Utilization of biological variation data in the interpretation of laboratory test results - survey about clinicians' opinion and knowledge
To interpret test results correctly, understanding of the variations that affect test results is essential. The aim of this study is: 1) to evaluate the clinicians' knowledge and opinion concerning biological variation (BV), and 2) to investigate if clinicians use BV in the interpretation of te...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biochemia Medica 2021-02, Vol.31 (1), p.010705-102 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 010705 |
container_title | Biochemia Medica |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Emre, Humeyra Ozturk Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande Coskun, Cihan Sezer, Ebru Demirel Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu Ucar, Fatma Cubukcu, Hikmet Can Arslan, Fatma Demet Deniz, Levent Senes, Mehmet Serteser, Mustafa Yazici, Cevat Yucel, Dogan Coskun, Abdurrahman |
description | To interpret test results correctly, understanding of the variations that affect test results is essential. The aim of this study is: 1) to evaluate the clinicians' knowledge and opinion concerning biological variation (BV), and 2) to investigate if clinicians use BV in the interpretation of test results.
This study uses a questionnaire comprising open-ended and close-ended questions. Questions were selected from the real-life numerical examples of interpretation of test results, the knowledge about main sources of variations in laboratories and the opinion of clinicians on BV. A total of 399 clinicians were interviewed, and the answers were evaluated using a scoring system ranked from A (clinician has the highest level of knowledge and the ability of using BV data) to D (clinician has no knowledge about variations in laboratory). The results were presented as number (N) and percentage (%).
Altogether, 60.4% of clinicians have knowledge of pre-analytical and analytical variations; but only 3.5% of them have knowledge related to BV. The number of clinicians using BV data or reference change value (RCV) to interpret measurements results was zero, while 79.4% of clinicians accepted that the difference between two measurements results located within the reference interval may be significant.
Clinicians do not use BV data or tools derived from BV such as RCV to interpret test results. It is recommended that BV should be included in the medical school curriculum, and clinicians should be encouraged to use BV data for safe and valid interpretation of test results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.11613/BM.2021.010705 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7745156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2474468186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-a6a5b4069f9cc377b586b8addba996ce0ac2ca687c9b6412521f39fa0b9555a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRCIlsKZG_INLtn6I7GdCxKtClRq1Ut7tiaOs2vqjRfb2Wr5Cf3VeEm7oqd5mnnvjWYeQh8pWVAqKD89u14wwuiCUCJJ8wodU1WLStaKvS6Yc1KRVrAj9C6lX4Q0TaPkW3TEOVdEtewYPd5l590fyC6MOAy4c8GHpTPg8Raim_s9ZMBuxHllS8k2bqLNB4mHLkTIIe5wtinjaNPkc8IVTlPc2h0u8ylj493ojIMxfcZhU3BRw9jj-zE8eNsv7Xv0ZgCf7IeneoLuvl_cnv-srm5-XJ5_u6pMzWmuQEDT1US0Q2sMl7JrlOgU9H0HbSuMJWCYAaGkaTtRU9YwOvB2ANK15XwQ_AR9nX03U7e2vbFjjuD1Jro1xJ0O4PTLyehWehm2Wsq6oc3eoJoNVtHA_Qvh3EnR2AJ12U0UK_wvTwtj-D2VF-m1S8Z6D6MNU9KslnUtFFV769OZamJIKdrh4E6J_pe4PrvW-8T1nHhRfPr_mgP_OWL-F56Vq5M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474468186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilization of biological variation data in the interpretation of laboratory test results - survey about clinicians' opinion and knowledge</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Emre, Humeyra Ozturk ; Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande ; Coskun, Cihan ; Sezer, Ebru Demirel ; Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu ; Ucar, Fatma ; Cubukcu, Hikmet Can ; Arslan, Fatma Demet ; Deniz, Levent ; Senes, Mehmet ; Serteser, Mustafa ; Yazici, Cevat ; Yucel, Dogan ; Coskun, Abdurrahman</creator><creatorcontrib>Emre, Humeyra Ozturk ; Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande ; Coskun, Cihan ; Sezer, Ebru Demirel ; Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu ; Ucar, Fatma ; Cubukcu, Hikmet Can ; Arslan, Fatma Demet ; Deniz, Levent ; Senes, Mehmet ; Serteser, Mustafa ; Yazici, Cevat ; Yucel, Dogan ; Coskun, Abdurrahman</creatorcontrib><description>To interpret test results correctly, understanding of the variations that affect test results is essential. The aim of this study is: 1) to evaluate the clinicians' knowledge and opinion concerning biological variation (BV), and 2) to investigate if clinicians use BV in the interpretation of test results.
