A stress test to evaluate the usefulness of Akaike information criterion in short-term earthquake prediction
Akaike information criterion (AIC) has been recently adopted to identify possible earthquake precursors in ionospheric total electron content (TEC). According to the authors of this methodology, their technique allows finding abrupt increases (positive breaks) in vertical TEC rate of change 25–80 mi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2020-12, Vol.10 (1), p.21153-21153, Article 21153 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21153 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 21153 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Tozzi, Roberta Masci, Fabrizio Pezzopane, Michael |
description | Akaike information criterion (AIC) has been recently adopted to identify possible earthquake precursors in ionospheric total electron content (TEC). According to the authors of this methodology, their technique allows finding abrupt increases (positive breaks) in vertical TEC rate of change 25–80 min before the occurrence of large earthquakes, highlighting a promising implication of AIC method in Mw > 8 earthquakes alert strategies. Due to the relevance of this matter, a lively scientific debate ensued from these results. In this study, we carefully evaluate AIC method potentiality in searching earthquake TEC precursory signatures. We first investigate the dependence of the detected breaks number on the adjustable AIC method parameters. Then, we show that breaks occurrence clusters around specific local times and around moderate and high solar and geomagnetic activity. The outcome of this study is that AIC method is not concretely usable for issuing large earthquakes alerts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-020-77834-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7713355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473280056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-63a3086e1961777c9789ba809ae70c112c3f69963290945ee93207acd07302d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFPFTEQxxujEYJ8AQ6miRcvq9PO7nZ7MXkhICYkXuTclL5ZXmG3fbRdEr-9fT5A9GAvnWZ-85_O_Bk7EfBJAA6fcys6PTQgoVFqwLaBV-xQQts1EqV8_SI-YMc530I9ndSt0G_ZAaJU2LXqkE0rnkuinHmhXHiJnB7stNhCvGyIL5nGZQq7fBz56s76O-I-jDHNtvgYuEu-UNpFPvC8iak09T1zsqls7hdb8W2itXc7-h17M9op0_HjfcSuzs9-nF40l9-_fjtdXTau01iaHi3C0JPQvVBKOa0GfW0H0JYUOCGkw7HXukepQbcdkUYJyro1KAS5RjxiX_a62-V6prWjUJKdzDb52aafJlpv_s4EvzE38cEoJRC7rgp8fBRI8X6pizGzz46myQaKSzay7VUvAVpZ0Q__oLdxSaGOVymFcqhr7ysl95RLMedE4_NnBJidn2bvp6l-mt9-GqhF71-O8Vzy5F4FcA_kmgo3lP70_o_sL0b-q-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473280056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A stress test to evaluate the usefulness of Akaike information criterion in short-term earthquake prediction</title><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Tozzi, Roberta ; Masci, Fabrizio ; Pezzopane, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Tozzi, Roberta ; Masci, Fabrizio ; Pezzopane, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Akaike information criterion (AIC) has been recently adopted to identify possible earthquake precursors in ionospheric total electron content (TEC). According to the authors of this methodology, their technique allows finding abrupt increases (positive breaks) in vertical TEC rate of change 25–80 min before the occurrence of large earthquakes, highlighting a promising implication of AIC method in Mw > 8 earthquakes alert strategies. Due to the relevance of this matter, a lively scientific debate ensued from these results. In this study, we carefully evaluate AIC method potentiality in searching earthquake TEC precursory signatures. We first investigate the dependence of the detected breaks number on the adjustable AIC method parameters. Then, we show that breaks occurrence clusters around specific local times and around moderate and high solar and geomagnetic activity. The outcome of this study is that AIC method is not concretely usable for issuing large earthquakes alerts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77834-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33273547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>704/2151/508 ; 704/4111 ; 704/525 ; Earthquake prediction ; Earthquakes ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2020-12, Vol.10 (1), p.21153-21153, Article 21153</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-63a3086e1961777c9789ba809ae70c112c3f69963290945ee93207acd07302d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-63a3086e1961777c9789ba809ae70c112c3f69963290945ee93207acd07302d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713355/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7713355/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tozzi, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masci, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezzopane, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>A stress test to evaluate the usefulness of Akaike information criterion in short-term earthquake prediction</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Akaike information criterion (AIC) has been recently adopted to identify possible earthquake precursors