2 Acute phase response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in beef steers supplemented with prebiotic blends

Abstract A study was conducted to determine the effects of two prebiotic blends on the acute phase response (APR) following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in steers. Crossbred steers (n = 36; 273±4 kg) were fed for 21d on three different treatments: 1) Control, fed a standard receiving ration; 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2020-11, Vol.98 (Supplement_2), p.38-39
Hauptverfasser: Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick, Broadway, Paul R, Carroll, Jeffery A, Compart, Devan M Paulus, Forcherio, J C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 39
container_issue Supplement_2
container_start_page 38
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 98
creator Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick
Broadway, Paul R
Carroll, Jeffery A
Compart, Devan M Paulus
Forcherio, J C
description Abstract A study was conducted to determine the effects of two prebiotic blends on the acute phase response (APR) following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in steers. Crossbred steers (n = 36; 273±4 kg) were fed for 21d on three different treatments: 1) Control, fed a standard receiving ration; 2) Control ration supplemented with a Prebiotic/Probiotic blend (28.4 g/hd/d; PMI); and 3) Control ration supplemented with a DFM/Prebiotic blend (19.0 g/hd/d; PMI). On d20, calves were fitted with indwelling rectal temperature (RT) monitors and jugular catheters and moved into individual stanchions in a covered barn. On d21, blood samples were collected, and sickness behavior scores recorded at 0.5-h intervals from -2 to 8h and again at 24h relative to an i.v. challenge with 0.25 µg/kg BW LPS. Serum was isolated and stored until analyzed for pro-inflammatory cytokines, cortisol and glucose concentrations. Complete blood counts were measured every 2h from -2 to 8h and again at 24h. Pre-challenge RT measured for 18h prior to the challenge tended (P = 0.10) to be affected by treatment such that calves fed the Prebiotic/Probiotic blend had greater RT than Control and tended to be greater than calves fed the DFM/Prebiotic blend (38.9, 39.2, and 39.0±0.1oC, respectively). Post-challenge RT increased 0.8–1.0oC on average but did not differ between treatments (P = 0.53). Sickness behavior scores were not different between treatments (P = 0.14). There were no differences in white blood cell or differential counts between treatments (P ≥ 0.25). Serum concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ increased in response to the challenge (P < 0.01) but were not different between treatments (P ≥ 0.26). Serum cortisol and glucose concentrations were reduced in both supplemented groups compared to Control steers (P ≤ 0.006). Therefore, the data suggest that the effects of the prebiotic blends during an immune challenge were limited to alterations in metabolic biomarkers and energy utilization.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skz397.088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7697497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skz397.088</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/jas/skz397.088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-64e5d9c133db67337d3ec9624ea69eaaf34947982a036039837c81ae38521bcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXz7l66JY0bZpchDH8BQMveg5p-rpmdk1IOmX-9UYqgidP3wfvfb48PghdU7KgRLLlTsdlfPtksloQIU7QjJZ5mTHK2SmaEZLTTAian6OLGHeE0LyU5Qx1OV6ZwwjYdzoCDhC9G9IwOtxb77zrj1Eb0-lgG8Ap-x6GLWA74BqgxXEECBHHg_c97GEYocEfduywD1BbN1qD60Q08RKdtbqPcPWTc_R6f_eyfsw2zw9P69UmM5QLkfECykYaylhT84qxqmFgJM8L0FyC1i0rZFFJkWvCOGFSsMoIqoGJMqe1adkc3U69_lDvoTHppaB75YPd63BUTlv1dzPYTm3du6q4rApZpYLFVGCCizFA-8tSor5FqyRaTaJVEp2AmwlwB__f7RcHMIOn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>2 Acute phase response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in beef steers supplemented with prebiotic blends</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick ; Broadway, Paul R ; Carroll, Jeffery A ; Compart, Devan M Paulus ; Forcherio, J C</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick ; Broadway, Paul R ; Carroll, Jeffery A ; Compart, Devan M Paulus ; Forcherio, J C</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract A study was conducted to determine the effects of two prebiotic blends on the acute phase response (APR) following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in steers. Crossbred steers (n = 36; 273±4 kg) were fed for 21d on three different treatments: 1) Control, fed a standard receiving ration; 2) Control ration supplemented with a