Supporting a Healthier Takeaway Meal Choice: Creating a Universal Health Rating for Online Takeaway Fast-Food Outlets
Digital food ordering platforms are used by millions across the world and provide easy access to takeaway fast-food that is broadly, though not exclusively, characterised as energy dense and nutrient poor. Outlets are routinely rated for hygiene, but not for their healthiness. Nutritional informatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2020-12, Vol.17 (24), p.9260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 9260 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Goffe, Louis Uwamahoro, Nadege S Dixon, Christopher J Blain, Alasdair P Danielsen, Jona Kirk, David Adamson, Ashley J |
description | Digital food ordering platforms are used by millions across the world and provide easy access to takeaway fast-food that is broadly, though not exclusively, characterised as energy dense and nutrient poor. Outlets are routinely rated for hygiene, but not for their healthiness. Nutritional information is mandatory in pre-packaged foods, with many companies voluntarily using traffic light labels to support making healthier choices. We wanted to identify a feasible universal method to objectively score takeaway fast-food outlets listed on Just Eat that could provide users with an accessible rating that can infer an outlet's
. Using a sample of takeaway outlets listed on Just Eat, we obtained four complete assessments by nutrition researchers of each outlet's healthiness to create a cumulative score that ranged from 4 to 12. We then identified and manually extracted nutritional attributes from each outlet's digital menu, e.g., number of vegetables that have the potential to be numerated. Using generalized linear modelling we identified which attributes were linear predictors of an outlet's healthiness assessment from nutritional researchers. The availability of water, salad, and the diversity of vegetables were positively associated with academic researchers' assessment of an outlet's healthiness, whereas the availability of chips, desserts, and multiple meal sizes were negatively associated. This study shows promise for the feasibility of an objective measure of healthiness that could be applied to all outlet listings on Just Eat and other digital food outlet aggregation platforms. However, further research is required to assess the metric's validity, its desirability and value to users, and ultimately its potential influence on food choice behaviour. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph17249260 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7763894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2470411594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-acf2b40184f207de89a2a6ddcb3b72dc0b864f8c2dc3c6c1dee5e7d042c50de13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUlPwzAQhS0EYilcOSJLXLgEvNVJOCChigISqBLL2XLsCXVJ42AnIP49oS3raUbzvnma0UNon5JjznNy4mYQmilNmciZJGtom0pJEiEJXf_Vb6GdGGeE8EzIfBNtcc4ZY5ncRt191zQ-tK5-whpfga7aqYOAH_Qz6Df9jm_7ER5NvTNwikcB9Ap9rN0rhNiLyyV8t1RKH_CkrlwNPx5jHdtk7L3Fk66toI27aKPUVYS9VR2gx_HFw-gquZlcXo_ObxIjaNYm2pSsEIRmomQktZDlmmlprSl4kTJrSJFJUWamb7mRhlqAIaSWCGaGxALlA3S29G26Yg7WQN0GXakmuLkO78prp_4qtZuqJ_-q0lTyLBe9wdHKIPiXDmKr5i4aqCpdg--iYiIlkg37G3v08B86812o-_cWlKB0uDA8XlIm-BgDlN_HUKI-E1V_E-0XDn6_8I1_Rcg_APVnn3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470411594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supporting a Healthier Takeaway Meal Choice: Creating a Universal Health Rating for Online Takeaway Fast-Food Outlets</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Goffe, Louis ; Uwamahoro, Nadege S ; Dixon, Christopher J ; Blain, Alasdair P ; Danielsen, Jona ; Kirk, David ; Adamson, Ashley J</creator><creatorcontrib>Goffe, Louis ; Uwamahoro, Nadege S ; Dixon, Christopher J ; Blain, Alasdair P ; Danielsen, Jona ; Kirk, David ; Adamson, Ashley J</creatorcontrib><description>Digital food ordering platforms are used by millions across the world and provide easy access to takeaway fast-food that is broadly, though not exclusively, characterised as energy dense and nutrient poor. Outlets are routinely rated for hygiene, but not for their healthiness. Nutritional information is mandatory in pre-packaged foods, with many companies voluntarily using traffic light labels to support making healthier choices. We wanted to identify a feasible universal method to objectively score takeaway fast-food outlets listed on Just Eat that could provide users with an accessible rating that can infer an outlet's
