A cross-sectional survey of fertility knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology residents
Background To evaluate fertility knowledge among current Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) residents using a recently published validated instrument, the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS). Methods OB-GYN residents in the United States were recruited through an email to al...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fertility Research and Practice 2020-12, Vol.6 (1), p.1-22, Article 22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Fertility Research and Practice |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Roberts, Leah May Kudesia, Rashmi Zhao, Huaqing Dolan, Shaliz Rose, Marisa |
description | Background To evaluate fertility knowledge among current Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) residents using a recently published validated instrument, the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS). Methods OB-GYN residents in the United States were recruited through an email to all residency coordinators nationwide. They were asked to voluntarily respond to a short questionnaire including demographic information and the FIT-KS instrument, through an online survey platform. Of approximately 5000 OB-GYN residents in the country, 177 responded. Results The sample was 91% female, with 69% between the ages of 26 and 30. Participants evenly represented all 4 years of training. Mean FIT-KS score was 21.2 (73% correct; range 17-26). No statistically significant differences were noted across the level of training. Several knowledge gaps were noted. Residents could define the common assisted reproductive technologies; however overestimated their success rates per cycle. Conclusions Substantial gaps exist in fertility knowledge among OB-GYN residents, with understanding of male fertility and success rates of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) being particularly limited. Knowledge of fertility does not change throughout residency training, demonstrating consistent gaps in fertility knowledge. Knowledge during post graduate year (PGY)-1 year is consistent with mean scores found in prior research in Internal Medicine residents (65%), as well as a cohort of female medical students and obstetrics and gynecology residents and fellows (64.9%) (Fertil Steril 108:711-7, 2017; Fertil Steril 110:e239, 2018). Keywords: Fertility, Fertility awareness, Infertility, Medical education, Residency education |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40738-020-00091-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7724860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A650613181</galeid><sourcerecordid>A650613181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3192-b68c5b322a7f3471e922e2e37a26fce43eb2e7de63143af873f59e84cd780c653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtrHiEUhofS0oQ0fyAroZtuJvE2XjaFj9AbBLpJshXHOU5N_TTVmZT59zX5QkmLC-X4nPeIT9edEXxOiBIXlWPJVI8p7jHGmvT0VXdM8cB7ibV-_eJ81J3WetcgMiiJsXrbHTFGNR20PO5ud8iVXGtfwS0hJxtRXcsDbCh75KEsIYZlQz9T_h1hmgGFhPJYF1hKcBXZNKF5S-ByzPOGCtQwQVrqu-6Nt7HC6fN-0t18_nR9-bW_-v7l2-XuqneMaNqPQrlhZJRa6RmXBDSlQIFJS4V3wBmMFOQEghHOrFeS-UGD4m6SCjsxsJPu4yH3fh33MLk2u9ho7kvY27KZbIP59yaFH2bOD0ZKypXALeDDc0DJv1aoi9mH6iBGmyCv1VAulJCcC93Q9_-hd3kt7cceKUmIJFzTRp0fqNlGMCH53Oa6tibYB5cT-NDqOzFgQRhRpDXQQ8OThwL-7-sJNo-qzUG1aarNk2pD2R8TPZs0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2471171492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross-sectional survey of fertility knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology residents</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Roberts, Leah May ; Kudesia, Rashmi ; Zhao, Huaqing ; Dolan, Shaliz ; Rose, Marisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Leah May ; Kudesia, Rashmi ; Zhao, Huaqing ; Dolan, Shaliz ; Rose, Marisa</creatorcontrib><description>Background To evaluate fertility knowledge among current Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) residents using a recently published validated instrument, the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS). Methods OB-GYN residents in the United States were recruited through an email to all residency coordinators nationwide. They were asked to voluntarily respond to a short questionnaire including demographic information and the FIT-KS instrument, through an online survey platform. Of approximately 5000 OB-GYN residents in the country, 177 responded. Results The sample was 91% female, with 69% between the ages of 26 and 30. Participants evenly represented all 4 years of training. Mean FIT-KS score was 21.2 (73% correct; range 17-26). No statistically significant differences were noted across the level of training. Several knowledge gaps were noted. Residents could define the common assisted reproductive technologies; however overestimated their success rates per cycle. Conclusions Substantial gaps