This study uses a questionnaire comprising open-ended and close-ended questions. Questions were selected from the real-life numerical examples of interpretation of test results, the knowledge about main sources of variations in laboratories and the opinion of clinicians on BV. A total of 399 clinicians were interviewed, and the answers were evaluated using a scoring system ranked from A (clinician has the highest level of knowledge and the ability of using BV data) to D (clinician has no knowledge about variations in laboratory). The results were presented as number (N) and percentage (%).
Altogether, 60.4% of clinicians have knowledge of pre-analytical and analytical variations; but only 3.5% of them have knowledge related to BV. The number of clinicians using BV data or reference change value (RCV) to interpret measurements results was zero, while 79.4% of clinicians accepted that the difference between two measurements results located within the reference interval may be significant.
Clinicians do not use BV data or tools derived from BV such as RCV to interpret test results. It is recommended that BV should be included in the medical school curriculum, and clinicians should be encouraged to use BV data for safe and valid interpretation of test results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1330-0962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1846-7482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11613/BM.2021.010705</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33380892</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Croatia: Medicinska naklada</publisher><subject>biological variation ; Clinical Laboratory Techniques ; Humans ; laboratory error ; Medical Laboratory Science ; Original ; patient safety ; reference change value ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Biochemia Medica, 2021-02, Vol.31 (1), p.010705-102</ispartof><rights>Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.</rights><rights>Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2020 Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-a6a5b4069f9cc377b586b8addba996ce0ac2ca687c9b6412521f39fa0b9555a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-a6a5b4069f9cc377b586b8addba996ce0ac2ca687c9b6412521f39fa0b9555a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745156/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7745156/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380892$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emre, Humeyra Ozturk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coskun, Cihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sezer, Ebru Demirel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ucar, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cubukcu, Hikmet Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Fatma Demet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deniz, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senes, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serteser, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazici, Cevat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yucel, Dogan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coskun, Abdurrahman</creatorcontrib><title>Utilization of biological variation data in the interpretation of laboratory test results - survey about clinicians' opinion and knowledge</title><title>Biochemia Medica</title><addtitle>Biochem Med (Zagreb)</addtitle><description>To interpret test results correctly, understanding of the variations that affect test results is essential. The aim of this study is: 1) to evaluate the clinicians' knowledge and opinion concerning biological variation (BV), and 2) to investigate if clinicians use BV in the interpretation of test results.
This study uses a questionnaire comprising open-ended and close-ended questions. Questions were selected from the real-life numerical examples of interpretation of test results, the knowledge about main sources of variations in laboratories and the opinion of clinicians on BV. A total of 399 clinicians were interviewed, and the answers were evaluated using a scoring system ranked from A (clinician has the highest level of knowledge and the ability of using BV data) to D (clinician has no knowledge about variations in laboratory). The results were presented as number (N) and percentage (%).
Altogether, 60.4% of clinicians have knowledge of pre-analytical and analytical variations; but only 3.5% of them have knowledge related to BV. The number of clinicians using BV data or reference change value (RCV) to interpret measurements results was zero, while 79.4% of clinicians accepted that the difference between two measurements results located within the reference interval may be significant.
Clinicians do not use BV data or tools derived from BV such as RCV to interpret test results. It is recommended that BV should be included in the medical school curriculum, and clinicians should be encouraged to use BV data for safe and valid interpretation of test results.</description><subject>biological variation</subject><subject>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laboratory error</subject><subject>Medical Laboratory Science</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>patient safety</subject><subject>reference change value</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1330-0962</issn><issn>1846-7482</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRCIlsKZG_INLtn6I7GdCxKtClRq1Ut7tiaOs2vqjRfb2Wr5Cf3VeEm7oqd5mnnvjWYeQh8pWVAqKD89u14wwuiCUCJJ8wodU1WLStaKvS6Yc1KRVrAj9C6lX4Q0TaPkW3TEOVdEtewYPd5l590fyC6MOAy4c8GHpTPg8Raim_s9ZMBuxHllS8k2bqLNB4mHLkTIIe5wtinjaNPkc8IVTlPc2h0u8ylj493ojIMxfcZhU3BRw9jj-zE8eNsv7Xv0ZgCf7IeneoLuvl_cnv-srm5-XJ5_u6pMzWmuQEDT1US0Q2sMl7JrlOgU9H0HbSuMJWCYAaGkaTtRU9YwOvB2ANK15XwQ_AR9nX03U7e2vbFjjuD1Jro1xJ0O4PTLyehWehm2Wsq6oc3eoJoNVtHA_Qvh3EnR2AJ12U0UK_wvTwtj-D2VF-m1S8Z6D6MNU9KslnUtFFV769OZamJIKdrh4E6J_pe4PrvW-8T1nHhRfPr_mgP_OWL-F56Vq5M</recordid><startdate>20210215</startdate><enddate>20210215</enddate><creator>Emre, Humeyra Ozturk</creator><creator>Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande</creator><creator>Coskun, Cihan</creator><creator>Sezer, Ebru Demirel</creator><creator>Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu</creator><creator>Ucar, Fatma</creator><creator>Cubukcu, Hikmet