Prior PSMA PET-CT Imaging and Hounsfield Unit Impact on Tumor Yield and Success of Molecular Analyses from Bone Biopsies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Developing and optimizing targeted therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) necessitates molecular characterization. Obtaining sufficient tumor material for molecular characterization has been challenging. We aimed to identify clinical and imaging variables of imaging-gui...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2020-12, Vol.12 (12), p.3756
Hauptverfasser: Smits, Minke, Ekici, Kamer, Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita, van Oort, Inge M, Sedelaar, Michiel J P, Schalken, Jack A, Nagarajah, James, Scheenen, Tom W J, Gerritsen, Winald R, Fütterer, Jurgen J, Mehra, Niven
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3756
container_title Cancers
container_volume 12
creator Smits, Minke
Ekici, Kamer
Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita
van Oort, Inge M
Sedelaar, Michiel J P
Schalken, Jack A
Nagarajah, James
Scheenen, Tom W J
Gerritsen, Winald R
Fütterer, Jurgen J
Mehra, Niven
description Developing and optimizing targeted therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) necessitates molecular characterization. Obtaining sufficient tumor material for molecular characterization has been challenging. We aimed to identify clinical and imaging variables of imaging-guided bone biopsies in metastatic prostate cancer patients that associate with tumor yield and success in obtaining molecular results, and to design a predictive model: Clinical and imaging data were collected retrospectively from patients with prostate cancer who underwent a bone biopsy for histological and molecular characterization. Clinical characteristics, imaging modalities and imaging variables, were associated with successful biopsy results. In our study, we included a total of 110 bone biopsies. Histological conformation was possible in 84 of all biopsies, of which, in 73 of the 84, successful molecular characterization was performed. Prior use of PSMA PET-CT resulted in higher success rates in histological and molecular successful biopsies compared to CT or MRI. Evaluation of spine biopsies showed more often successful results compared to other locations for both histological and molecular biopsies ( = 0.027 and = 0.012, respectively). Low Hounsfield units (HUs) and deviation (Dev), taken at CT-guidance, were associated with histological successful biopsies ( = 0.025 and = 0.023, respectively) and with molecular successful biopsies ( = 0.010 and = 0.006, respectively). A prediction tool combining low HUs and low Dev resulted in significantly more successful biopsies, histological and molecular ( = 0.023 and = 0.007, respectively). Based on these results, we concluded that site selection for metastatic tissue biopsies with prior PSMA PET-CT imaging improves the chance of a successful biopsy. Further optimization can be achieved at CT-guidance, by selection of low HU and low Dev lesions. A prediction tool is provided to increase the success rate of bone biopsies in mCRPC patients, which can easily be implemented in daily practice.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers12123756
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7764855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471211761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-cd5a94784e92d62daa70d233ba6d63adfb685d66b1cfe2514e645a9e6550b6503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9PGzEQxS3UqiDKuTdkqZdetqz_Zy-VQkQLEhGRCAdOlteeTY127dTercQX6eetEyii-OKR5_eePPMQ-kTqr4w19Zk1wULKhBLKlJAH6IjWilZSNvzdq_oQneT8UJfDGFFSfUCHjDGqOGFH6M8q-Zjw6nY5x6uLdbVY46vBbHzYYBMcvoxTyJ2H3uG74MfS2xo74hjwehqK7n7f2pG3k7WQM44dXsYe7NSbhOfB9I8ZMu5SHPB5DIDPfdxmX558wEsYTR7N6C1epbirAC_2Q31E7zvTZzh5vo_R3feL9eKyur75cbWYX1eWUzJW1gnTcDXj0FAnqTNG1Y4y1hrpJDOua-VMOClbYjuggnCQvChAClG3UtTsGH178t1O7QDOQhiT6fU2-cGkRx2N1_93gv-pN_G3VkrymRDF4MuzQYq_JsijHny20PcmQJyyplzVTdk8IQX9_AZ9iFMqG9pTJcUSzo46e6Js2UhO0L18htR6F7t-E3tRnL6e4YX_FzL7C5ZTqr4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471211761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prior PSMA PET-CT Imaging and Hounsfield Unit Impact on Tumor Yield and Success of Molecular Analyses from Bone Biopsies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Smits, Minke ; Ekici, Kamer ; Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita ; van Oort, Inge M ; Sedelaar, Michiel J P ; Schalken, Jack A ; Nagarajah, James ; Scheenen, Tom W J ; Gerritsen, Winald R ; Fütterer, Jurgen J ; Mehra, Niven</creator><creatorcontrib>Smits, Minke ; Ekici, Kamer ; Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita ; van Oort, Inge M ; Sedelaar, Michiel J P ; Schalken, Jack A ; Nagarajah, James ; Scheenen, Tom W J ; Gerritsen, Winald R ; Fütterer, Jurgen J ; Mehra, Niven</creatorcontrib><description>Developing and optimizing targeted therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) necessitates molecular characterization. Obtaining sufficient tumor material for molecular characterization has been challenging. We aimed to identify clinical and imaging variables of imaging-guided bone biopsies in metastatic prostate cancer patients that associate with tumor yield and success in obtaining molecular results, and to design a predictive model: Clinical and imaging data were collected retrospectively from patients with prostate cancer who underwent a bone biopsy for histological and molecular characterization. Clinical characteristics, imaging modalities and imaging variables, were associated with successful biopsy results. In our study, we included a total of 110 bone biopsies. Histological conformation was possible in 84 of all biopsies, of which, in 73 of the 84, successful molecular characterization was performed. Prior use of PSMA PET-CT resulted in higher success rates in histological and molecular successful biopsies compared to CT or MRI. Evaluation of spine biopsies showed more often successful results compared to other locations for both histological and molecular biopsies ( = 0.027 