Recruitment and Retention Strategies of Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers in Family-based Intervention Studies
Family-based psychosocial behavioral interventions (PBIs) that target both the cancer patients and their caregivers may more effectively help them with self-care and improve quality of life; however, family-based PBIs often face unique challenges during study implementation. This systematic review a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Innovation in aging 2020-12, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.911-911 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 911 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_1 |
container_start_page | 911 |
container_title | Innovation in aging |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Guan, Ting Qan’ir, Yousef Jung, Ahrang Xu, Shenmeng Idiagbonya, Eno Song, Lixin |
description | Family-based psychosocial behavioral interventions (PBIs) that target both the cancer patients and their caregivers may more effectively help them with self-care and improve quality of life; however, family-based PBIs often face unique challenges during study implementation. This systematic review aimed to a) examine the recruitment and retention rates of cancer patients and their caregivers in clinical trials testing family-based PBIs; and b) explore the recruitment and retention strategies. We systematically searched five electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials that tested family-based psychosocial or behavioral interventions among adult patients with cancer and their adult family caregivers. Our searches yielded 48 studies. The average recruitment rates of patients and caregivers were 56.8% (SD=31.8%; range=8-100%) and 54.5% (SD=32.4%; range=8-100%), respectively. The majority of the studies have focused on white and female patients and caregivers. The average retention rate at end of follow-up times was 69.1%. Only 13 studies reported retention strategies, including providing money/gift cards upon returning of each follow-up survey or study completion, and excluding advanced cancer patients. Reasons for attrition, i.e., dropping out of studies, were classified as: health-related (e.g., death, illness, psychological distress), intervention-related (e.g., intervention does not meet expectation, frustration with group allocation, intervention burden) and other reasons (e.g. lack of time, unable to establish contact). Recruitment and retention of patients and caregivers in family-based PBI are integral to the success of interventions. Researchers need to incorporate effective strategies for optimizing recruitment and retention at the planning stage of their studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3349 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7741231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7741231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1449-4e531aee06337db3708bfc144e77f996997209f98bdbb083a42c9da803d9e0b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkNFqAjEQRUNpoWL9gr7kB1aTndVsXgpFaisILdY-h2Qzu6Zo1iar4N83Vint0wycO4fhEnLP2ZAzCaMGQ-vdyDVas7EYAhTyivRykDIbA2PXf_ZbMojxkzHGZUoVeY98LbEKe9dt0XdUe0uX2KXVtZ6-d0F32DiMtK3pVPsKA33TnUs8_mRXa3QhkZBSBwyROk9neus2x8zoiJbOfYfh8Ovb2yS7Ize13kQcXGaffMyeVtOXbPH6PJ8-LrKKF4XMChwD14hsAiCsAcFKU58QClFLOZFS5EzWsjTWGFaCLvJKWl0ysBKZmUCfPJy9u73Zoq3SF0Fv1C64rQ5H1Wqn_hPv1qppD0qIgufAkwDOgiq0MQasf285U6fm1bl5dWlenZqHbyR7fT8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recruitment and Retention Strategies of Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers in Family-based Intervention Studies</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Guan, Ting ; Qan’ir, Yousef ; Jung, Ahrang ; Xu, Shenmeng ; Idiagbonya, Eno ; Song, Lixin</creator><creatorcontrib>Guan, Ting ; Qan’ir, Yousef ; Jung, Ahrang ; Xu, Shenmeng ; Idiagbonya, Eno ; Song, Lixin</creatorcontrib><description>Family-based psychosocial behavioral interventions (PBIs) that target both the cancer patients and their caregivers may more effectively help them with self-care and improve quality of life; however, family-based PBIs often face unique challenges during study implementation. This systematic review aimed to a) examine the recruitment and retention rates of cancer patients and their caregivers in clinical trials testing family-based PBIs; and b) explore the recruitment and retention strategies. We systematically searched five electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials that tested family-based psychosocial or behavioral interventions among adult patients with cancer and their adult family caregivers. Our searches yielded 48 studies. The average recruitment rates of patients and caregivers were 56.8% (SD=31.8%; range=8-100%) and 54.5% (SD=32.4%; range=8-100%), respectively. The majority of the studies have focused on white and female patients and caregivers. The average retention rate at end of follow-up times was 69.1%. Only 13 studies reported retention strategies, including providing money/gift cards upon returning of each follow-up survey or study completion, and excluding advanced cancer patients. Reasons for attrition, i.e., dropping out of studies, were classified as: health-related (e.g., death, illness, psychological distress), intervention-related (e.g., intervention does not meet expectation, frustration with group allocation, intervention burden) and other reasons (e.g. lack of time, unable to establish contact). Recruitment and retention of patients and caregivers in family-based PBI are integral to the success of interventions. Researchers need to incorporate effective strategies for optimizing recruitment and retention at the planning stage of their studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2399-5300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Innovation in aging, 2020-12, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.911-911</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7741231/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7741231/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guan, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qan’ir, Yousef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ahrang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shenmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idiagbonya, Eno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Lixin</creatorcontrib><title>Recruitment and Retention Strategies of Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers in Family-based Intervention Studies</title><title>Innovation in aging</title><description>Family-based psychosocial behavioral interventions (PBIs) that target both the cancer patients and their caregivers may more effectively help them with self-care and improve quality