Designing for emergency remote blended and online education: a response to Bennett et al. (2017)
This paper is in response to the article entitled “The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers’ design work” (Bennett et al. in Educ Technol Res Dev 65(1):125–145, 2017). Design constitutes a fundamental part of what teachers do (Goodyear in HERDSA Rev Higher Educ 2:27–5...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational technology research and development 2021-02, Vol.69 (1), p.281-284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 284 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 281 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Connolly, Cornelia Hall, Tony |
description | This paper is in response to the article entitled “The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers’ design work” (Bennett et al. in Educ Technol Res Dev 65(1):125–145, 2017). Design constitutes a fundamental part of what teachers do (Goodyear in HERDSA Rev Higher Educ 2:27–50, 2015). However, it has received negligible attention in the research literature. Bennett et al. make a significant contribution to knowledge by identifying and illustrating how university teachers engage in educational design. In particular, the paper identifies key areas for further support and the professional development of university teachers, including in the use of systematic design models and tools. This will help university teachers significantly, especially during the current pandemic has increased the design workload of university teachers as they endeavour to migrate and transtion their teaching online. Our response discusses Bennett et al. (2017) in the context of emergency remote teaching and the wholesale shift to new modalities of blended and online education. We also offer future suggestions arising from our review, including the importance of further international research on the topic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11423-020-09892-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7678576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713963855</galeid><sourcerecordid>A713963855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a0358e2b8fe0c7b5917b2585ce6e123359540504f9ab81bef5f83616a01e5bae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2P1iAUhRujccbRP-CKxM246OsFeoG6MJkZP5NJ3OgaaXtbmbTwCq3J_HvRTjS6EBbcwHMOF05VPeVw4AD6Rea8EbIGATW0phU13KtOOaKqFQK_X2poRM2VaE-qRznfQBlamYfViZQCQYE-rb68puyn4MPExpgYLZQmCv0tS7TElVg3UxhoYC4MLIbZB2I0bL1bfQwvmStYPsaQia2RXVIItK6MVubmAzsXwPXzx9WD0c2ZntytZ9Xnt28-Xb2vrz---3B1cV33TQtr7UCiIdGZkaDXHbZcdwIN9qSICymxxQYQmrF1neEdjTgaqbhywAk7R_KserX7HrduoaGnsCY322Pyi0u3Njpv_z4J_qud4nerlTaoVTE4vzNI8dtGebWLzz3NswsUt2xFo1Bjw3VT0Gf_oDdxS6E8z5Z_RdTGcF2ow05NbibrwxjLvX2ZAy2-j4FGX_YvNJetkgaxCMQu6FPMOdH4u3sO9mfidk_clsTtr8QtFJHcRbnAYaL0p5f_qH4ADSyrNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2505578817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing for emergency remote blended and online education: a response to Bennett et al. (2017)</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Connolly, Cornelia ; Hall, Tony</creator><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Cornelia ; Hall, Tony</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is in response to the article entitled “The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers’ design work” (Bennett et al. in Educ Technol Res Dev 65(1):125–145, 2017). Design constitutes a fundamental part of what teachers do (Goodyear in HERDSA Rev Higher Educ 2:27–50, 2015). However, it has received negligible attention in the research literature. Bennett et al. make a significant contribution to knowledge by identifying and illustrating how university teachers engage in educational design. In particular, the paper identifies key areas for further support and the professional development of university teachers, including in the use of systematic design models and tools. This will help university teachers significantly, especially during the current pandemic has increased the design workload of university teachers as they endeavour to migrate and transtion their teaching online. Our response discusses Bennett et al. (2017) in the context of emergency remote teaching and the wholesale shift to new modalities of blended and online education. We also offer future suggestions arising from our review, including the importance of further international research on the topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09892-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33250607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Blended learning ; College teachers ; COVID-19 ; Creative Teaching ; Distance Education ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational planning ; Educational Technology ; Higher education ; Learning and Instruction ; Online education ; Online instruction ; Professional development ; School buildings ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2021-02, Vol.69 (1), p.281-284</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a0358e2b8fe0c7b5917b2585ce6e123359540504f9ab81bef5f83616a01e5bae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a0358e2b8fe0c7b5917b2585ce6e123359540504f9ab81bef5f83616a01e5bae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6576-9687 ; 0000-0001-9778-5569</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11423-020-09892-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-020-09892-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Tony</creatorcontrib><title>Designing for emergency remote blended and online education: a response to Bennett et al. (2017)</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>This paper is in response to the article entitled “The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers’ design work” (Bennett et al. in Educ Technol Res Dev 65(1):125–145, 2017). Design constitutes a fundamental part of what teachers do (Goodyear in HERDSA Rev