Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages

An accurate reconstruction of Sino-Tibetan language evolution would greatly advance our understanding of East Asian population history. Two recent phylogenetic studies attempted to do so but several of their conclusions are different from each other. Here we reconstruct the phylogeny of the Sino-Tib...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20792-20792, Article 20792
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Hanzhi, Ji, Ting, Pagel, Mark, Mace, Ruth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20792
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20792
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 10
creator Zhang, Hanzhi
Ji, Ting
Pagel, Mark
Mace, Ruth
description An accurate reconstruction of Sino-Tibetan language evolution would greatly advance our understanding of East Asian population history. Two recent phylogenetic studies attempted to do so but several of their conclusions are different from each other. Here we reconstruct the phylogeny of the Sino-Tibetan language family, using Bayesian computational methods applied to a larger and linguistically more diverse sample. Our results confirm previous work in finding that the ancestral Sino-Tibetans first split into Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman clades, and support the existence of key internal relationships. But we find that the initial divergence of this group occurred earlier than previously suggested, at approximately 8000 years before the present, coinciding with the onset of millet-based agriculture and significant environmental changes in the Yellow River region. Our findings illustrate that key aspects of phylogenetic history can be replicated in this complex language family, and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the first Sino-Tibetan speakers in relation to the “early farming dispersal” theory of language evolution.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7695722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473271973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-15df80f1c84590dc8ba10092ed48e66ff10d674b9623888c97e22d3aa8c8b19d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtPxCAUhYnRqFH_gAvTxI2bKlygwMbE-E6MLtQ1YVrawXRghNZk_r3o-F7IBpL7nXM5OQjtEnxIMJVHiRGuZIkBl0IwzEq2gjYBM14CBVj98d5AOyk94Xw4KEbUOtqgFJggnG2i6zMz2KaYTxd96KxfFGnsOpuGVFgT-0Vxa0PvhqmrixBd53wR2uLe-VA-uIkdjC9647vRZMk2WmtNn-zOx72FHi_OH06vypu7y-vTk5uyrkg1lIQ3rcQtqSXjCje1nBiCsQLbMGmrqm0JbirBJqoCKqWslbAADTVGZpSohm6h46XvfJzMbFNbP0TT63l0MxMXOhinf0-8m-ouvGhRKS4AssHBh0EMz2POqmcu1bbPSWwYkwZWcUa55DSj-3_QpzBGn-NlSikAEFj8TwkKgijx5gVLqo4hpWjbry8TrN8q1ctKda5Uv1eqWRbt_Qz7JfksMAN0CaQ88p2N37v_sX0FcmyrVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473271973</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages</title><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Hanzhi ; Ji, Ting ; Pagel, Mark ; Mace, Ruth</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hanzhi ; Ji, Ting ; Pagel, Mark ; Mace, Ruth</creatorcontrib><description>An accurate reconstruction of Sino-Tibetan language evolution would greatly advance our understanding of East Asian population history. Two recent phylogenetic studies attempted to do so but several of their conclusions are different from each other. Here we reconstruct the phylogeny of the Sino-Tibetan language family, using Bayesian computational methods applied to a larger and linguistically more diverse sample. Our results confirm previous work in finding that the ancestral Sino-Tibetans first split into Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman clades, and support the existence of key internal relationships. But we find that the initial divergence of this group occurred earlier than previously suggested, at approximately 8000 years before the present, coinciding with the onset of millet-based agriculture and significant environmental changes in the Yellow River region. Our findings illustrate that key aspects of phylogenetic history can be replicated in this complex language family, and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the first Sino-Tibetan speakers in relation to the “early farming dispersal” theory of language evolution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33247154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/181/1403 ; 631/181/19 ; 631/181/757 ; Bayesian analysis ; Computer applications ; Dispersal ; Divergence ; Environmental changes ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Language ; multidisciplinary ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20792-20792, Article 20792</ispartof><rights>Crown 2020</rights><rights>Crown 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-15df80f1c84590dc8ba10092ed48e66ff10d674b9623888c97e22d3aa8c8b19d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-15df80f1c84590dc8ba10092ed48e66ff10d674b9623888c97e22d3aa8c8b19d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695722/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7695722/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33247154$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hanzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Ruth</creatorcontrib><title>Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>An