. Using a sample of takeaway outlets listed on Just Eat, we obtained four complete assessments by nutrition researchers of each outlet's healthiness to create a cumulative score that ranged from 4 to 12. We then identified and manually extracted nutritional attributes from each outlet's digital menu, e.g., number of vegetables that have the potential to be numerated. Using generalized linear modelling we identified which attributes were linear predictors of an outlet's healthiness assessment from nutritional researchers. The availability of water, salad, and the diversity of vegetables were positively associated with academic researchers' assessment of an outlet's healthiness, whereas the availability of chips, desserts, and multiple meal sizes were negatively associated. This study shows promise for the feasibility of an objective measure of healthiness that could be applied to all outlet listings on Just Eat and other digital food outlet aggregation platforms. However, further research is required to assess the metric's validity, its desirability and value to users, and ultimately its potential influence on food choice behaviour.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17249260</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33322286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Choice Behavior ; Consumption ; Desserts ; Diet, Healthy ; Fast food ; Fast Foods ; Feasibility ; Food ; Food Preferences ; Food quality ; Health care ; Hygiene ; Labeling ; Linear Models ; Literacy ; Meals ; Nutrition ; Nutritive Value ; Packaged food ; Traffic signals ; Vegetables ; Water availability</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-12, Vol.17 (24), p.9260</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-acf2b40184f207de89a2a6ddcb3b72dc0b864f8c2dc3c6c1dee5e7d042c50de13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-acf2b40184f207de89a2a6ddcb3b72dc0b864f8c2dc3c6c1dee5e7d042c50de13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9296-0396 ; 0000-0002-3712-5283 ; 0000-0002-3623-2458 ; 0000-0003-2776-0643 ; 0000-0003-3735-2846</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763894/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763894/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33322286$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goffe, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uwamahoro, Nadege S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blain, Alasdair P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danielsen, Jona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Ashley J</creatorcontrib><title>Supporting a Healthier Takeaway Meal Choice: Creating a Universal Health Rating for Online Takeaway Fast-Food Outlets</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Digital food ordering platforms are used by millions across the world and provide easy access to takeaway fast-food that is broadly, though not exclusively, characterised as energy dense and nutrient poor. Outlets are routinely rated for hygiene, but not for their healthiness. Nutritional information is mandatory in pre-packaged foods, with many companies voluntarily using traffic light labels to support making healthier choices. We wanted to identify a feasible universal method to objectively score takeaway fast-food outlets listed on Just Eat that could provide users with an accessible rating that can infer an outlet's
. Using a sample of takeaway outlets listed on Just Eat, we obtained four complete assessments by nutrition researchers of each outlet's healthiness to create a cumulative score that ranged from 4 to 12. We then identified and manually extracted nutritional attributes from each outlet's digital menu, e.g., number of vegetables that have the potential to be numerated. Using generalized linear modelling we identified which attributes were linear predictors of an outlet's healthiness assessment from nutritional researchers. The availability of water, salad, and the diversity of vegetables were positively associated with academic researchers' assessment of an outlet's healthiness, whereas the availability of chips, desserts, and multiple meal sizes were negatively associated. This study shows promise for the feasibility of an objective measure of healthiness that could be applied to all outlet listings on Just Eat and other digital food outlet aggregation platforms. However, further research is required to assess the metric's validity, its desirability and value to users, and ultimately its potential influence on food choice behaviour.</description><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Desserts</subject><subject>Diet, Healthy</subject><subject>Fast food</subject><subject>Fast Foods</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food Preferences</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritive Value</subject><subject>Packaged food</subject><subject>Traffic signals</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Water availability</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUlPwzAQhS0EYilcOSJLXLgEvNVJOCChigISqBLL2XLsCXVJ42AnIP49oS3raUbzvnma0UNon5JjznNy4mYQmilNmciZJGtom0pJEiEJXf_Vb6GdGGeE8EzIfBNtcc4ZY5ncRt191zQ-tK5-whpfga7aqYOAH_Qz6Df9jm_7ER5NvTNwikcB9Ap9rN0rhNiLyyV8t1RKH_CkrlwNPx5jHdtk7L3Fk66toI27aKPUVYS9VR2gx_HFw-gquZlcXo_ObxIjaNYm2pSsEIRmomQktZDlmmlprSl4kTJrSJFJUWamb7mRhlqAIaSWCGaGxALlA3S29G26Yg7WQN0GXakmuLkO78prp_4qtZuqJ_-q0lTyLBe9wdHKIPiXDmKr5i4aqCpdg--iYiIlkg37G3v08B86812o-_cWlKB0uDA8XlIm-BgDlN_HUKI-E1V_E-0XDn6_8I1_Rcg_APVnn3M</recordid><startdate>20201211</startdate><enddate>20201211</enddate><creator>Goffe, Louis</creator><creator>Uwamahoro, Nadege S</creator><creator>Dixon, Christopher J</creator><creator>Blain, Alasdair P</creator><creator>Danielsen, Jona</creator><creator>Kirk, David</creator><creator>Adamson, Ashley J</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-0396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-5283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3623-2458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2776-0643</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3735-2846</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201211</creationdate><title>Supporting