exist in fertility knowledge among OB-GYN residents, with understanding of male fertility and success rates of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) being particularly limited. Knowledge of fertility does not change throughout residency training, demonstrating consistent gaps in fertility knowledge. Knowledge during post graduate year (PGY)-1 year is consistent with mean scores found in prior research in Internal Medicine residents (65%), as well as a cohort of female medical students and obstetrics and gynecology residents and fellows (64.9%) (Fertil Steril 108:711-7, 2017; Fertil Steril 110:e239, 2018). Keywords: Fertility, Fertility awareness, Infertility, Medical education, Residency education</description><identifier>ISSN: 2054-7099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-7099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40738-020-00091-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33292597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Cross-sectional studies ; Family planning ; Females ; Fertility ; Gynecology ; Higher education ; In vitro fertilization ; Infertility ; Knowledge ; Medical colleges ; Obstetrics ; Physicians ; Polls & surveys ; Population ; Pregnancy ; Reproductive technologies ; Statistical analysis ; Surveys ; Variance analysis ; Women</subject><ispartof>Fertility Research and Practice, 2020-12, Vol.6 (1), p.1-22, Article 22</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3192-b68c5b322a7f3471e922e2e37a26fce43eb2e7de63143af873f59e84cd780c653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3192-b68c5b322a7f3471e922e2e37a26fce43eb2e7de63143af873f59e84cd780c653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8065-6098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724860/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7724860/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Leah May</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudesia, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Huaqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Shaliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Marisa</creatorcontrib><title>A cross-sectional survey of fertility knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology residents</title><title>Fertility Research and Practice</title><description>Background To evaluate fertility knowledge among current Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) residents using a recently published validated instrument, the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS). Methods OB-GYN residents in the United States were recruited through an email to all residency coordinators nationwide. They were asked to voluntarily respond to a short questionnaire including demographic information and the FIT-KS instrument, through an online survey platform. Of approximately 5000 OB-GYN residents in the country, 177 responded. Results The sample was 91% female, with 69% between the ages of 26 and 30. Participants evenly represented all 4 years of training. Mean FIT-KS score was 21.2 (73% correct; range 17-26). No statistically significant differences were noted across the level of training. Several knowledge gaps were noted. Residents could define the common assisted reproductive technologies; however overestimated their success rates per cycle. Conclusions Substantial gaps exist in fertility knowledge among OB-GYN residents, with understanding of male fertility and success rates of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) being particularly limited. Knowledge of fertility does not change throughout residency training, demonstrating consistent gaps in fertility knowledge. Knowledge during post graduate year (PGY)-1 year is consistent with mean scores found in prior research in Internal Medicine residents (65%), as well as a cohort of female medical students and obstetrics and gynecology residents and fellows (64.9%) (Fertil Steril 108:711-7, 2017; Fertil Steril 110:e239, 2018). Keywords: Fertility, Fertility awareness, Infertility, Medical education, Residency education</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>In vitro fertilization</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Medical colleges</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>2054-7099</issn><issn>2054-7099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtrHiEUhofS0oQ0fyAroZtuJvE2XjaFj9AbBLpJshXHOU5N_TTVmZT59zX5QkmLC-X4nPeIT9edEXxOiBIXlWPJVI8p7jHGmvT0VXdM8cB7ibV-_eJ81J3WetcgMiiJsXrbHTFGNR20PO5ud8iVXGtfwS0hJxtRXcsDbCh75KEsIYZlQz9T_h1hmgGFhPJYF1hKcBXZNKF5S-ByzPOGCtQwQVrqu-6Nt7HC6fN-0t18_nR9-bW_-v7l2-XuqneMaNqPQrlhZJRa6RmXBDSlQIFJS4V3wBmMFOQEghHOrFeS-UGD4m6SCjsxsJPu4yH3fh33MLk2u9ho7kvY27KZbIP59yaFH2bOD0ZKypXALeDDc0DJv1aoi9mH6iBGmyCv1VAulJCcC93Q9_-hd3kt7cceKUmIJFzTRp0fqNlGMCH53Oa6tibYB5cT-NDqOzFgQRhRpDXQQ8OThwL-7-sJNo-qzUG1aarNk2pD2R8TPZs0</recordid><startdate>20201209</startdate><enddate>20201209</enddate><creator>Roberts, Leah