of life; however, family-based PBIs often face unique challenges during study implementation. This systematic review aimed to a) examine the recruitment and retention rates of cancer patients and their caregivers in clinical trials testing family-based PBIs; and b) explore the recruitment and retention strategies. We systematically searched five electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials that tested family-based psychosocial or behavioral interventions among adult patients with cancer and their adult family caregivers. Our searches yielded 48 studies. The average recruitment rates of patients and caregivers were 56.8% (SD=31.8%; range=8-100%) and 54.5% (SD=32.4%; range=8-100%), respectively. The majority of the studies have focused on white and female patients and caregivers. The average retention rate at end of follow-up times was 69.1%. Only 13 studies reported retention strategies, including providing money/gift cards upon returning of each follow-up survey or study completion, and excluding advanced cancer patients. Reasons for attrition, i.e., dropping out of studies, were classified as: health-related (e.g., death, illness, psychological distress), intervention-related (e.g., intervention does not meet expectation, frustration with group allocation, intervention burden) and other reasons (e.g. lack of time, unable to establish contact). Recruitment and retention of patients and caregivers in family-based PBI are integral to the success of interventions. Researchers need to incorporate effective strategies for optimizing recruitment and retention at the planning stage of their studies.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>2399-5300</issn><issn>2399-5300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkNFqAjEQRUNpoWL9gr7kB1aTndVsXgpFaisILdY-h2Qzu6Zo1iar4N83Vint0wycO4fhEnLP2ZAzCaMGQ-vdyDVas7EYAhTyivRykDIbA2PXf_ZbMojxkzHGZUoVeY98LbEKe9dt0XdUe0uX2KXVtZ6-d0F32DiMtK3pVPsKA33TnUs8_mRXa3QhkZBSBwyROk9neus2x8zoiJbOfYfh8Ovb2yS7Ize13kQcXGaffMyeVtOXbPH6PJ8-LrKKF4XMChwD14hsAiCsAcFKU58QClFLOZFS5EzWsjTWGFaCLvJKWl0ysBKZmUCfPJy9u73Zoq3SF0Fv1C64rQ5H1Wqn_hPv1qppD0qIgufAkwDOgiq0MQasf285U6fm1bl5dWlenZqHbyR7fT8</recordid><startdate>20201216</startdate><enddate>20201216</enddate><creator>Guan, Ting</creator><creator>Qan’ir, Yousef</creator><creator>Jung, Ahrang</creator><creator>Xu, Shenmeng</creator><creator>Idiagbonya, Eno</creator><creator>Song, Lixin</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201216</creationdate><title>Recruitment and Retention Strategies of Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers in Family-based Intervention Studies</title><author>Guan, Ting ; Qan’ir, Yousef ; Jung, Ahrang ; Xu, Shenmeng ; Idiagbonya, Eno ; Song, Lixin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1449-4e531aee06337db3708bfc144e77f996997209f98bdbb083a42c9da803d9e0b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guan, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qan’ir, Yousef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ahrang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Shenmeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idiagbonya, Eno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Lixin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guan, Ting</au><au>Qan’ir, Yousef</au><au>Jung, Ahrang</au><au>Xu, Shenmeng</au><au>Idiagbonya, Eno</au><au>Song, Lixin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recruitment and Retention Strategies of Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers in Family-based Intervention Studies</atitle><jtitle>Innovation in aging</jtitle><date>2020-12-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>911</spage><epage>911</epage><pages>911-911</pages><issn>2399-5300</issn><eissn>2399-5300</eissn><abstract>Family-based psychosocial behavioral interventions (PBIs) that target both the cancer patients and their caregivers may more effectively help them with self-care and improve quality of life; however, family-based PBIs often face unique challenges during study implementation. This systematic review aimed to a) examine the recruitment and retention rates of cancer patients and their caregivers in clinical trials testing family-based PBIs; and b) explore the recruitment and retention strategies. We systematically searched five electronic databases to identify randomized controlled trials that tested family-based psychosocial or behavioral interventions among adult patients with cancer and their adult family caregivers. Our searches yielded 48 studies. The average recruitment rates of patients and caregivers were 56.8% (SD=31.8%; range=8-100%) and 54.5% (SD=32.4%; range=8-100%), respectively. The majority of the studies have focused on white and female patients and caregivers. The average retention rate at end of follow-up times was 69.1%. Only 13 studies reported retention strategies, including providing money/gift cards upon returning of each follow-up survey or study completion, and excluding advanced cancer patients. Reasons for attrition, i.e., dropping out of studies, were classified as: health-related (e.g., death, illness, psychological distress), intervention-related (e.g., intervention does not meet expectation, frustration with group allocation, intervention burden) and other reasons (e.g. lack of time, unable to establish contact). Recruitment and retention of patients and caregivers in family-based PBI are integral to the success of interventions. Researchers need to incorporate effective strategies for optimizing recruitment and retention at the planning stage of their studies.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3349</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2399-5300 |
ispartof | Innovation in aging, 2020-12, Vol.4 (Supplement_1), p.911-911 |
issn | 2399-5300 2399-5300 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7741231 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Abstracts |
title | Recruitment and Retention Strategies of Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers in Family-based Intervention Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A43%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recruitment%20and%20Retention%20Strategies%20of%20Cancer%20Patients%20and%20Their%20Caregivers%20in%20Family-based%20Intervention%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Innovation%20in%20aging&rft.au=Guan,%20Ting&rft.date=2020-12-16&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=911&rft.epage=911&rft.pages=911-911&rft.issn=2399-5300&rft.eissn=2399-5300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3349&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral_cross%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7741231%3C/pubmedcentral_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |