Characterizing Discourse Deficits Following Penetrating Head Injury: A Preliminary Model

Purpose: Discourse analyses have demonstrated utility for delineating subtle communication deficits following closed head injuries (CHIs). The present investigation examined the discourse performance of a large group of individuals with penetrating head injury (PHI). Performance was also compared ac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of speech-language pathology 2013-05, Vol.22 (2), p.S438-S448
Hauptverfasser: Coelho, Carl, Le, Karen, Mozeiko, Jennifer, Hamilton, Mark, Tyler, Elizabeth, Krueger, Frank, Grafman, Jordan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S448
container_issue 2
container_start_page S438
container_title American journal of speech-language pathology
container_volume 22
creator Coelho, Carl
Le, Karen
Mozeiko, Jennifer
Hamilton, Mark
Tyler, Elizabeth
Krueger, Frank
Grafman, Jordan
description Purpose: Discourse analyses have demonstrated utility for delineating subtle communication deficits following closed head injuries (CHIs). The present investigation examined the discourse performance of a large group of individuals with penetrating head injury (PHI). Performance was also compared across 6 subgroups of PHI based on lesion locale. A preliminary model of discourse production following PHI was proposed and tested. Method: Story narratives were elicited from 2 groups of participants, 167 with PHI and 46 non brain-injured (NBI). Micro- and macrostructural components of each story were analyzed. Measures of memory, executive functions, and intelligence were also administered. All measures were compared across groups and PHI subgroups. The proposed model of discourse production was tested with a structural equation modeling procedure. Results: No differences for the discourse measures were noted across the six PHI subgroups. Three measures distinguished the PHI and NBI groups: narrative length, story grammar, and completeness. The proposed model of discourse production had an adequate-to-good fit with the cognitive and discourse data. Conclusion: In spite of differing mechanisms of injury, the PHI group's discourse performance was consistent with what has been reported for individuals with CHI. The model tested represents a preliminary step toward understanding discourse production following traumatic brain injury. (Contains 7 tables and 1 figure.)
doi_str_mv 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0076)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7684633</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A338601975</galeid><ericid>EJ1005642</ericid><sourcerecordid>A338601975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-91c0072147eb0a2a7645b16c7302ab3001cbffbc8c171d36fac93b1103899b8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFklFrFDEUhQdRbK3-BHVAkPqw7U0yyUx8EJZtaysV-6DgW8hkM7tZskmbzCj113uHbdeuCJKHCXO_ezn35BTFawJHBKrqmABvJsAEHFIg7JjQCUAt3j0q9gnHiiQEHuP9ntornuW8AgBCKH1a7FEmJJeE7xffZ0udtOltcr9cWJQnLps4pGzLE9s54_pcnkXv48-xeGWD7ZPux_u51fPyIqyGdPu-nJZXyXq3dkGn2_JznFv_vHjSaZ_ti7vvQfHt7PTr7Hxy-eXjxWx6OTFc8h6VGlROSVXbFjTVtah4S4SpGVDdMlRs2q5rTWNITeZMdNpI1uJ6rJGybQw7KD5s5l4P7drOjQ2o0Kvr5NaoRUXt1G4luKVaxB-qFk0lGMMBh3cDUrwZbO7VGj2w3utg45AVqaSQDSdA_48yXtUSQFaIvvkLXaGtAZ1ASkiGG1T0D7XQ3ioXuogSzThUTRlrBBBZc6SO_kHhmdu1MzHgQ-H_nYa3DxqWVvt-maMfehdD3gXFBjQp5pxst_WNgBqDpsYIqTFCagyaIlSNQcPGVw9d37bdBwuBlxsAg2W25dNPBIAL3Pw3mKXUew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1369311042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing Discourse Deficits Following Penetrating Head Injury: A Preliminary Model</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Coelho, Carl ; Le, Karen ; Mozeiko, Jennifer ; Hamilton, Mark ; Tyler, Elizabeth ; Krueger, Frank ; Grafman, Jordan</creator><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Carl ; Le, Karen ; Mozeiko, Jennifer ; Hamilton, Mark ; Tyler, Elizabeth ; Krueger, Frank ; Grafman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Discourse analyses have demonstrated utility for delineating subtle communication deficits following closed head injuries (CHIs). The present investigation examined the discourse performance of a large group of individuals with penetrating head injury (PHI). Performance was also compared across 6 subgroups of PHI based on lesion locale. A preliminary model of discourse production following PHI was proposed and tested. Method: Story narratives were elicited from 2 groups of participants, 167 with PHI and 46 non brain-injured (NBI). Micro- and macrostructural components of each story were analyzed. Measures of memory, executive functions, and intelligence were also administered. All measures were compared across groups and PHI subgroups. The proposed model of discourse production was tested with a structural equation modeling procedure. Results: No differences for the discourse measures were noted across the six PHI subgroups. Three measures distinguished the PHI and NBI groups: narrative length, story grammar, and completeness. The proposed model of discourse production had an adequate-to-good fit with the cognitive and discourse data. Conclusion: In spite of differing mechanisms of injury, the PHI group's discourse performance was consistent with what has been reported for individuals with CHI. The model tested represents a preliminary step toward understanding discourse production following traumatic brain injury. (Contains 7 tables and 1 figure.