Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey

Objectives To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis. Methods Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology 2020-12, Vol.5 (6), p.1019-1028
Hauptverfasser: Andrews, Peter J., Pendolino, Alfonso Luca, Ottaviano, Giancarlo, Scarpa, Bruno, Grant, Joseph, Gaudioso, Piergiorgio, Bordin, Anna, Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario, Leoni, Davide, Cattelan, Annamaria, Kaura, Anika, Gane, Simon, Hamilton, Nick J., Choi, David, Andrews, Julie A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1028
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1019
container_title Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology
container_volume 5
creator Andrews, Peter J.
Pendolino, Alfonso Luca
Ottaviano, Giancarlo
Scarpa, Bruno
Grant, Joseph
Gaudioso, Piergiorgio
Bordin, Anna
Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario
Leoni, Davide
Cattelan, Annamaria
Kaura, Anika
Gane, Simon
Hamilton, Nick J.
Choi, David
Andrews, Julie A.
description Objectives To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis. Methods Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed HCWs (COVID‐19 positive) in London and Padua. Results Hundred and fourteen COVID‐19 positive HCWs were surveyed with a response rate of 70.6% over a median follow‐up period of 52 days. UK prevalence of OD and TD was 73.1% and 69.2%, respectively. There was a male to female ratio of 1:3 with 81.6% being white, 43.7% being nurses/health care assistants (HCAs), and 39.3% being doctors. In addition, 53.2% of them worked on COVID‐19 wards. Complete recovery was reported in 31.8% for OD and 47.1% for TD with a 52 days follow‐up. The job role of doctors and nurses negatively influenced smell (P = .04 and P = .02) and taste recovery (P = .02 and P = .01). Ethnicity (being white) showed to positively influence only taste recovery (P = .04). Sex (being female) negatively influenced OD and TD recovery only in Paduan HCWs (P = .02 and P = .011, respectively). Working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Conclusions The prevalence of OD and TD was considerably higher in HCWs. The prognosis for OD and TD recovery was worse for nurses/HCAs and doctors but working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Sixty‐eight percent of surveyed HCWs at 52 days continued to experience OD or TD requiring additional future medical management capacity. Level of Evidence 4. XXX.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lio2.507
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7752034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2471522582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-c34fe5b0f1b599e63b1644ffc7e3a4926bd717c763858303b3053e1c000ed2693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEolWpxBMgS2zYpPUljhMWSNUU6EgjzQbYWo5z0nFx7MF2psqOHVuekSfBQ0svSGx8LJ1Pn_6jvyheEnxCMKan1nh6wrF4UhxSJpqywax5-uB_UBzHeIUxJjWt6wY_Lw4YYzVnLTssfqztoHTyYUbK9SipmAD1cxwmp5PxDqnRu0s0Gtv_-v4z-fyMvoegMhbncZv8qJLRaLH-sjzPS9KirY8mmR2gDSibNkirAOjah68Q4lt05pBxCYJTe72yKE5hB_OL4tmgbITj23lUfP7w_tPiolytPy4XZ6tSc0ZFqVk1AO_wQDretlCzjtRVNQxaAFNVS-uuF0RoUbOGNwyzjmHOgOh8PfS0btlR8e7Gu526EXoNLgVl5TaYUYVZemXk440zG3npd1IITjGrsuDNrSD4bxPEJEcTNVirHPgpSloJVmGcU2X09T_olZ_y4fYPRTilvKH3Qh18jAGGuzAEy33Bcl-wzAVn9NXD8Hfg3zozUN4A18bC_F-RXC3XdC_8Dd9Ls9o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471522582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Andrews, Peter J. ; Pendolino, Alfonso Luca ; Ottaviano, Giancarlo ; Scarpa, Bruno ; Grant, Joseph ; Gaudioso, Piergiorgio ; Bordin, Anna ; Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario ; Leoni, Davide ; Cattelan, Annamaria ; Kaura, Anika ; Gane, Simon ; Hamilton, Nick J. ; Choi, David ; Andrews, Julie A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Peter J. ; Pendolino, Alfonso Luca ; Ottaviano, Giancarlo ; Scarpa, Bruno ; Grant, Joseph ; Gaudioso, Piergiorgio ; Bordin, Anna ; Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario ; Leoni, Davide ; Cattelan, Annamaria ; Kaura, Anika ; Gane, Simon ; Hamilton, Nick J. ; Choi, David ; Andrews, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis. Methods Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed HCWs (COVID‐19 positive) in London and Padua. Results Hundred and fourteen COVID‐19 positive HCWs were surveyed with a response rate of 70.6% over a median follow‐up period of 52 days. UK prevalence of OD and TD was 73.1% and 69.2%, respectively. There was a male to female ratio of 1:3 with 81.6% being white, 43.7% being nurses/health care assistants (HCAs), and 39.3% being doctors. In addition, 53.2% of them worked on COVID‐19 wards. Complete recovery was reported in 31.8% for OD and 47.1% for TD with a 52 days follow‐up. The job role of doctors and nurses negatively influenced smell (P = .04 and P = .02) and taste recovery (P = .02 and P = .01). Ethnicity (being white) showed to positively influence only taste recovery (P = .04). Sex (being female) negatively influenced OD and TD recovery only in Paduan HCWs (P = .02 and P = .011, respectively). Working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Conclusions The prevalence of OD and TD was considerably higher in HCWs. The prognosis for OD and TD recovery was worse for nurses/HCAs and doctors but working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Sixty‐eight percent of surveyed HCWs at 52 days continued to experience OD or TD requiring additional future medical management capacity. Level of Evidence 4. XXX.