Prebiotic/Probiotic blend (28.4 g/hd/d; PMI); and 3) Control ration supplemented with a DFM/Prebiotic blend (19.0 g/hd/d; PMI). On d20, calves were fitted with indwelling rectal temperature (RT) monitors and jugular catheters and moved into individual stanchions in a covered barn. On d21, blood samples were collected, and sickness behavior scores recorded at 0.5-h intervals from -2 to 8h and again at 24h relative to an i.v. challenge with 0.25 µg/kg BW LPS. Serum was isolated and stored until analyzed for pro-inflammatory cytokines, cortisol and glucose concentrations. Complete blood counts were measured every 2h from -2 to 8h and again at 24h. Pre-challenge RT measured for 18h prior to the challenge tended (P = 0.10) to be affected by treatment such that calves fed the Prebiotic/Probiotic blend had greater RT than Control and tended to be greater than calves fed the DFM/Prebiotic blend (38.9, 39.2, and 39.0±0.1oC, respectively). Post-challenge RT increased 0.8–1.0oC on average but did not differ between treatments (P = 0.53). Sickness behavior scores were not different between treatments (P = 0.14). There were no differences in white blood cell or differential counts between treatments (P ≥ 0.25). Serum concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ increased in response to the challenge (P &lt; 0.01) but were not different between treatments (P ≥ 0.26). Serum cortisol and glucose concentrations were reduced in both supplemented groups compared to Control steers (P ≤ 0.006). Therefore, the data suggest that the effects of the prebiotic blends during an immune challenge were limited to alterations in metabolic biomarkers and energy utilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz397.088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98 (Supplement_2), p.38-39</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697497/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7697497/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broadway, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Jeffery A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compart, Devan M Paulus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forcherio, J C</creatorcontrib><title>2 Acute phase response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in beef steers supplemented with prebiotic blends</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract A study was conducted to determine the effects of two prebiotic blends on the acute phase response (APR) following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in steers. Crossbred steers (n = 36; 273±4 kg) were fed for 21d on three different treatments: 1) Control, fed a standard receiving ration; 2) Control ration supplemented with a Prebiotic/Probiotic blend (28.4 g/hd/d; PMI); and 3) Control ration supplemented with a DFM/Prebiotic blend (19.0 g/hd/d; PMI). On d20, calves were fitted with indwelling rectal temperature (RT) monitors and jugular catheters and moved into individual stanchions in a covered barn. On d21, blood samples were collected, and sickness behavior scores recorded at 0.5-h intervals from -2 to 8h and again at 24h relative to an i.v. challenge with 0.25 µg/kg BW LPS. Serum was isolated and stored until analyzed for pro-inflammatory cytokines, cortisol and glucose concentrations. Complete blood counts were measured every 2h from -2 to 8h and again at 24h. Pre-challenge RT measured for 18h prior to the challenge tended (P = 0.10) to be affected by treatment such that calves fed the Prebiotic/Probiotic blend had greater RT than Control and tended to be greater than calves fed the DFM/Prebiotic blend (38.9, 39.2, and 39.0±0.1oC, respectively). Post-challenge RT increased 0.8–1.0oC on average but did not differ between treatments (P = 0.53). Sickness behavior scores were not different between treatments (P = 0.14). There were no differences in white blood cell or differential counts between treatments (P ≥ 0.25). Serum concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ increased in response to the challenge (P &lt; 0.01) but were not different between treatments (P ≥ 0.26). Serum cortisol and glucose concentrations were reduced in both supplemented groups compared to Control steers (P ≤ 0.006). Therefore, the data suggest that the effects of the prebiotic blends during an immune challenge were limited to alterations in metabolic biomarkers and energy utilization.