May</creator><creator>Kudesia, Rashmi</creator><creator>Zhao, Huaqing</creator><creator>Dolan, Shaliz</creator><creator>Rose, Marisa</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-6098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201209</creationdate><title>A cross-sectional survey of fertility knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology residents</title><author>Roberts, Leah May ; Kudesia, Rashmi ; Zhao, Huaqing ; Dolan, Shaliz ; Rose, Marisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3192-b68c5b322a7f3471e922e2e37a26fce43eb2e7de63143af873f59e84cd780c653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>In vitro fertilization</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Medical colleges</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Leah May</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kudesia, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Huaqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Shaliz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Marisa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Fertility Research and Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, Leah May</au><au>Kudesia, Rashmi</au><au>Zhao, Huaqing</au><au>Dolan, Shaliz</au><au>Rose, Marisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross-sectional survey of fertility knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology residents</atitle><jtitle>Fertility Research and Practice</jtitle><date>2020-12-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><artnum>22</artnum><issn>2054-7099</issn><eissn>2054-7099</eissn><abstract>Background To evaluate fertility knowledge among current Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB-GYN) residents using a recently published validated instrument, the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS). Methods OB-GYN residents in the United States were recruited through an email to all residency coordinators nationwide. They were asked to voluntarily respond to a short questionnaire including demographic information and the FIT-KS instrument, through an online survey platform. Of approximately 5000 OB-GYN residents in the country, 177 responded. Results The sample was 91% female, with 69% between the ages of 26 and 30. Participants evenly represented all 4 years of training. Mean FIT-KS score was 21.2 (73% correct; range 17-26). No statistically significant differences were noted across the level of training. Several knowledge gaps were noted. Residents could define the common assisted reproductive technologies; however overestimated their success rates per cycle. Conclusions Substantial gaps exist in fertility knowledge among OB-GYN residents, with understanding of male fertility and success rates of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) being particularly limited. Knowledge of fertility does not change throughout residency training, demonstrating consistent gaps in fertility knowledge. Knowledge during post graduate year (PGY)-1 year is consistent with mean scores found in prior research in Internal Medicine residents (65%), as well as a cohort of female medical students and obstetrics and gynecology residents and fellows (64.9%) (Fertil Steril 108:711-7, 2017; Fertil Steril 110:e239, 2018). Keywords: Fertility, Fertility awareness, Infertility, Medical education, Residency education</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>33292597</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40738-020-00091-2</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-6098</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2054-7099 |
ispartof | Fertility Research and Practice, 2020-12, Vol.6 (1), p.1-22, Article 22 |
issn | 2054-7099 2054-7099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7724860 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Age Cross-sectional studies Family planning Females Fertility Gynecology Higher education In vitro fertilization Infertility Knowledge Medical colleges Obstetrics Physicians Polls & surveys Population Pregnancy Reproductive technologies Statistical analysis Surveys Variance analysis Women |
title | A cross-sectional survey of fertility knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology residents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A22%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross-sectional%20survey%20of%20fertility%20knowledge%20in%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20residents&rft.jtitle=Fertility%20Research%20and%20Practice&rft.au=Roberts,%20Leah%20May&rft.date=2020-12-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.artnum=22&rft.issn=2054-7099&rft.eissn=2054-7099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40738-020-00091-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA650613181%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2471171492&rft_id=info:pmid/33292597&rft_galeid=A650613181&rfr_iscdi=true |