Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis

Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2020-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e11071-e11071
Hauptverfasser: Basham, Maleeha Ali, Ghumro, Hassan Ali, Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed, Saeed, Sumayyah, Pervez, Syed Annas, Farooque, Umar, Kumar, Naresh, Imtiaz, Zainab, Sajjad, Muhsana, Jamal, Aisha, Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra, Idris, Farha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e11071
container_issue 10
container_start_page e11071
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 12
creator Basham, Maleeha Ali
Ghumro, Hassan Ali
Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed
Saeed, Sumayyah
Pervez, Syed Annas
Farooque, Umar
Kumar, Naresh
Imtiaz, Zainab
Sajjad, Muhsana
Jamal, Aisha
Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra
Idris, Farha
description Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of patients having sepsis. This study aims to validate the prognostic accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in determining the mortality of both septic and non-septic patients. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in May 2018 in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Past 200 patient records, from January 2018 to April 2018, were examined, and 20 records were discarded due to insufficient data. Sufficient observational data were collected, which was used to assess the validity of the SOFA and qSOFA in determining the mortality rate of sepsis. A comparison of the two modalities was made. Results Out of the 200 patients, 180 were enrolled. Data from their entire ICU stay were used to calculate their initial, highest, and mean SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA score up to nine correlated with a mortality rate of up to
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.11071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7676951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2463602777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-60d6dde00dd0472e2ae461e2af42f4431e6ea42040f1465a40d182582457c7983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1PAyEUJEZjjXrzB3D0YCuwLGwvJk1j1URj_D4SXN626BYqsE38Tf5J0TZGb56Gl5k3E94gdEDJQMpyeFx3Abo4oJRIuoF2GBVVv6IV3_z17qH9GF8IIVnEiCTbqFcUjHEhyh308ahba2x6x77Bd_DWgUtWt_g6TLXDE23bnIBHMUKM88xh7Qy-6Wz9-i-1devJuim-8iHltJx1qxN8cWkG-MIlcNEuAY91Xn5wNuEnm2bYh2_0XcpRi2jjHtpqdBthf4276GFyej8-719en12MR5f9mvEq9QUxwhggxBjCJQOmgQuaoeGs4bygIEBzRjhpKBel5sTQipUV46Ws5bAqdtHJynfRPc_B1PkjQbdqEexch3fltVV_GWdnauqXSgophiXNBodrg-DzjWJScxtraFvtwHdR5dsXgjApZZYeraR18DEGaH5iKFFfFatVxeq74uITZ2uc4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2463602777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Basham, Maleeha Ali ; Ghumro, Hassan Ali ; Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed ; Saeed, Sumayyah ; Pervez, Syed Annas ; Farooque, Umar ; Kumar, Naresh ; Imtiaz, Zainab ; Sajjad, Muhsana ; Jamal, Aisha ; Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra ; Idris, Farha</creator><creatorcontrib>Basham, Maleeha Ali ; Ghumro, Hassan Ali ; Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed ; Saeed, Sumayyah ; Pervez, Syed Annas ; Farooque, Umar ; Kumar, Naresh ; Imtiaz, Zainab ; Sajjad, Muhsana ; Jamal, Aisha ; Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra ; Idris, Farha</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of patients having sepsis. This study aims to validate the prognostic accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in determining the mortality of both septic and non-septic patients. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in May 2018 in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Past 200 patient records, from January 2018 to April 2018, were examined, and 20 records were discarded due to insufficient data. Sufficient observational data were collected, which was used to assess the validity of the SOFA and qSOFA in determining the mortality rate of sepsis. A comparison of the two modalities was made. Results Out of the 200 patients, 180 were enrolled. Data from their entire ICU stay were used to calculate their initial, highest, and mean SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA score up to nine correlated with a mortality rate of up to &lt;79%, while scores 10 and above predicted a 100% mortality rate. A mean qSOFA score of three predicted a 67% mortality rate. Univariate logistic analysis performed with odds ratio showed that the mean qSOFA score was in comparison more closely able to predict mortality, followed by mean SOFA score (p values &lt; 0.01). Conclusions This study concluded that both SOFA and qSOFA scores are good predictors of mortality. However, qSOFA is more closely accurate in predicting mortality than SOFA. But further analysis with larger sample size for a longer duration as well as the application of these scores in the emergency departments and general wards can prove the precision of this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33224665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto (CA): Cureus</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Emergency Medicine ; Internal Medicine</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2020-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e11071-e11071</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020, Basham et al. 2020 Basham