accurate reconstruction of Sino-Tibetan language evolution would greatly advance our understanding of East Asian population history. Two recent phylogenetic studies attempted to do so but several of their conclusions are different from each other. Here we reconstruct the phylogeny of the Sino-Tibetan language family, using Bayesian computational methods applied to a larger and linguistically more diverse sample. Our results confirm previous work in finding that the ancestral Sino-Tibetans first split into Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman clades, and support the existence of key internal relationships. But we find that the initial divergence of this group occurred earlier than previously suggested, at approximately 8000 years before the present, coinciding with the onset of millet-based agriculture and significant environmental changes in the Yellow River region. Our findings illustrate that key aspects of phylogenetic history can be replicated in this complex language family, and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the first Sino-Tibetan speakers in relation to the “early farming dispersal” theory of language evolution.</description><subject>631/181/1403</subject><subject>631/181/19</subject><subject>631/181/757</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtPxCAUhYnRqFH_gAvTxI2bKlygwMbE-E6MLtQ1YVrawXRghNZk_r3o-F7IBpL7nXM5OQjtEnxIMJVHiRGuZIkBl0IwzEq2gjYBM14CBVj98d5AOyk94Xw4KEbUOtqgFJggnG2i6zMz2KaYTxd96KxfFGnsOpuGVFgT-0Vxa0PvhqmrixBd53wR2uLe-VA-uIkdjC9647vRZMk2WmtNn-zOx72FHi_OH06vypu7y-vTk5uyrkg1lIQ3rcQtqSXjCje1nBiCsQLbMGmrqm0JbirBJqoCKqWslbAADTVGZpSohm6h46XvfJzMbFNbP0TT63l0MxMXOhinf0-8m-ouvGhRKS4AssHBh0EMz2POqmcu1bbPSWwYkwZWcUa55DSj-3_QpzBGn-NlSikAEFj8TwkKgijx5gVLqo4hpWjbry8TrN8q1ctKda5Uv1eqWRbt_Qz7JfksMAN0CaQ88p2N37v_sX0FcmyrVg</recordid><startdate>20201127</startdate><enddate>20201127</enddate><creator>Zhang, Hanzhi</creator><creator>Ji, Ting</creator><creator>Pagel, Mark</creator><creator>Mace, Ruth</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201127</creationdate><title>Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages</title><author>Zhang, Hanzhi ; Ji, Ting ; Pagel, Mark ; Mace, Ruth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-15df80f1c84590dc8ba10092ed48e66ff10d674b9623888c97e22d3aa8c8b19d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>631/181/1403</topic><topic>631/181/19</topic><topic>631/181/757</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hanzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mace, Ruth</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Hanzhi</au><au>Ji, Ting</au><au>Pagel, Mark</au><au>Mace, Ruth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2020-11-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20792</spage><epage>20792</epage><pages>20792-20792</pages><artnum>20792</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>An accurate reconstruction of Sino-Tibetan language evolution would greatly advance our understanding of East Asian population history. Two recent phylogenetic studies attempted to do so but several of their conclusions are different from each other. Here we reconstruct the phylogeny of the Sino-Tibetan language family, using Bayesian computational methods applied to a larger and linguistically more diverse sample. Our results confirm previous work in finding that the ancestral Sino-Tibetans first split into Sinitic and Tibeto-Burman clades, and support the existence of key internal relationships. But we find that the initial divergence of this group occurred earlier than previously suggested, at approximately 8000 years before the present, coinciding with the onset of millet-based agriculture and significant environmental changes in the Yellow River region. Our findings illustrate that key aspects of phylogenetic history can be replicated in this complex language family, and calls for a more nuanced understanding of the first Sino-Tibetan speakers in relation to the “early farming dispersal” theory of language evolution.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>33247154</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2020-11, Vol.10 (1), p.20792-20792, Article 20792
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7695722
source Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects 631/181/1403
631/181/19
631/181/757
Bayesian analysis
Computer applications
Dispersal
Divergence
Environmental changes
Humanities and Social Sciences
Language
multidisciplinary
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Dated phylogeny suggests early Neolithic origin of Sino-Tibetan languages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A14%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dated%20phylogeny%20suggests%20early%20Neolithic%20origin%20of%20Sino-Tibetan%20languages&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Zhang,%20Hanzhi&rft.date=2020-11-27&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20792&rft.epage=20792&rft.pages=20792-20792&rft.artnum=20792&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-020-77404-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2473271973%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473271973&rft_id=info:pmid/33247154&rfr_iscdi=true