Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction
The 3D printing process offers several advantages to the medical industry by producing complex and bespoke devices that accurately reproduce customized patient geometries. Despite the recent developments that strongly enhanced the dominance of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques over conventional...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials 2020-12, Vol.13 (23), p.5584 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 5584 |
container_title | Materials |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Ginestra, Paola Ferraro, Rosalba Monica Zohar-Hauber, Keren Abeni, Andrea Giliani, Silvia Ceretti, Elisabetta |
description | The 3D printing process offers several advantages to the medical industry by producing complex and bespoke devices that accurately reproduce customized patient geometries. Despite the recent developments that strongly enhanced the dominance of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques over conventional methods, processes need to be continually optimized and controlled to obtain implants that can fulfill all the requirements of the surgical procedure and the anatomical district of interest. The best outcomes of an implant derive from optimal compromise and balance between a good interaction with the surrounding tissue through cell attachment and reduced inflammatory response mainly caused by a weak interface with the native tissue or bacteria colonization of the implant surface. For these reasons, the chemical, morphological, and mechanical properties of a device need to be designed in order to assure the best performances considering the in vivo environment components. In particular, complex 3D geometries can be produced with high dimensional accuracy but inadequate surface properties due to the layer manufacturing process that always entails the use of post-processing techniques to improve the surface quality, increasing the lead times of the whole process despite the reduction of the supply chain. The goal of this work was to provide a comparison between Ti6Al4V samples fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM) with different building directions in relation to the building plate. The results highlighted the influence of the process technique on osteoblast attachment and mineralization compared with the building orientation that showed a limited effect in promoting a proper osseointegration over a long-term period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ma13235584 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7729448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2469087161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-64cc8c50395710063772da54723155645735c76a7421aee93f7cdc71d7194a753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9qFDEYxQdRbKm98QEk4I0Iq_mfiRfCdm1VWOlFq7chJpluSiYZk0yhT-ErN9utazU3CZwfJ-f7Tte9RPAdIRK-HzUimDDW0yfdIZKSL5Ck9Omj90F3XMo1bIcQ1GP5vDsgBEvBGDrsfl-44Ez1Nw6sdXEZfHOh-ngFdLTgdCvlFMGJ0-NeSQO49HwZ6A8wpAzOc92kyVlvwHKagje6-hTLB7AEqzROOut794s621vQvOrG7UBnwcnsg916fvJ5myLFF92zQYfijh_uo-772enl6stiff7562q5XhgKeV1wakxvGCSSCQQhJ0JgqxkVmCDGOGWCMCO4FhQj7ZwkgzDWCGRF24gWjBx1H3e-0_xzdNa4WLMOasp-1PlWJe3Vv0r0G3WVblT7qO20bwZvHgxy-jW7UtXoi3Eh6OjSXBSmXMJeII4a-vo_9DrNObbx7ilGJcayUW93lMmplOyGfRgE1bZq9bfqBr96HH-P_imW3AFvNqNa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2469549229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ginestra, Paola ; Ferraro, Rosalba Monica ; Zohar-Hauber, Keren ; Abeni, Andrea ; Giliani, Silvia ; Ceretti, Elisabetta</creator><creatorcontrib>Ginestra, Paola ; Ferraro, Rosalba Monica ; Zohar-Hauber, Keren ; Abeni, Andrea ; Giliani, Silvia ; Ceretti, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><description>The 3D printing process offers several advantages to the medical industry by producing complex and bespoke devices that accurately reproduce customized patient geometries. Despite the recent developments that strongly enhanced the dominance of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques over conventional methods, processes need to be continually optimized and controlled to obtain implants that can fulfill all the requirements of the surgical procedure and the anatomical district of interest. The best outcomes of an implant derive from optimal compromise and balance between a good interaction with the surrounding tissue through cell attachment and reduced inflammatory response mainly caused by a weak interface with the native tissue or bacteria colonization of the implant surface. For these reasons, the chemical, morphological, and mechanical properties of a device need to be designed in order to assure the best performances considering the in vivo environment components. In particular, complex 3D geometries can be produced with high dimensional accuracy but inadequate surface properties due to the layer manufacturing process that always entails the use of post-processing techniques to improve the surface quality, increasing the lead times of the whole process despite the reduction of the supply chain. The goal of this work was to provide a comparison between Ti6Al4V samples fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM) with different building directions in relation to the building plate. The results highlighted the influence of the process technique on osteoblast attachment and mineralization compared with the