Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan
Survivorship care plans (SCPs) may facilitate cancer survivorship care shared between oncologists and primary care, particularly for patients more likely to receive care across healthcare systems such as rural patients. However, limited research has addressed primary care clinicians’ information or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cancer education 2022-02, Vol.37 (1), p.23-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Journal of cancer education |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Stewart, Taylor P. Sesto, Mary E. Haine, James E. Henningfield, Mary F. Norslien, Kirsten Zhang, Xiao Hahn, David L. Tevaarwerk, Amye J. |
description | Survivorship care plans (SCPs) may facilitate cancer survivorship care shared between oncologists and primary care, particularly for patients more likely to receive care across healthcare systems such as rural patients. However, limited research has addressed primary care clinicians’ information or workflow needs with regard to SCPs. This study’s objective was to assess primary care clinicians’ perceived usefulness with a
re-engineered SCP
previously developed by applying engineering approaches and informed by primary care preferences. An emailed survey of primary care clinicians assessed perceived usefulness with the
re-engineered SCP
. Clinicians were recruited across the USA from primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with high concentrations of rural practices. Over 90% of respondents
(n = 111)
agreed that (1) the
re-engineered SCP
was useful
(n = 95
) and (2) they would want to receive a similar SCP (
n
= 93). The majority demonstrated high agreement regarding the SCP’s relevance, understandability, content, and ability to help provide better survivorship care. Perceived usefulness was consistent between rural and non-rural clinicians. Suggested improvements involved decreased length, addition of a bulleted list, and electronic health record integration. Results indicate that the majority of primary care clinicians perceive the
re-engineered SCP
as useful. However, primary care clinicians indicated continued barriers despite end-user specific alterations. Future research should investigate additional strategies to support primary care survivorship-related workload, provide essential SCP content, and improve survivorship care delivery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13187-020-01776-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7708524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2409194964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e4ce8dc09bba53c1efe79fe2126cf0f1a31cbe41974aa5357485762b4b65d6d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUhVHVqJmmfYEuKqRuuogbwGDwplI0Sn-kSImm7RphfO0QeWAK9kh5hL51cZykaRZZocv9zuFeDkLvKPlECZEniZZUyYIwUhAqZVXwF2hFBS9zKfhLtCJKiULRWhyi1yldk3zNiHiFDkvGlaqYXKE_G0jTMCYcOnzme-cBovP9Mb6MbmviDV6bCMf4wtswhD6XYRhME6IZ3R7wBnoT28xjg39McQ83s89jKQ4-9zZQ3JtDe0u6fYjpyu0W6HIw_g066MyQ4O3deYR-fTn7uf5WnF98_b4-PS8sl3wsgFtQrSV10xhRWgodyLoDRlllO9JRU1LbAKe15CYDQnIlZMUa3lSirVpZHqHPi-9uarbQWvBjNIPeLUPrYJz-v-Pdle7DXktJlGA8G3y8M4jh9wRp1FuXLOR_8RCmpBknNa15Xc3ohyfodZiiz-tpVjHBKS_rmWILZWNIKUL3MAwlek5aL0nrnLS-TVrPoveP13iQ3EebgXIB0m5OFOK_t5-x_QuAWLYU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2625414394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Stewart, Taylor P. ; Sesto, Mary E. ; Haine, James E. ; Henningfield, Mary F. ; Norslien, Kirsten ; Zhang, Xiao ; Hahn, David L. ; Tevaarwerk, Amye J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Taylor P. ; Sesto, Mary E. ; Haine, James E. ; Henningfield, Mary F. ; Norslien, Kirsten ; Zhang, Xiao ; Hahn, David L. ; Tevaarwerk, Amye J.</creatorcontrib><description>Survivorship care plans (SCPs) may facilitate cancer survivorship care shared between oncologists and primary care, particularly for patients more likely to receive care across healthcare systems such as rural patients. However, limited research has addressed primary care clinicians’ information or workflow needs with regard to SCPs. This study’s objective was to assess primary care clinicians’ perceived usefulness with a
re-engineered SCP
previously developed by applying engineering approaches and informed by primary care preferences. An emailed survey of primary care clinicians assessed perceived usefulness with the
re-engineered SCP
. Clinicians were recruited across the USA from primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with high concentrations of rural practices. Over 90% of respondents
(n = 111)
agreed that (1) the
re-engineered SCP
was useful
(n = 95
) and (2) they would want to receive a similar SCP (
n
= 93). The majority demonstrated high agreement regarding the SCP’s relevance, understandability, content, and ability to help provide better survivorship care. Perceived usefulness was consistent between rural and non-rural clinicians. Suggested improvements involved decreased length, addition of a bulleted list, and electronic health record integration. Results indicate that the majority of primary care clinicians perceive the
re-engineered SCP
as useful. However, primary care clinicians indicated continued barriers despite end-user specific alterations. Future research should investigate additional strategies to support primary care survivorship-related workload, provide essential SCP content, and improve survivorship care delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8195</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0154</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01776-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32488627</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer Research ; Humans ; Medical Oncology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Patient Care Planning ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Primary care ; Primary Health Care ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Survivorship</subject><ispartof>Journal of cancer education, 2022-02, Vol.37 (1), p.23-29</ispartof><rights>American Association for Cancer Education 2020</rights><rights>2020. American Association for Cancer Education.</rights><rights>American Association for Cancer Education 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e4ce8dc09bba53c1efe79fe2126cf0f1a31cbe41974aa5357485762b4b65d6d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e4ce8dc09bba53c1efe79fe2126cf0f1a31cbe41974aa5357485762b4b65d6d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8087-5119</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13187-020-01776-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13187-020-01776-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32488627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Taylor P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sesto, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haine, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henningfield, Mary F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norslien, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tevaarwerk, Amye J.</creatorcontrib><title>Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan</title><title>Journal of cancer education</title><addtitle>J Canc Educ</addtitle><addtitle>J Cancer Educ</addtitle><description>Survivorship care plans (SCPs) may facilitate cancer survivorship care shared between oncologists and primary care, particularly for patients more likely to receive care across healthcare systems such as rural patients. However, limited research has addressed primary care clinicians’ information or workflow needs with regard to SCPs. This study’s objective was to assess primary care clinicians’ perceived usefulness with a
re-engineered SCP
previously developed by applying engineering approaches and informed by primary care preferences. An emailed survey of primary care clinicians assessed perceived usefulness with the
re-engineered SCP
. Clinicians were recruited across the USA from primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with high concentrations of rural practices. Over 90% of respondents
(n = 111)
agreed that (1) the
re-engineered SCP
was useful
(n = 95
) and (2) they would want to receive a similar SCP (
n
= 93). The majority demonstrated high agreement regarding the SCP’s relevance, understandability, content, and ability to help provide better survivorship care. Perceived usefulness was consistent between rural and non-rural clinicians. Suggested improvements involved decreased length, addition of a bulleted list, and electronic health record integration. Results indicate that the majority of primary care clinicians perceive the
re-engineered SCP
as useful. However, primary care clinicians indicated continued barriers despite end-user specific alterations. Future research should investigate additional strategies to support primary care survivorship-related workload, provide essential SCP content, and improve survivorship care delivery.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Oncology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Survivorship</subject><issn>0885-8195</issn><issn>1543-0154</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUhVHVqJmmfYEuKqRuuogbwGDwplI0Sn-kSImm7RphfO0QeWAK9kh5hL51cZykaRZZocv9zuFeDkLvKPlECZEniZZUyYIwUhAqZVXwF2hFBS9zKfhLtCJKiULRWhyi1yldk3zNiHiFDkvGlaqYXKE_G0jTMCYcOnzme-cBovP9Mb6MbmviDV6bCMf4wtswhD6XYRhME6IZ3R7wBnoT28xjg39McQ83s89jKQ4-9zZQ3JtDe0u6fYjpyu0W6HIw_g066MyQ4O3deYR-fTn7uf5WnF98_b4-PS8sl3wsgFtQrSV10xhRWgodyLoDRlllO9JRU1LbAKe15CYDQnIlZMUa3lSirVpZHqHPi-9uarbQWvBjNIPeLUPrYJz-v-Pdle7DXktJlGA8G3y8M4jh9wRp1FuXLOR_8RCmpBknNa15Xc3ohyfodZiiz-tpVjHBKS_rmWILZWNIKUL3MAwlek5aL0nrnLS-TVrPoveP13iQ3EebgXIB0m5OFOK_t5-x_QuAWLYU</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Stewart, Taylor P.