Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 and Their Relationship with a Negative RT-PCR Result
This study was designed to examine maternal-perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) according to the result of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and to investigate possible variables that could be useful for pred...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2020-11, Vol.9 (11), p.3552 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3552 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Cuñarro-López, Yolanda Cano-Valderrama, Óscar Pintado-Recarte, Pilar Cueto-Hernández, Ignacio González-Garzón, Blanca García-Tizón, Santiago Bujan, Julia Asúnsolo, Ángel Ortega, Miguel A De León-Luis, Juan Antonio |
description | This study was designed to examine maternal-perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) according to the result of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and to investigate possible variables that could be useful for predicting a negative RT-PCR result. Participants of this retrospective cohort study were obstetrics patients with suspected COVID-19 who underwent an RT-PCR test in a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain. Maternal-perinatal features were analysed according to the results of this test. Clinical, radiological and analytical characteristics that could be associated with a negative result were also explored. In a final subgroup analysis, patients were included if they had pneumonia and a negative test result for the virus. Out of the 111 obstetric patients with suspected COVID-19 that were enrolled, 38.7% returned a negative result. In this RT-PCR-negative group, we recorded lower rates of pneumonia (21.4% vs. 45.6%,
= 0.009), severe or critical clinical features (4.7% vs. 11.8% and 0.0% vs. 5.9%,
= 0.02, respectively), lower lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (168 UI/L vs. 224.5 UI/L,
= 0.003), a greater need for maternal treatment (60.3% vs 24.4%,
< 0.001), a reduced need for oxygen therapy (2.4% vs 28.8%,
< 0.001) and a lower rate of intensive care unit admission (0.0% vs. 3.7%,
= 0.046) than the RT-PCR-positive group. While no differences were found in other variables, the monocyte count was higher (946.2/μL vs. 518.8/μL,
= 0.022) in this group. The predictive model for a negative test result included the monocyte count, LDH level and no need for oxygen therapy. This model was able to identify 73.5% of patients with a negative RT-PCR result. Only 11% of the patients with pneumonia testing negative for the virus had IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The proportion of pregnant women with suspected COVID-19 and a negative RT-PCR result was nearly 39%. In these patients, the symptoms were mild and the systemic severity of the disease was lower. The monocyte count, LDH level and no need for oxygen therapy were the factors that were more related to a negative test result in this group. These variables could be used to guide the management of patients with suspected COVID-19, mainly while waiting for RT-PCR results or in settings where this test is not available. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm9113552 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7694252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2641057861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f2e53e3de7714310b76bfa81b06fa4e541a241024369eb379ec16bc7f456f7723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1PFDEUhhsjEQLc-ANME2-MyUC_O3NDQlYFEmQ36-pt0-meYbuZj7XtoP57uiwi2JvTnj7nzdu-CL2l5ITzipyuXVdRyqVkr9ABI1oXhJf89bP9PjqOcU3yKkvBqH6D9jmnsqRaHqDfX22C0NsW236JZxB8b1M-Tcfkhg4i9j2e2eShTxH_8mmFv41xAy7BEk-mP64-FbR6GF2swAc8hzbDQx9XfrPDLb6B29y7AzxfFLPJPDNxbNMR2mtsG-H4sR6i718-LyaXxfX04mpyfl04QVQqGgaSA1-C1lRwSmqt6saWtCaqsQKkoJYJSpjgqoKa6wocVbXTjZCq0ZrxQ3S2092MdQdLlx8SbGs2wXc2_DGD9eblTe9X5na4M1pVgsmtwIdHgTD8HCEm0_nooG1tD8MYDROy1JxUaou-_w9dD-P2czOlskupS0Uz9XFHuTDEGKB5MkOJ2WZq_mWa4XfP7T-hfxPk9-tum7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2641057861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 and Their Relationship with a Negative RT-PCR Result</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cuñarro-López, Yolanda ; Cano-Valderrama, Óscar ; Pintado-Recarte, Pilar ; Cueto-Hernández, Ignacio ; González-Garzón, Blanca ; García-Tizón, Santiago ; Bujan, Julia ; Asúnsolo, Ángel ; Ortega, Miguel A ; De León-Luis, Juan Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuñarro-López, Yolanda ; Cano-Valderrama, Óscar ; Pintado-Recarte, Pilar ; Cueto-Hernández, Ignacio ; González-Garzón, Blanca ; García-Tizón, Santiago ; Bujan, Julia ; Asúnsolo, Ángel ; Ortega, Miguel A ; De León-Luis, Juan Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>This study was designed to examine maternal-perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) according to the result of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and to investigate possible variables that could be useful for predicting a negative RT-PCR result. Participants of this retrospective cohort study were obstetrics patients with suspected COVID-19 who underwent an RT-PCR test in a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain. Maternal-perinatal features were analysed according to the results of this test. Clinical, radiological and analytical characteristics that could be associated with a negative result were also explored. In a final subgroup analysis, patients were included if they had pneumonia and a negative test result for the virus. Out of the 111 obstetric patients with suspected COVID-19 that were enrolled, 38.7% returned a negative result. In this RT-PCR-negative group, we recorded lower rates of pneumonia (21.4% vs. 45.6%,
= 0.009), severe or critical clinical features (4.7% vs. 11.8% and 0.0% vs. 5.9%,
= 0.02, respectively), lower lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (168 UI/L vs. 224.5 UI/L,
= 0.003), a greater need for maternal treatment (60.3% vs 24.4%,
< 0.001), a reduced need for oxygen therapy (2.4% vs 28.8%,
< 0.001) and a lower rate of intensive care unit admission (0.0% vs. 3.7%,
= 0.046) than the RT-PCR-positive group. While no differences were found in other variables, the monocyte count was higher (946.2/μL vs. 518.8/μL,
= 0.022) in this group. The predictive model for a negative test result included the monocyte count, LDH level and no need for oxygen therapy. This model was able to identify 73.5% of patients with a negative RT-PCR result. Only 11% of the patients with pneumonia testing negative for the virus had IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The proportion of pregnant women with suspected COVID-19 and a negative RT-PCR result was nearly 39%. In these patients, the symptoms were mild and the systemic severity of the disease was lower. The monocyte count, LDH level and no need for oxygen therapy were the factors that were more related to a negative test result in this group. These variables could be used to guide the management of patients with suspected COVID-19, mainly while waiting for RT-PCR results or in settings where this test is not available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113552</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33158175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Asymptomatic ; Clinical medicine ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease transmission ; Ethics ; Hospitals ; Intensive care ; Mortality ; Multivariate analysis ; Obstetrics ; Oxygen saturation ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Pneumonia ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-11, Vol.9 (11), p.3552</ispartof><rights>2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 by the authors. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f2e53e3de7714310b76bfa81b06fa4e541a241024369eb379ec16bc7f456f7723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f2e53e3de7714310b76bfa81b06fa4e541a241024369eb379ec16bc7f456f7723</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2588-1708 ; 0000-0003-2419-2476 ; 0000-0002-8190-8680 ; 0000-0003-0775-6217 ; 0000-0001-7898-4685 ; 0000-0002-6320-2668</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694252/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7694252/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33158175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuñarro-López, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cano-Valderrama, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintado-Recarte, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cueto-Hernández, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Garzón, Blanca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Tizón, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bujan, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asúnsolo, Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega, Miguel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De León-Luis, Juan Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 and Their Relationship with a Negative RT-PCR Result</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>This study was designed to examine maternal-perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) according to the result of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and to investigate possible variables that could be useful for predicting a negative RT-PCR result. Participants of this retrospective cohort study were obstetrics patients with suspected COVID-19 who underwent an RT-PCR test in a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain. Maternal-perinatal features were analysed according to the results of this test. Clinical, radiological and analytical characteristics that could be associated with a negative result were also explored. In a final subgroup analysis, patients were included if they had pneumonia and a negative test result for the virus. Out of the 111 obstetric patients with suspected COVID-19 that were enrolled, 38.7% returned a negative result. In this RT-PCR-negative group, we recorded lower rates of pneumonia (21.4% vs. 45.6%,
= 0.009), severe or critical clinical features (4.7% vs. 11.8% and 0.0% vs. 5.9%,
= 0.02, respectively), lower lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (168 UI/L vs. 224.5 UI/L,
= 0.003), a greater need for maternal treatment (60.3% vs 24.4%,
< 0.001), a reduced need for oxygen therapy (2.4% vs 28.8%,
< 0.001) and a lower rate of intensive care unit admission (0.0% vs. 3.7%,
= 0.046) than the RT-PCR-positive group. While no differences were found in other variables, the monocyte count was higher (946.2/μL vs. 518.8/μL,
= 0.022) in this group. The predictive model for a negative test result included the monocyte count, LDH level and no need for oxygen therapy. This model was able to identify 73.5% of patients with a negative RT-PCR result. Only 11% of the patients with pneumonia testing negative for the virus had IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The proportion of pregnant women with suspected COVID-19 and a negative RT-PCR result was nearly 39%. In these patients, the symptoms were mild and the systemic severity of the disease was lower. The monocyte count, LDH level and no need for oxygen therapy were the factors that were more related to a negative test result in this group. These variables could be used to guide the management of patients with suspected COVID-19, mainly while waiting for RT-PCR results or in settings where this test is not available.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Oxygen saturation</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1PFDEUhhsjEQLc-ANME2-MyUC_O3NDQlYFEmQ36-pt0-meYbuZj7XtoP57uiwi2JvTnj7nzdu-CL2l5ITzipyuXVdRyqVkr9ABI1oXhJf89bP9PjqOcU3yKkvBqH6D9jmnsqRaHqDfX22C0NsW236JZxB8b1M-Tcfkhg4i9j2e2eShTxH_8mmFv41xAy7BEk-mP64-FbR6GF2swAc8hzbDQx9XfrPDLb6B29y7AzxfFLPJPDNxbNMR2mtsG-H4sR6i718-LyaXxfX04mpyfl04QVQqGgaSA1-C1lRwSmqt6saWtCaqsQKkoJYJSpjgqoKa6wocVbXTjZCq0ZrxQ3S2092MdQdLlx8SbGs2wXc2_DGD9eblTe9X5na4M1pVgsmtwIdHgTD8HCEm0_nooG1tD8MYDROy1JxUaou-_w9dD-P2czOlskupS0Uz9XFHuTDEGKB5MkOJ2WZq_mWa4XfP7T-hfxPk9-tum7Q</recordid><startdate>20201104</startdate><enddate>20201104</enddate><creator>Cuñarro-López, Yolanda</creator><creator>Cano-Valderrama, Óscar</creator><creator>Pintado-Recarte, Pilar</creator><creator>Cueto-Hernández, Ignacio</creator><creator>González-Garzón, Blanca</creator><creator>García-Tizón, Santiago</creator><creator>Bujan, Julia</creator><creator>Asúnsolo, Ángel</creator><creator>Ortega, Miguel A</creator><creator>De León-Luis, Juan