Results of Stenting for Central Venous Occlusions and Stenoses in the Hemodialysis Patients

Objectives: We aim to investigate the results of stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients.Methods: Twenty-nine cases treated with endovascular recanalization with deployment of bare metal stent (BMS) for central venous occlusions (24 cases) and recurrent steno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of Vascular Diseases 2020/09/25, Vol.13(3), pp.235-239
Hauptverfasser: Eguchi, Daihiko, Honma, Kenichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 239
container_issue 3
container_start_page 235
container_title Annals of Vascular Diseases
container_volume 13
creator Eguchi, Daihiko
Honma, Kenichi
description Objectives: We aim to investigate the results of stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients.Methods: Twenty-nine cases treated with endovascular recanalization with deployment of bare metal stent (BMS) for central venous occlusions (24 cases) and recurrent stenoses (5 cases) between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Results of these procedures including success rate, operative time, estimated blood loss, morbidity, primary patency, assisted primary patency and freedom from target-lesion revascularization (TLR) were evaluated.Results: Nine lesions were in brachiocephalic vein (Occlusion/Stenosis: 8/1) and 20 lesions were in subclavian vein (Occlusion/Stenosis: 16/4). Procedural success was 94% (29/31 cases) and operation time/estimated blood loss was 68±39 min/28±54 g. Symptom were relieved or disappeared in all successful cases. Morbidity (extravasation of contrast medium) was 3% (1/29). During the period of observation, 1 stent fracture with occlusion and 1 stent migration to periphery were recognized. 1-year primary patency, freedom from TLR, and assisted primary patency were 40% (median patent time: 256 days), 67% (median patent time: 524 days), and 77%, respectively.Conclusion: Stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients is safe and durable treatment option. However, considering its off-label use and potential hazard including vessel rupture, stent migration, and stent fracture, the indication for BMS deployment should be conservative, and interventionist should be well acquainted with prevention and measures to these complications. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2019; 28: 193–198.)
doi_str_mv 10.3400/avd.oa.20-00114
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7751087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2474500614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5ee99d034ba93430ee7c883a97c6222e81e7d35dce220b308b2e3e38635be1c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctr3DAQxkVpaF4991Z07MUbvWzLl0JZkiYQSOgjFHoQsjy7q-CVUo0cyH9fZTc16WVmYH7zzUgfIR84W0jF2Jl9HBbRLgSrGONcvSFHXGteNUrot3PNfx2SY8R7xpqm6fQ7ciil1KoV6oj8_gY4jRlpXNHvGUL2YU1XMdFlqZMd6R2EOCG9cW6c0MeA1IZhh0YEpD7QvAF6Cds4eDs-oUd6a7Mv03hKDlZ2RHj_kk_Iz4vzH8vL6vrm69Xyy3Xl6lrkqgbouoFJ1dtOKskAWqe1tF3rGiEEaA7tIOvBgRCsl0z3AiRI3ci6B-6YPCGf97oPU7-Fwu0uNw_Jb216MtF6838n-I1Zx0fTtjVnui0Cn14EUvwzAWaz9ehgHG2A8ngjVKvq8ntcFfRsj7oUEROs5jWcmWdLTLGkrDSCmZ0lZeLj6-tm_p8HBTjfA_eY7RpmwKbs3Qg7QS6NfA6vhOe-29hkIMi_8xui-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474500614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of Stenting for Central Venous Occlusions and Stenoses in the Hemodialysis Patients</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Eguchi, Daihiko ; Honma, Kenichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Daihiko ; Honma, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: We aim to investigate the results of stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients.Methods: Twenty-nine cases treated with endovascular recanalization with deployment of bare metal stent (BMS) for central venous occlusions (24 cases) and recurrent stenoses (5 cases) between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Results of these procedures including success rate, operative time, estimated blood loss, morbidity, primary patency, assisted primary patency and freedom from target-lesion revascularization (TLR) were evaluated.Results: Nine lesions were in brachiocephalic vein (Occlusion/Stenosis: 8/1) and 20 lesions were in subclavian vein (Occlusion/Stenosis: 16/4). Procedural success was 94% (29/31 cases) and operation time/estimated blood loss was 68±39 min/28±54 g. Symptom were relieved or disappeared in all successful cases. Morbidity (extravasation of contrast medium) was 3% (1/29). During the period of observation, 1 stent fracture with occlusion and 1 stent migration to periphery were recognized. 