The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey

To assess the variation in the waiting time for diagnostic imaging (DI) services among Croatian public hospitals and the utilization of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. We analyzed aggregated data from public hospitals. Counties were classified according to eco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Croatian medical journal 2020-12, Vol.61 (6), p.538-546
Hauptverfasser: Biloglav, Zrinka, Medaković, Petar, Buljević, Jure, Žuvela, Franko, Padjen, Ivan, Vrkić, Dina, Ćurić, Josip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 546
container_issue 6
container_start_page 538
container_title Croatian medical journal
container_volume 61
creator Biloglav, Zrinka
Medaković, Petar
Buljević, Jure
Žuvela, Franko
Padjen, Ivan
Vrkić, Dina
Ćurić, Josip
description To assess the variation in the waiting time for diagnostic imaging (DI) services among Croatian public hospitals and the utilization of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. We analyzed aggregated data from public hospitals. Counties were classified according to economic strength, and utilization was expressed as the average number of exams per machine. We compared the waiting times for 2018 and utilization for 2015 according to hospital category (high and low level) and economic strength by county. The waiting time was longer for MRI compared with CT, 268 vs 77.61 days. Overall CT waiting time was in the unfavorable European Health Consumer Index category. High-level hospitals had longer waiting time for MRI and CT. The waiting time positively correlated with economic strength for MRI (P=0.019), but not for CT. In low-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 104 to 6032, whereas CT utilization ranged from 48 to 17852. In high-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 3846 to 11 026, while CT utilization ranged from 503 to 17 234. CT (P=0.041) and MRI (P=0.031) utilization in high-level hospitals was significantly higher than in low-level hospitals. The waiting times for CT and MRI were exceptionally long regardless of the hospital category, with highly varying utilization. Croatia performed more exams per scanner compared with other EU countries, but not significantly so. High-level hospitals' utilization was significantly higher than that of low-level hospitals, and CT utilization was significantly higher than EU average, while the difference for MRI utilization was not significant.
doi_str_mv 10.3325/CMJ.2020.61.538
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7821363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A649726234</galeid><sourcerecordid>A649726234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-fe974def8a9cceca646ba4adde8e35a2b6866af6906071f26371f2f9409862843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1r3DAQxU1pabZpz70VQaH0Ykdf1to9BMLST1J6Sc9iVh7bCra0teSE7bF_eeVsGrJQBBK8-c1jNLwse81oIQQvzzbfvxWcclooVpSiepKtWNLziin1NFtRUYq8Lqk8yV6EcE0TKKV6np0IIRkVlK2yP1c9EnAw7IMNxLfkFmy0riPRjkuhIXO0g_0N0Xq31I0fd3PEhkQ_-m6CXb-_w0boHEZryITBO3AGiU3aYmUd2Uw-OcAHAsTdWd3aBkmYpxvcv8yetTAEfHX_nmY_P3282nzJL398_rq5uMyNrFnMW6zXssG2gtoYNKCk2oKEpsEKRQl8qyqloFU1VXTNWq7Ecre1pHWleCXFaXZ-8N3N2xEbgy5OMOjdlOac9tqD1ccVZ3vd-Ru9rjgTSiSD9_cGk_81Y4h6tMHgMIBDPwfN5VoxLutaJfTtAe1gQG1d65OjWXB9oWS95oqLZaLiP1Q6DY7WeIetTfpRw7tHDT3CEPvgh3nZaDgGzw6gmXwIE7YP32RUL8nRZrzWS3K0YjolJ3W8ebydB_5fVMRfvd_AZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2476124996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Biloglav, Zrinka ; Medaković, Petar ; Buljević, Jure ; Žuvela, Franko ; Padjen, Ivan ; Vrkić, Dina ; Ćurić, Josip</creator><creatorcontrib>Biloglav, Zrinka ; Medaković, Petar ; Buljević, Jure ; Žuvela, Franko ; Padjen, Ivan ; Vrkić, Dina ; Ćurić, Josip</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the variation in the waiting time for diagnostic imaging (DI) services among Croatian public hospitals and the utilization of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. We analyzed aggregated data from public hospitals. Counties were classified according to economic strength, and utilization was expressed as the average number of exams per machine. We compared the waiting times for 2018 and utilization for 2015 according to hospital category (high and low level) and economic strength by county. The waiting time was longer for MRI compared with CT, 268 vs 77.61 days. Overall CT waiting time was in the unfavorable European Health Consumer Index category. High-level hospitals had longer waiting time for MRI and CT. The waiting time positively correlated with economic strength for MRI (P=0.019), but not for CT. In low-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 104 to 6032, whereas CT utilization ranged from 48 to 17852. In high-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 3846 to 11 026, while CT utilization ranged from 503 to 17 234. CT (P=0.041) and MRI (P=0.031) utilization in high-level hospitals was significantly higher than in low-level hospitals. The waiting times for CT and MRI were exceptionally