Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global Health & Medicine 2020/10/31, Vol.2(5), pp.282-291 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 291 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 282 |
container_title | Global Health & Medicine |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Ito, Kyoji Takemura, Nobuyuki Inagaki, Fuyuki Mihara, Fuminori Kokudo, Norihiro |
description | Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines established by Japan, China, Hong Kong, the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Variations in treatment algorithms between the guidelines is inevitable, considering the differences in the prevalence and etiology of HCC, local clinical practice, and medical and insurance systems between countries or regions, and this might be confusing for practitioners worldwide. A comprehensive understanding of the guidelines that are globally available might be useful for future improvement of each guideline. |
doi_str_mv | 10.35772/ghm.2020.01066 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7731415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2470902591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-e253b750254d93d4ef793829b7ee8c5bbf175a1318751398eb01713236567b0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1vFSEUxYnR2KZ27c6w08175WMYZjYmWj9q0sSNrgkwd2ZoGHgC08b_XtpXp0pCuMn9ce65OQi9pmTPhZTsYpqXPSOM7AklbfsMnbKGN7ue9s3zre7aE3Se8w0hhAnKCCcv0Qmvh3SMnaLhkxtHSBAsYBdwSaDLAqFg7aeYXJmXjMeY8AwHXaIF71evE7Y6WRfiorGBcgcQ8F1Mfnib8SG5YN1BezytbgDvAuRX6MWofYbzx_cM_fzy-cfl1e76-9dvlx-ud1ZIXnbABDdSVJ_N0POhgVH2vGO9kQCdFcaMVApNOe2koLzvwBAqKWe8Fa00xPAz9P6oe1jNAoOteyTtVbW06PRbRe3U_53gZjXFWyUlpw0VVeDdo0CKv1bIRS0u3y-tA8Q1K9ZI0ld_Pa3oxRG1KeacYNzGUKIe4lE1HnUfj3qIp_5486-7jf8bRgU-HoGbXPQEG6BTcdbDUU-Jep9Ut6addVIQ-B8WuaTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2470902591</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ito, Kyoji ; Takemura, Nobuyuki ; Inagaki, Fuyuki ; Mihara, Fuminori ; Kokudo, Norihiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kyoji ; Takemura, Nobuyuki ; Inagaki, Fuyuki ; Mihara, Fuminori ; Kokudo, Norihiro</creatorcontrib><description>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines established by Japan, China, Hong Kong, the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Variations in treatment algorithms between the guidelines is inevitable, considering the differences in the prevalence and etiology of HCC, local clinical practice, and medical and insurance systems between countries or regions, and this might be confusing for practitioners worldwide. A comprehensive understanding of the guidelines that are globally available might be useful for future improvement of each guideline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2434-9186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2434-9194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.35772/ghm.2020.01066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33330822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: National Center for Global Health and Medicine</publisher><subject>ablation ; Review ; surgery ; systemic chemotherapy ; transcatheter arterial chemoembolization ; transplantation</subject><ispartof>Global Health & Medicine, 2020/10/31, Vol.2(5), pp.282-291</ispartof><rights>2020 National Center for Global Health and Medicine</rights><rights>2020, National Center for Global Health and Medicine.</rights><rights>2020, National Center for Global Health and Medicine 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-e253b750254d93d4ef793829b7ee8c5bbf175a1318751398eb01713236567b0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-e253b750254d93d4ef793829b7ee8c5bbf175a1318751398eb01713236567b0b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731415/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7731415/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1881,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33330822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kyoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemura, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inagaki, Fuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihara, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokudo, Norihiro</creatorcontrib><title>Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines</title><title>Global Health & Medicine</title><addtitle>GHM</addtitle><description>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines established by Japan, China, Hong Kong, the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Variations in treatment algorithms between the guidelines is inevitable, considering the differences in the prevalence and etiology of HCC, local clinical practice, and medical and insurance systems between countries or regions, and this might be confusing for practitioners worldwide. A comprehensive understanding of the guidelines that are globally available might be useful for future improvement of each guideline.