Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey
Objectives To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis. Methods Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology 2020-12, Vol.5 (6), p.1019-1028 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1028 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1019 |
container_title | Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Andrews, Peter J. Pendolino, Alfonso Luca Ottaviano, Giancarlo Scarpa, Bruno Grant, Joseph Gaudioso, Piergiorgio Bordin, Anna Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario Leoni, Davide Cattelan, Annamaria Kaura, Anika Gane, Simon Hamilton, Nick J. Choi, David Andrews, Julie A. |
description | Objectives
To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis.
Methods
Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed HCWs (COVID‐19 positive) in London and Padua.
Results
Hundred and fourteen COVID‐19 positive HCWs were surveyed with a response rate of 70.6% over a median follow‐up period of 52 days. UK prevalence of OD and TD was 73.1% and 69.2%, respectively. There was a male to female ratio of 1:3 with 81.6% being white, 43.7% being nurses/health care assistants (HCAs), and 39.3% being doctors. In addition, 53.2% of them worked on COVID‐19 wards. Complete recovery was reported in 31.8% for OD and 47.1% for TD with a 52 days follow‐up. The job role of doctors and nurses negatively influenced smell (P = .04 and P = .02) and taste recovery (P = .02 and P = .01). Ethnicity (being white) showed to positively influence only taste recovery (P = .04). Sex (being female) negatively influenced OD and TD recovery only in Paduan HCWs (P = .02 and P = .011, respectively). Working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis.
Conclusions
The prevalence of OD and TD was considerably higher in HCWs. The prognosis for OD and TD recovery was worse for nurses/HCAs and doctors but working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Sixty‐eight percent of surveyed HCWs at 52 days continued to experience OD or TD requiring additional future medical management capacity.
Level of Evidence
4.
XXX. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lio2.507 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7752034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471522582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-c34fe5b0f1b599e63b1644ffc7e3a4926bd717c763858303b3053e1c000ed2693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEolWpxBMgS2zYpPUljhMWSNUU6EgjzQbYWo5z0nFx7MF2psqOHVuekSfBQ0svSGx8LJ1Pn_6jvyheEnxCMKan1nh6wrF4UhxSJpqywax5-uB_UBzHeIUxJjWt6wY_Lw4YYzVnLTssfqztoHTyYUbK9SipmAD1cxwmp5PxDqnRu0s0Gtv_-v4z-fyMvoegMhbncZv8qJLRaLH-sjzPS9KirY8mmR2gDSibNkirAOjah68Q4lt05pBxCYJTe72yKE5hB_OL4tmgbITj23lUfP7w_tPiolytPy4XZ6tSc0ZFqVk1AO_wQDretlCzjtRVNQxaAFNVS-uuF0RoUbOGNwyzjmHOgOh8PfS0btlR8e7Gu526EXoNLgVl5TaYUYVZemXk440zG3npd1IITjGrsuDNrSD4bxPEJEcTNVirHPgpSloJVmGcU2X09T_olZ_y4fYPRTilvKH3Qh18jAGGuzAEy33Bcl-wzAVn9NXD8Hfg3zozUN4A18bC_F-RXC3XdC_8Dd9Ls9o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471522582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Andrews, Peter J. ; Pendolino, Alfonso Luca ; Ottaviano, Giancarlo ; Scarpa, Bruno ; Grant, Joseph ; Gaudioso, Piergiorgio ; Bordin, Anna ; Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario ; Leoni, Davide ; Cattelan, Annamaria ; Kaura, Anika ; Gane, Simon ; Hamilton, Nick J. ; Choi, David ; Andrews, Julie A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Peter J. ; Pendolino, Alfonso Luca ; Ottaviano, Giancarlo ; Scarpa, Bruno ; Grant, Joseph ; Gaudioso, Piergiorgio ; Bordin, Anna ; Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario ; Leoni, Davide ; Cattelan, Annamaria ; Kaura, Anika ; Gane, Simon ; Hamilton, Nick J. ; Choi, David ; Andrews, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis.
Methods
Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed HCWs (COVID‐19 positive) in London and Padua.
Results
Hundred and fourteen COVID‐19 positive HCWs were surveyed with a response rate of 70.6% over a median follow‐up period of 52 days. UK prevalence of OD and TD was 73.1% and 69.2%, respectively. There was a male to female ratio of 1:3 with 81.6% being white, 43.7% being nurses/health care assistants (HCAs), and 39.3% being doctors. In addition, 53.2% of them worked on COVID‐19 wards. Complete recovery was reported in 31.8% for OD and 47.1% for TD with a 52 days follow‐up. The job role of doctors and nurses negatively influenced smell (P = .04 and P = .02) and taste recovery (P = .02 and P = .01). Ethnicity (being white) showed to positively influence only taste recovery (P = .04). Sex (being female) negatively influenced OD and TD recovery only in Paduan HCWs (P = .02 and P = .011, respectively). Working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis.
Conclusions
The prevalence of OD and TD was considerably higher in HCWs. The prognosis for OD and TD recovery was worse for nurses/HCAs and doctors but working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Sixty‐eight percent of surveyed HCWs at 52 days continued to experience OD or TD requiring additional future medical management capacity.
Level of Evidence
4.
XXX.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2378-8038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2378-8038</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lio2.507</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33365393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology ; COVID‐19 ; Ethnicity ; Hospitals ; Infections ; Intensive care ; Laboratories ; Medical prognosis ; Nurses ; Olfaction disorders ; olfactory dysfunction ; Original Research ; Otolaryngology ; Population ; Questionnaires ; rhinology ; smell ; survey ; Survival analysis ; taste ; taste dysfunction</subject><ispartof>Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020-12, Vol.5 (6), p.1019-1028</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-c34fe5b0f1b599e63b1644ffc7e3a4926bd717c763858303b3053e1c000ed2693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-c34fe5b0f1b599e63b1644ffc7e3a4926bd717c763858303b3053e1c000ed2693</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5731-3276 ; 0000-0002-6348-5303 ; 0000-0003-2433-4761 ; 0000-0003-3563-5164</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752034/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752034/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33365393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendolino, Alfonso Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottaviano, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarpa, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudioso, Piergiorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordin, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoni, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattelan, Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaura, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gane, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><title>Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey</title><title>Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis.
Methods
Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed HCWs (COVID‐19 positive) in London and Padua.
Results
Hundred and fourteen COVID‐19 positive HCWs were surveyed with a response rate of 70.6% over a median follow‐up period of 52 days. UK prevalence of OD and TD was 73.1% and 69.2%, respectively. There was a male to female ratio of 1:3 with 81.6% being white, 43.7% being nurses/health care assistants (HCAs), and 39.3% being doctors. In addition, 53.2% of them worked on COVID‐19 wards. Complete recovery was reported in 31.8% for OD and 47.1% for TD with a 52 days follow‐up. The job role of doctors and nurses negatively influenced smell (P = .04 and P = .02) and taste recovery (P = .02 and P = .01). Ethnicity (being white) showed to positively influence only taste recovery (P = .04). Sex (being female) negatively influenced OD and TD recovery only in Paduan HCWs (P = .02 and P = .011, respectively). Working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis.
Conclusions
The prevalence of OD and TD was considerably higher in HCWs. The prognosis for OD and TD recovery was worse for nurses/HCAs and doctors but working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Sixty‐eight percent of surveyed HCWs at 52 days continued to experience OD or TD requiring additional future medical management capacity.
Level of Evidence
4.
XXX.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology</subject><subject>COVID‐19</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Olfaction disorders</subject><subject>olfactory dysfunction</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>rhinology</subject><subject>smell</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>taste</subject><subject>taste dysfunction</subject><issn>2378-8038</issn><issn>2378-8038</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEolWpxBMgS2zYpPUljhMWSNUU6EgjzQbYWo5z0nFx7MF2psqOHVuekSfBQ0svSGx8LJ1Pn_6jvyheEnxCMKan1nh6wrF4UhxSJpqywax5-uB_UBzHeIUxJjWt6wY_Lw4YYzVnLTssfqztoHTyYUbK9SipmAD1cxwmp5PxDqnRu0s0Gtv_-v4z-fyMvoegMhbncZv8qJLRaLH-sjzPS9KirY8mmR2gDSibNkirAOjah68Q4lt05pBxCYJTe72yKE5hB_OL4tmgbITj23lUfP7w_tPiolytPy4XZ6tSc0ZFqVk1AO_wQDretlCzjtRVNQxaAFNVS-uuF0RoUbOGNwyzjmHOgOh8PfS0btlR8e7Gu526EXoNLgVl5TaYUYVZemXk440zG3npd1IITjGrsuDNrSD4bxPEJEcTNVirHPgpSloJVmGcU2X09T_olZ_y4fYPRTilvKH3Qh18jAGGuzAEy33Bcl-wzAVn9NXD8Hfg3zozUN4A18bC_F-RXC3XdC_8Dd9Ls9o</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Andrews, Peter J.</creator><creator>Pendolino, Alfonso Luca</creator><creator>Ottaviano, Giancarlo</creator><creator>Scarpa, Bruno</creator><creator>Grant, Joseph</creator><creator>Gaudioso, Piergiorgio</creator><creator>Bordin, Anna</creator><creator>Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario</creator><creator>Leoni, Davide</creator><creator>Cattelan, Annamaria</creator><creator>Kaura, Anika</creator><creator>Gane, Simon</creator><creator>Hamilton, Nick J.</creator><creator>Choi, David</creator><creator>Andrews, Julie A.