long regardless of the hospital category, with highly varying utilization. Croatia performed more exams per scanner compared with other EU countries, but not significantly so. High-level hospitals' utilization was significantly higher than that of low-level hospitals, and CT utilization was significantly higher than EU average, while the difference for MRI utilization was not significant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0353-9504</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1332-8166</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3325/CMJ.2020.61.538</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33410301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Croatia: Sveuciliste U Zagrebu</publisher><subject>Croatia - epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; CT imaging ; Databases, Factual ; Evaluation ; Female ; Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medical appointments and schedules ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Time-to-Treatment ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Waiting Lists ; Watchful Waiting</subject><ispartof>Croatian medical journal, 2020-12, Vol.61 (6), p.538-546</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Sveuciliste U Zagrebu</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 by the Croatian Medical Journal. All rights reserved. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-fe974def8a9cceca646ba4adde8e35a2b6866af6906071f26371f2f9409862843</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7821363/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7821363/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33410301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biloglav, Zrinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medaković, Petar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buljević, Jure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Žuvela, Franko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padjen, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrkić, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ćurić, Josip</creatorcontrib><title>The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey</title><title>Croatian medical journal</title><addtitle>Croat Med J</addtitle><description>To assess the variation in the waiting time for diagnostic imaging (DI) services among Croatian public hospitals and the utilization of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. We analyzed aggregated data from public hospitals. Counties were classified according to economic strength, and utilization was expressed as the average number of exams per machine. We compared the waiting times for 2018 and utilization for 2015 according to hospital category (high and low level) and economic strength by county. The waiting time was longer for MRI compared with CT, 268 vs 77.61 days. Overall CT waiting time was in the unfavorable European Health Consumer Index category. High-level hospitals had longer waiting time for MRI and CT. The waiting time positively correlated with economic strength for MRI (P=0.019), but not for CT. In low-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 104 to 6032, whereas CT utilization ranged from 48 to 17852. In high-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 3846 to 11 026, while CT utilization ranged from 503 to 17 234. CT (P=0.041) and MRI (P=0.031) utilization in high-level hospitals was significantly higher than in low-level hospitals. The waiting times for CT and MRI were exceptionally long regardless of the hospital category, with highly varying utilization. Croatia performed more exams per scanner compared with other EU countries, but not significantly so. High-level hospitals' utilization was significantly higher than that of low-level hospitals, and CT utilization was significantly higher than EU average, while the difference for MRI utilization was not significant.</description><subject>Croatia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical appointments and schedules</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time-to-Treatment</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Waiting Lists</subject><subject>Watchful Waiting</subject><issn>0353-9504</issn><issn>1332-8166</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1r3DAQxU1pabZpz70VQaH0Ykdf1to9BMLST1J6Sc9iVh7bCra0teSE7bF_eeVsGrJQBBK8-c1jNLwse81oIQQvzzbfvxWcclooVpSiepKtWNLziin1NFtRUYq8Lqk8yV6EcE0TKKV6np0IIRkVlK2yP1c9EnAw7IMNxLfkFmy0riPRjkuhIXO0g_0N0Xq31I0fd3PEhkQ_-m6CXb-_w0boHEZryITBO3AGiU3aYmUd2Uw-OcAHAsTdWd3aBkmYpxvcv8yetTAEfHX_nmY_P3282nzJL398_rq5uMyNrFnMW6zXssG2gtoYNKCk2oKEpsEKRQl8qyqloFU1VXTNWq7Ecre1pHWleCXFaXZ-8N3N2xEbgy5OMOjdlOac9tqD1ccVZ3vd-Ru9rjgTSiSD9_cGk_81Y4h6tMHgMIBDPwfN5VoxLutaJfTtAe1gQG1d65OjWXB9oWS95oqLZaLiP1Q6DY7WeIetTfpRw7tHDT3CEPvgh3nZaDgGzw6gmXwIE7YP32RUL8nRZrzWS3K0YjolJ3W8ebydB_5fVMRfvd_AZg</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Biloglav, Zrinka</creator><creator>Medaković, Petar</creator><creator>Buljević, Jure</creator><creator>Žuvela, Franko</creator><creator>Padjen, Ivan</creator><creator>Vrkić, Dina</creator><creator>Ćurić, Josip</creator><general>Sveuciliste