Antonio</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2588-1708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2419-2476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8190-8680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0775-6217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7898-4685</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6320-2668</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201104</creationdate><title>Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 and Their Relationship with a Negative RT-PCR Result</title><author>Cuñarro-López, Yolanda ; Cano-Valderrama, Óscar ; Pintado-Recarte, Pilar ; Cueto-Hernández, Ignacio ; González-Garzón, Blanca ; García-Tizón, Santiago ; Bujan, Julia ; Asúnsolo, Ángel ; Ortega, Miguel A ; De León-Luis, Juan Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-f2e53e3de7714310b76bfa81b06fa4e541a241024369eb379ec16bc7f456f7723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Oxygen saturation</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuñarro-López, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cano-Valderrama, Óscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pintado-Recarte, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cueto-Hernández, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Garzón, Blanca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Tizón, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bujan, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asúnsolo, Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega, Miguel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De León-Luis, Juan Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuñarro-López, Yolanda</au><au>Cano-Valderrama, Óscar</au><au>Pintado-Recarte, Pilar</au><au>Cueto-Hernández, Ignacio</au><au>González-Garzón, Blanca</au><au>García-Tizón, Santiago</au><au>Bujan, Julia</au><au>Asúnsolo, Ángel</au><au>Ortega, Miguel A</au><au>De León-Luis, Juan Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 and Their Relationship with a Negative RT-PCR Result</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2020-11-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3552</spage><pages>3552-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>This study was designed to examine maternal-perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) according to the result of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and to investigate possible variables that could be useful for predicting a negative RT-PCR result. Participants of this retrospective cohort study were obstetrics patients with suspected COVID-19 who underwent an RT-PCR test in a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain. Maternal-perinatal features were analysed according to the results of this test. Clinical, radiological and analytical characteristics that could be associated with a negative result were also explored. In a final subgroup analysis, patients were included if they had pneumonia and a negative test result for the virus. Out of the 111 obstetric patients with suspected COVID-19 that were enrolled, 38.7% returned a negative result. In this RT-PCR-negative group, we recorded lower rates of pneumonia (21.4% vs. 45.6%,
= 0.009), severe or critical clinical features (4.7% vs. 11.8% and 0.0% vs. 5.9%,
= 0.02, respectively), lower lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (168 UI/L vs. 224.5 UI/L,
= 0.003), a greater need for maternal treatment (60.3% vs 24.4%,
< 0.001), a reduced need for oxygen therapy (2.4% vs 28.8%,
< 0.001) and a lower rate of intensive care unit admission (0.0% vs. 3.7%,
= 0.046) than the RT-PCR-positive group. While no differences were found in other variables, the monocyte count was higher (946.2/μL vs. 518.8/μL,
= 0.022) in this group. The predictive model for a negative test result included the monocyte count, LDH level and no need for oxygen therapy. This model was able to identify 73.5% of patients with a negative RT-PCR result. Only 11% of the patients with pneumonia testing negative for the virus had IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The proportion of pregnant women with suspected COVID-19 and a negative RT-PCR result was nearly 39%. In these patients, the symptoms were mild and the systemic severity of the disease was lower. The monocyte count, LDH level and no need for oxygen therapy were the factors that were more related to a negative test result in this group. These variables could be used to guide the management of patients with suspected COVID-19, mainly while waiting for RT-PCR results or in settings where this test is not available.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>33158175</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm9113552</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2588-1708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2419-2476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8190-8680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0775-6217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7898-4685</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6320-2668</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2020-11, Vol.9 (11), p.3552 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7694252 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibodies Asymptomatic Clinical medicine Coronaviruses COVID-19 Disease transmission Ethics Hospitals Intensive care Mortality Multivariate analysis Obstetrics Oxygen saturation Pandemics Patients Pneumonia Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Variables |
title | Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 and Their Relationship with a Negative RT-PCR Result |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A20%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maternal%20and%20Perinatal%20Outcomes%20in%20Patients%20with%20Suspected%20COVID-19%20and%20Their%20Relationship%20with%20a%20Negative%20RT-PCR%20Result&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Cu%C3%B1arro-L%C3%B3pez,%20Yolanda&rft.date=2020-11-04&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3552&rft.pages=3552-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm9113552&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2641057861%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2641057861&rft_id=info:pmid/33158175&rfr_iscdi=true |