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-3276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-5303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-4761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-5164</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey</title><author>Andrews, Peter J. ; Pendolino, Alfonso Luca ; Ottaviano, Giancarlo ; Scarpa, Bruno ; Grant, Joseph ; Gaudioso, Piergiorgio ; Bordin, Anna ; Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario ; Leoni, Davide ; Cattelan, Annamaria ; Kaura, Anika ; Gane, Simon ; Hamilton, Nick J. ; Choi, David ; Andrews, Julie A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-c34fe5b0f1b599e63b1644ffc7e3a4926bd717c763858303b3053e1c000ed2693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology</topic><topic>COVID‐19</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Olfaction disorders</topic><topic>olfactory dysfunction</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>rhinology</topic><topic>smell</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>taste</topic><topic>taste dysfunction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendolino, Alfonso Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottaviano, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarpa, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudioso, Piergiorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordin, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoni, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattelan, Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaura, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gane, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrews, Peter J.</au><au>Pendolino, Alfonso Luca</au><au>Ottaviano, Giancarlo</au><au>Scarpa, Bruno</au><au>Grant, Joseph</au><au>Gaudioso, Piergiorgio</au><au>Bordin, Anna</au><au>Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario</au><au>Leoni, Davide</au><au>Cattelan, Annamaria</au><au>Kaura, Anika</au><au>Gane, Simon</au><au>Hamilton, Nick J.</au><au>Choi, David</au><au>Andrews, Julie A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey</atitle><jtitle>Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1019</spage><epage>1028</epage><pages>1019-1028</pages><issn>2378-8038</issn><eissn>2378-8038</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis.
Methods
Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed HCWs (COVID‐19 positive) in London and Padua.
Results
Hundred and fourteen COVID‐19 positive HCWs were surveyed with a response rate of 70.6% over a median follow‐up period of 52 days. UK prevalence of OD and TD was 73.1% and 69.2%, respectively. There was a male to female ratio of 1:3 with 81.6% being white, 43.7% being nurses/health care assistants (HCAs), and 39.3% being doctors. In addition, 53.2% of them worked on COVID‐19 wards. Complete recovery was reported in 31.8% for OD and 47.1% for TD with a 52 days follow‐up. The job role of doctors and nurses negatively influenced smell (P = .04 and P = .02) and taste recovery (P = .02 and P = .01). Ethnicity (being white) showed to positively influence only taste recovery (P = .04). Sex (being female) negatively influenced OD and TD recovery only in Paduan HCWs (P = .02 and P = .011, respectively). Working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis.
Conclusions
The prevalence of OD and TD was considerably higher in HCWs. The prognosis for OD and TD recovery was worse for nurses/HCAs and doctors but working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Sixty‐eight percent of surveyed HCWs at 52 days continued to experience OD or TD requiring additional future medical management capacity.
Level of Evidence
4.
XXX.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33365393</pmid><doi>10.1002/lio2.507</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-3276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-5303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-4761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-5164</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2378-8038 |
ispartof | Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020-12, Vol.5 (6), p.1019-1028 |
issn | 2378-8038 2378-8038 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7752034 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Age Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology COVID‐19 Ethnicity Hospitals Infections Intensive care Laboratories Medical prognosis Nurses Olfaction disorders olfactory dysfunction Original Research Otolaryngology Population Questionnaires rhinology smell survey Survival analysis taste taste dysfunction |
title | Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A19%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Olfactory%20and%20taste%20dysfunction%20among%20mild%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90moderate%20symptomatic%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20positive%20health%20care%20workers:%20An%20international%20survey&rft.jtitle=Laryngoscope%20investigative%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Andrews,%20Peter%20J.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1019&rft.epage=1028&rft.pages=1019-1028&rft.issn=2378-8038&rft.eissn=2378-8038&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lio2.507&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2471522582%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471522582&rft_id=info:pmid/33365393&rfr_iscdi=true |