People with Parkinson disease with and without freezing of gait respond similarly to external and self-generated cues

•External cues, but not self-generated cues, increase gait variability in all groups.•Higher baseline gait variability was associated with lower cued gait variability.•Higher gait variability is associated with falls in PD-FOG, PD + FOG, and Controls. Gait deficits in Parkinson disease (PD), includi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2020-10, Vol.82, p.161-166
Hauptverfasser: Horin, Adam P., Harrison, Elinor C., Rawson, Kerri S., Earhart, Gammon M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 166
container_issue
container_start_page 161
container_title Gait & posture
container_volume 82
creator Horin, Adam P.
Harrison, Elinor C.
Rawson, Kerri S.
Earhart, Gammon M.
description •External cues, but not self-generated cues, increase gait variability in all groups.•Higher baseline gait variability was associated with lower cued gait variability.•Higher gait variability is associated with falls in PD-FOG, PD + FOG, and Controls. Gait deficits in Parkinson disease (PD), including freezing of gait (FOG), can be among the most debilitating symptoms. Rhythmic auditory cueing has been used to alleviate some gait symptoms. However, different cue types, such as externally-generated and self-generated cues, affect gait variability differently. The differential effects of these cue types on people with PD with FOG (PD + FOG), who often have higher gait variability, and those with PD without FOG (PD-FOG) is unknown. Given the relationship of gait variability to fall risk, this is an important area to address. This study aims to 1) confirm the association between falls and gait variability measures in PD-FOG, PD + FOG and age-matched Controls; 2) investigate the effects of different cue types on gait variability in PD-FOG and PD + FOG; and 3) determine whether baseline gait characteristics are associated with response to cues. This cross-sectional study investigated PD-FOG (n = 24), PD + FOG (n = 20), and Controls (n = 24). Gait trials were collected during use of externally-generated and self-generated cues for all participants. Gait variability measures were the primary outcomes to assess the effects of rhythmic auditory cues. Logistic regression models showed increased gait variability was associated with falls across groups. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed externally-generated cues increased gait variability, whereas self-generated cues did not, for all groups. Pearson’s correlations showed participants with higher baseline gait variability had greater reduction in gait variability with rhythmic auditory cueing. Higher gait variability is associated with falls. This study demonstrates that PD + FOG are capable of using self-generated cues without increasing gait variability measures, thereby stabilizing gait. People with higher baseline gait variability are likely to experience the largest reductions in variability with the addition of external cues.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7718283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636220305373</els_id><sourcerecordid>2443520080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-a53cb1ad1aa25667c9240d534686e6601c8f48a85ea72cc598a8eeca7b0274623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhL1Q-ckkYO4mTXBCoooBUiR7gbM06k60Xrx1sp6X99WS72wpOnDyy33vz5I-xMwGlAKHebcsN2jyFlEsJEkroS4DmGVuJru0LKUX_nK2gV6pQlZIn7FVKWwCoq06-ZCeV7CsJrVqx-YrC5Ijf2nzNrzD-tD4FzwebCNPxGv3wMIQ58zES3Vu_4WHk-wY8UprCIkh2Zx1Gd8dz4PQ7U_ToHqyJ3FhsyFPETAM3M6XX7MWILtGb43nKflx8-n7-pbj89vnr-cfLwtStyAU2lVkLHASibJRqTS9rGJqqVp0ipUCYbqw77BrCVhrT9MtMZLBdg2xrJatT9v6QO83rHQ2GfI7o9BTtDuOdDmj1vy_eXutNuNFtKzrZVUvA22NADL-W4lnvbDLkHHoKc9KyrqtGAnSwSNVBamJIKdL4tEaA3jPTW_3ITO-Zaej1wmwxnv1d8sn2CGkRfDgIaPmqG0tRJ2PJGxpsJJP1EOz_dvwBY1WvTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2443520080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>People with Parkinson disease with and without freezing of gait respond similarly to external and self-generated cues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Horin, Adam P. ; Harrison, Elinor C. ; Rawson, Kerri S. ; Earhart, Gammon M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Horin, Adam P. ; Harrison, Elinor C. ; Rawson, Kerri S. ; Earhart, Gammon M.</creatorcontrib><description>•External cues, but not self-generated cues, increase gait variability in all groups.•Higher baseline gait variability was associated with lower cued gait variability.•Higher gait variability is associated with falls in PD-FOG, PD + FOG, and Controls. Gait deficits in Parkinson disease (PD), including freezing of gait (FOG), can be among the most debilitating symptoms. Rhythmic auditory cueing has been used to alleviate some gait symptoms. However, different cue types, such as externally-generated and self-generated cues, affect gait variability differently. The differential effects of these cue types on people with PD with FOG (PD + FOG), who often have higher gait variability, and those with PD without FOG (PD-FOG) is unknown. Given the relationship of gait variability to fall risk, this is an important area to address. This study aims to 1) confirm the association between falls and gait variability measures in PD-FOG, PD + FOG and age-matched Controls; 2) investigate the effects of different cue types on gait variability in PD-FOG and PD + FOG; and 3) determine whether baseline gait characteristics are associated with response to cues. This cross-sectional study investigated PD-FOG (n = 24), PD + FOG (n = 20), and Controls (n = 24). Gait trials were collected during use of externally-generated and self-generated cues for all participants. Gait variability measures were the primary outcomes to assess the effects of rhythmic auditory cues. Logistic regression models showed increased gait variability was associated with falls across groups. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed externally-generated cues increased gait variability, whereas self-generated cues did not, for all groups. Pearson’s correlations showed participants with higher baseline gait variability had greater reduction in gait variability with rhythmic auditory cueing. Higher gait variability is associated with falls. This study demonstrates that PD + FOG are capable of using self-generated cues without increasing gait variability measures, thereby stabilizing gait. People with higher baseline gait variability are likely to experience the largest reductions in variability with the addition of external cues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32932076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Cues ; Falls ; Female ; Freezing ; Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology ; Gait variability ; Humans ; Male ; Parkinson disease ; Parkinson Disease - complications</subject><ispartof>Gait &amp; posture, 2020-10, Vol.82, p.161-166</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-a53cb1ad1aa25667c9240d534686e6601c8f48a85ea72cc598a8eeca7b0274623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-a53cb1ad1aa25667c9240d534686e6601c8f48a85ea72cc598a8eeca7b0274623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7111-4860</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636220305373$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32932076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horin, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Elinor C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawson, Kerri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earhart, Gammon M.</creatorcontrib><title>People with Parkinson disease with and without freezing of gait respond similarly to external and self-generated cues</title><title>Gait &amp; posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>•External cues, but not self-generated cues, increase gait variability in all groups.•Higher baseline gait variability was associated with lower cued gait variability.•Higher gait variability is associated with falls in PD-FOG, PD + FOG, and Controls. Gait deficits in Parkinson disease (PD), including freezing of gait (FOG), can be among the most debilitating symptoms. Rhythmic auditory cueing has been used to alleviate some gait symptoms. However, different cue types, such as externally-generated and self-generated cues, affect gait variability differently. The differential effects of these cue types on people with PD with FOG (PD + FOG), who often have higher gait variability, and those with PD without FOG (PD-FOG) is unknown. Given the relationship of gait variability to fall risk, this is an important area to address. This study aims to 1) confirm the association between falls and gait variability measures in PD-FOG, PD + FOG and age-matched Controls; 2) investigate the effects of different cue types on gait variability in PD-FOG and PD + FOG; and 3) determine whether baseline gait characteristics are associated with response to cues. This cross-sectional study investigated PD-FOG (n = 24), PD + FOG (n = 20), and Controls (n = 24). Gait trials were collected during use of externally-generated and self-generated cues for all participants. Gait variability measures were the primary outcomes to assess the effects of rhythmic auditory cues. Logistic regression models showed increased gait variability was associated with falls across groups. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed externally-generated cues increased gait variability, whereas self-generated cues did not, for all groups. Pearson’s correlations showed participants with higher baseline gait variability had greater reduction in gait variability with rhythmic auditory cueing. Higher gait variability is associated with falls. This study demonstrates that PD + FOG are capable of using self-generated cues without increasing gait variability measures, thereby stabilizing gait. People with higher baseline gait variability are likely to experience the largest reductions in variability with the addition of external cues.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Falls</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Freezing</subject><subject>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</subject><subject>Gait variability</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Parkinson disease</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - complications</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhL1Q-ckkYO4mTXBCoooBUiR7gbM06k60Xrx1sp6X99WS72wpOnDyy33vz5I-xMwGlAKHebcsN2jyFlEsJEkroS4DmGVuJru0LKUX_nK2gV6pQlZIn7FVKWwCoq06-ZCeV7CsJrVqx-YrC5Ijf2nzNrzD-tD4FzwebCNPxGv3wMIQ58zES3Vu_4WHk-wY8UprCIkh2Zx1Gd8dz4PQ7U_ToHqyJ3FhsyFPETAM3M6XX7MWILtGb43nKflx8-n7-pbj89vnr-cfLwtStyAU2lVkLHASibJRqTS9rGJqqVp0ipUCYbqw77BrCVhrT9MtMZLBdg2xrJatT9v6QO83rHQ2GfI7o9BTtDuOdDmj1vy_eXutNuNFtKzrZVUvA22NADL-W4lnvbDLkHHoKc9KyrqtGAnSwSNVBamJIKdL4tEaA3jPTW_3ITO-Zaej1wmwxnv1d8sn2CGkRfDgIaPmqG0tRJ2PJGxpsJJP1EOz_dvwBY1WvTA</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Horin, Adam P.