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9110</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0076)</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23695915</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSPFZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aphasia ; Brain ; Brain damage ; Brain Injuries - complications ; Brain Injuries - physiopathology ; Brain Injuries - psychology ; Case studies ; Child Language ; Cognition - physiology ; Communication Skills ; Comparative Analysis ; Discourse Analysis ; Executive Function ; Executive Function - physiology ; Grammar ; Head Injuries ; Head Injuries, Penetrating - complications ; Head Injuries, Penetrating - physiopathology ; Head Injuries, Penetrating - psychology ; Humans ; Injuries ; Intelligence ; Language disorders ; Language Disorders - etiology ; Language Disorders - physiopathology ; Language Disorders - psychology ; Language Impairments ; Male ; Males ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Narration ; Narratives ; Neurological Impairments ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Pilot Projects ; Pragmatics ; Retrospective Studies ; Sentences ; Speech Production Measurement ; Story Grammar ; Story Telling ; Structural Equation Models ; Studies ; Veterans ; Vietnam Conflict</subject><ispartof>American journal of speech-language pathology, 2013-05, Vol.22 (2), p.S438-S448</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association May 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-91c0072147eb0a2a7645b16c7302ab3001cbffbc8c171d36fac93b1103899b8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-91c0072147eb0a2a7645b16c7302ab3001cbffbc8c171d36fac93b1103899b8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1005642$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23695915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozeiko, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grafman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing Discourse Deficits Following Penetrating Head Injury: A Preliminary Model</title><title>American journal of speech-language pathology</title><addtitle>Am J Speech Lang Pathol</addtitle><description>Purpose: Discourse analyses have demonstrated utility for delineating subtle communication deficits following closed head injuries (CHIs). The present investigation examined the discourse performance of a large group of individuals with penetrating head injury (PHI). Performance was also compared across 6 subgroups of PHI based on lesion locale. A preliminary model of discourse production following PHI was proposed and tested. Method: Story narratives were elicited from 2 groups of participants, 167 with PHI and 46 non brain-injured (NBI). Micro- and macrostructural components of each story were analyzed. Measures of memory, executive functions, and intelligence were also administered. All measures were compared across groups and PHI subgroups. The proposed model of discourse production was tested with a structural equation modeling procedure. Results: No differences for the discourse measures were noted across the six PHI subgroups. Three measures distinguished the PHI and NBI groups: narrative length, story grammar, and completeness. The proposed model of discourse production had an adequate-to-good fit with the cognitive and discourse data. Conclusion: In spite of differing mechanisms of injury, the PHI group's discourse performance was consistent with what has been reported for individuals with CHI. The model tested represents a preliminary step toward understanding discourse production following traumatic brain injury. (Contains 7 tables and 1 figure.)</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aphasia</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain damage</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - complications</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Brain Injuries - psychology</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Communication Skills</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Discourse Analysis</subject><subject>Executive Function</subject><subject>Executive Function - physiology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Head Injuries</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Penetrating - complications</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Penetrating - physiopathology</subject><subject>Head Injuries, Penetrating - psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Language disorders</subject><subject>Language Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Language Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Language Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Language Impairments</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Narration</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Neurological Impairments</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Speech Production Measurement</subject><subject>Story Grammar</subject><subject>Story Telling</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><subject>Vietnam Conflict</subject><issn>1058-0360</issn><issn>1558-9110</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFklFrFDEUhQdRbK3-BHVAkPqw7U0yyUx8EJZtaysV-6DgW8hkM7tZskmbzCj113uHbdeuCJKHCXO_ezn35BTFawJHBKrqmABvJsAEHFIg7JjQCUAt3j0q9gnHiiQEHuP9ntornuW8AgBCKH1a7FEmJJeE7xffZ0udtOltcr9cWJQnLps4pGzLE9s54_pcnkXv48-xeGWD7ZPux_u51fPyIqyGdPu-nJZXyXq3dkGn2_JznFv_vHjSaZ_ti7vvQfHt7PTr7Hxy-eXjxWx6OTFc8h6VGlROSVXbFjTVtah4S4SpGVDdMlRs2q5rTWNITeZMdNpI1uJ6rJGybQw7KD5s5l4P7drOjQ2o0Kvr5NaoRUXt1G4luKVaxB-qFk0lGMMBh3cDUrwZbO7VGj2w3utg45AVqaSQDSdA_48yXtUSQFaIvvkLXaGtAZ1ASkiGG1T0D7XQ3ioXuogSzThUTRlrBBBZc6SO_kHhmdu1MzHgQ-H_nYa3DxqWVvt-maMfehdD3gXFBjQp5pxst_WNgBqDpsYIqTFCagyaIlSNQcPGVw9d37bdBwuBlxsAg2W25dNPBIAL3Pw3mKXUew</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Coelho, Carl</creator><creator>Le, Karen</creator><creator>Mozeiko, Jennifer</creator><creator>Hamilton, Mark</creator><creator>Tyler, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Krueger, Frank</creator><creator>Grafman, Jordan</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Characterizing Discourse Deficits Following Penetrating Head Injury: A Preliminary Model</title><author>Coelho, Carl ; Le, Karen ; Mozeiko, Jennifer ; Hamilton, Mark ; Tyler, Elizabeth ; Krueger, Frank ; Grafman, Jordan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-91c0072147eb0a2a7645b16c7302ab3001cbffbc8c171d36fac93b1103899b8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aphasia</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain damage</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - complications</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Brain Injuries - psychology</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Communication Skills</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Discourse Analysis</topic><topic>Executive Function</topic><topic>Executive Function - physiology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Head Injuries</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Penetrating - complications</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Penetrating - physiopathology</topic><topic>Head Injuries, Penetrating - psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Language disorders</topic><topic>Language Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Language Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Language Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Language Impairments</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Narration</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Neurological Impairments</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Speech Production Measurement</topic><topic>Story Grammar</topic><topic>Story Telling</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><topic>Vietnam Conflict</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozeiko, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grafman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of speech-language pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coelho, Carl</au><au>Le, Karen</au><au>Mozeiko, Jennifer</au><au>Hamilton, Mark</au><au>Tyler, Elizabeth</au><au>Krueger, Frank</au><au>Grafman, Jordan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1005642</ericid><atitle>Characterizing Discourse Deficits Following Penetrating Head Injury: A Preliminary Model</atitle><jtitle>American journal of speech-language pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Speech Lang Pathol</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>S438</spage><epage>S448</epage><pages>S438-S448</pages><issn>1058-0360</issn><eissn>1558-9110</eissn><coden>AJSPFZ</coden><abstract>Purpose: Discourse analyses have demonstrated utility for delineating subtle communication deficits following closed head injuries (CHIs). The present investigation examined the discourse performance of a large group of individuals with penetrating head injury (PHI). Performance was also compared across 6 subgroups of PHI based on lesion locale. A preliminary model of discourse production following PHI was proposed and tested. Method: Story narratives were elicited from 2 groups of participants, 167 with PHI and 46 non brain-injured (NBI). Micro- and macrostructural components of each story were analyzed. Measures of memory, executive functions, and intelligence were also administered. All measures were compared across groups and PHI subgroups. The proposed model of discourse production was tested with a structural equation modeling procedure. Results: No differences for the discourse measures were noted across the six PHI subgroups. Three measures distinguished the PHI and NBI groups: narrative length, story grammar, and completeness. The proposed model of discourse production had an adequate-to-good fit with the cognitive and discourse data. Conclusion: In spite of differing mechanisms of injury, the PHI group's discourse performance was consistent with what has been reported for individuals with CHI. The model tested represents a preliminary step toward understanding discourse production following traumatic brain injury. (Contains 7 tables and 1 figure.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</pub><pmid>23695915</pmid><doi>10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0076)</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-0360
ispartof American journal of speech-language pathology, 2013-05, Vol.22 (2), p.S438-S448
issn 1058-0360
1558-9110
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7684633
source Education Source (EBSCOhost); MEDLINE
subjects Aged
Aphasia
Brain
Brain damage
Brain Injuries - complications
Brain Injuries - physiopathology
Brain Injuries - psychology
Case studies
Child Language
Cognition - physiology
Communication Skills
Comparative Analysis
Discourse Analysis
Executive Function
Executive Function - physiology
Grammar
Head Injuries
Head Injuries, Penetrating - complications
Head Injuries, Penetrating - physiopathology
Head Injuries, Penetrating - psychology
Humans
Injuries
Intelligence
Language disorders
Language Disorders - etiology
Language Disorders - physiopathology
Language Disorders - psychology
Language Impairments
Male
Males
Memory
Memory - physiology
Middle Aged
Models, Psychological
Narration
Narratives
Neurological Impairments
Neuropsychological Tests
Pilot Projects
Pragmatics
Retrospective Studies
Sentences
Speech Production Measurement
Story Grammar
Story Telling
Structural Equation Models
Studies
Veterans
Vietnam Conflict
title Characterizing Discourse Deficits Following Penetrating Head Injury: A Preliminary Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A42%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20Discourse%20Deficits%20Following%20Penetrating%20Head%20Injury:%20A%20Preliminary%20Model&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20speech-language%20pathology&rft.au=Coelho,%20Carl&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=S438&rft.epage=S448&rft.pages=S438-S448&rft.issn=1058-0360&rft.eissn=1558-9110&rft.coden=AJSPFZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0076)&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA338601975%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1369311042&rft_id=info:pmid/23695915&rft_galeid=A338601975&rft_ericid=EJ1005642&rfr_iscdi=true