Early Physical Rehabilitation after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Is It Feasible and Safe?
The primary purpose of this research was to investigate the feasibility and safety of delivering an early supervised physical therapy intervention to women after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); furthermore, we aimed to provide explorative data on its effects. This was a single-site feasibility st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2020-11, Vol.17 (22), p.8382 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 8382 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ostos-Díaz, Beatriz Casuso-Holgado, María Jesús Muñoz-Fernández, María Jesús Carazo, Ana F Martín-Valero, Rocío Medrano-Sánchez, Esther M |
description | The primary purpose of this research was to investigate the feasibility and safety of delivering an early supervised physical therapy intervention to women after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); furthermore, we aimed to provide explorative data on its effects. This was a single-site feasibility study. Pre- and post-evaluation was conducted from baseline to follow-up at 6 months. Primary outcomes were participant recruitment, participant retention, compliance with the intervention, and safety. Secondary outcomes were shoulder range of motion, handgrip strength, upper limb pain and disability, scar recovery, quality of life, and the incidence of axillary web syndrome (AWS) and/or lymphoedema. A total of 43 participants (mean age 55.37 years) completed the trial and the follow-up period. A total of 91% of women who met the inclusion criteria agreed to participate, and the adherence rate was 80%. No adverse events were reported. Incidence of AWS was 9.3%, and there was no incidence of lymphoedema at 6 months. Our results support that this intervention is feasible and safe. The results presented in this study also provide preliminary evidence for the use of a rehabilitation program as a supportive intervention after SLNB, but future research on effectiveness is needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph17228382 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7697742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2461396695</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ce29b3e3d11224101f252733918f40237b3689d84bcd70b215761448c466b9d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCI8rpyRD5yKfhVJ-YAolWBShUgHmfLcTbEyE2CnSLl7wlqqehpV7uzszMahE4pueBckUv3CaEpacJYylO2gw6olGQoJKG7__oBOozxkxCeCqn20YBzqlI-UgfITU3wHX4uu-is8fgFSpM571rTurrCpmgh4FeoWleBx_Nu0ZT4sc4Bj13dxA67Co8DmNjiiakshCs8i3jW4rt-5jIP2FQ5fjUF3ByjvcL4CCfreoTe76Zvk4fh_Ol-NrmdD23vpx1aYCrjwHNKGROU0IKNWNJ7pWkhCONJxmWq8lRkNk9IxugokVSI1AopM5ULfoSuV7zNMltAbnvtwXjdBLcwodO1cXp7U7lSf9TfOpEqSQTrCc7XBKH-WkJs9cJFC96bCupl1ExIypWUatRDL1ZQG-oYAxSbN5To33z0dj79wdl_cRv4XyD8B4FOjCo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2461396695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early Physical Rehabilitation after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Is It Feasible and Safe?</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><source>Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Ostos-Díaz, Beatriz ; Casuso-Holgado, María Jesús ; Muñoz-Fernández, María Jesús ; Carazo, Ana F ; Martín-Valero, Rocío ; Medrano-Sánchez, Esther M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ostos-Díaz, Beatriz ; Casuso-Holgado, María Jesús ; Muñoz-Fernández, María Jesús ; Carazo, Ana F ; Martín-Valero, Rocío ; Medrano-Sánchez, Esther M</creatorcontrib><description>The primary purpose of this research was to investigate the feasibility and safety of delivering an early supervised physical therapy intervention to women after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); furthermore, we aimed to provide explorative data on its effects. This was a single-site feasibility study. Pre- and post-evaluation was conducted from baseline to follow-up at 6 months. Primary outcomes were participant recruitment, participant retention, compliance with the intervention, and safety. Secondary outcomes were shoulder range of motion, handgrip strength, upper limb pain and disability, scar recovery, quality of life, and the incidence of axillary web syndrome (AWS) and/or lymphoedema. A total of 43 participants (mean age 55.37 years) completed the trial and the follow-up period. A total of 91% of women who met the inclusion criteria agreed to participate, and the adherence rate was 80%. No adverse events were reported. Incidence of AWS was 9.3%, and there was no incidence of lymphoedema at 6 months. Our results support that this intervention is feasible and safe. The results presented in this study also provide preliminary evidence for the use of a rehabilitation program as a supportive intervention after SLNB, but future research on effectiveness is needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228382</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33198359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI</publisher><subject>Breast Neoplasms - rehabilitation ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Exercise Therapy - standards ; Female ; Hand Strength ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Quality of Life ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - rehabilitation ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-11, Vol.17 (22), p.8382</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ce29b3e3d11224101f252733918f40237b3689d84bcd70b215761448c466b9d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ce29b3e3d11224101f252733918f40237b3689d84bcd70b215761448c466b9d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1664-3647 ; 0000-0002-4217-6827</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697742/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697742/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33198359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ostos-Díaz, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casuso-Holgado, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Fernández, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carazo, Ana F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Valero, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medrano-Sánchez, Esther M</creatorcontrib><title>Early Physical Rehabilitation after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Is It Feasible and Safe?