Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach

Identifying factors that contribute to subjective reports of memory decline may have important implications for interpretation of objective memory performance. Research suggests that subjective memory decline is influenced by affective symptoms such as anxiety and stress that are subsequently associ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Innovation in aging 2020-12, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.895-895
Hauptverfasser: Walden, Allison, Robertson, Anna, Lag, Madeline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 895
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page 895
container_title Innovation in aging
container_volume 4
creator Walden, Allison
Robertson, Anna
Lag, Madeline
description Identifying factors that contribute to subjective reports of memory decline may have important implications for interpretation of objective memory performance. Research suggests that subjective memory decline is influenced by affective symptoms such as anxiety and stress that are subsequently associated with poorer performance on neurocognitive tests. Personality is an additional factor, as evidence demonstrates that neuroticism may predict subjective memory decline. More research is needed to understand how factors such as demographics, personality traits, and subjective health impact subjective memory. The present study applies a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to identify constructs that predict how individuals view subjective memory decline compared to others their age. Researchers used a national database, Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), due to its comprehensive and diverse sample (N = 3,291). Predictor variables pertained to demographics, personality traits, as well as physical and mental health self-reports, and the outcome variable captured subjective memory relative to one’s peers. A three-step hierarchical regression model indicated that demographic variables, personality traits, and self-evaluated health significantly contributed to 26.7% of the variance of self-evaluated memory compared to others their age, F(35, 2836) = 29.48, p < .001, with each block incrementally adding to the significance of the findings. Results suggest that subjective evaluation of physical health, personality traits, and demographic variables uniquely influence subjective memory decline relative to others of the same age. Awareness of how biopsychosocial factors may contribute to affective symptoms may have implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological testing results.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3299
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7742125</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7742125</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1449-ed4ef0a8aa74a76c9bf4e2feff9e19770c6e33757835143f376f922b51ba1a383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1qAjEUhUNpoWJ9gm7yAmoyyRjTRcFK_8DS0tZ1uJO5GSPOZEhGwbevopR2dQ_cc77FR8gtZyPOtBhXGEPjx74CYLkaiUzrC9LLhNbDXDB2-Sdfk0FKa8YY10JqmfXI57IpMaYOmtI3Ff3aFmu0nd8hnYe6hehTaGhw9A3rEPe0C_QDD_07OqMPPrRpb1chBethQ2dtGwPY1Q25crBJODjfPlk-PX7PX4aL9-fX-WwxtFxKPcRSomMwBVAS1MTqwknMHDqnkWulmJ2gECpXU5FzKZxQE6ezrMh5ARzEVPTJ_YnbbosaS4tNF2Fj2uhriHsTwJv_n8avTBV2RimZ8Sw_AMQJYGNIKaL73XJmjmrNSa05qzVHteIHMJpyDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Walden, Allison ; Robertson, Anna ; Lag, Madeline</creator><creatorcontrib>Walden, Allison ; Robertson, Anna ; Lag, Madeline</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying factors that contribute to subjective reports of memory decline may have important implications for interpretation of objective memory performance. Research suggests that subjective memory decline is influenced by affective symptoms such as anxiety and stress that are subsequently associated with poorer performance on neurocognitive tests. Personality is an additional factor, as evidence demonstrates that neuroticism may predict subjective memory decline. More research is needed to understand how factors such as demographics, personality traits, and subjective health impact subjective memory. The present study applies a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to identify constructs that predict how individuals view subjective memory decline compared to others their age. Researchers used a national database, Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), due to its comprehensive and diverse sample (N = 3,291). Predictor variables pertained to demographics, personality traits, as well as physical and mental health self-reports, and the outcome variable captured subjective memory relative to one’s peers. A three-step hierarchical regression model indicated that demographic variables, personality traits, and self-evaluated health significantly contributed to 26.7% of the variance of self-evaluated memory compared to others their age, F(35, 2836) = 29.48, p &lt; .001, with each block incrementally adding to the significance of the findings. Results suggest that subjective evaluation of physical health, personality traits, and demographic variables uniquely influence subjective memory decline relative to others of the same age. Awareness of how biopsychosocial factors may contribute to affective symptoms may have implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological testing results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Innovation in aging, 2020-12, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.895-895</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742125/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7742125/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walden, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lag, Madeline</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach</title><title>Innovation in aging</title><description>Identifying factors that contribute to subjective reports of memory decline may have important implications for interpretation of objective memory