201 participants were included in the study and had a median age of 46, and baseline motor score of 50. Participants were mostly males (85%) with sensory and motor complete injuries (50%). Seventy individuals (35%) were administered gabapentinoids within the first 30 days after injury, and presented with similar demographics. In the longitudinal model, the administration of gabapentinoids within 30 days after injury was associated with improved motor recovery when compared to those who did not receive gabapentinoids during this time (3.69 additional motor points from 4 to 48 weeks after injury, p = 0.03). This effect size increased as administration occurred earlier after injury (i.e., a benefit of 4.68 points when administered within 5 days). CONCLUSIONSThis retrospective, observational study has provided evidence of the beneficial effect of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants on motor recovery after spinal cord injury. More critically, it has highlighted a potential time-dependence, suggesting earlier intervention is associated with better outcomes. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class IV evidence that gabapentinoids improve motor recovery for individuals with acute spinal cord injury.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anticonvulsants - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>GABA Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - drug effects</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - drug therapy</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><issn>0028-3878</issn><issn>1526-632X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtP4zAUha0RCArDP0DISzYBPxLH2SAhxEuqYDMjZmc59k1rSOJiJ1T997gqMMwswJtr-X7n-OoehA4pOaGMstOHu-kJ-XsoqQryA01owUQmOPuzhSaEMJlxWcpdtBfjY4IKVlY7aJezSlaU0Al6OI_RG6cH53vsGzy4zvWz9W2ma72AfnC9dxaPEfDSDXPc-cEHHMD4FwgrrJsBAo4L1-sWGx8sdv3jGFY_0Xaj2wgHb3Uf_b66_HVxk03vr28vzqeZKQgjmW5kZa2kUFlhippzYpq8YZwCtZY2rBZVrTnTZaUFGGpqIwkUAEB0zmwNfB-dbXwXY92BNWngoFu1CK7TYaW8durfTu_mauZfVCm5EIVIBsdvBsE_jxAH1blooG11D36MiuV5ySnLWZnQfIOa4GMM0Hx8Q4laZ6JSJur_TJLs6POIH6L3EBIgN8DSt2mb8akdlxDUHHQ7zL_zzr-QrjlBaZ6xtOtkUpAsvXDCXwGE0auc</recordid><startdate>20201215</startdate><enddate>20201215</enddate><creator>Warner, Freda M.</creator><creator>Cragg, Jacquelyn J.</creator><creator>Jutzeler, Catherine R.</creator><creator>Grassner, Lukas</creator><creator>Mach, Orpheus</creator><creator>Maier, Doris D.</creator><creator>Mach, Benedikt</creator><creator>Schwab, Jan M.</creator><creator>Kopp, Marcel A.</creator><creator>Kramer, John L.K.</creator><general>American Academy of Neurology</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6784-4919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6832-9599</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201215</creationdate><title>Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury</title><author>Warner, Freda M. ; Cragg, Jacquelyn J. ; Jutzeler, Catherine R. ; Grassner, Lukas ; Mach, Orpheus ; Maier, Doris D. ; Mach, Benedikt ; Schwab, Jan M. ; Kopp, Marcel A. ; Kramer, John L.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5020-af89dd81e9d6c5b330cf4f231e1dd1f2b69ba32a79a6ec1cbc80e5eee0a42dbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anticonvulsants - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>GABA Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - drug effects</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - drug therapy</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warner, Freda M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cragg, Jacquelyn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jutzeler, Catherine R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grassner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, Orpheus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maier, Doris D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mach, Benedikt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Jan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopp, Marcel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, John L.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warner, Freda M.</au><au>Cragg, Jacquelyn J.</au><au>Jutzeler, Catherine R.</au><au>Grassner, Lukas</au><au>Mach, Orpheus</au><au>Maier, Doris D.</au><au>Mach, Benedikt</au><au>Schwab, Jan M.</au><au>Kopp, Marcel A.</au><au>Kramer, John L.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury</atitle><jtitle>Neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Neurology</addtitle><date>2020-12-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>e3412</spage><epage>e3419</epage><pages>e3412-e3419</pages><issn>0028-3878</issn><eissn>1526-632X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVEThe aim of the current study was to explore the hypothesis that earlier administration of acute gabapentoids is beneficial to motor recovery after spinal cord injury in humans. METHODSThis is an observational study using a cohort from the European Multi-Centre Study about Spinal Cord Injury. Patient charts were reviewed to extract information regarding the administration and timing of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants. The primary outcome measure was motor scores, as measured by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, collected longitudinally in the first year after injury. Sensory scores (light touch and pin prick) and functional measures (Spinal Cord Independence Measure) were secondary outcomes. Linear mixed effects regression models included a drug-by-time interaction to determine if exposure to gabapentinoids altered recovery of muscle strength in the first year post injury. RESULTSA total of 201 participants were included in the study and had a median age of 46, and baseline motor score of 50. Participants were mostly males (85%) with sensory and motor complete injuries (50%). Seventy individuals (35%) were administered gabapentinoids within the first 30 days after injury, and presented with similar demographics. In the longitudinal model, the administration of gabapentinoids within 30 days after injury was associated with improved motor recovery when compared to those who did not receive gabapentinoids during this time (3.69 additional motor points from 4 to 48 weeks after injury, p = 0.03). This effect size increased as administration occurred earlier after injury (i.e., a benefit of 4.68 points when administered within 5 days). CONCLUSIONSThis retrospective, observational study has provided evidence of the beneficial effect of gabapentinoid anticonvulsants on motor recovery after spinal cord injury. More critically, it has highlighted a potential time-dependence, suggesting earlier intervention is associated with better outcomes. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class IV evidence that gabapentinoids improve motor recovery for individuals with acute spinal cord injury.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Neurology</pub><pmid>32989101</pmid><doi>10.1212/WNL.0000000000010950</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6784-4919</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6832-9599</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3878
ispartof Neurology, 2020-12, Vol.95 (24), p.e3412-e3419
issn 0028-3878
1526-632X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7836656
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Anticonvulsants - administration & dosage
Female
GABA Agents - administration & dosage
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Recovery of Function - drug effects
Severity of Illness Index
Spinal Cord Injuries - drug therapy
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
title Association of timing of gabapentinoid use with motor recovery after spinal cord injury
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T01%3A18%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20of%20timing%20of%20gabapentinoid%20use%20with%20motor%20recovery%20after%20spinal%20cord%20injury&rft.jtitle=Neurology&rft.au=Warner,%20Freda%20M.&rft.date=2020-12-15&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=e3412&rft.epage=e3419&rft.pages=e3412-e3419&rft.issn=0028-3878&rft.eissn=1526-632X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010950&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2447312427%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2447312427&rft_id=info:pmid/32989101&rfr_iscdi=true