</creator><creator>Sesto, Mary E.</creator><creator>Haine, James E.</creator><creator>Henningfield, Mary F.</creator><creator>Norslien, Kirsten</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiao</creator><creator>Hahn, David L.</creator><creator>Tevaarwerk, Amye J.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-5119</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan</title><author>Stewart, Taylor P. ; Sesto, Mary E. ; Haine, James E. ; Henningfield, Mary F. ; Norslien, Kirsten ; Zhang, Xiao ; Hahn, David L. ; Tevaarwerk, Amye J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e4ce8dc09bba53c1efe79fe2126cf0f1a31cbe41974aa5357485762b4b65d6d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Oncology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Survivorship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Taylor P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sesto, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haine, James E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henningfield, Mary F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norslien, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tevaarwerk, Amye J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cancer education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stewart, Taylor P.</au><au>Sesto, Mary E.</au><au>Haine, James E.</au><au>Henningfield, Mary F.</au><au>Norslien, Kirsten</au><au>Zhang, Xiao</au><au>Hahn, David L.</au><au>Tevaarwerk, Amye J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cancer education</jtitle><stitle>J Canc Educ</stitle><addtitle>J Cancer Educ</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>23-29</pages><issn>0885-8195</issn><eissn>1543-0154</eissn><abstract>Survivorship care plans (SCPs) may facilitate cancer survivorship care shared between oncologists and primary care, particularly for patients more likely to receive care across healthcare systems such as rural patients. However, limited research has addressed primary care clinicians’ information or workflow needs with regard to SCPs. This study’s objective was to assess primary care clinicians’ perceived usefulness with a
re-engineered SCP
previously developed by applying engineering approaches and informed by primary care preferences. An emailed survey of primary care clinicians assessed perceived usefulness with the
re-engineered SCP
. Clinicians were recruited across the USA from primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) with high concentrations of rural practices. Over 90% of respondents
(n = 111)
agreed that (1) the
re-engineered SCP
was useful
(n = 95
) and (2) they would want to receive a similar SCP (
n
= 93). The majority demonstrated high agreement regarding the SCP’s relevance, understandability, content, and ability to help provide better survivorship care. Perceived usefulness was consistent between rural and non-rural clinicians. Suggested improvements involved decreased length, addition of a bulleted list, and electronic health record integration. Results indicate that the majority of primary care clinicians perceive the
re-engineered SCP
as useful. However, primary care clinicians indicated continued barriers despite end-user specific alterations. Future research should investigate additional strategies to support primary care survivorship-related workload, provide essential SCP content, and improve survivorship care delivery.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>32488627</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13187-020-01776-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-5119</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8195 |
ispartof | Journal of cancer education, 2022-02, Vol.37 (1), p.23-29 |
issn | 0885-8195 1543-0154 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7708524 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cancer Research Humans Medical Oncology Neoplasms - therapy Patient Care Planning Pharmacology/Toxicology Primary care Primary Health Care Surveys and Questionnaires Survivorship |
title | Results of Engineering, Primary Care, Oncology Collaborative Regarding a Survey of Primary Care on a Re-Engineered Survivorship Care Plan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A54%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20Engineering,%20Primary%20Care,%20Oncology%20Collaborative%20Regarding%20a%20Survey%20of%20Primary%20Care%20on%20a%20Re-Engineered%20Survivorship%20Care%20Plan&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cancer%20education&rft.au=Stewart,%20Taylor%20P.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=23-29&rft.issn=0885-8195&rft.eissn=1543-0154&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13187-020-01776-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2409194964%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2625414394&rft_id=info:pmid/32488627&rfr_iscdi=true |