Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions

In recent years, the power sector has shown a growing reliance on natural gas, a cleaner-burning fuel than coal that emits approximately half as much CO2 per kW h of energy produced. This rapid growth in the consumption of natural gas has led to increased CO2 emissions from gas-fired power plants. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & environmental science 2019-01, Vol.12 (7), p.2161-2173
Hauptverfasser: Siegelman, Rebecca L, Milner, Phillip J, Kim, Eugene J, Weston, Simon C, Long, Jeffrey R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2173
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2161
container_title Energy & environmental science
container_volume 12
creator Siegelman, Rebecca L
Milner, Phillip J
Kim, Eugene J
Weston, Simon C
Long, Jeffrey R
description In recent years, the power sector has shown a growing reliance on natural gas, a cleaner-burning fuel than coal that emits approximately half as much CO2 per kW h of energy produced. This rapid growth in the consumption of natural gas has led to increased CO2 emissions from gas-fired power plants. To limit the contribution of fossil fuel combustion to atmospheric CO2 levels, carbon capture and sequestration has been proposed as a potential emission mitigation strategy. However, despite extensive exploration of solid adsorbents for CO2 capture, few studies have examined the performance of adsorbents in post-combustion capture processes specific to natural gas flue emissions. In this perspective, we emphasize the importance of considering gas-fired power plants alongside coal-fired plants in future analyses of carbon capture materials. We address specific challenges and opportunities related to adsorptive carbon capture from the emissions of gas-fired plants and discuss several promising candidate materials. Finally, we suggest experiments to determine the viability of new CO2 capture materials for this separation. This broadening in the scope of current carbon capture research is urgently needed to accelerate the deployment of transformational carbon capture technologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c9ee00505f
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7731587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2254460404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g371t-1cb8e4f1b9a260a170f93da4c200b4809283916a800ca600694e8b4b9b35713a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUDuP1jAQtBCIe0DDL7CgoQmsH4njBgl9Ag7ppGugtmxnk8-nxA62g3T_Hkt3FFDtaHd2dmYJecPgAwOhP3qNCNBDPz8jl0z1susVDM__4kHzC3JVyj3AwEHpl-RCCME45-MlWU5nu64YFyzUxommfU-5HjHU0DpzytROJeW9hhQ7ZwtO9HTHqbd7PTLSOaeNRtuwXeliC_VpcyE2ln_wK1LcQilttbwiL2a7Fnz9VK_Jz69ffpxuutu7b99Pn2-7RShWO-bdiHJmTls-gGUKZi0mKz0HcHIEzUeh2WBHAG-HFkhLHJ102oleMWHFNfn0qLsfbsPJY6zNmtlz2Gx-MMkG8-8khrNZ0m-jlGD9qJrA20eBVGowxYeK_uxTjOirYVr1zUQjvX-6ktOvA0s1LafHdbUR01EMlwqAjxqGRn33H_U-HTm2HxjOeykHkCDFHzhyixI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2254460404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><creator>Siegelman, Rebecca L ; Milner, Phillip J ; Kim, Eugene J ; Weston, Simon C ; Long, Jeffrey R</creator><creatorcontrib>Siegelman, Rebecca L ; Milner, Phillip J ; Kim, Eugene J ; Weston, Simon C ; Long, Jeffrey R ; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the power sector has shown a growing reliance on natural gas, a cleaner-burning fuel than coal that emits approximately half as much CO2 per kW h of energy produced. This rapid growth in the consumption of natural gas has led to increased CO2 emissions from gas-fired power plants. To limit the contribution of fossil fuel combustion to atmospheric CO2 levels, carbon capture and sequestration has been proposed as a potential emission mitigation strategy. However, despite extensive exploration of solid adsorbents for CO2 capture, few studies have examined the performance of adsorbents in post-combustion capture processes specific to natural gas flue emissions. In this perspective, we emphasize the importance of considering gas-fired power plants alongside coal-fired plants in future analyses of carbon capture materials. We address specific challenges and opportunities related to adsorptive carbon capture from the emissions of gas-fired plants and discuss several promising candidate materials. Finally, we suggest experiments to determine the viability of new CO2 capture materials for this separation. This broadening in the scope of current carbon capture research is urgently needed to accelerate the deployment of transformational carbon capture technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-5706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c9ee00505f</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33312228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>03 NATURAL GAS ; Adsorbents ; Adsorptivity ; Burning ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Carbon sequestration ; Coal-fired power plants ; Combined cycle ; Combustion ; Electric power generation ; Emissions ; Fossil fuels ; Fuel combustion ; Gas-fired power plants ; Industrial plant emissions ; Materials selection ; Mitigation ; Natural gas ; Power plants ; Viability</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; environmental science, 2019-01, Vol.12 (7), p.2161-2173</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>000000022618013X ; 0000000274395055 ; 0000000253241321 ; 0000000242496118</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975809$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siegelman, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner, Phillip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Eugene J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, Simon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions</title><title>Energy &amp; environmental science</title><description>In recent years, the power sector has shown a growing reliance on natural gas, a cleaner-burning fuel than coal that emits approximately half as much CO2 per kW h of energy produced. This rapid growth in the consumption of natural gas has led to increased CO2 emissions from gas-fired power plants. To limit the contribution of fossil fuel combustion to atmospheric CO2 levels, carbon capture and sequestration has been proposed as a potential emission mitigation strategy. However, despite extensive exploration of solid adsorbents for CO2 capture, few studies have examined the performance of adsorbents in post-combustion capture processes specific to natural gas flue emissions. In this perspective, we emphasize the importance of considering gas-fired power plants alongside coal-fired plants in future analyses of carbon capture materials. We address specific challenges and opportunities related to adsorptive carbon capture from the emissions of gas-fired plants and discuss several promising candidate materials. Finally, we suggest experiments to determine the viability of new CO2 capture materials for this separation. This broadening in the scope of current carbon capture research is urgently needed to accelerate the deployment of transformational carbon capture technologies.