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXz7l66JY0bZpchDH8BQMveg5p-rpmdk1IOmX-9UYqgidP3wfvfb48PghdU7KgRLLlTsdlfPtksloQIU7QjJZ5mTHK2SmaEZLTTAian6OLGHeE0LyU5Qx1OV6ZwwjYdzoCDhC9G9IwOtxb77zrj1Eb0-lgG8Ap-x6GLWA74BqgxXEECBHHg_c97GEYocEfduywD1BbN1qD60Q08RKdtbqPcPWTc_R6f_eyfsw2zw9P69UmM5QLkfECykYaylhT84qxqmFgJM8L0FyC1i0rZFFJkWvCOGFSsMoIqoGJMqe1adkc3U69_lDvoTHppaB75YPd63BUTlv1dzPYTm3du6q4rApZpYLFVGCCizFA-8tSor5FqyRaTaJVEp2AmwlwB__f7RcHMIOn</recordid><startdate>20201128</startdate><enddate>20201128</enddate><creator>Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick</creator><creator>Broadway, Paul R</creator><creator>Carroll, Jeffery A</creator><creator>Compart, Devan M Paulus</creator><creator>Forcherio, J C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201128</creationdate><title>2 Acute phase response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in beef steers supplemented with prebiotic blends</title><author>Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick ; Broadway, Paul R ; Carroll, Jeffery A ; Compart, Devan M Paulus ; Forcherio, J C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1688-64e5d9c133db67337d3ec9624ea69eaaf34947982a036039837c81ae38521bcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broadway, Paul R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carroll, Jeffery A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compart, Devan M Paulus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forcherio, J C</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanchez, Nicole C Burdick</au><au>Broadway, Paul R</au><au>Carroll, Jeffery A</au><au>Compart, Devan M Paulus</au><au>Forcherio, J C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2 Acute phase response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in beef steers supplemented with prebiotic blends</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2020-11-28</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>38-39</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract A study was conducted to determine the effects of two prebiotic blends on the acute phase response (APR) following lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge in steers. Crossbred steers (n = 36; 273±4 kg) were fed for 21d on three different treatments: 1) Control, fed a standard receiving ration; 2) Control ration supplemented with a Prebiotic/Probiotic blend (28.4 g/hd/d; PMI); and 3) Control ration supplemented with a DFM/Prebiotic blend (19.0 g/hd/d; PMI). On d20, calves were fitted with indwelling rectal temperature (RT) monitors and jugular catheters and moved into individual stanchions in a covered barn. On d21, blood samples were collected, and sickness behavior scores recorded at 0.5-h intervals from -2 to 8h and again at 24h relative to an i.v. challenge with 0.25 µg/kg BW LPS. Serum was isolated and stored until analyzed for pro-inflammatory cytokines, cortisol and glucose concentrations. Complete blood counts were measured every 2h from -2 to 8h and again at 24h. Pre-challenge RT measured for 18h prior to the challenge tended (P = 0.10) to be affected by treatment such that calves fed the Prebiotic/Probiotic blend had greater RT than Control and tended to be greater than calves fed the DFM/Prebiotic blend (38.9, 39.2, and 39.0±0.1oC, respectively). Post-challenge RT increased 0.8–1.0oC on average but did not differ between treatments (P = 0.53). Sickness behavior scores were not different between treatments (P = 0.14). There were no differences in white blood cell or differential counts between treatments (P ≥ 0.25). Serum concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-γ increased in response to the challenge (P &lt; 0.01) but were not different between treatments (P ≥ 0.26). Serum cortisol and glucose concentrations were reduced in both supplemented groups compared to Control steers (P ≤ 0.006). Therefore, the data suggest that the effects of the prebiotic blends during an immune challenge were limited to alterations in metabolic biomarkers and energy utilization.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skz397.088</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2020-11, Vol.98 (Supplement_2), p.38-39
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7697497
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Abstracts
title 2 Acute phase response to lipopolysaccharide challenge in beef steers supplemented with prebiotic blends
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2%20Acute%20phase%20response%20to%20lipopolysaccharide%20challenge%20in%20beef%20steers%20supplemented%20with%20prebiotic%20blends&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Sanchez,%20Nicole%20C%20Burdick&rft.date=2020-11-28&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=38-39&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skz397.088&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/jas/skz397.088%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skz397.088&rfr_iscdi=true