Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats

Background Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases. Objective To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of veterinary internal medicine 2020-11, Vol.34 (6), p.2671-2676
Hauptverfasser: Buller, Maggie C., Johnson, Lynelle R., Outerbridge, Catherine A., Vernau, William, White, Stephen D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2676
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2671
container_title Journal of veterinary internal medicine
container_volume 34
creator Buller, Maggie C.
Johnson, Lynelle R.
Outerbridge, Catherine A.
Vernau, William
White, Stephen D.
description Background Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases. Objective To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia. Animals Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats. Methods Prospective, case‐control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores >300 considered positive. Results Cats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jvim.15951
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7694819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2457277976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-25f41a703e60e1a14d1912e77f712fa010d6c2acd8cce82f3a8679bbb252ab203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOBDU9giQ2qlGI7iZ1skFBVSlERC3621o1zM-ORYwc76WhegafG06mQYMHdWFfn89GxDyGvOLvked7u7u14yeu25k_IirdlW3Cp5FOyYk3LCykrdkbOU9oxJuq6Vs_JWVnyirVMrMivrxiXkdpxXHzYuNAtznp6TSOmKfiEic6BAsYAzmHcoE806wbmRPd23lIP8xKzdqDBmCVG6zcUbNzDgWJI1odpa50FasI4QcT-aLd4GAY0c95M8HMM7sHwBXk2gEv48vFck-8frr9dfSzuvtzcXr2_K0wlal6Ieqg4KFaiZMiBVz1vuUClBsXFAIyzXhoBpm-MwUYMJTRStV3XiVpAJ1i5Ju9OvtPSjdgbzBHA6SnaEeJBB7D6b8Xbrd6Ee61kWzX5f9fkzaNBDD8XTLMebTLoHHgMS9KiqpVQqlUyo6__QXdhiT4_L1OykkxUZZmpixNlYkgp4vAnDGf6WLE-VqwfKs4wP8F76_DwH1J_-nH7-XTnN35drCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464602433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Buller, Maggie C. ; Johnson, Lynelle R. ; Outerbridge, Catherine A. ; Vernau, William ; White, Stephen D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buller, Maggie C. ; Johnson, Lynelle R. ; Outerbridge, Catherine A. ; Vernau, William ; White, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases. Objective To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia. Animals Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats. Methods Prospective, case‐control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores &gt;300 considered positive. Results Cats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-6640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33140902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Allergens ; Allergies ; Asthma ; Blood diseases ; bronchitis ; Bronchoscopy ; Cats ; Diagnostic tests ; ELISA ; Enzymes ; immunology ; Inflammation ; Laboratories ; Lavage ; Neutrophils ; Polyclonal antibodies ; SMALL ANIMAL ; Standardized tests</subject><ispartof>Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020-11, Vol.34 (6), p.2671-2676</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-25f41a703e60e1a14d1912e77f712fa010d6c2acd8cce82f3a8679bbb252ab203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-25f41a703e60e1a14d1912e77f712fa010d6c2acd8cce82f3a8679bbb252ab203</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5331-5626</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694819/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694819/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buller, Maggie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Outerbridge, Catherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernau, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><title>Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats</title><title>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</title><description>Background Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases. Objective To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia. Animals Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats. Methods Prospective, case‐control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores &gt;300 considered positive. Results Cats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Blood diseases</subject><subject>bronchitis</subject><subject>Bronchoscopy</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>immunology</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lavage</subject><subject>Neutrophils</subject><subject>Polyclonal antibodies</subject><subject>SMALL ANIMAL</subject><subject>Standardized tests</subject><issn>0891-6640</issn><issn>1939-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOBDU9giQ2qlGI7iZ1skFBVSlERC3621o1zM-ORYwc76WhegafG06mQYMHdWFfn89GxDyGvOLvked7u7u14yeu25k_IirdlW3Cp5FOyYk3LCykrdkbOU9oxJuq6Vs_JWVnyirVMrMivrxiXkdpxXHzYuNAtznp6TSOmKfiEic6BAsYAzmHcoE806wbmRPd23lIP8xKzdqDBmCVG6zcUbNzDgWJI1odpa50FasI4QcT-aLd4GAY0c95M8HMM7sHwBXk2gEv48vFck-8frr9dfSzuvtzcXr2_K0wlal6Ieqg4KFaiZMiBVz1vuUClBsXFAIyzXhoBpm-MwUYMJTRStV3XiVpAJ1i5Ju9OvtPSjdgbzBHA6SnaEeJBB7D6b8Xbrd6Ee61kWzX5f9fkzaNBDD8XTLMebTLoHHgMS9KiqpVQqlUyo6__QXdhiT4_L1OykkxUZZmpixNlYkgp4vAnDGf6WLE-VqwfKs4wP8F76_DwH1J_-nH7-XTnN35drCQ</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Buller, Maggie C.</creator><creator>Johnson, Lynelle R.</creator><creator>Outerbridge, Catherine A.</creator><creator>Vernau, William</creator><creator>White, Stephen D.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-5626</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats</title><author>Buller, Maggie C. ; Johnson, Lynelle R. ; Outerbridge, Catherine A. ; Vernau, William ; White, Stephen D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-25f41a703e60e1a14d1912e77f712fa010d6c2acd8cce82f3a8679bbb252ab203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Blood diseases</topic><topic>bronchitis</topic><topic>Bronchoscopy</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>immunology</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lavage</topic><topic>Neutrophils</topic><topic>Polyclonal antibodies</topic><topic>SMALL ANIMAL</topic><topic>Standardized tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buller, Maggie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Outerbridge, Catherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernau, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buller, Maggie C.</au><au>Johnson, Lynelle R.</au><au>Outerbridge, Catherine A.</au><au>Vernau, William</au><au>White, Stephen D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats</atitle><jtitle>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2671</spage><epage>2676</epage><pages>2671-2676</pages><issn>0891-6640</issn><eissn>1939-1676</eissn><abstract>Background Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases. Objective To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia. Animals Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats. Methods Prospective, case‐control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores &gt;300 considered positive. Results Cats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33140902</pmid><doi>10.1111/jvim.15951</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-5626</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0891-6640
ispartof Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020-11, Vol.34 (6), p.2671-2676
issn 0891-6640
1939-1676
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7694819
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Age
Allergens
Allergies
Asthma
Blood diseases
bronchitis
Bronchoscopy
Cats
Diagnostic tests
ELISA
Enzymes
immunology
Inflammation
Laboratories
Lavage
Neutrophils
Polyclonal antibodies
SMALL ANIMAL
Standardized tests
title Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A31%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serum%20immunoglobulin%20E%20responses%20to%20aeroallergens%20in%20cats%20with%20naturally%20occurring%20airway%20eosinophilia%20compared%20to%20unaffected%20control%20cats&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20veterinary%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=Buller,%20Maggie%20C.&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2671&rft.epage=2676&rft.pages=2671-2676&rft.issn=0891-6640&rft.eissn=1939-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jvim.15951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2457277976%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464602433&rft_id=info:pmid/33140902&rfr_iscdi=true