Perceived Crowding and Risk Perception According to Leisure Activity Type during COVID-19 Using Spatial Proximity

This study aimed to investigate the difference in people's perceived crowding and risk perception during leisure activities using the criteria of spatial proximity during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 is a viral respiratory tract disease that poses an increasing risk of infection through pers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-01, Vol.18 (2), p.457
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Young-Jae, Kang, Seung-Woo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 457
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 18
creator Kim, Young-Jae
Kang, Seung-Woo
description This study aimed to investigate the difference in people's perceived crowding and risk perception during leisure activities using the criteria of spatial proximity during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 is a viral respiratory tract disease that poses an increasing risk of infection through person-to-person transmission in a confined space or close proximity to an infected person. It is thus crucial to maintain a sufficiently safe distance from others during leisure activities. In this study, measures concerning leisure activity spaces and the current status of leisure activities were investigated. Data were gathered from a total of 1078 participants via an online survey conducted from 26 to 29 October 2020. Frequency analysis was performed to investigate the sample characteristics and exploratory factor analysis was performed to analyze the validity of the measurement tools. Results revealed that people's perceived crowding of leisure activity spaces directly influenced their participation in leisure activities. Regarding age, those in their 20s were more aware of congestion and their risk perception was higher than those in their 40s and 50s. It was found that people perceived cultural and artistic activities to be dangerous as they often take place as part of tourism and leisure activities and amidst crowds. However, their high-risk perception indirectly influenced their participation patterns, making it difficult to enjoy leisure activities. To lower the risk perception of leisure activity spaces, it was necessary to secure more safe distancing than current regulations require. Future research must conduct a longitudinal investigation by objectively stratifying the degree of perceived crowding.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph18020457
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7827604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477260966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-7ef1748a0cb22f42e626ceccb60f87cccfe8e1ed8755a018bfc71be3b407d7ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtP3DAUha2qVXl122VlqRs2odePsT2bSmiAFmkkUIFuLce5AU8zcbCTgfn3zTAUQVfX1-fzkY8OIZ8ZHAkxhW9hgam7YwY4yIl-R3aZUlBIBez9q_MO2ct5ASCMVNOPZEcIKQAk3yX3l5g8hhVWdJbiQxXaW-raiv4K-Q990ro-xJYeex_Tk9pHOseQh4TjZR9WoV_T63WHtBrSRp9d_D4_KdiU3uTNetW5PriGXqb4GJYjfEA-1K7J-Ol57pObs9Pr2c9ifvHjfHY8L7w0si801kxL48CXnNeSo-LKo_elgtpo732NBhlWRk8mDpgpa69ZiaKUoCvtKrFPvm99u6FcYuWx7ZNrbJfC0qW1jS7Yt0ob7uxtXFltuFYgR4PDZ4MU7wfMvV2G7LFpXItxyJZLrbmCqVIj-vU_dBGH1I7xtpQWXPGROtpSPsWcE9Yvn2FgN23at22OD768jvCC_6tP_AUtL53_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2477273262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived Crowding and Risk Perception According to Leisure Activity Type during COVID-19 Using Spatial Proximity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Kim, Young-Jae ; Kang, Seung-Woo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jae ; Kang, Seung-Woo</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to investigate the difference in people's perceived crowding and risk perception during leisure activities using the criteria of spatial proximity during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 is a viral respiratory tract disease that poses an increasing risk of infection through person-to-person transmission in a confined space or close proximity to an infected person. It is thus crucial to maintain a sufficiently safe distance from others during leisure activities. In this study, measures concerning leisure activity spaces and the current status of leisure activities were investigated. Data were gathered from a total of 1078 participants via an online survey conducted from 26 to 29 October 2020. Frequency analysis was performed to investigate the sample characteristics and exploratory factor analysis was performed to analyze the validity of the measurement tools. Results revealed that people's perceived crowding of leisure activity spaces directly influenced their participation in leisure activities. Regarding age, those in their 20s were more aware of congestion and their risk perception was higher than those in their 40s and 50s. It was found that people perceived cultural and artistic activities to be dangerous as they often take place as part of tourism and leisure activities and amidst crowds. However, their high-risk perception indirectly influenced their participation patterns, making it difficult to enjoy leisure activities. To lower the risk perception of leisure activity spaces, it was necessary to secure more safe distancing than current regulations require. Future research must conduct a longitudinal investigation by objectively stratifying the degree of perceived crowding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020457</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33430042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Confined spaces ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Crowding ; Factor analysis ; Frequency analysis ; Health risks ; Humans ; Leisure ; Leisure Activities ; Likert scale ; Middle Aged ; Outdoor activities ; Pandemics ; Parks &amp; recreation areas ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Physical Distancing ; Proximity ; Public spaces ; Questionnaires ; Recreation ; Respiratory tract ; Respiratory tract diseases ; Risk Assessment ; Risk perception ; Social distancing ; Sports facilities ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tourism ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-01, Vol.18 (2), p.457</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-7ef1748a0cb22f42e626ceccb60f87cccfe8e1ed8755a018bfc71be3b407d7ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-7ef1748a0cb22f42e626ceccb60f87cccfe8e1ed8755a018bfc71be3b407d7ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4825-6182</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827604/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827604/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33430042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Seung-Woo</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived Crowding and Risk Perception According to Leisure Activity Type during COVID-19 Using Spatial Proximity</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>This study aimed to investigate the difference in people's perceived crowding and risk perception during leisure activities using the criteria of spatial proximity during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 is a viral respiratory tract disease that poses an increasing risk of infection through person-to-person transmission in a confined space or close proximity to an infected person. It is thus crucial to maintain a sufficiently safe distance from others during leisure activities. In this study, measures concerning leisure activity spaces and the current status of leisure activities were investigated. Data were gathered from a total of 1078 participants via an online survey conducted from 26 to 29 October 2020. Frequency analysis was performed to investigate the sample characteristics and exploratory factor analysis was performed to analyze the validity of the measurement tools. Results revealed that people's perceived crowding of leisure activity spaces directly influenced their participation in leisure activities. Regarding age, those in their 20s were more aware of congestion and their risk perception was higher than those in their 40s and 50s. It was found that people perceived cultural and artistic activities to be dangerous as they often take place as part of tourism and leisure activities and amidst crowds. However, their high-risk perception indirectly influenced their participation patterns, making it difficult to enjoy leisure activities. To lower the risk perception of leisure activity spaces, it was necessary to secure more safe distancing than current regulations require. Future research must conduct a longitudinal investigation by objectively stratifying the degree of perceived crowding.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Confined spaces</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crowding</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Frequency analysis</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Leisure Activities</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outdoor activities</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Parks &amp; recreation areas</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physical Distancing</subject><subject>Proximity</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Respiratory tract</subject><subject>Respiratory tract diseases</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Social distancing</subject><subject>Sports facilities</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtP3DAUha2qVXl122VlqRs2odePsT2bSmiAFmkkUIFuLce5AU8zcbCTgfn3zTAUQVfX1-fzkY8OIZ8ZHAkxhW9hgam7YwY4yIl-R3aZUlBIBez9q_MO2ct5ASCMVNOPZEcIKQAk3yX3l5g8hhVWdJbiQxXaW-raiv4K-Q990ro-xJYeex_Tk9pHOseQh4TjZR9WoV_T63WHtBrSRp9d_D4_KdiU3uTNetW5PriGXqb4GJYjfEA-1K7J-Ol57pObs9Pr2c9ifvHjfHY8L7w0si801kxL48CXnNeSo-LKo_elgtpo732NBhlWRk8mDpgpa69ZiaKUoCvtKrFPvm99u6FcYuWx7ZNrbJfC0qW1jS7Yt0ob7uxtXFltuFYgR4PDZ4MU7wfMvV2G7LFpXItxyJZLrbmCqVIj-vU_dBGH1I7xtpQWXPGROtpSPsWcE9Yvn2FgN23at22OD768jvCC_6tP_AUtL53_</recordid><startdate>20210108</startdate><enddate>20210108</enddate><creator>Kim, Young-Jae</creator><creator>Kang, Seung-Woo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-6182</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210108</creationdate><title>Perceived Crowding and Risk Perception According to Leisure Activity Type during COVID-19 Using Spatial Proximity</title><author>Kim, Young-Jae ; Kang, Seung-Woo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-7ef1748a0cb22f42e626ceccb60f87cccfe8e1ed8755a018bfc71be3b407d7ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Confined spaces</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crowding</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Frequency analysis</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Leisure Activities</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outdoor activities</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Parks &amp; recreation areas</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physical Distancing</topic><topic>Proximity</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Respiratory tract</topic><topic>Respiratory tract diseases</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Social distancing</topic><topic>Sports facilities</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Seung-Woo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Young-Jae</au><au>Kang, Seung-Woo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived Crowding and Risk Perception According to Leisure Activity Type during COVID-19 Using Spatial Proximity</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2021-01-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>457</spage><pages>457-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to investigate the difference in people's perceived crowding and risk perception during leisure activities using the criteria of spatial proximity during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 is a viral respiratory tract disease that poses an increasing risk of infection through person-to-person transmission in a confined space or close proximity to an infected person. It is thus crucial to maintain a sufficiently safe distance from others during leisure activities. In this study, measures concerning leisure activity spaces and the current status of leisure activities were investigated. Data were gathered from a total of 1078 participants via an online survey conducted from 26 to 29 October 2020. Frequency analysis was performed to investigate the sample characteristics and exploratory factor analysis was performed to analyze the validity of the measurement tools. Results revealed that people's perceived crowding of leisure activity spaces directly influenced their participation in leisure activities. Regarding age, those in their 20s were more aware of congestion and their risk perception was higher than those in their 40s and 50s. It was found that people perceived cultural and artistic activities to be dangerous as they often take place as part of tourism and leisure activities and amidst crowds. However, their high-risk perception indirectly influenced their participation patterns, making it difficult to enjoy leisure activities. To lower the risk perception of leisure activity spaces, it was necessary to secure more safe distancing than current regulations require. Future research must conduct a longitudinal investigation by objectively stratifying the degree of perceived crowding.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33430042</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18020457</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4825-6182</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-01, Vol.18 (2), p.457
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7827604
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Confined spaces
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Crowding
Factor analysis
Frequency analysis
Health risks
Humans
Leisure
Leisure Activities
Likert scale
Middle Aged
Outdoor activities
Pandemics
Parks & recreation areas
Perception
Perceptions
Physical Distancing
Proximity
Public spaces
Questionnaires
Recreation
Respiratory tract
Respiratory tract diseases
Risk Assessment
Risk perception
Social distancing
Sports facilities
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tourism
Young Adult
title Perceived Crowding and Risk Perception According to Leisure Activity Type during COVID-19 Using Spatial Proximity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A14%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20Crowding%20and%20Risk%20Perception%20According%20to%20Leisure%20Activity%20Type%20during%20COVID-19%20Using%20Spatial%20Proximity&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Kim,%20Young-Jae&rft.date=2021-01-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=457&rft.pages=457-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18020457&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2477260966%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2477273262&rft_id=info:pmid/33430042&rfr_iscdi=true