and = 0.012, respectively). Low Hounsfield units (HUs) and deviation (Dev), taken at CT-guidance, were associated with histological successful biopsies ( = 0.025 and = 0.023, respectively) and with molecular successful biopsies ( = 0.010 and = 0.006, respectively). A prediction tool combining low HUs and low Dev resulted in significantly more successful biopsies, histological and molecular ( = 0.023 and = 0.007, respectively). Based on these results, we concluded that site selection for metastatic tissue biopsies with prior PSMA PET-CT imaging improves the chance of a successful biopsy. Further optimization can be achieved at CT-guidance, by selection of low HU and low Dev lesions. A prediction tool is provided to increase the success rate of bone biopsies in mCRPC patients, which can easily be implemented in daily practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33327413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Androgens ; Antigens ; Biomarkers ; Biopsy ; Bone cancer ; Bone imaging ; Cancer therapies ; Castration ; Computed tomography ; Conformation ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Mutation ; Patients ; Prediction models ; Prostate cancer ; Success ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2020-12, Vol.12 (12), p.3756</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-cd5a94784e92d62daa70d233ba6d63adfb685d66b1cfe2514e645a9e6550b6503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-cd5a94784e92d62daa70d233ba6d63adfb685d66b1cfe2514e645a9e6550b6503</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1360-7285 ; 0000-0002-7218-0122 ; 0000-0002-3555-0809 ; 0000-0002-4794-1831</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764855/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764855/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smits, Minke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekici, Kamer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oort, Inge M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedelaar, Michiel J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schalken, Jack A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarajah, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheenen, Tom W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerritsen, Winald R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fütterer, Jurgen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehra, Niven</creatorcontrib><title>Prior PSMA PET-CT Imaging and Hounsfield Unit Impact on Tumor Yield and Success of Molecular Analyses from Bone Biopsies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>Developing and optimizing targeted therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) necessitates molecular characterization. Obtaining sufficient tumor material for molecular characterization has been challenging. We aimed to identify clinical and imaging variables of imaging-guided bone biopsies in metastatic prostate cancer patients that associate with tumor yield and success in obtaining molecular results, and to design a predictive model: Clinical and imaging data were collected retrospectively from patients with prostate cancer who underwent a bone biopsy for histological and molecular characterization. Clinical characteristics, imaging modalities and imaging variables, were associated with successful biopsy results. In our study, we included a total of 110 bone biopsies. Histological conformation was possible in 84 of all biopsies, of which, in 73 of the 84, successful molecular characterization was performed. Prior use of PSMA PET-CT resulted in higher success rates in histological and molecular successful biopsies compared to CT or MRI. Evaluation of spine biopsies showed more often successful results compared to other locations for both histological and molecular biopsies ( = 0.027 and = 0.012, respectively). Low Hounsfield units (HUs) and deviation (Dev), taken at CT-guidance, were associated with histological successful biopsies ( = 0.025 and = 0.023, respectively) and with molecular successful biopsies ( = 0.010 and = 0.006, respectively). A prediction tool combining low HUs and low Dev resulted in significantly more successful biopsies, histological and molecular ( = 0.023 and = 0.007, respectively). Based on these results, we concluded that site selection for metastatic tissue biopsies with prior PSMA PET-CT imaging improves the chance of a successful biopsy. Further optimization can be achieved at CT-guidance, by selection of low HU and low Dev lesions. A prediction tool is provided to increase the success rate of bone biopsies in mCRPC patients, which can easily be implemented in daily practice.</description><subject>Androgens</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Bone cancer</subject><subject>Bone imaging</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Castration</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Conformation</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9PGzEQxS3UqiDKuTdkqZdetqz_Zy-VQkQLEhGRCAdOlteeTY127dTercQX6eetEyii-OKR5_eePPMQ-kTqr4w19Zk1wULKhBLKlJAH6IjWilZSNvzdq_oQneT8UJfDGFFSfUCHjDGqOGFH6M8q-Zjw6nY5x6uLdbVY46vBbHzYYBMcvoxTyJ2H3uG74MfS2xo74hjwehqK7n7f2pG3k7WQM44dXsYe7NSbhOfB9I8ZMu5SHPB5DIDPfdxmX558wEsYTR7N6C1epbirAC_2Q31E7zvTZzh5vo_R3feL9eKyur75cbWYX1eWUzJW1gnTcDXj0FAnqTNG1Y4y1hrpJDOua-VMOClbYjuggnCQvChAClG3UtTsGH178t1O7QDOQhiT6fU2-cGkRx2N1_93gv-pN_G3VkrymRDF4MuzQYq_JsijHny20PcmQJyyplzVTdk8IQX9_AZ9iFMqG9pTJcUSzo46e6Js2UhO0L18htR6F7t-E3tRnL6e4YX_FzL7C5ZTqr4</recordid><startdate>20201214</startdate><enddate>20201214</enddate><creator>Smits, Minke</creator><creator>Ekici, Kamer</creator><creator>Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita</creator><creator>van Oort, Inge M</creator><creator>Sedelaar, Michiel J P</creator><creator>Schalken, Jack A</creator><creator>Nagarajah, James</creator><creator>Scheenen, Tom W J</creator><creator>Gerritsen, Winald R</creator><creator>Fütterer, Jurgen