1-year primary patency, freedom from TLR, and assisted primary patency were 40% (median patent time: 256 days), 67% (median patent time: 524 days), and 77%, respectively.Conclusion: Stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients is safe and durable treatment option. However, considering its off-label use and potential hazard including vessel rupture, stent migration, and stent fracture, the indication for BMS deployment should be conservative, and interventionist should be well acquainted with prevention and measures to these complications. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2019; 28: 193–198.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1881-641X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1881-6428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.20-00114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33384724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases</publisher><subject>bare metal stent ; central vein ; endovascular treatment ; Original ; vascular access surgery</subject><ispartof>Annals of Vascular Diseases, 2020/09/25, Vol.13(3), pp.235-239</ispartof><rights>2020 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.</rights><rights>2020 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases.</rights><rights>2020 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. 2020 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5ee99d034ba93430ee7c883a97c6222e81e7d35dce220b308b2e3e38635be1c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5ee99d034ba93430ee7c883a97c6222e81e7d35dce220b308b2e3e38635be1c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751087/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7751087/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1877,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33384724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Daihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honma, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><title>Results of Stenting for Central Venous Occlusions and Stenoses in the Hemodialysis Patients</title><title>Annals of Vascular Diseases</title><addtitle>Annals of Vascular Diseases</addtitle><description>Objectives: We aim to investigate the results of stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients.Methods: Twenty-nine cases treated with endovascular recanalization with deployment of bare metal stent (BMS) for central venous occlusions (24 cases) and recurrent stenoses (5 cases) between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Results of these procedures including success rate, operative time, estimated blood loss, morbidity, primary patency, assisted primary patency and freedom from target-lesion revascularization (TLR) were evaluated.Results: Nine lesions were in brachiocephalic vein (Occlusion/Stenosis: 8/1) and 20 lesions were in subclavian vein (Occlusion/Stenosis: 16/4). Procedural success was 94% (29/31 cases) and operation time/estimated blood loss was 68±39 min/28±54 g. Symptom were relieved or disappeared in all successful cases. Morbidity (extravasation of contrast medium) was 3% (1/29). During the period of observation, 1 stent fracture with occlusion and 1 stent migration to periphery were recognized. 1-year primary patency, freedom from TLR, and assisted primary patency were 40% (median patent time: 256 days), 67% (median patent time: 524 days), and 77%, respectively.Conclusion: Stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients is safe and durable treatment option. However, considering its off-label use and potential hazard including vessel rupture, stent migration, and stent fracture, the indication for BMS deployment should be conservative, and interventionist should be well acquainted with prevention and measures to these complications. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2019; 28: 193–198.)</description><subject>bare metal stent</subject><subject>central vein</subject><subject>endovascular treatment</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>vascular access surgery</subject><issn>1881-641X</issn><issn>1881-6428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkctr3DAQxkVpaF4991Z07MUbvWzLl0JZkiYQSOgjFHoQsjy7q-CVUo0cyH9fZTc16WVmYH7zzUgfIR84W0jF2Jl9HBbRLgSrGONcvSFHXGteNUrot3PNfx2SY8R7xpqm6fQ7ciil1KoV6oj8_gY4jRlpXNHvGUL2YU1XMdFlqZMd6R2EOCG9cW6c0MeA1IZhh0YEpD7QvAF6Cds4eDs-oUd6a7Mv03hKDlZ2RHj_kk_Iz4vzH8vL6vrm69Xyy3Xl6lrkqgbouoFJ1dtOKskAWqe1tF3rGiEEaA7tIOvBgRCsl0z3AiRI3ci6B-6YPCGf97oPU7-Fwu0uNw_Jb216MtF6838n-I1Zx0fTtjVnui0Cn14EUvwzAWaz9ehgHG2A8ngjVKvq8ntcFfRsj7oUEROs5jWcmWdLTLGkrDSCmZ0lZeLj6-tm_p8HBTjfA_eY7RpmwKbs3Qg7QS6NfA6vhOe-29hkIMi_8xui-A</recordid><startdate>20200925</startdate><enddate>20200925</enddate><creator>Eguchi, Daihiko</creator><creator>Honma, Kenichi</creator><general>The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases</general><general>Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200925</creationdate><title>Results of Stenting for Central Venous Occlusions and Stenoses in the Hemodialysis Patients</title><author>Eguchi, Daihiko ; Honma, Kenichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c552t-5ee99d034ba93430ee7c883a97c6222e81e7d35dce220b308b2e3e38635be1c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>bare metal stent</topic><topic>central vein</topic><topic>endovascular treatment</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>vascular access surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eguchi, Daihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honma, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of Vascular Diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eguchi, Daihiko</au><au>Honma, Kenichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of Stenting for Central Venous Occlusions and Stenoses in the Hemodialysis Patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of Vascular Diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Annals of Vascular Diseases</addtitle><date>2020-09-25</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>235-239</pages><issn>1881-641X</issn><eissn>1881-6428</eissn><abstract>Objectives: We aim to investigate the results of stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients.Methods: Twenty-nine cases treated with endovascular recanalization with deployment of bare metal stent (BMS) for central venous occlusions (24 cases) and recurrent stenoses (5 cases) between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Results of these procedures including success rate, operative time, estimated blood loss, morbidity, primary patency, assisted primary patency and freedom from target-lesion revascularization (TLR) were evaluated.Results: Nine lesions were in brachiocephalic vein (Occlusion/Stenosis: 8/1) and 20 lesions were in subclavian vein (Occlusion/Stenosis: 16/4). Procedural success was 94% (29/31 cases) and operation time/estimated blood loss was 68±39 min/28±54 g. Symptom were relieved or disappeared in all successful cases. Morbidity (extravasation of contrast medium) was 3% (1/29). During the period of observation, 1 stent fracture with occlusion and 1 stent migration to periphery were recognized. 1-year primary patency, freedom from TLR, and assisted primary patency were 40% (median patent time: 256 days), 67% (median patent time: 524 days), and 77%, respectively.Conclusion: Stenting for central venous occlusions and stenoses in the hemodialysis patients is safe and durable treatment option. However, considering its off-label use and potential hazard including vessel rupture, stent migration, and stent fracture, the indication for BMS deployment should be conservative, and interventionist should be well acquainted with prevention and measures to these complications. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2019; 28: 193–198.)</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases</pub><pmid>33384724</pmid><doi>10.3400/avd.oa.20-00114</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1881-641X
ispartof Annals of Vascular Diseases, 2020/09/25, Vol.13(3), pp.235-239
issn 1881-641X
1881-6428
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7751087
source J-STAGE Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects bare metal stent
central vein
endovascular treatment
Original
vascular access surgery
title Results of Stenting for Central Venous Occlusions and Stenoses in the Hemodialysis Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T19%3A10%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20Stenting%20for%20Central%20Venous%20Occlusions%20and%20Stenoses%20in%20the%20Hemodialysis%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20Vascular%20Diseases&rft.au=Eguchi,%20Daihiko&rft.date=2020-09-25&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=235-239&rft.issn=1881-641X&rft.eissn=1881-6428&rft_id=info:doi/10.3400/avd.oa.20-00114&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2474500614%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474500614&rft_id=info:pmid/33384724&rfr_iscdi=true