a Healthier Takeaway Meal Choice: Creating a Universal Health Rating for Online Takeaway Fast-Food Outlets</title><author>Goffe, Louis ; Uwamahoro, Nadege S ; Dixon, Christopher J ; Blain, Alasdair P ; Danielsen, Jona ; Kirk, David ; Adamson, Ashley J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-acf2b40184f207de89a2a6ddcb3b72dc0b864f8c2dc3c6c1dee5e7d042c50de13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Desserts</topic><topic>Diet, Healthy</topic><topic>Fast food</topic><topic>Fast Foods</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food Preferences</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritive Value</topic><topic>Packaged food</topic><topic>Traffic signals</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Water availability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goffe, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uwamahoro, Nadege S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dixon, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blain, Alasdair P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danielsen, Jona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Ashley J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goffe, Louis</au><au>Uwamahoro, Nadege S</au><au>Dixon, Christopher J</au><au>Blain, Alasdair P</au><au>Danielsen, Jona</au><au>Kirk, David</au><au>Adamson, Ashley J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supporting a Healthier Takeaway Meal Choice: Creating a Universal Health Rating for Online Takeaway Fast-Food Outlets</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-12-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>9260</spage><pages>9260-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Digital food ordering platforms are used by millions across the world and provide easy access to takeaway fast-food that is broadly, though not exclusively, characterised as energy dense and nutrient poor. Outlets are routinely rated for hygiene, but not for their healthiness. Nutritional information is mandatory in pre-packaged foods, with many companies voluntarily using traffic light labels to support making healthier choices. We wanted to identify a feasible universal method to objectively score takeaway fast-food outlets listed on Just Eat that could provide users with an accessible rating that can infer an outlet's
. Using a sample of takeaway outlets listed on Just Eat, we obtained four complete assessments by nutrition researchers of each outlet's healthiness to create a cumulative score that ranged from 4 to 12. We then identified and manually extracted nutritional attributes from each outlet's digital menu, e.g., number of vegetables that have the potential to be numerated. Using generalized linear modelling we identified which attributes were linear predictors of an outlet's healthiness assessment from nutritional researchers. The availability of water, salad, and the diversity of vegetables were positively associated with academic researchers' assessment of an outlet's healthiness, whereas the availability of chips, desserts, and multiple meal sizes were negatively associated. This study shows promise for the feasibility of an objective measure of healthiness that could be applied to all outlet listings on Just Eat and other digital food outlet aggregation platforms. However, further research is required to assess the metric's validity, its desirability and value to users, and ultimately its potential influence on food choice behaviour.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33322286</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph17249260</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-0396</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-5283</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3623-2458</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2776-0643</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3735-2846</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-12, Vol.17 (24), p.9260 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7763894 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Choice Behavior Consumption Desserts Diet, Healthy Fast food Fast Foods Feasibility Food Food Preferences Food quality Health care Hygiene Labeling Linear Models Literacy Meals Nutrition Nutritive Value Packaged food Traffic signals Vegetables Water availability |
title | Supporting a Healthier Takeaway Meal Choice: Creating a Universal Health Rating for Online Takeaway Fast-Food Outlets |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T02%3A46%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supporting%20a%20Healthier%20Takeaway%20Meal%20Choice:%20Creating%20a%20Universal%20Health%20Rating%20for%20Online%20Takeaway%20Fast-Food%20Outlets&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Goffe,%20Louis&rft.date=2020-12-11&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=9260&rft.pages=9260-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph17249260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2470411594%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470411594&rft_id=info:pmid/33322286&rfr_iscdi=true |