in ionospheric total electron content (TEC). According to the authors of this methodology, their technique allows finding abrupt increases (positive breaks) in vertical TEC rate of change 25–80 min before the occurrence of large earthquakes, highlighting a promising implication of AIC method in Mw > 8 earthquakes alert strategies. Due to the relevance of this matter, a lively scientific debate ensued from these results. In this study, we carefully evaluate AIC method potentiality in searching earthquake TEC precursory signatures. We first investigate the dependence of the detected breaks number on the adjustable AIC method parameters. Then, we show that breaks occurrence clusters around specific local times and around moderate and high solar and geomagnetic activity. The outcome of this study is that AIC method is not concretely usable for issuing large earthquakes alerts.</description><subject>704/2151/508</subject><subject>704/4111</subject><subject>704/525</subject><subject>Earthquake prediction</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFPFTEQxxujEYJ8AQ6miRcvq9PO7nZ7MXkhICYkXuTclL5ZXmG3fbRdEr-9fT5A9GAvnWZ-85_O_Bk7EfBJAA6fcys6PTQgoVFqwLaBV-xQQts1EqV8_SI-YMc530I9ndSt0G_ZAaJU2LXqkE0rnkuinHmhXHiJnB7stNhCvGyIL5nGZQq7fBz56s76O-I-jDHNtvgYuEu-UNpFPvC8iak09T1zsqls7hdb8W2itXc7-h17M9op0_HjfcSuzs9-nF40l9-_fjtdXTau01iaHi3C0JPQvVBKOa0GfW0H0JYUOCGkw7HXukepQbcdkUYJyro1KAS5RjxiX_a62-V6prWjUJKdzDb52aafJlpv_s4EvzE38cEoJRC7rgp8fBRI8X6pizGzz46myQaKSzay7VUvAVpZ0Q__oLdxSaGOVymFcqhr7ysl95RLMedE4_NnBJidn2bvp6l-mt9-GqhF71-O8Vzy5F4FcA_kmgo3lP70_o_sL0b-q-I</recordid><startdate>20201203</startdate><enddate>20201203</enddate><creator>Tozzi, Roberta</creator><creator>Masci, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Pezzopane, Michael</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201203</creationdate><title>A stress test to evaluate the usefulness of Akaike information criterion in short-term earthquake prediction</title><author>Tozzi, Roberta ; Masci, Fabrizio ; Pezzopane, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c593t-63a3086e1961777c9789ba809ae70c112c3f69963290945ee93207acd07302d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>704/2151/508</topic><topic>704/4111</topic><topic>704/525</topic><topic>Earthquake prediction</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tozzi, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masci, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pezzopane, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tozzi, Roberta</au><au>Masci, Fabrizio</au><au>Pezzopane, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A stress test to evaluate the usefulness of Akaike information criterion in short-term earthquake prediction</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2020-12-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21153</spage><epage>21153</epage><pages>21153-21153</pages><artnum>21153</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Akaike information criterion (AIC) has been recently adopted to identify possible earthquake precursors in ionospheric total electron content (TEC). According to the authors of this methodology, their technique allows finding abrupt increases (positive breaks) in vertical TEC rate of change 25–80 min before the occurrence of large earthquakes, highlighting a promising implication of AIC method in Mw > 8 earthquakes alert strategies. Due to the relevance of this matter, a lively scientific debate ensued from these results. In this study, we carefully evaluate AIC method potentiality in searching earthquake TEC precursory signatures. We first investigate the dependence of the detected breaks number on the adjustable AIC method parameters. Then, we show that breaks occurrence clusters around specific local times and around moderate and high solar and geomagnetic activity. The outcome of this study is that AIC method is not concretely usable for issuing large earthquakes alerts.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>33273547</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-020-77834-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2020-12, Vol.10 (1), p.21153-21153, Article 21153 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7713355 |
source | Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | 704/2151/508 704/4111 704/525 Earthquake prediction Earthquakes Humanities and Social Sciences multidisciplinary Science Science (multidisciplinary) |
title | A stress test to evaluate the usefulness of Akaike information criterion in short-term earthquake prediction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T08%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20stress%20test%20to%20evaluate%20the%20usefulness%20of%20Akaike%20information%20criterion%20in%20short-term%20earthquake%20prediction&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Tozzi,%20Roberta&rft.date=2020-12-03&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21153&rft.epage=21153&rft.pages=21153-21153&rft.artnum=21153&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-020-77834-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2473280056%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473280056&rft_id=info:pmid/33273547&rfr_iscdi=true |