Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats
Background Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases. Objective To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of veterinary internal medicine 2020-11, Vol.34 (6), p.2671-2676 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2676 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2671 |
container_title | Journal of veterinary internal medicine |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Buller, Maggie C. Johnson, Lynelle R. Outerbridge, Catherine A. Vernau, William White, Stephen D. |
description | Background
Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases.
Objective
To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia.
Animals
Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats.
Methods
Prospective, case‐control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores >300 considered positive.
Results
Cats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jvim.15951 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7694819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2457277976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-25f41a703e60e1a14d1912e77f712fa010d6c2acd8cce82f3a8679bbb252ab203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOBDU9giQ2qlGI7iZ1skFBVSlERC3621o1zM-ORYwc76WhegafG06mQYMHdWFfn89GxDyGvOLvked7u7u14yeu25k_IirdlW3Cp5FOyYk3LCykrdkbOU9oxJuq6Vs_JWVnyirVMrMivrxiXkdpxXHzYuNAtznp6TSOmKfiEic6BAsYAzmHcoE806wbmRPd23lIP8xKzdqDBmCVG6zcUbNzDgWJI1odpa50FasI4QcT-aLd4GAY0c95M8HMM7sHwBXk2gEv48vFck-8frr9dfSzuvtzcXr2_K0wlal6Ieqg4KFaiZMiBVz1vuUClBsXFAIyzXhoBpm-MwUYMJTRStV3XiVpAJ1i5Ju9OvtPSjdgbzBHA6SnaEeJBB7D6b8Xbrd6Ee61kWzX5f9fkzaNBDD8XTLMebTLoHHgMS9KiqpVQqlUyo6__QXdhiT4_L1OykkxUZZmpixNlYkgp4vAnDGf6WLE-VqwfKs4wP8F76_DwH1J_-nH7-XTnN35drCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2464602433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Buller, Maggie C. ; Johnson, Lynelle R. ; Outerbridge, Catherine A. ; Vernau, William ; White, Stephen D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buller, Maggie C. ; Johnson, Lynelle R. ; Outerbridge, Catherine A. ; Vernau, William ; White, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases.
Objective
To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia.
Animals
Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats.
Methods
Prospective, case‐control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores >300 considered positive.
Results
Cats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0891-6640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jvim.15951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33140902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Allergens ; Allergies ; Asthma ; Blood diseases ; bronchitis ; Bronchoscopy ; Cats ; Diagnostic tests ; ELISA ; Enzymes ; immunology ; Inflammation ; Laboratories ; Lavage ; Neutrophils ; Polyclonal antibodies ; SMALL ANIMAL ; Standardized tests</subject><ispartof>Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020-11, Vol.34 (6), p.2671-2676</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-25f41a703e60e1a14d1912e77f712fa010d6c2acd8cce82f3a8679bbb252ab203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-25f41a703e60e1a14d1912e77f712fa010d6c2acd8cce82f3a8679bbb252ab203</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5331-5626</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694819/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694819/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buller, Maggie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Outerbridge, Catherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernau, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><title>Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats</title><title>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</title><description>Background
Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases.
Objective
To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia.
Animals
Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats.
Methods
Prospective, case‐control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores >300 considered positive.