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2378-8038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2378-8038</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lio2.507</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33365393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology ; COVID‐19 ; Ethnicity ; Hospitals ; Infections ; Intensive care ; Laboratories ; Medical prognosis ; Nurses ; Olfaction disorders ; olfactory dysfunction ; Original Research ; Otolaryngology ; Population ; Questionnaires ; rhinology ; smell ; survey ; Survival analysis ; taste ; taste dysfunction</subject><ispartof>Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020-12, Vol.5 (6), p.1019-1028</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society.</rights><rights>2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-c34fe5b0f1b599e63b1644ffc7e3a4926bd717c763858303b3053e1c000ed2693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-c34fe5b0f1b599e63b1644ffc7e3a4926bd717c763858303b3053e1c000ed2693</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5731-3276 ; 0000-0002-6348-5303 ; 0000-0003-2433-4761 ; 0000-0003-3563-5164</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752034/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7752034/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33365393$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendolino, Alfonso Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottaviano, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarpa, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudioso, Piergiorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordin, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoni, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattelan, Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaura, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gane, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><title>Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey</title><title>Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Objectives To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis. Methods Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed HCWs (COVID‐19 positive) in London and Padua. Results Hundred and fourteen COVID‐19 positive HCWs were surveyed with a response rate of 70.6% over a median follow‐up period of 52 days. UK prevalence of OD and TD was 73.1% and 69.2%, respectively. There was a male to female ratio of 1:3 with 81.6% being white, 43.7% being nurses/health care assistants (HCAs), and 39.3% being doctors. In addition, 53.2% of them worked on COVID‐19 wards. Complete recovery was reported in 31.8% for OD and 47.1% for TD with a 52 days follow‐up. The job role of doctors and nurses negatively influenced smell (P = .04 and P = .02) and taste recovery (P = .02 and P = .01). Ethnicity (being white) showed to positively influence only taste recovery (P = .04). Sex (being female) negatively influenced OD and TD recovery only in Paduan HCWs (P = .02 and P = .011, respectively). Working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Conclusions The prevalence of OD and TD was considerably higher in HCWs. The prognosis for OD and TD recovery was worse for nurses/HCAs and doctors but working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Sixty‐eight percent of surveyed HCWs at 52 days continued to experience OD or TD requiring additional future medical management capacity. Level of Evidence 4. XXX.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology</subject><subject>COVID‐19</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Olfaction disorders</subject><subject>olfactory dysfunction</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>rhinology</subject><subject>smell</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>taste</subject><subject>taste dysfunction</subject><issn>2378-8038</issn><issn>2378-8038</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhiMEolWpxBMgS2zYpPUljhMWSNUU6EgjzQbYWo5z0nFx7MF2psqOHVuekSfBQ0svSGx8LJ1Pn_6jvyheEnxCMKan1nh6wrF4UhxSJpqywax5-uB_UBzHeIUxJjWt6wY_Lw4YYzVnLTssfqztoHTyYUbK9SipmAD1cxwmp5PxDqnRu0s0Gtv_-v4z-fyMvoegMhbncZv8qJLRaLH-sjzPS9KirY8mmR2gDSibNkirAOjah68Q4lt05pBxCYJTe72yKE5hB_OL4tmgbITj23lUfP7w_tPiolytPy4XZ6tSc0ZFqVk1AO_wQDretlCzjtRVNQxaAFNVS-uuF0RoUbOGNwyzjmHOgOh8PfS0btlR8e7Gu526EXoNLgVl5TaYUYVZemXk440zG3npd1IITjGrsuDNrSD4bxPEJEcTNVirHPgpSloJVmGcU2X09T_olZ_y4fYPRTilvKH3Qh18jAGGuzAEy33Bcl-wzAVn9NXD8Hfg3zozUN4A18bC_F-RXC3XdC_8Dd9Ls9o</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Andrews, Peter J.</creator><creator>Pendolino, Alfonso Luca</creator><creator>Ottaviano, Giancarlo</creator><creator>Scarpa, Bruno</creator><creator>Grant, Joseph</creator><creator>Gaudioso, Piergiorgio</creator><creator>Bordin, Anna</creator><creator>Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario</creator><creator>Leoni, Davide</creator><creator>Cattelan, Annamaria</creator><creator>Kaura, Anika</creator><creator>Gane, Simon</creator><creator>Hamilton, Nick J.