building orientation that showed a limited effect in promoting a proper osseointegration over a long-term period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1944</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ma13235584</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33297551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>3-D printers ; Additive manufacturing ; Biomedical materials ; Comparative studies ; Contact angle ; Corrosion resistance ; Customization ; Design optimization ; Electron beam melting ; Inflammatory response ; Laser beam melting ; Lasers ; Life expectancy ; Mechanical properties ; Metal fatigue ; Microscopy ; Morphology ; Orthopedics ; Post-production processing ; Stress concentration ; Supply chains ; Surface properties ; Surgical implants ; Three dimensional printing ; Titanium alloys ; Titanium base alloys ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Materials, 2020-12, Vol.13 (23), p.5584</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-64cc8c50395710063772da54723155645735c76a7421aee93f7cdc71d7194a753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-64cc8c50395710063772da54723155645735c76a7421aee93f7cdc71d7194a753</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8137-4642 ; 0000-0002-1485-8118</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729448/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7729448/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33297551$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ginestra, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Rosalba Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zohar-Hauber, Keren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abeni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giliani, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceretti, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><title>Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction</title><title>Materials</title><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><description>The 3D printing process offers several advantages to the medical industry by producing complex and bespoke devices that accurately reproduce customized patient geometries. Despite the recent developments that strongly enhanced the dominance of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques over conventional methods, processes need to be continually optimized and controlled to obtain implants that can fulfill all the requirements of the surgical procedure and the anatomical district of interest. The best outcomes of an implant derive from optimal compromise and balance between a good interaction with the surrounding tissue through cell attachment and reduced inflammatory response mainly caused by a weak interface with the native tissue or bacteria colonization of the implant surface. For these reasons, the chemical, morphological, and mechanical properties of a device need to be designed in order to assure the best performances considering the in vivo environment components. In particular, complex 3D geometries can be produced with high dimensional accuracy but inadequate surface properties due to the layer manufacturing process that always entails the use of post-processing techniques to improve the surface quality, increasing the lead times of the whole process despite the reduction of the supply chain. The goal of this work was to provide a comparison between Ti6Al4V samples fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM) with different building directions in relation to the building plate. The results highlighted the influence of the process technique on osteoblast attachment and mineralization compared with the building orientation that showed a limited effect in promoting a proper osseointegration over a long-term period.</description><subject>3-D printers</subject><subject>Additive manufacturing</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Corrosion resistance</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Electron beam melting</subject><subject>Inflammatory response</subject><subject>Laser beam melting</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Metal fatigue</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Post-production processing</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Three dimensional printing</subject><subject>Titanium alloys</subject><subject>Titanium base alloys</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>1996-1944</issn><issn>1996-1944</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9qFDEYxQdRbKm98QEk4I0Iq_mfiRfCdm1VWOlFq7chJpluSiYZk0yhT-ErN9utazU3CZwfJ-f7Tte9RPAdIRK-HzUimDDW0yfdIZKSL5Ck9Omj90F3XMo1bIcQ1GP5vDsgBEvBGDrsfl-44Ez1Nw6sdXEZfHOh-ngFdLTgdCvlFMGJ0-NeSQO49HwZ6A8wpAzOc92kyVlvwHKagje6-hTLB7AEqzROOut794s621vQvOrG7UBnwcnsg916fvJ5myLFF92zQYfijh_uo-772enl6stiff7562q5XhgKeV1wakxvGCSSCQQhJ0JgqxkVmCDGOGWCMCO4FhQj7ZwkgzDWCGRF24gWjBx1H3e-0_xzdNa4WLMOasp-1PlWJe3Vv0r0G3WVblT7qO20bwZvHgxy-jW7UtXoi3Eh6OjSXBSmXMJeII4a-vo_9DrNObbx7ilGJcayUW93lMmplOyGfRgE1bZq9bfqBr96HH-P_imW3AFvNqNa</recordid><startdate>20201207</startdate><enddate>20201207</enddate><creator>Ginestra, Paola</creator><creator>Ferraro, Rosalba Monica</creator><creator>Zohar-Hauber, Keren</creator><creator>Abeni, Andrea</creator><creator>Giliani, Silvia</creator><creator>Ceretti, Elisabetta</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-4642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1485-8118</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201207</creationdate><title>Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction</title><author>Ginestra, Paola ; Ferraro, Rosalba Monica ; Zohar-Hauber, Keren ; Abeni, Andrea ; Giliani, Silvia ; Ceretti, Elisabetta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-64cc8c50395710063772da54723155645735c76a7421aee93f7cdc71d7194a753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>3-D printers</topic><topic>Additive manufacturing</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Corrosion resistance</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Electron beam melting</topic><topic>Inflammatory response</topic><topic>Laser beam melting</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Metal fatigue</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Post-production processing</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Three dimensional printing</topic><topic>Titanium alloys</topic><topic>Titanium base alloys</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ginestra, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraro, Rosalba Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zohar-Hauber, Keren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abeni, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giliani, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceretti, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ginestra, Paola</au><au>Ferraro, Rosalba Monica</au><au>Zohar-Hauber, Keren</au><au>Abeni, Andrea</au><au>Giliani, Silvia</au><au>Ceretti, Elisabetta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction</atitle><jtitle>Materials</jtitle><addtitle>Materials (Basel)</addtitle><date>2020-12-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>5584</spage><pages>5584-</pages><issn>1996-1944</issn><eissn>1996-1944</eissn><abstract>The 3D printing process offers several advantages to the medical industry by producing complex and bespoke devices that accurately reproduce customized patient geometries. Despite the recent developments that strongly enhanced the dominance of additive manufacturing (AM) techniques over conventional methods, processes need to be continually optimized and controlled to obtain implants that can fulfill all the requirements of the surgical procedure and the anatomical district of interest. The best outcomes of an implant derive from optimal compromise and balance between a good interaction with the surrounding tissue through cell attachment and reduced inflammatory response mainly caused by a weak interface with the native tissue or bacteria colonization of the implant surface. For these reasons, the chemical, morphological, and mechanical properties of a device need to be designed in order to assure the best performances considering the in vivo environment components. In particular, complex 3D geometries can be produced with high dimensional accuracy but inadequate surface properties due to the layer manufacturing process that always entails the use of post-processing techniques to improve the surface quality, increasing the lead times of the whole process despite the reduction of the supply chain. The goal of this work was to provide a comparison between Ti6Al4V samples fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM) with different building directions in relation to the building plate. The results highlighted the influence of the process technique on osteoblast attachment and mineralization compared with the building orientation that showed a limited effect in promoting a proper osseointegration over a long-term period.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33297551</pmid><doi>10.3390/ma13235584</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8137-4642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1485-8118</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1944 |
ispartof | Materials, 2020-12, Vol.13 (23), p.5584 |
issn | 1996-1944 1996-1944 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7729448 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | 3-D printers Additive manufacturing Biomedical materials Comparative studies Contact angle Corrosion resistance Customization Design optimization Electron beam melting Inflammatory response Laser beam melting Lasers Life expectancy Mechanical properties Metal fatigue Microscopy Morphology Orthopedics Post-production processing Stress concentration Supply chains Surface properties Surgical implants Three dimensional printing Titanium alloys Titanium base alloys Transplants & implants |
title | Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting of Ti6Al4V for Orthopedic Applications: A Comparative Study on the Applied Building Direction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A34%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20Laser%20Melting%20and%20Electron%20Beam%20Melting%20of%20Ti6Al4V%20for%20Orthopedic%20Applications:%20A%20Comparative%20Study%20on%20the%20Applied%20Building%20Direction&rft.jtitle=Materials&rft.au=Ginestra,%20Paola&rft.date=2020-12-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=5584&rft.pages=5584-&rft.issn=1996-1944&rft.eissn=1996-1944&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ma13235584&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2469087161%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2469549229&rft_id=info:pmid/33297551&rfr_iscdi=true |