</creator><creator>Harrison, Elinor C.</creator><creator>Rawson, Kerri S.</creator><creator>Earhart, Gammon M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-4860</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>People with Parkinson disease with and without freezing of gait respond similarly to external and self-generated cues</title><author>Horin, Adam P. ; Harrison, Elinor C. ; Rawson, Kerri S. ; Earhart, Gammon M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-a53cb1ad1aa25667c9240d534686e6601c8f48a85ea72cc598a8eeca7b0274623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Falls</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Freezing</topic><topic>Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology</topic><topic>Gait variability</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Parkinson disease</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horin, Adam P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, Elinor C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawson, Kerri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Earhart, Gammon M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horin, Adam P.</au><au>Harrison, Elinor C.</au><au>Rawson, Kerri S.</au><au>Earhart, Gammon M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>People with Parkinson disease with and without freezing of gait respond similarly to external and self-generated cues</atitle><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>82</volume><spage>161</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>161-166</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>•External cues, but not self-generated cues, increase gait variability in all groups.•Higher baseline gait variability was associated with lower cued gait variability.•Higher gait variability is associated with falls in PD-FOG, PD + FOG, and Controls. Gait deficits in Parkinson disease (PD), including freezing of gait (FOG), can be among the most debilitating symptoms. Rhythmic auditory cueing has been used to alleviate some gait symptoms. However, different cue types, such as externally-generated and self-generated cues, affect gait variability differently. The differential effects of these cue types on people with PD with FOG (PD + FOG), who often have higher gait variability, and those with PD without FOG (PD-FOG) is unknown. Given the relationship of gait variability to fall risk, this is an important area to address. This study aims to 1) confirm the association between falls and gait variability measures in PD-FOG, PD + FOG and age-matched Controls; 2) investigate the effects of different cue types on gait variability in PD-FOG and PD + FOG; and 3) determine whether baseline gait characteristics are associated with response to cues. This cross-sectional study investigated PD-FOG (n = 24), PD + FOG (n = 20), and Controls (n = 24). Gait trials were collected during use of externally-generated and self-generated cues for all participants. Gait variability measures were the primary outcomes to assess the effects of rhythmic auditory cues. Logistic regression models showed increased gait variability was associated with falls across groups. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed externally-generated cues increased gait variability, whereas self-generated cues did not, for all groups. Pearson’s correlations showed participants with higher baseline gait variability had greater reduction in gait variability with rhythmic auditory cueing. Higher gait variability is associated with falls. This study demonstrates that PD + FOG are capable of using self-generated cues without increasing gait variability measures, thereby stabilizing gait. People with higher baseline gait variability are likely to experience the largest reductions in variability with the addition of external cues.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32932076</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7111-4860</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6362
ispartof Gait & posture, 2020-10, Vol.82, p.161-166
issn 0966-6362
1879-2219
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7718283
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cues
Falls
Female
Freezing
Gait Disorders, Neurologic - etiology
Gait variability
Humans
Male
Parkinson disease
Parkinson Disease - complications
title People with Parkinson disease with and without freezing of gait respond similarly to external and self-generated cues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T20%3A23%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=People%20with%20Parkinson%20disease%20with%20and%20without%20freezing%20of%20gait%20respond%20similarly%20to%20external%20and%20self-generated%20cues&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Horin,%20Adam%20P.&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=82&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=161-166&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2443520080%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2443520080&rft_id=info:pmid/32932076&rft_els_id=S0966636220305373&rfr_iscdi=true