Results
Cats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Blood diseases</subject><subject>bronchitis</subject><subject>Bronchoscopy</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>immunology</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lavage</subject><subject>Neutrophils</subject><subject>Polyclonal antibodies</subject><subject>SMALL ANIMAL</subject><subject>Standardized tests</subject><issn>0891-6640</issn><issn>1939-1676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOBDU9giQ2qlGI7iZ1skFBVSlERC3621o1zM-ORYwc76WhegafG06mQYMHdWFfn89GxDyGvOLvked7u7u14yeu25k_IirdlW3Cp5FOyYk3LCykrdkbOU9oxJuq6Vs_JWVnyirVMrMivrxiXkdpxXHzYuNAtznp6TSOmKfiEic6BAsYAzmHcoE806wbmRPd23lIP8xKzdqDBmCVG6zcUbNzDgWJI1odpa50FasI4QcT-aLd4GAY0c95M8HMM7sHwBXk2gEv48vFck-8frr9dfSzuvtzcXr2_K0wlal6Ieqg4KFaiZMiBVz1vuUClBsXFAIyzXhoBpm-MwUYMJTRStV3XiVpAJ1i5Ju9OvtPSjdgbzBHA6SnaEeJBB7D6b8Xbrd6Ee61kWzX5f9fkzaNBDD8XTLMebTLoHHgMS9KiqpVQqlUyo6__QXdhiT4_L1OykkxUZZmpixNlYkgp4vAnDGf6WLE-VqwfKs4wP8F76_DwH1J_-nH7-XTnN35drCQ</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Buller, Maggie C.</creator><creator>Johnson, Lynelle R.</creator><creator>Outerbridge, Catherine A.</creator><creator>Vernau, William</creator><creator>White, Stephen D.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-5626</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats</title><author>Buller, Maggie C. ; Johnson, Lynelle R. ; Outerbridge, Catherine A. ; Vernau, William ; White, Stephen D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-25f41a703e60e1a14d1912e77f712fa010d6c2acd8cce82f3a8679bbb252ab203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Blood diseases</topic><topic>bronchitis</topic><topic>Bronchoscopy</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>immunology</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lavage</topic><topic>Neutrophils</topic><topic>Polyclonal antibodies</topic><topic>SMALL ANIMAL</topic><topic>Standardized tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buller, Maggie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Lynelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Outerbridge, Catherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernau, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buller, Maggie C.</au><au>Johnson, Lynelle R.</au><au>Outerbridge, Catherine A.</au><au>Vernau, William</au><au>White, Stephen D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats</atitle><jtitle>Journal of veterinary internal medicine</jtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2671</spage><epage>2676</epage><pages>2671-2676</pages><issn>0891-6640</issn><eissn>1939-1676</eissn><abstract>Background
Eosinophilic airway disease in cats is sometimes described as allergic in origin, but controversy exists in the documentation of allergy in cats and the utility of allergy testing for respiratory tract diseases.
Objective
To examine serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) response to aeroallergens in cats with airway eosinophilia.
Animals
Fifteen cats with idiopathic eosinophilic airway inflammation and 9 control cats.
Methods
Prospective, case‐control study. Surplus serum from cats with airway eosinophilia documented by bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage was submitted for IgE measurement using ELISA polyclonal antibody methodology. Responses for regional allergens (fungal organisms, weeds, grasses, trees, mites, insects) were assessed. Results were reported as ELISA absorbance units with scores 0 to 79 considered negative, scores between 80 and 300 considered intermediate, and scores >300 considered positive.
Results
Cats with airway eosinophilia had significantly more positive serum IgE responses (25/720) than did healthy controls (5/432, P = .02); however, the number of cats with positive IgE responses (5/15) did not differ from controls (1/9, P = .35). The allergen that most commonly resulted in positive serum IgE response in cats with airway eosinophilia was dust mite (n = 4) followed by 2 types of storage mites (n = 3 each). No control cat tested positive for these allergens.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Serum IgE production against aeroallergens was found in some cats with eosinophilic airway inflammation, but the number of affected cats with positive results did not differ from controls. Further investigation in cats with eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic airway disease in comparison to control cats is warranted.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33140902</pmid><doi>10.1111/jvim.15951</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5331-5626</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0891-6640 |
ispartof | Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020-11, Vol.34 (6), p.2671-2676 |
issn | 0891-6640 1939-1676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7694819 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Age Allergens Allergies Asthma Blood diseases bronchitis Bronchoscopy Cats Diagnostic tests ELISA Enzymes immunology Inflammation Laboratories Lavage Neutrophils Polyclonal antibodies SMALL ANIMAL Standardized tests |
title | Serum immunoglobulin E responses to aeroallergens in cats with naturally occurring airway eosinophilia compared to unaffected control cats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A31%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serum%20immunoglobulin%20E%20responses%20to%20aeroallergens%20in%20cats%20with%20naturally%20occurring%20airway%20eosinophilia%20compared%20to%20unaffected%20control%20cats&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20veterinary%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=Buller,%20Maggie%20C.&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2671&rft.epage=2676&rft.pages=2671-2676&rft.issn=0891-6640&rft.eissn=1939-1676&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jvim.15951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2457277976%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2464602433&rft_id=info:pmid/33140902&rfr_iscdi=true |