Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global Health & Medicine 2020/10/31, Vol.2(5), pp.282-291
Hauptverfasser: Ito, Kyoji, Takemura, Nobuyuki, Inagaki, Fuyuki, Mihara, Fuminori, Kokudo, Norihiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 291
container_issue 5
container_start_page 282
container_title Global Health & Medicine
container_volume 2
creator Ito, Kyoji
Takemura, Nobuyuki
Inagaki, Fuyuki
Mihara, Fuminori
Kokudo, Norihiro
description Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines established by Japan, China, Hong Kong, the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Variations in treatment algorithms between the guidelines is inevitable, considering the differences in the prevalence and etiology of HCC, local clinical practice, and medical and insurance systems between countries or regions, and this might be confusing for practitioners worldwide. A comprehensive understanding of the guidelines that are globally available might be useful for future improvement of each guideline.
doi_str_mv 10.35772/ghm.2020.01066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7731415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2470902591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-e253b750254d93d4ef793829b7ee8c5bbf175a1318751398eb01713236567b0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1vFSEUxYnR2KZ27c6w08175WMYZjYmWj9q0sSNrgkwd2ZoGHgC08b_XtpXp0pCuMn9ce65OQi9pmTPhZTsYpqXPSOM7AklbfsMnbKGN7ue9s3zre7aE3Se8w0hhAnKCCcv0Qmvh3SMnaLhkxtHSBAsYBdwSaDLAqFg7aeYXJmXjMeY8AwHXaIF71evE7Y6WRfiorGBcgcQ8F1Mfnib8SG5YN1BezytbgDvAuRX6MWofYbzx_cM_fzy-cfl1e76-9dvlx-ud1ZIXnbABDdSVJ_N0POhgVH2vGO9kQCdFcaMVApNOe2koLzvwBAqKWe8Fa00xPAz9P6oe1jNAoOteyTtVbW06PRbRe3U_53gZjXFWyUlpw0VVeDdo0CKv1bIRS0u3y-tA8Q1K9ZI0ld_Pa3oxRG1KeacYNzGUKIe4lE1HnUfj3qIp_5486-7jf8bRgU-HoGbXPQEG6BTcdbDUU-Jep9Ut6addVIQ-B8WuaTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470902591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ito, Kyoji ; Takemura, Nobuyuki ; Inagaki, Fuyuki ; Mihara, Fuminori ; Kokudo, Norihiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kyoji ; Takemura, Nobuyuki ; Inagaki, Fuyuki ; Mihara, Fuminori ; Kokudo, Norihiro</creatorcontrib><description>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines established by Japan, China, Hong Kong, the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Variations in treatment algorithms between the guidelines is inevitable, considering the differences in the prevalence and etiology of HCC, local clinical practice, and medical and insurance systems between countries or regions, and this might be confusing for practitioners worldwide. A comprehensive understanding of the guidelines that are globally available might be useful for future improvement of each guideline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2434-9186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2434-9194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.35772/ghm.2020.01066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33330822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: National Center for Global Health and Medicine</publisher><subject>ablation ; Review ; surgery ; systemic chemotherapy ; transcatheter arterial chemoembolization ; transplantation</subject><ispartof>Global Health &amp; Medicine, 2020/10/31, Vol.2(5), pp.282-291</ispartof><rights>2020 National Center for Global Health and Medicine</rights><rights>2020, National Center for Global Health and Medicine.</rights><rights>2020, National Center for Global Health and Medicine 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-e253b750254d93d4ef793829b7ee8c5bbf175a1318751398eb01713236567b0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-e253b750254d93d4ef793829b7ee8c5bbf175a1318751398eb01713236567b0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731415/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731415/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1881,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kyoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemura, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inagaki, Fuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihara, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokudo, Norihiro</creatorcontrib><title>Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines</title><title>Global Health &amp; Medicine</title><addtitle>GHM</addtitle><description>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines established by Japan, China, Hong Kong, the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Variations in treatment algorithms between the guidelines is inevitable, considering the differences in the prevalence and etiology of HCC, local clinical practice, and medical and insurance systems between countries or regions, and this might be confusing for practitioners worldwide. A comprehensive understanding of the guidelines that are globally available might be useful for future improvement of each guideline.