Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence

In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2021-01, Vol.10 (2), p.203
Hauptverfasser: Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia, Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos, Rawal, Sahil, Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 203
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 10
creator Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia
Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos
Rawal, Sahil
Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P
description In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical background of patients with HFmrEF is intermediate between that of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of demographics and comorbid conditions. However, the current evidence, stemming from observational studies and post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, suggests that patients with HFmrEF benefit from medications that target the neurohormonal axes, a pathophysiological behavior that resembles that of HFrEF. Use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sacubitril/valsartan is reasonable in patients with HFmrEF, whereas evidence is currently scarce for other therapies. In clinical practice, patients with HFmrEF are treated more like HFrEF patients, potentially because of history of systolic dysfunction that has partially recovered. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function with contemporary noninvasive modalities, e.g., echocardiographic strain imaging, is promising for the selection of patients with HFmrEF who will benefit from neurohormonal antagonists and other HFrEF-targeted therapies.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm10020203
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7827304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2477263020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a3364e7fad85dea58af6bfe359d703558b49572959c49e76f1ff81d55512ee5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LBDEMhosoKqsn71LwIshopx_TjgdBxFVhRRTFY-nOpG6X-dC2o_jvra7KanJIIA8vSV6EdnJyyFhJjuZVmxNCU7IVtEmJlBlhiq0u9RtoO4Q5SaEUp7lcRxuMcVoqpTbR7b0HE1voIu4tvgTjIx4b1wwe8JuLM3zt6uzOdE-Az-dQRdd3eOzNV3OMH2cm4quA4yyNX10NXQVbaM2aJsD2dx2hh_H5_dllNrm5uDo7nWQVJ2XMDGMFB2lNrUQNRihji6kFJspaEiaEmvJSSFqKsuIlyMLm1qq8FkLkFEAAG6GThe7zMG2hrtIJ3jT62bvW-HfdG6f_Tjo300_9q5aKSkZ4Etj_FvD9ywAh6taFCprGdNAPQVMuJS3Y52tHaO8fOu8H36XzNC14TpITXCTqYEFVvg_Bg_1dJif60y295Faid5f3_2V_vGEf9iiOtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2641039045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia ; Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos ; Rawal, Sahil ; Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P</creator><creatorcontrib>Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia ; Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos ; Rawal, Sahil ; Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P</creatorcontrib><description>In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical background of patients with HFmrEF is intermediate between that of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of demographics and comorbid conditions. However, the current evidence, stemming from observational studies and post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, suggests that patients with HFmrEF benefit from medications that target the neurohormonal axes, a pathophysiological behavior that resembles that of HFrEF. Use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sacubitril/valsartan is reasonable in patients with HFmrEF, whereas evidence is currently scarce for other therapies. In clinical practice, patients with HFmrEF are treated more like HFrEF patients, potentially because of history of systolic dysfunction that has partially recovered. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function with contemporary noninvasive modalities, e.g., echocardiographic strain imaging, is promising for the selection of patients with HFmrEF who will benefit from neurohormonal antagonists and other HFrEF-targeted therapies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020203</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33429888</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Beta blockers ; Biomarkers ; Blood pressure ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiovascular disease ; Clinical medicine ; Confidence intervals ; Ejection fraction ; Enzymes ; Epidemiology ; Etiology ; Heart failure ; Mortality ; Pathophysiology ; Patients ; Review</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-01, Vol.10 (2), p.203</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a3364e7fad85dea58af6bfe359d703558b49572959c49e76f1ff81d55512ee5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a3364e7fad85dea58af6bfe359d703558b49572959c49e76f1ff81d55512ee5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1704-0725 ; 0000-0002-1284-429X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827304/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7827304/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33429888$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawal, Sahil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical background of patients with HFmrEF is intermediate between that of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of demographics and comorbid conditions. However, the current evidence, stemming from observational studies and post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, suggests that patients with HFmrEF benefit from medications that target the neurohormonal axes, a pathophysiological behavior that resembles that of HFrEF. Use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sacubitril/valsartan is reasonable in patients with HFmrEF, whereas evidence is currently scarce for other therapies. In clinical practice, patients with HFmrEF are treated more like HFrEF patients, potentially because of history of systolic dysfunction that has partially recovered. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function with contemporary noninvasive modalities, e.g., echocardiographic strain imaging, is promising for the selection of patients with HFmrEF who will benefit from neurohormonal antagonists and other HFrEF-targeted therapies.</description><subject>Beta blockers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pathophysiology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LBDEMhosoKqsn71LwIshopx_TjgdBxFVhRRTFY-nOpG6X-dC2o_jvra7KanJIIA8vSV6EdnJyyFhJjuZVmxNCU7IVtEmJlBlhiq0u9RtoO4Q5SaEUp7lcRxuMcVoqpTbR7b0HE1voIu4tvgTjIx4b1wwe8JuLM3zt6uzOdE-Az-dQRdd3eOzNV3OMH2cm4quA4yyNX10NXQVbaM2aJsD2dx2hh_H5_dllNrm5uDo7nWQVJ2XMDGMFB2lNrUQNRihji6kFJspaEiaEmvJSSFqKsuIlyMLm1qq8FkLkFEAAG6GThe7zMG2hrtIJ3jT62bvW-HfdG6f_Tjo300_9q5aKSkZ4Etj_FvD9ywAh6taFCprGdNAPQVMuJS3Y52tHaO8fOu8H36XzNC14TpITXCTqYEFVvg_Bg_1dJif60y295Faid5f3_2V_vGEf9iiOtw</recordid><startdate>20210108</startdate><enddate>20210108</enddate><creator>Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia</creator><creator>Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos</creator><creator>Rawal, Sahil</creator><creator>Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-0725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1284-429X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210108</creationdate><title>Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence</title><author>Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia ; Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos ; Rawal, Sahil ; Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-a3364e7fad85dea58af6bfe359d703558b49572959c49e76f1ff81d55512ee5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Beta blockers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pathophysiology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawal, Sahil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koufou, Eleni-Evangelia</au><au>Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos</au><au>Rawal, Sahil</au><au>Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2021-01-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><pages>203-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>In this review, we briefly outline our current knowledge on the epidemiology, outcomes, and pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and discuss in more depth the evidence on current treatment options for this group of patients. In most studies, the clinical background of patients with HFmrEF is intermediate between that of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in terms of demographics and comorbid conditions. However, the current evidence, stemming from observational studies and post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials, suggests that patients with HFmrEF benefit from medications that target the neurohormonal axes, a pathophysiological behavior that resembles that of HFrEF. Use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sacubitril/valsartan is reasonable in patients with HFmrEF, whereas evidence is currently scarce for other therapies. In clinical practice, patients with HFmrEF are treated more like HFrEF patients, potentially because of history of systolic dysfunction that has partially recovered. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function with contemporary noninvasive modalities, e.g., echocardiographic strain imaging, is promising for the selection of patients with HFmrEF who will benefit from neurohormonal antagonists and other HFrEF-targeted therapies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33429888</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm10020203</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1704-0725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1284-429X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-01, Vol.10 (2), p.203
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7827304
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Beta blockers
Biomarkers
Blood pressure
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiovascular disease
Clinical medicine
Confidence intervals
Ejection fraction
Enzymes
Epidemiology
Etiology
Heart failure
Mortality
Pathophysiology
Patients
Review
title Treatment of Heart Failure with Mid-Range Ejection Fraction: What Is the Evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A58%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20Heart%20Failure%20with%20Mid-Range%20Ejection%20Fraction:%20What%20Is%20the%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Koufou,%20Eleni-Evangelia&rft.date=2021-01-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.pages=203-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm10020203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2477263020%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2641039045&rft_id=info:pmid/33429888&rfr_iscdi=true