performance. Research suggests that subjective memory decline is influenced by affective symptoms such as anxiety and stress that are subsequently associated with poorer performance on neurocognitive tests. Personality is an additional factor, as evidence demonstrates that neuroticism may predict subjective memory decline. More research is needed to understand how factors such as demographics, personality traits, and subjective health impact subjective memory. The present study applies a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to identify constructs that predict how individuals view subjective memory decline compared to others their age. Researchers used a national database, Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), due to its comprehensive and diverse sample (N = 3,291). Predictor variables pertained to demographics, personality traits, as well as physical and mental health self-reports, and the outcome variable captured subjective memory relative to one’s peers. A three-step hierarchical regression model indicated that demographic variables, personality traits, and self-evaluated health significantly contributed to 26.7% of the variance of self-evaluated memory compared to others their age, F(35, 2836) = 29.48, p &lt; .001, with each block incrementally adding to the significance of the findings. Results suggest that subjective evaluation of physical health, personality traits, and demographic variables uniquely influence subjective memory decline relative to others of the same age. Awareness of how biopsychosocial factors may contribute to affective symptoms may have implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological testing results.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>2399-5300</issn><issn>2399-5300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1qAjEUhUNpoWJ9gm7yAmoyyRjTRcFK_8DS0tZ1uJO5GSPOZEhGwbevopR2dQ_cc77FR8gtZyPOtBhXGEPjx74CYLkaiUzrC9LLhNbDXDB2-Sdfk0FKa8YY10JqmfXI57IpMaYOmtI3Ff3aFmu0nd8hnYe6hehTaGhw9A3rEPe0C_QDD_07OqMPPrRpb1chBethQ2dtGwPY1Q25crBJODjfPlk-PX7PX4aL9-fX-WwxtFxKPcRSomMwBVAS1MTqwknMHDqnkWulmJ2gECpXU5FzKZxQE6ezrMh5ARzEVPTJ_YnbbosaS4tNF2Fj2uhriHsTwJv_n8avTBV2RimZ8Sw_AMQJYGNIKaL73XJmjmrNSa05qzVHteIHMJpyDA</recordid><startdate>20201216</startdate><enddate>20201216</enddate><creator>Walden, Allison</creator><creator>Robertson, Anna</creator><creator>Lag, Madeline</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201216</creationdate><title>Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach</title><author>Walden, Allison ; Robertson, Anna ; Lag, Madeline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1449-ed4ef0a8aa74a76c9bf4e2feff9e19770c6e33757835143f376f922b51ba1a383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walden, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lag, Madeline</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walden, Allison</au><au>Robertson, Anna</au><au>Lag, Madeline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach</atitle><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle><date>2020-12-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>895</spage><epage>895</epage><pages>895-895</pages><issn>2399-5300</issn><eissn>2399-5300</eissn><abstract>Identifying factors that contribute to subjective reports of memory decline may have important implications for interpretation of objective memory performance. Research suggests that subjective memory decline is influenced by affective symptoms such as anxiety and stress that are subsequently associated with poorer performance on neurocognitive tests. Personality is an additional factor, as evidence demonstrates that neuroticism may predict subjective memory decline. More research is needed to understand how factors such as demographics, personality traits, and subjective health impact subjective memory. The present study applies a comprehensive, biopsychosocial approach to identify constructs that predict how individuals view subjective memory decline compared to others their age. Researchers used a national database, Midlife in the United States (MIDUS), due to its comprehensive and diverse sample (N = 3,291). Predictor variables pertained to demographics, personality traits, as well as physical and mental health self-reports, and the outcome variable captured subjective memory relative to one’s peers. A three-step hierarchical regression model indicated that demographic variables, personality traits, and self-evaluated health significantly contributed to 26.7% of the variance of self-evaluated memory compared to others their age, F(35, 2836) = 29.48, p &lt; .001, with each block incrementally adding to the significance of the findings. Results suggest that subjective evaluation of physical health, personality traits, and demographic variables uniquely influence subjective memory decline relative to others of the same age. Awareness of how biopsychosocial factors may contribute to affective symptoms may have implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological testing results.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3299</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2399-5300
ispartof Innovation in aging, 2020-12, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.895-895
issn 2399-5300
2399-5300
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7742125
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Abstracts
title Understanding Subjective Comparison of Memory to Peers: A Biopsychosocial Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A02%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Subjective%20Comparison%20of%20Memory%20to%20Peers:%20A%20Biopsychosocial%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Innovation%20in%20aging&rft.au=Walden,%20Allison&rft.date=2020-12-16&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=895&rft.pages=895-895&rft.issn=2399-5300&rft.eissn=2399-5300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3299&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7742125%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true