</description><subject>03 NATURAL GAS</subject><subject>Adsorbents</subject><subject>Adsorptivity</subject><subject>Burning</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Coal-fired power plants</subject><subject>Combined cycle</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Fuel combustion</subject><subject>Gas-fired power plants</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>1754-5692</issn><issn>1754-5706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUDuP1jAQtBCIe0DDL7CgoQmsH4njBgl9Ag7ppGugtmxnk8-nxA62g3T_Hkt3FFDtaHd2dmYJecPgAwOhP3qNCNBDPz8jl0z1susVDM__4kHzC3JVyj3AwEHpl-RCCME45-MlWU5nu64YFyzUxommfU-5HjHU0DpzytROJeW9hhQ7ZwtO9HTHqbd7PTLSOaeNRtuwXeliC_VpcyE2ln_wK1LcQilttbwiL2a7Fnz9VK_Jz69ffpxuutu7b99Pn2-7RShWO-bdiHJmTls-gGUKZi0mKz0HcHIEzUeh2WBHAG-HFkhLHJ102oleMWHFNfn0qLsfbsPJY6zNmtlz2Gx-MMkG8-8khrNZ0m-jlGD9qJrA20eBVGowxYeK_uxTjOirYVr1zUQjvX-6ktOvA0s1LafHdbUR01EMlwqAjxqGRn33H_U-HTm2HxjOeykHkCDFHzhyixI</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Siegelman, Rebecca L</creator><creator>Milner, Phillip J</creator><creator>Kim, Eugene J</creator><creator>Weston, Simon C</creator><creator>Long, Jeffrey R</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000022618013X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000274395055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000253241321</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000242496118</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions</title><author>Siegelman, Rebecca L ; Milner, Phillip J ; Kim, Eugene J ; Weston, Simon C ; Long, Jeffrey R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g371t-1cb8e4f1b9a260a170f93da4c200b4809283916a800ca600694e8b4b9b35713a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>03 NATURAL GAS</topic><topic>Adsorbents</topic><topic>Adsorptivity</topic><topic>Burning</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Coal-fired power plants</topic><topic>Combined cycle</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Fuel combustion</topic><topic>Gas-fired power plants</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siegelman, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner, Phillip J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Eugene J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, Simon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Jeffrey R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siegelman, Rebecca L</au><au>Milner, Phillip J</au><au>Kim, Eugene J</au><au>Weston, Simon C</au><au>Long, Jeffrey R</au><aucorp>Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; environmental science</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2161</spage><epage>2173</epage><pages>2161-2173</pages><issn>1754-5692</issn><eissn>1754-5706</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the power sector has shown a growing reliance on natural gas, a cleaner-burning fuel than coal that emits approximately half as much CO2 per kW h of energy produced. This rapid growth in the consumption of natural gas has led to increased CO2 emissions from gas-fired power plants. To limit the contribution of fossil fuel combustion to atmospheric CO2 levels, carbon capture and sequestration has been proposed as a potential emission mitigation strategy. However, despite extensive exploration of solid adsorbents for CO2 capture, few studies have examined the performance of adsorbents in post-combustion capture processes specific to natural gas flue emissions. In this perspective, we emphasize the importance of considering gas-fired power plants alongside coal-fired plants in future analyses of carbon capture materials. We address specific challenges and opportunities related to adsorptive carbon capture from the emissions of gas-fired plants and discuss several promising candidate materials. Finally, we suggest experiments to determine the viability of new CO2 capture materials for this separation. This broadening in the scope of current carbon capture research is urgently needed to accelerate the deployment of transformational carbon capture technologies.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>33312228</pmid><doi>10.1039/c9ee00505f</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000022618013X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000274395055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000253241321</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000242496118</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-5692
ispartof Energy & environmental science, 2019-01, Vol.12 (7), p.2161-2173
issn 1754-5692
1754-5706
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7731587
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-
subjects 03 NATURAL GAS
Adsorbents
Adsorptivity
Burning
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
Carbon sequestration
Coal-fired power plants
Combined cycle
Combustion
Electric power generation
Emissions
Fossil fuels
Fuel combustion
Gas-fired power plants
Industrial plant emissions
Materials selection
Mitigation
Natural gas
Power plants
Viability
title Challenges and opportunities for adsorption-based CO2 capture from natural gas combined cycle emissions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T06%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20and%20opportunities%20for%20adsorption-based%20CO2%20capture%20from%20natural%20gas%20combined%20cycle%20emissions&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Siegelman,%20Rebecca%20L&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Berkeley%20National%20Laboratory%20(LBNL),%20Berkeley,%20CA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2161&rft.epage=2173&rft.pages=2161-2173&rft.issn=1754-5692&rft.eissn=1754-5706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c9ee00505f&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2254460404%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2254460404&rft_id=info:pmid/33312228&rfr_iscdi=true