Can</creator><creator>Arslan, Fatma Demet</creator><creator>Deniz, Levent</creator><creator>Senes, Mehmet</creator><creator>Serteser, Mustafa</creator><creator>Yazici, Cevat</creator><creator>Yucel, Dogan</creator><creator>Coskun, Abdurrahman</creator><general>Medicinska naklada</general><general>Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>VP8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210215</creationdate><title>Utilization of biological variation data in the interpretation of laboratory test results - survey about clinicians' opinion and knowledge</title><author>Emre, Humeyra Ozturk ; Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande ; Coskun, Cihan ; Sezer, Ebru Demirel ; Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu ; Ucar, Fatma ; Cubukcu, Hikmet Can ; Arslan, Fatma Demet ; Deniz, Levent ; Senes, Mehmet ; Serteser, Mustafa ; Yazici, Cevat ; Yucel, Dogan ; Coskun, Abdurrahman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-a6a5b4069f9cc377b586b8addba996ce0ac2ca687c9b6412521f39fa0b9555a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>biological variation</topic><topic>Clinical Laboratory Techniques</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laboratory error</topic><topic>Medical Laboratory Science</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>patient safety</topic><topic>reference change value</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emre, Humeyra Ozturk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coskun, Cihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sezer, Ebru Demirel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ucar, Fatma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cubukcu, Hikmet Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Fatma Demet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deniz, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senes, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serteser, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazici, Cevat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yucel, Dogan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coskun, Abdurrahman</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hrcak: Portal of scientific journals of Croatia</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biochemia Medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emre, Humeyra Ozturk</au><au>Karpuzoglu, Fatma Hande</au><au>Coskun, Cihan</au><au>Sezer, Ebru Demirel</au><au>Ozturk, Ozlem Goruroglu</au><au>Ucar, Fatma</au><au>Cubukcu, Hikmet Can</au><au>Arslan, Fatma Demet</au><au>Deniz, Levent</au><au>Senes, Mehmet</au><au>Serteser, Mustafa</au><au>Yazici, Cevat</au><au>Yucel, Dogan</au><au>Coskun, Abdurrahman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilization of biological variation data in the interpretation of laboratory test results - survey about clinicians' opinion and knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Biochemia Medica</jtitle><addtitle>Biochem Med (Zagreb)</addtitle><date>2021-02-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>010705</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>010705-102</pages><issn>1330-0962</issn><eissn>1846-7482</eissn><abstract>To interpret test results correctly, understanding of the variations that affect test results is essential. The aim of this study is: 1) to evaluate the clinicians' knowledge and opinion concerning biological variation (BV), and 2) to investigate if clinicians use BV in the interpretation of test results.
This study uses a questionnaire comprising open-ended and close-ended questions. Questions were selected from the real-life numerical examples of interpretation of test results, the knowledge about main sources of variations in laboratories and the opinion of clinicians on BV. A total of 399 clinicians were interviewed, and the answers were evaluated using a scoring system ranked from A (clinician has the highest level of knowledge and the ability of using BV data) to D (clinician has no knowledge about variations in laboratory). The results were presented as number (N) and percentage (%).
Altogether, 60.4% of clinicians have knowledge of pre-analytical and analytical variations; but only 3.5% of them have knowledge related to BV. The number of clinicians using BV data or reference change value (RCV) to interpret measurements results was zero, while 79.4% of clinicians accepted that the difference between two measurements results located within the reference interval may be significant.
Clinicians do not use BV data or tools derived from BV such as RCV to interpret test results. It is recommended that BV should be included in the medical school curriculum, and clinicians should be encouraged to use BV data for safe and valid interpretation of test results.</abstract><cop>Croatia</cop><pub>Medicinska naklada</pub><pmid>33380892</pmid><doi>10.11613/BM.2021.010705</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1330-0962 |
ispartof | Biochemia Medica, 2021-02, Vol.31 (1), p.010705-102 |
issn | 1330-0962 1846-7482 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7745156 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | biological variation Clinical Laboratory Techniques Humans laboratory error Medical Laboratory Science Original patient safety reference change value Reference Values Reproducibility of Results |
title | Utilization of biological variation data in the interpretation of laboratory test results - survey about clinicians' opinion and knowledge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A05%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilization%20of%20biological%20variation%20data%20in%20the%20interpretation%20of%20laboratory%20test%20results%20-%20survey%20about%20clinicians'%20opinion%20and%20knowledge&rft.jtitle=Biochemia%20Medica&rft.au=Emre,%20Humeyra%20Ozturk&rft.date=2021-02-15&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=010705&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=010705-102&rft.issn=1330-0962&rft.eissn=1846-7482&rft_id=info:doi/10.11613/BM.2021.010705&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2474468186%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474468186&rft_id=info:pmid/33380892&rfr_iscdi=true |