U Zagrebu</general><general>Croatian Medical Schools</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey</title><author>Biloglav, Zrinka ; Medaković, Petar ; Buljević, Jure ; Žuvela, Franko ; Padjen, Ivan ; Vrkić, Dina ; Ćurić, Josip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-fe974def8a9cceca646ba4adde8e35a2b6866af6906071f26371f2f9409862843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Croatia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical appointments and schedules</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time-to-Treatment</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Waiting Lists</topic><topic>Watchful Waiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biloglav, Zrinka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medaković, Petar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buljević, Jure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Žuvela, Franko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padjen, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrkić, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ćurić, Josip</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Croatian medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biloglav, Zrinka</au><au>Medaković, Petar</au><au>Buljević, Jure</au><au>Žuvela, Franko</au><au>Padjen, Ivan</au><au>Vrkić, Dina</au><au>Ćurić, Josip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey</atitle><jtitle>Croatian medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Croat Med J</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>538</spage><epage>546</epage><pages>538-546</pages><issn>0353-9504</issn><eissn>1332-8166</eissn><abstract>To assess the variation in the waiting time for diagnostic imaging (DI) services among Croatian public hospitals and the utilization of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners. We analyzed aggregated data from public hospitals. Counties were classified according to economic strength, and utilization was expressed as the average number of exams per machine. We compared the waiting times for 2018 and utilization for 2015 according to hospital category (high and low level) and economic strength by county. The waiting time was longer for MRI compared with CT, 268 vs 77.61 days. Overall CT waiting time was in the unfavorable European Health Consumer Index category. High-level hospitals had longer waiting time for MRI and CT. The waiting time positively correlated with economic strength for MRI (P=0.019), but not for CT. In low-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 104 to 6032, whereas CT utilization ranged from 48 to 17852. In high-level hospitals, MRI utilization ranged from 3846 to 11 026, while CT utilization ranged from 503 to 17 234. CT (P=0.041) and MRI (P=0.031) utilization in high-level hospitals was significantly higher than in low-level hospitals. The waiting times for CT and MRI were exceptionally long regardless of the hospital category, with highly varying utilization. Croatia performed more exams per scanner compared with other EU countries, but not significantly so. High-level hospitals' utilization was significantly higher than that of low-level hospitals, and CT utilization was significantly higher than EU average, while the difference for MRI utilization was not significant.</abstract><cop>Croatia</cop><pub>Sveuciliste U Zagrebu</pub><pmid>33410301</pmid><doi>10.3325/CMJ.2020.61.538</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0353-9504
ispartof Croatian medical journal, 2020-12, Vol.61 (6), p.538-546
issn 0353-9504
1332-8166
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7821363
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Croatia - epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
CT imaging
Databases, Factual
Evaluation
Female
Hospitals - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical appointments and schedules
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Time-to-Treatment
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - statistics & numerical data
Waiting Lists
Watchful Waiting
title The analysis of waiting time and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Croatia: a nationwide survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A07%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20analysis%20of%20waiting%20time%20and%20utilization%20of%20computed%20tomography%20and%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20Croatia:%20a%20nationwide%20survey&rft.jtitle=Croatian%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Biloglav,%20Zrinka&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=538&rft.epage=546&rft.pages=538-546&rft.issn=0353-9504&rft.eissn=1332-8166&rft_id=info:doi/10.3325/CMJ.2020.61.538&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA649726234%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2476124996&rft_id=info:pmid/33410301&rft_galeid=A649726234&rfr_iscdi=true