</description><subject>ablation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>systemic chemotherapy</subject><subject>transcatheter arterial chemoembolization</subject><subject>transplantation</subject><issn>2434-9186</issn><issn>2434-9194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1vFSEUxYnR2KZ27c6w08175WMYZjYmWj9q0sSNrgkwd2ZoGHgC08b_XtpXp0pCuMn9ce65OQi9pmTPhZTsYpqXPSOM7AklbfsMnbKGN7ue9s3zre7aE3Se8w0hhAnKCCcv0Qmvh3SMnaLhkxtHSBAsYBdwSaDLAqFg7aeYXJmXjMeY8AwHXaIF71evE7Y6WRfiorGBcgcQ8F1Mfnib8SG5YN1BezytbgDvAuRX6MWofYbzx_cM_fzy-cfl1e76-9dvlx-ud1ZIXnbABDdSVJ_N0POhgVH2vGO9kQCdFcaMVApNOe2koLzvwBAqKWe8Fa00xPAz9P6oe1jNAoOteyTtVbW06PRbRe3U_53gZjXFWyUlpw0VVeDdo0CKv1bIRS0u3y-tA8Q1K9ZI0ld_Pa3oxRG1KeacYNzGUKIe4lE1HnUfj3qIp_5486-7jf8bRgU-HoGbXPQEG6BTcdbDUU-Jep9Ut6addVIQ-B8WuaTA</recordid><startdate>20201031</startdate><enddate>20201031</enddate><creator>Ito, Kyoji</creator><creator>Takemura, Nobuyuki</creator><creator>Inagaki, Fuyuki</creator><creator>Mihara, Fuminori</creator><creator>Kokudo, Norihiro</creator><general>National Center for Global Health and Medicine</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201031</creationdate><title>Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines</title><author>Ito, Kyoji ; Takemura, Nobuyuki ; Inagaki, Fuyuki ; Mihara, Fuminori ; Kokudo, Norihiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-e253b750254d93d4ef793829b7ee8c5bbf175a1318751398eb01713236567b0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ablation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>systemic chemotherapy</topic><topic>transcatheter arterial chemoembolization</topic><topic>transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kyoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemura, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inagaki, Fuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihara, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokudo, Norihiro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global Health &amp; Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ito, Kyoji</au><au>Takemura, Nobuyuki</au><au>Inagaki, Fuyuki</au><au>Mihara, Fuminori</au><au>Kokudo, Norihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Global Health &amp; Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>GHM</addtitle><date>2020-10-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>282-291</pages><issn>2434-9186</issn><eissn>2434-9194</eissn><abstract>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines established by Japan, China, Hong Kong, the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Variations in treatment algorithms between the guidelines is inevitable, considering the differences in the prevalence and etiology of HCC, local clinical practice, and medical and insurance systems between countries or regions, and this might be confusing for practitioners worldwide. A comprehensive understanding of the guidelines that are globally available might be useful for future improvement of each guideline.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>National Center for Global Health and Medicine</pub><pmid>33330822</pmid><doi>10.35772/ghm.2020.01066</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2434-9186
ispartof Global Health & Medicine, 2020/10/31, Vol.2(5), pp.282-291
issn 2434-9186
2434-9194
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7731415
source J-STAGE Free; PubMed Central
subjects ablation
Review
surgery
systemic chemotherapy
transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
transplantation
title Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A47%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difference%20in%20treatment%20algorithms%20for%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma%20between%20world's%20principal%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=Global%20Health%20&%20Medicine&rft.au=Ito,%20Kyoji&rft.date=2020-10-31&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=282-291&rft.issn=2434-9186&rft.eissn=2434-9194&rft_id=info:doi/10.35772/ghm.2020.01066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2470902591%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470902591&rft_id=info:pmid/33330822&rfr_iscdi=true