J</creator><creator>Mehra, Niven</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-7285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7218-0122</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-0809</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4794-1831</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201214</creationdate><title>Prior PSMA PET-CT Imaging and Hounsfield Unit Impact on Tumor Yield and Success of Molecular Analyses from Bone Biopsies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer</title><author>Smits, Minke ; Ekici, Kamer ; Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita ; van Oort, Inge M ; Sedelaar, Michiel J P ; Schalken, Jack A ; Nagarajah, James ; Scheenen, Tom W J ; Gerritsen, Winald R ; Fütterer, Jurgen J ; Mehra, Niven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-cd5a94784e92d62daa70d233ba6d63adfb685d66b1cfe2514e645a9e6550b6503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Androgens</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Bone cancer</topic><topic>Bone imaging</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Castration</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Conformation</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smits, Minke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekici, Kamer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oort, Inge M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedelaar, Michiel J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schalken, Jack A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarajah, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheenen, Tom W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerritsen, Winald R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fütterer, Jurgen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehra, Niven</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smits, Minke</au><au>Ekici, Kamer</au><au>Pamidimarri Naga, Samhita</au><au>van Oort, Inge M</au><au>Sedelaar, Michiel J P</au><au>Schalken, Jack A</au><au>Nagarajah, James</au><au>Scheenen, Tom W J</au><au>Gerritsen, Winald R</au><au>Fütterer, Jurgen J</au><au>Mehra, Niven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prior PSMA PET-CT Imaging and Hounsfield Unit Impact on Tumor Yield and Success of Molecular Analyses from Bone Biopsies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2020-12-14</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3756</spage><pages>3756-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>Developing and optimizing targeted therapies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) necessitates molecular characterization. Obtaining sufficient tumor material for molecular characterization has been challenging. We aimed to identify clinical and imaging variables of imaging-guided bone biopsies in metastatic prostate cancer patients that associate with tumor yield and success in obtaining molecular results, and to design a predictive model: Clinical and imaging data were collected retrospectively from patients with prostate cancer who underwent a bone biopsy for histological and molecular characterization. Clinical characteristics, imaging modalities and imaging variables, were associated with successful biopsy results. In our study, we included a total of 110 bone biopsies. Histological conformation was possible in 84 of all biopsies, of which, in 73 of the 84, successful molecular characterization was performed. Prior use of PSMA PET-CT resulted in higher success rates in histological and molecular successful biopsies compared to CT or MRI. Evaluation of spine biopsies showed more often successful results compared to other locations for both histological and molecular biopsies ( = 0.027 and = 0.012, respectively). Low Hounsfield units (HUs) and deviation (Dev), taken at CT-guidance, were associated with histological successful biopsies ( = 0.025 and = 0.023, respectively) and with molecular successful biopsies ( = 0.010 and = 0.006, respectively). A prediction tool combining low HUs and low Dev resulted in significantly more successful biopsies, histological and molecular ( = 0.023 and = 0.007, respectively). Based on these results, we concluded that site selection for metastatic tissue biopsies with prior PSMA PET-CT imaging improves the chance of a successful biopsy. Further optimization can be achieved at CT-guidance, by selection of low HU and low Dev lesions. A prediction tool is provided to increase the success rate of bone biopsies in mCRPC patients, which can easily be implemented in daily practice.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33327413</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers12123756</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-7285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7218-0122</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-0809</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4794-1831</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2020-12, Vol.12 (12), p.3756
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7764855
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Androgens
Antigens
Biomarkers
Biopsy
Bone cancer
Bone imaging
Cancer therapies
Castration
Computed tomography
Conformation
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Metastases
Metastasis
Mutation
Patients
Prediction models
Prostate cancer
Success
Variables
title Prior PSMA PET-CT Imaging and Hounsfield Unit Impact on Tumor Yield and Success of Molecular Analyses from Bone Biopsies in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A37%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prior%20PSMA%20PET-CT%20Imaging%20and%20Hounsfield%20Unit%20Impact%20on%20Tumor%20Yield%20and%20Success%20of%20Molecular%20Analyses%20from%20Bone%20Biopsies%20in%20Metastatic%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Smits,%20Minke&rft.date=2020-12-14&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3756&rft.pages=3756-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers12123756&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2471211761%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471211761&rft_id=info:pmid/33327413&rfr_iscdi=true