</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>The primary purpose of this research was to investigate the feasibility and safety of delivering an early supervised physical therapy intervention to women after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); furthermore, we aimed to provide explorative data on its effects. This was a single-site feasibility study. Pre- and post-evaluation was conducted from baseline to follow-up at 6 months. Primary outcomes were participant recruitment, participant retention, compliance with the intervention, and safety. Secondary outcomes were shoulder range of motion, handgrip strength, upper limb pain and disability, scar recovery, quality of life, and the incidence of axillary web syndrome (AWS) and/or lymphoedema. A total of 43 participants (mean age 55.37 years) completed the trial and the follow-up period. A total of 91% of women who met the inclusion criteria agreed to participate, and the adherence rate was 80%. No adverse events were reported. Incidence of AWS was 9.3%, and there was no incidence of lymphoedema at 6 months. Our results support that this intervention is feasible and safe. The results presented in this study also provide preliminary evidence for the use of a rehabilitation program as a supportive intervention after SLNB, but future research on effectiveness is needed.</description><subject>Breast Neoplasms - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - standards</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hand Strength</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCI8rpyRD5yKfhVJ-YAolWBShUgHmfLcTbEyE2CnSLl7wlqqehpV7uzszMahE4pueBckUv3CaEpacJYylO2gw6olGQoJKG7__oBOozxkxCeCqn20YBzqlI-UgfITU3wHX4uu-is8fgFSpM571rTurrCpmgh4FeoWleBx_Nu0ZT4sc4Bj13dxA67Co8DmNjiiakshCs8i3jW4rt-5jIP2FQ5fjUF3ByjvcL4CCfreoTe76Zvk4fh_Ol-NrmdD23vpx1aYCrjwHNKGROU0IKNWNJ7pWkhCONJxmWq8lRkNk9IxugokVSI1AopM5ULfoSuV7zNMltAbnvtwXjdBLcwodO1cXp7U7lSf9TfOpEqSQTrCc7XBKH-WkJs9cJFC96bCupl1ExIypWUatRDL1ZQG-oYAxSbN5To33z0dj79wdl_cRv4XyD8B4FOjCo</recordid><startdate>20201112</startdate><enddate>20201112</enddate><creator>Ostos-Díaz, Beatriz</creator><creator>Casuso-Holgado, María Jesús</creator><creator>Muñoz-Fernández, María Jesús</creator><creator>Carazo, Ana F</creator><creator>Martín-Valero, Rocío</creator><creator>Medrano-Sánchez, Esther M</creator><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-3647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4217-6827</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201112</creationdate><title>Early Physical Rehabilitation after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Is It Feasible and Safe?</title><author>Ostos-Díaz, Beatriz ; Casuso-Holgado, María Jesús ; Muñoz-Fernández, María Jesús ; Carazo, Ana F ; Martín-Valero, Rocío ; Medrano-Sánchez, Esther M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-ce29b3e3d11224101f252733918f40237b3689d84bcd70b215761448c466b9d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Breast Neoplasms - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - standards</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hand Strength</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ostos-Díaz, Beatriz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casuso-Holgado, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Fernández, María Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carazo, Ana F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Valero, Rocío</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medrano-Sánchez, Esther M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ostos-Díaz, Beatriz</au><au>Casuso-Holgado, María Jesús</au><au>Muñoz-Fernández, María Jesús</au><au>Carazo, Ana F</au><au>Martín-Valero, Rocío</au><au>Medrano-Sánchez, Esther M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early Physical Rehabilitation after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Is It Feasible and Safe?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-11-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>8382</spage><pages>8382-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>The primary purpose of this research was to investigate the feasibility and safety of delivering an early supervised physical therapy intervention to women after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); furthermore, we aimed to provide explorative data on its effects. This was a single-site feasibility study. Pre- and post-evaluation was conducted from baseline to follow-up at 6 months. Primary outcomes were participant recruitment, participant retention, compliance with the intervention, and safety. Secondary outcomes were shoulder range of motion, handgrip strength, upper limb pain and disability, scar recovery, quality of life, and the incidence of axillary web syndrome (AWS) and/or lymphoedema. A total of 43 participants (mean age 55.37 years) completed the trial and the follow-up period. A total of 91% of women who met the inclusion criteria agreed to participate, and the adherence rate was 80%. No adverse events were reported. Incidence of AWS was 9.3%, and there was no incidence of lymphoedema at 6 months. Our results support that this intervention is feasible and safe. The results presented in this study also provide preliminary evidence for the use of a rehabilitation program as a supportive intervention after SLNB, but future research on effectiveness is needed.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI</pub><pmid>33198359</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph17228382</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-3647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4217-6827</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020-11, Vol.17 (22), p.8382 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7697742 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; MEDLINE; PubMed Central(OpenAccess); Full-Text Journals in Chemistry (Open access); EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Breast Neoplasms - rehabilitation Breast Neoplasms - surgery Exercise Therapy - standards Female Hand Strength Humans Middle Aged Quality of Life Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - rehabilitation Treatment Outcome |
title | Early Physical Rehabilitation after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Is It Feasible and Safe? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A12%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20Physical%20Rehabilitation%20after%20Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Biopsy%20in%20Breast%20Cancer:%20Is%20It%20Feasible%20and%20Safe?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Ostos-D%C3%ADaz,%20Beatriz&rft.date=2020-11-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=8382&rft.pages=8382-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph17228382&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2461396695%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2461396695&rft_id=info:pmid/33198359&rfr_iscdi=true |