</description><subject>ablation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>surgery</subject><subject>systemic chemotherapy</subject><subject>transcatheter arterial chemoembolization</subject><subject>transplantation</subject><issn>2434-9186</issn><issn>2434-9194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1vFSEUxYnR2KZ27c6w08175WMYZjYmWj9q0sSNrgkwd2ZoGHgC08b_XtpXp0pCuMn9ce65OQi9pmTPhZTsYpqXPSOM7AklbfsMnbKGN7ue9s3zre7aE3Se8w0hhAnKCCcv0Qmvh3SMnaLhkxtHSBAsYBdwSaDLAqFg7aeYXJmXjMeY8AwHXaIF71evE7Y6WRfiorGBcgcQ8F1Mfnib8SG5YN1BezytbgDvAuRX6MWofYbzx_cM_fzy-cfl1e76-9dvlx-ud1ZIXnbABDdSVJ_N0POhgVH2vGO9kQCdFcaMVApNOe2koLzvwBAqKWe8Fa00xPAz9P6oe1jNAoOteyTtVbW06PRbRe3U_53gZjXFWyUlpw0VVeDdo0CKv1bIRS0u3y-tA8Q1K9ZI0ld_Pa3oxRG1KeacYNzGUKIe4lE1HnUfj3qIp_5486-7jf8bRgU-HoGbXPQEG6BTcdbDUU-Jep9Ut6addVIQ-B8WuaTA</recordid><startdate>20201031</startdate><enddate>20201031</enddate><creator>Ito, Kyoji</creator><creator>Takemura, Nobuyuki</creator><creator>Inagaki, Fuyuki</creator><creator>Mihara, Fuminori</creator><creator>Kokudo, Norihiro</creator><general>National Center for Global Health and Medicine</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201031</creationdate><title>Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines</title><author>Ito, Kyoji ; Takemura, Nobuyuki ; Inagaki, Fuyuki ; Mihara, Fuminori ; Kokudo, Norihiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c573t-e253b750254d93d4ef793829b7ee8c5bbf175a1318751398eb01713236567b0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ablation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>surgery</topic><topic>systemic chemotherapy</topic><topic>transcatheter arterial chemoembolization</topic><topic>transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kyoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemura, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inagaki, Fuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihara, Fuminori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokudo, Norihiro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global Health & Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ito, Kyoji</au><au>Takemura, Nobuyuki</au><au>Inagaki, Fuyuki</au><au>Mihara, Fuminori</au><au>Kokudo, Norihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Global Health & Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>GHM</addtitle><date>2020-10-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>282-291</pages><issn>2434-9186</issn><eissn>2434-9194</eissn><abstract>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancerrelated death globally. Clinical guidelines for HCC have been established and revised by many countries and regions. We summarized and compared the treatment algorithms in the updated HCC guidelines established by Japan, China, Hong Kong, the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and the European Association for the Study of the Liver and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Variations in treatment algorithms between the guidelines is inevitable, considering the differences in the prevalence and etiology of HCC, local clinical practice, and medical and insurance systems between countries or regions, and this might be confusing for practitioners worldwide. A comprehensive understanding of the guidelines that are globally available might be useful for future improvement of each guideline.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>National Center for Global Health and Medicine</pub><pmid>33330822</pmid><doi>10.35772/ghm.2020.01066</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2434-9186 |
ispartof | Global Health & Medicine, 2020/10/31, Vol.2(5), pp.282-291 |
issn | 2434-9186 2434-9194 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7731415 |
source | J-STAGE Free; PubMed Central |
subjects | ablation Review surgery systemic chemotherapy transcatheter arterial chemoembolization transplantation |
title | Difference in treatment algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma between world's principal guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A47%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difference%20in%20treatment%20algorithms%20for%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma%20between%20world's%20principal%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=Global%20Health%20&%20Medicine&rft.au=Ito,%20Kyoji&rft.date=2020-10-31&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=282-291&rft.issn=2434-9186&rft.eissn=2434-9194&rft_id=info:doi/10.35772/ghm.2020.01066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2470902591%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2470902591&rft_id=info:pmid/33330822&rfr_iscdi=true |