Higher Educ 2:27–50, 2015). However, it has received negligible attention in the research literature. Bennett et al. make a significant contribution to knowledge by identifying and illustrating how university teachers engage in educational design. In particular, the paper identifies key areas for further support and the professional development of university teachers, including in the use of systematic design models and tools. This will help university teachers significantly, especially during the current pandemic has increased the design workload of university teachers as they endeavour to migrate and transtion their teaching online. Our response discusses Bennett et al. (2017) in the context of emergency remote teaching and the wholesale shift to new modalities of blended and online education. We also offer future suggestions arising from our review, including the importance of further international research on the topic.</description><subject>Blended learning</subject><subject>College teachers</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Creative Teaching</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational planning</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Online education</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>School buildings</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2P1iAUhRujccbRP-CKxM246OsFeoG6MJkZP5NJ3OgaaXtbmbTwCq3J_HvRTjS6EBbcwHMOF05VPeVw4AD6Rea8EbIGATW0phU13KtOOaKqFQK_X2poRM2VaE-qRznfQBlamYfViZQCQYE-rb68puyn4MPExpgYLZQmCv0tS7TElVg3UxhoYC4MLIbZB2I0bL1bfQwvmStYPsaQia2RXVIItK6MVubmAzsXwPXzx9WD0c2ZntytZ9Xnt28-Xb2vrz---3B1cV33TQtr7UCiIdGZkaDXHbZcdwIN9qSICymxxQYQmrF1neEdjTgaqbhywAk7R_KserX7HrduoaGnsCY322Pyi0u3Njpv_z4J_qud4nerlTaoVTE4vzNI8dtGebWLzz3NswsUt2xFo1Bjw3VT0Gf_oDdxS6E8z5Z_RdTGcF2ow05NbibrwxjLvX2ZAy2-j4FGX_YvNJetkgaxCMQu6FPMOdH4u3sO9mfidk_clsTtr8QtFJHcRbnAYaL0p5f_qH4ADSyrNQ</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Connolly, Cornelia</creator><creator>Hall, Tony</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-9687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-5569</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Designing for emergency remote blended and online education: a response to Bennett et al. (2017)</title><author>Connolly, Cornelia ; Hall, Tony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-a0358e2b8fe0c7b5917b2585ce6e123359540504f9ab81bef5f83616a01e5bae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Blended learning</topic><topic>College teachers</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Creative Teaching</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational planning</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Online education</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>School buildings</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connolly, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Tony</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connolly, Cornelia</au><au>Hall, Tony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Designing for emergency remote blended and online education: a response to Bennett et al. (2017)</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>281-284</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>This paper is in response to the article entitled “The process of designing for learning: understanding university teachers’ design work” (Bennett et al. in Educ Technol Res Dev 65(1):125–145, 2017). Design constitutes a fundamental part of what teachers do (Goodyear in HERDSA Rev Higher Educ 2:27–50, 2015). However, it has received negligible attention in the research literature. Bennett et al. make a significant contribution to knowledge by identifying and illustrating how university teachers engage in educational design. In particular, the paper identifies key areas for further support and the professional development of university teachers, including in the use of systematic design models and tools. This will help university teachers significantly, especially during the current pandemic has increased the design workload of university teachers as they endeavour to migrate and transtion their teaching online. Our response discusses Bennett et al. (2017) in the context of emergency remote teaching and the wholesale shift to new modalities of blended and online education. We also offer future suggestions arising from our review, including the importance of further international research on the topic.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33250607</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11423-020-09892-0</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-9687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-5569</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2021-02, Vol.69 (1), p.281-284 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7678576 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Blended learning College teachers COVID-19 Creative Teaching Distance Education Distance learning Education Educational planning Educational Technology Higher education Learning and Instruction Online education Online instruction Professional development School buildings Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods |
title | Designing for emergency remote blended and online education: a response to Bennett et al. (2017) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T03%3A49%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20for%20emergency%20remote%20blended%20and%20online%20education:%20a%20response%20to%20Bennett%20et%20al.%20(2017)&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Connolly,%20Cornelia&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=281-284&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-020-09892-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA713963855%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2505578817&rft_id=info:pmid/33250607&rft_galeid=A713963855&rfr_iscdi=true |