</creator><creator>Choi, David</creator><creator>Andrews, Julie A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-3276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-5303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-4761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-5164</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey</title><author>Andrews, Peter J. ; Pendolino, Alfonso Luca ; Ottaviano, Giancarlo ; Scarpa, Bruno ; Grant, Joseph ; Gaudioso, Piergiorgio ; Bordin, Anna ; Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario ; Leoni, Davide ; Cattelan, Annamaria ; Kaura, Anika ; Gane, Simon ; Hamilton, Nick J. ; Choi, David ; Andrews, Julie A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5327-c34fe5b0f1b599e63b1644ffc7e3a4926bd717c763858303b3053e1c000ed2693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology</topic><topic>COVID‐19</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Olfaction disorders</topic><topic>olfactory dysfunction</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>rhinology</topic><topic>smell</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>taste</topic><topic>taste dysfunction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendolino, Alfonso Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ottaviano, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarpa, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudioso, Piergiorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bordin, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoni, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cattelan, Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaura, Anika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gane, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Julie A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Andrews, Peter J.</au><au>Pendolino, Alfonso Luca</au><au>Ottaviano, Giancarlo</au><au>Scarpa, Bruno</au><au>Grant, Joseph</au><au>Gaudioso, Piergiorgio</au><au>Bordin, Anna</au><au>Marchese‐Ragona, Rosario</au><au>Leoni, Davide</au><au>Cattelan, Annamaria</au><au>Kaura, Anika</au><au>Gane, Simon</au><au>Hamilton, Nick J.</au><au>Choi, David</au><au>Andrews, Julie A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey</atitle><jtitle>Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1019</spage><epage>1028</epage><pages>1019-1028</pages><issn>2378-8038</issn><eissn>2378-8038</eissn><abstract>Objectives To determine the prevalence of olfactory and taste dysfunction (OD; TD) among COVID‐19 positive health care workers (HCWs), their associated risk factors and prognosis. Methods Between May and June 2020, a longitudinal multicenter study was conducted on symptomatic COVID‐19 PCR confirmed HCWs (COVID‐19 positive) in London and Padua. Results Hundred and fourteen COVID‐19 positive HCWs were surveyed with a response rate of 70.6% over a median follow‐up period of 52 days. UK prevalence of OD and TD was 73.1% and 69.2%, respectively. There was a male to female ratio of 1:3 with 81.6% being white, 43.7% being nurses/health care assistants (HCAs), and 39.3% being doctors. In addition, 53.2% of them worked on COVID‐19 wards. Complete recovery was reported in 31.8% for OD and 47.1% for TD with a 52 days follow‐up. The job role of doctors and nurses negatively influenced smell (P = .04 and P = .02) and taste recovery (P = .02 and P = .01). Ethnicity (being white) showed to positively influence only taste recovery (P = .04). Sex (being female) negatively influenced OD and TD recovery only in Paduan HCWs (P = .02 and P = .011, respectively). Working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Conclusions The prevalence of OD and TD was considerably higher in HCWs. The prognosis for OD and TD recovery was worse for nurses/HCAs and doctors but working on a COVID‐19 ward did not influence prognosis. Sixty‐eight percent of surveyed HCWs at 52 days continued to experience OD or TD requiring additional future medical management capacity. Level of Evidence 4. XXX.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33365393</pmid><doi>10.1002/lio2.507</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5731-3276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-5303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-4761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3563-5164</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2378-8038
ispartof Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020-12, Vol.5 (6), p.1019-1028
issn 2378-8038
2378-8038
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7752034
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Age
Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology
COVID‐19
Ethnicity
Hospitals
Infections
Intensive care
Laboratories
Medical prognosis
Nurses
Olfaction disorders
olfactory dysfunction
Original Research
Otolaryngology
Population
Questionnaires
rhinology
smell
survey
Survival analysis
taste
taste dysfunction
title Olfactory and taste dysfunction among mild‐to‐moderate symptomatic COVID‐19 positive health care workers: An international survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A19%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Olfactory%20and%20taste%20dysfunction%20among%20mild%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90moderate%20symptomatic%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20positive%20health%20care%20workers:%20An%20international%20survey&rft.jtitle=Laryngoscope%20investigative%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Andrews,%20Peter%20J.&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1019&rft.epage=1028&rft.pages=1019-1028&rft.issn=2378-8038&rft.eissn=2378-8038&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lio2.507&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2471522582%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471522582&rft_id=info:pmid/33365393&rfr_iscdi=true