Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C According to Concentration: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

(1) Background: Mitomycin C (MMC) is commonly used during trabeculectomy. However, there is no consensus on which concentration should be used. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC in eyes undergoing trabeculectomy. (2) Methods: Thirty-six eyes (36 glaucoma p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2020-12, Vol.10 (1), p.59
Hauptverfasser: Seol, Bo Ram, Lee, Sang Yoon, Kim, Yu Jeong, Kim, Young Kook, Jeoung, Jin Wook, Park, Ki Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 10
creator Seol, Bo Ram
Lee, Sang Yoon
Kim, Yu Jeong
Kim, Young Kook
Jeoung, Jin Wook
Park, Ki Ho
description (1) Background: Mitomycin C (MMC) is commonly used during trabeculectomy. However, there is no consensus on which concentration should be used. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC in eyes undergoing trabeculectomy. (2) Methods: Thirty-six eyes (36 glaucoma patients) were randomized to undergo a trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL or 0.4 mg/mL of MMC. The success rate was evaluated according to three criteria: (A) intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤18 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥20%; (B) IOP ≤15 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥25%; (C) IOP ≤12 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥30%. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to identify the predictive factors for failure. Immunohistochemical procedures for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) were performed on Tenon's tissue. Bleb morphology was evaluated. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of complications. (3) Results: Of the 36 eyes, 19 underwent trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL of MMC and 17 with 0.4 mg/mL. The success rates were 75%, 67%, and 47% at 6 months for criteria A, B, and C, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups. High MMP-9 staining and low preoperative IOP were associated with failure (hazard ratio (HR), 5.556; = 0.033, and HR, 0.936; = 0.033). Complications included hypotony in two eyes (6%), hyphema in one eye (3%), and choroidal detachment in one eye (3%). (4) Conclusions: Trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC showed similar IOP-control effects to those recorded in previous studies, along with a low rate of complications. There was no significant difference in efficacy or safety between the 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL MMC groups.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm10010059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7796253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473901131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-59a3436c6755cb0b01bc0413534f603a878c965b75286fab0913a49dbb716a413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVFrFDEUhYMottQ--S4BXwRZTeYmkxkfhGWorVBRtD6HJJPpZplJ1iRTWX-DP9oMW8tqCOTCPfnuSQ5Czyl5A9CSt1szUULK5u0jdFoRIVYEGnh8VJ-g85S2pKymYRUVT9EJAAgOFE7R7y5MOxVdCh6HAeeNxRfD4Iwye6x8j7-pweb90rqJSlszj9bkMO3xT5c3-JNbauM87vDamBB7529xDrgL3lifo8ou-Hd4jb_EkHblqruz-GsBh8n9sj3uRufLsLHQnRqfoSeDGpM9vz_P0PcPFzfd1er68-XHbn29Moy0ecVbBQxqUwvOjSaaUG0Io8CBDTUB1YjGtDXXgldNPShNWgqKtb3WgtaqCM_Q-wN3N-vJ9geno9xFN6m4l0E5-W_Hu428DXdSiLauOBTAq3tADD9mm7KcXDJ2HJW3YU6yYqKEQykss17-J92GOfryPFnVjBJgrFqArw8qU_4pRTs8mKFELkHLo6CL-sWx_wft31jhD6VppD8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2641034423</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C According to Concentration: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Seol, Bo Ram ; Lee, Sang Yoon ; Kim, Yu Jeong ; Kim, Young Kook ; Jeoung, Jin Wook ; Park, Ki Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Seol, Bo Ram ; Lee, Sang Yoon ; Kim, Yu Jeong ; Kim, Young Kook ; Jeoung, Jin Wook ; Park, Ki Ho</creatorcontrib><description>(1) Background: Mitomycin C (MMC) is commonly used during trabeculectomy. However, there is no consensus on which concentration should be used. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC in eyes undergoing trabeculectomy. (2) Methods: Thirty-six eyes (36 glaucoma patients) were randomized to undergo a trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL or 0.4 mg/mL of MMC. The success rate was evaluated according to three criteria: (A) intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤18 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥20%; (B) IOP ≤15 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥25%; (C) IOP ≤12 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥30%. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to identify the predictive factors for failure. Immunohistochemical procedures for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) were performed on Tenon's tissue. Bleb morphology was evaluated. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of complications. (3) Results: Of the 36 eyes, 19 underwent trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL of MMC and 17 with 0.4 mg/mL. The success rates were 75%, 67%, and 47% at 6 months for criteria A, B, and C, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups. High MMP-9 staining and low preoperative IOP were associated with failure (hazard ratio (HR), 5.556; = 0.033, and HR, 0.936; = 0.033). Complications included hypotony in two eyes (6%), hyphema in one eye (3%), and choroidal detachment in one eye (3%). (4) Conclusions: Trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC showed similar IOP-control effects to those recorded in previous studies, along with a low rate of complications. There was no significant difference in efficacy or safety between the 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL MMC groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm10010059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33375313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Clinical medicine ; Cornea ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Glaucoma ; Hospitals ; Medical research ; Patients ; Photography ; Surgery ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-12, Vol.10 (1), p.59</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-59a3436c6755cb0b01bc0413534f603a878c965b75286fab0913a49dbb716a413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-59a3436c6755cb0b01bc0413534f603a878c965b75286fab0913a49dbb716a413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3490-0854</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796253/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7796253/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33375313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seol, Bo Ram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yu Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeoung, Jin Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Ki Ho</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C According to Concentration: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>(1) Background: Mitomycin C (MMC) is commonly used during trabeculectomy. However, there is no consensus on which concentration should be used. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC in eyes undergoing trabeculectomy. (2) Methods: Thirty-six eyes (36 glaucoma patients) were randomized to undergo a trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL or 0.4 mg/mL of MMC. The success rate was evaluated according to three criteria: (A) intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤18 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥20%; (B) IOP ≤15 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥25%; (C) IOP ≤12 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥30%. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to identify the predictive factors for failure. Immunohistochemical procedures for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) were performed on Tenon's tissue. Bleb morphology was evaluated. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of complications. (3) Results: Of the 36 eyes, 19 underwent trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL of MMC and 17 with 0.4 mg/mL. The success rates were 75%, 67%, and 47% at 6 months for criteria A, B, and C, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups. High MMP-9 staining and low preoperative IOP were associated with failure (hazard ratio (HR), 5.556; = 0.033, and HR, 0.936; = 0.033). Complications included hypotony in two eyes (6%), hyphema in one eye (3%), and choroidal detachment in one eye (3%). (4) Conclusions: Trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC showed similar IOP-control effects to those recorded in previous studies, along with a low rate of complications. There was no significant difference in efficacy or safety between the 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL MMC groups.</description><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVFrFDEUhYMottQ--S4BXwRZTeYmkxkfhGWorVBRtD6HJJPpZplJ1iRTWX-DP9oMW8tqCOTCPfnuSQ5Czyl5A9CSt1szUULK5u0jdFoRIVYEGnh8VJ-g85S2pKymYRUVT9EJAAgOFE7R7y5MOxVdCh6HAeeNxRfD4Iwye6x8j7-pweb90rqJSlszj9bkMO3xT5c3-JNbauM87vDamBB7529xDrgL3lifo8ou-Hd4jb_EkHblqruz-GsBh8n9sj3uRufLsLHQnRqfoSeDGpM9vz_P0PcPFzfd1er68-XHbn29Moy0ecVbBQxqUwvOjSaaUG0Io8CBDTUB1YjGtDXXgldNPShNWgqKtb3WgtaqCM_Q-wN3N-vJ9geno9xFN6m4l0E5-W_Hu428DXdSiLauOBTAq3tADD9mm7KcXDJ2HJW3YU6yYqKEQykss17-J92GOfryPFnVjBJgrFqArw8qU_4pRTs8mKFELkHLo6CL-sWx_wft31jhD6VppD8</recordid><startdate>20201226</startdate><enddate>20201226</enddate><creator>Seol, Bo Ram</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Yoon</creator><creator>Kim, Yu Jeong</creator><creator>Kim, Young Kook</creator><creator>Jeoung, Jin Wook</creator><creator>Park, Ki Ho</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-0854</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201226</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C According to Concentration: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Seol, Bo Ram ; Lee, Sang Yoon ; Kim, Yu Jeong ; Kim, Young Kook ; Jeoung, Jin Wook ; Park, Ki Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-59a3436c6755cb0b01bc0413534f603a878c965b75286fab0913a49dbb716a413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seol, Bo Ram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yu Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Kook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeoung, Jin Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Ki Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seol, Bo Ram</au><au>Lee, Sang Yoon</au><au>Kim, Yu Jeong</au><au>Kim, Young Kook</au><au>Jeoung, Jin Wook</au><au>Park, Ki Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C According to Concentration: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2020-12-26</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><pages>59-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>(1) Background: Mitomycin C (MMC) is commonly used during trabeculectomy. However, there is no consensus on which concentration should be used. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC in eyes undergoing trabeculectomy. (2) Methods: Thirty-six eyes (36 glaucoma patients) were randomized to undergo a trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL or 0.4 mg/mL of MMC. The success rate was evaluated according to three criteria: (A) intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤18 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥20%; (B) IOP ≤15 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥25%; (C) IOP ≤12 mmHg and IOP reduction ≥30%. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to identify the predictive factors for failure. Immunohistochemical procedures for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) were performed on Tenon's tissue. Bleb morphology was evaluated. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of complications. (3) Results: Of the 36 eyes, 19 underwent trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL of MMC and 17 with 0.4 mg/mL. The success rates were 75%, 67%, and 47% at 6 months for criteria A, B, and C, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups. High MMP-9 staining and low preoperative IOP were associated with failure (hazard ratio (HR), 5.556; = 0.033, and HR, 0.936; = 0.033). Complications included hypotony in two eyes (6%), hyphema in one eye (3%), and choroidal detachment in one eye (3%). (4) Conclusions: Trabeculectomy with 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL of MMC showed similar IOP-control effects to those recorded in previous studies, along with a low rate of complications. There was no significant difference in efficacy or safety between the 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL MMC groups.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33375313</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm10010059</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-0854</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-12, Vol.10 (1), p.59
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7796253
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Clinical medicine
Cornea
Diabetic retinopathy
Glaucoma
Hospitals
Medical research
Patients
Photography
Surgery
Wound healing
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C According to Concentration: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A22%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Trabeculectomy%20with%20Mitomycin%20C%20According%20to%20Concentration:%20A%20Prospective%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Seol,%20Bo%20Ram&rft.date=2020-12-26&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.pages=59-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm10010059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2473901131%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2641034423&rft_id=info:pmid/33375313&rfr_iscdi=true