Rebound Tonometry over Soft Contact Lenses
Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is named as a gold standard for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement. To assess the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometry over hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) of different powers. This study included 117...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta informatica medica 2020-09, Vol.28 (3), p.185-189 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 189 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 185 |
| container_title | Acta informatica medica |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Krolo, Iva Mihaljevic, Boze Kasumovic, Aida Bagatin, Freja Ravlic, Maja Malenica Herman, Jelena Skunca |
| description | Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is named as a gold standard for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.
To assess the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometry over hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) of different powers.
This study included 117 eyes of 61 patients (12 male, 49 female), all habitual wearers of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel CLs, and none previously diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension or anterior surface disease. Five IOP measurements were taken over each eye using a rebound tonometer (Icare): with soft CLs in situ and then repeated without CLs. Lens power ranged from -9.50 to +10.00 spherical diopters and to a maximum of -0.75 cylinder diopters.
A significant positive correlation was found between IOP measurements with and without CLs. The difference between IOP measurements with (mean 20.74±5.19 mmHg) and without (mean 18.79±4.36 mmHg) CLs was found to be 1.95 mmHg (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5455/aim.2020.28.185-189 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7780781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2476565777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-2f4fb03c32cc6d82f9fef06cd73870719cac9d14abbdd699c3a696fc6682038a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtLAzEQhYMotl5-gSALvoiwNffLiyDFGxQErc8hm010pbvRZLfQf29Kq6gPwzzMN4c5cwA4QXDCKGOXpmknGGI4wXKCJCuRVDtgjJTkJVNS7oIxJIyUEkE1AgcpvUPIGIZiH4wIoUhwKsbg4slVYejqYh660Lo-roqwdLF4Dr4vpqHrje2LmeuSS0dgz5tFcsfbfghebm_m0_ty9nj3ML2elZZQqUrsqa8gsQRby2uJvfLOQ25rQaSAAilrrKoRNVVV11wpSwxX3FvOJYZEGnIIrja6H0PVutq6ro9moT9i05q40sE0-u-ka970a1hqISQUEmWB861ADJ-DS71um2TdYmE6F4akMRWccSaEyOjZP_Q9DLHL9jJFJYeQEp4psqFsDClF53-OQVCvs9A5C73OQmOpcxa5VN46_e3jZ-f7-eQL1G6FRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2448600436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rebound Tonometry over Soft Contact Lenses</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Krolo, Iva ; Mihaljevic, Boze ; Kasumovic, Aida ; Bagatin, Freja ; Ravlic, Maja Malenica ; Herman, Jelena Skunca</creator><creatorcontrib>Krolo, Iva ; Mihaljevic, Boze ; Kasumovic, Aida ; Bagatin, Freja ; Ravlic, Maja Malenica ; Herman, Jelena Skunca</creatorcontrib><description>Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is named as a gold standard for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.
To assess the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometry over hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) of different powers.
This study included 117 eyes of 61 patients (12 male, 49 female), all habitual wearers of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel CLs, and none previously diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension or anterior surface disease. Five IOP measurements were taken over each eye using a rebound tonometer (Icare): with soft CLs in situ and then repeated without CLs. Lens power ranged from -9.50 to +10.00 spherical diopters and to a maximum of -0.75 cylinder diopters.
A significant positive correlation was found between IOP measurements with and without CLs. The difference between IOP measurements with (mean 20.74±5.19 mmHg) and without (mean 18.79±4.36 mmHg) CLs was found to be 1.95 mmHg (P <0.01). Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test and a correlation coefficient was calculated (r = 0.59; P <0.001). We have observed that increase in central corneal thickness (CCT) correlates positively with increase of measurement error of rebound tonometry (r = 0.43; P <0.001).
We have shown good reliability of IOP measurements over CLs of different materials and thickness profiles while using rebound tonometer which makes it a feasible and accurate method for clinical purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0353-8109</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1986-5988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5455/aim.2020.28.185-189</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33417647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bosnia and Herzegovina: Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina</publisher><subject>Contact lenses ; Contact pressure ; Correlation analysis ; Eye (anatomy) ; Glaucoma ; Hydrogels ; Hypertension ; Intraocular pressure ; Original Paper ; Silicone resins</subject><ispartof>Acta informatica medica, 2020-09, Vol.28 (3), p.185-189</ispartof><rights>2020 Iva Krolo, Boze Mihaljevic, Aida Kasumovic, Freja Bagatin, Maja Malenica Ravlic, Jelena Skunca Herman.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Iva Krolo, Boze Mihaljevic, Aida Kasumovic, Freja Bagatin, Maja Malenica Ravlic, Jelena Skunca Herman 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-2f4fb03c32cc6d82f9fef06cd73870719cac9d14abbdd699c3a696fc6682038a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780781/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7780781/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33417647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krolo, Iva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihaljevic, Boze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasumovic, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagatin, Freja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravlic, Maja Malenica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Jelena Skunca</creatorcontrib><title>Rebound Tonometry over Soft Contact Lenses</title><title>Acta informatica medica</title><addtitle>Acta Inform Med</addtitle><description>Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is named as a gold standard for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.
To assess the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometry over hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) of different powers.
This study included 117 eyes of 61 patients (12 male, 49 female), all habitual wearers of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel CLs, and none previously diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension or anterior surface disease. Five IOP measurements were taken over each eye using a rebound tonometer (Icare): with soft CLs in situ and then repeated without CLs. Lens power ranged from -9.50 to +10.00 spherical diopters and to a maximum of -0.75 cylinder diopters.
A significant positive correlation was found between IOP measurements with and without CLs. The difference between IOP measurements with (mean 20.74±5.19 mmHg) and without (mean 18.79±4.36 mmHg) CLs was found to be 1.95 mmHg (P <0.01). Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test and a correlation coefficient was calculated (r = 0.59; P <0.001). We have observed that increase in central corneal thickness (CCT) correlates positively with increase of measurement error of rebound tonometry (r = 0.43; P <0.001).
We have shown good reliability of IOP measurements over CLs of different materials and thickness profiles while using rebound tonometer which makes it a feasible and accurate method for clinical purposes.</description><subject>Contact lenses</subject><subject>Contact pressure</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Eye (anatomy)</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Hydrogels</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Silicone resins</subject><issn>0353-8109</issn><issn>1986-5988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkVtLAzEQhYMotl5-gSALvoiwNffLiyDFGxQErc8hm010pbvRZLfQf29Kq6gPwzzMN4c5cwA4QXDCKGOXpmknGGI4wXKCJCuRVDtgjJTkJVNS7oIxJIyUEkE1AgcpvUPIGIZiH4wIoUhwKsbg4slVYejqYh660Lo-roqwdLF4Dr4vpqHrje2LmeuSS0dgz5tFcsfbfghebm_m0_ty9nj3ML2elZZQqUrsqa8gsQRby2uJvfLOQ25rQaSAAilrrKoRNVVV11wpSwxX3FvOJYZEGnIIrja6H0PVutq6ro9moT9i05q40sE0-u-ka970a1hqISQUEmWB861ADJ-DS71um2TdYmE6F4akMRWccSaEyOjZP_Q9DLHL9jJFJYeQEp4psqFsDClF53-OQVCvs9A5C73OQmOpcxa5VN46_e3jZ-f7-eQL1G6FRA</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Krolo, Iva</creator><creator>Mihaljevic, Boze</creator><creator>Kasumovic, Aida</creator><creator>Bagatin, Freja</creator><creator>Ravlic, Maja Malenica</creator><creator>Herman, Jelena Skunca</creator><general>Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina</general><general>Academy of Medical sciences</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Rebound Tonometry over Soft Contact Lenses</title><author>Krolo, Iva ; Mihaljevic, Boze ; Kasumovic, Aida ; Bagatin, Freja ; Ravlic, Maja Malenica ; Herman, Jelena Skunca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3489-2f4fb03c32cc6d82f9fef06cd73870719cac9d14abbdd699c3a696fc6682038a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Contact lenses</topic><topic>Contact pressure</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Eye (anatomy)</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Hydrogels</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Silicone resins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krolo, Iva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihaljevic, Boze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasumovic, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagatin, Freja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravlic, Maja Malenica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Jelena Skunca</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta informatica medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krolo, Iva</au><au>Mihaljevic, Boze</au><au>Kasumovic, Aida</au><au>Bagatin, Freja</au><au>Ravlic, Maja Malenica</au><au>Herman, Jelena Skunca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rebound Tonometry over Soft Contact Lenses</atitle><jtitle>Acta informatica medica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Inform Med</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>185-189</pages><issn>0353-8109</issn><eissn>1986-5988</eissn><abstract>Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) is named as a gold standard for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement.
To assess the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using rebound tonometry over hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CLs) of different powers.
This study included 117 eyes of 61 patients (12 male, 49 female), all habitual wearers of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel CLs, and none previously diagnosed with glaucoma, ocular hypertension or anterior surface disease. Five IOP measurements were taken over each eye using a rebound tonometer (Icare): with soft CLs in situ and then repeated without CLs. Lens power ranged from -9.50 to +10.00 spherical diopters and to a maximum of -0.75 cylinder diopters.
A significant positive correlation was found between IOP measurements with and without CLs. The difference between IOP measurements with (mean 20.74±5.19 mmHg) and without (mean 18.79±4.36 mmHg) CLs was found to be 1.95 mmHg (P <0.01). Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test and a correlation coefficient was calculated (r = 0.59; P <0.001). We have observed that increase in central corneal thickness (CCT) correlates positively with increase of measurement error of rebound tonometry (r = 0.43; P <0.001).
We have shown good reliability of IOP measurements over CLs of different materials and thickness profiles while using rebound tonometer which makes it a feasible and accurate method for clinical purposes.</abstract><cop>Bosnia and Herzegovina</cop><pub>Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina</pub><pmid>33417647</pmid><doi>10.5455/aim.2020.28.185-189</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0353-8109 |
| ispartof | Acta informatica medica, 2020-09, Vol.28 (3), p.185-189 |
| issn | 0353-8109 1986-5988 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7780781 |
| source | PMC (PubMed Central); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Contact lenses Contact pressure Correlation analysis Eye (anatomy) Glaucoma Hydrogels Hypertension Intraocular pressure Original Paper Silicone resins |
| title | Rebound Tonometry over Soft Contact Lenses |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rebound%20Tonometry%20over%20Soft%20Contact%20Lenses&rft.jtitle=Acta%20informatica%20medica&rft.au=Krolo,%20Iva&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=185-189&rft.issn=0353-8109&rft.eissn=1986-5988&rft_id=info:doi/10.5455/aim.2020.28.185-189&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2476565777%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2448600436&rft_id=info:pmid/33417647&rfr_iscdi=true |