et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-60d6dde00dd0472e2ae461e2af42f4431e6ea42040f1465a40d182582457c7983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676951/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676951/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basham, Maleeha Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghumro, Hassan Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Sumayyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pervez, Syed Annas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farooque, Umar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Naresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imtiaz, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajjad, Muhsana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamal, Aisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, Farha</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of patients having sepsis. This study aims to validate the prognostic accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in determining the mortality of both septic and non-septic patients. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in May 2018 in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Past 200 patient records, from January 2018 to April 2018, were examined, and 20 records were discarded due to insufficient data. Sufficient observational data were collected, which was used to assess the validity of the SOFA and qSOFA in determining the mortality rate of sepsis. A comparison of the two modalities was made. Results Out of the 200 patients, 180 were enrolled. Data from their entire ICU stay were used to calculate their initial, highest, and mean SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA score up to nine correlated with a mortality rate of up to &lt;79%, while scores 10 and above predicted a 100% mortality rate. A mean qSOFA score of three predicted a 67% mortality rate. Univariate logistic analysis performed with odds ratio showed that the mean qSOFA score was in comparison more closely able to predict mortality, followed by mean SOFA score (p values &lt; 0.01). Conclusions This study concluded that both SOFA and qSOFA scores are good predictors of mortality. However, qSOFA is more closely accurate in predicting mortality than SOFA. But further analysis with larger sample size for a longer duration as well as the application of these scores in the emergency departments and general wards can prove the precision of this study.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1PAyEUJEZjjXrzB3D0YCuwLGwvJk1j1URj_D4SXN626BYqsE38Tf5J0TZGb56Gl5k3E94gdEDJQMpyeFx3Abo4oJRIuoF2GBVVv6IV3_z17qH9GF8IIVnEiCTbqFcUjHEhyh308ahba2x6x77Bd_DWgUtWt_g6TLXDE23bnIBHMUKM88xh7Qy-6Wz9-i-1devJuim-8iHltJx1qxN8cWkG-MIlcNEuAY91Xn5wNuEnm2bYh2_0XcpRi2jjHtpqdBthf4276GFyej8-719en12MR5f9mvEq9QUxwhggxBjCJQOmgQuaoeGs4bygIEBzRjhpKBel5sTQipUV46Ws5bAqdtHJynfRPc_B1PkjQbdqEexch3fltVV_GWdnauqXSgophiXNBodrg-DzjWJScxtraFvtwHdR5dsXgjApZZYeraR18DEGaH5iKFFfFatVxeq74uITZ2uc4A</recordid><startdate>20201020</startdate><enddate>20201020</enddate><creator>Basham, Maleeha Ali</creator><creator>Ghumro, Hassan Ali</creator><creator>Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed</creator><creator>Saeed, Sumayyah</creator><creator>Pervez, Syed Annas</creator><creator>Farooque, Umar</creator><creator>Kumar, Naresh</creator><creator>Imtiaz, Zainab</creator><creator>Sajjad, Muhsana</creator><creator>Jamal, Aisha</creator><creator>Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra</creator><creator>Idris, Farha</creator><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201020</creationdate><title>Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis</title><author>Basham, Maleeha Ali ; Ghumro, Hassan Ali ; Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed ; Saeed, Sumayyah ; Pervez, Syed Annas ; Farooque, Umar ; Kumar, Naresh ; Imtiaz, Zainab ; Sajjad, Muhsana ; Jamal, Aisha ; Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra ; Idris, Farha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-60d6dde00dd0472e2ae461e2af42f4431e6ea42040f1465a40d182582457c7983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basham, Maleeha Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghumro, Hassan Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Sumayyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pervez, Syed Annas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farooque, Umar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Naresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imtiaz, Zainab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajjad, Muhsana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamal, Aisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Idris, Farha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basham, Maleeha Ali</au><au>Ghumro, Hassan Ali</au><au>Muhammad Usman Shah, Syed</au><au>Saeed, Sumayyah</au><au>Pervez, Syed Annas</au><au>Farooque, Umar</au><au>Kumar, Naresh</au><au>Imtiaz, Zainab</au><au>Sajjad, Muhsana</au><au>Jamal, Aisha</au><au>Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra</au><au>Idris, Farha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2020-10-20</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e11071</spage><epage>e11071</epage><pages>e11071-e11071</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of patients having sepsis. This study aims to validate the prognostic accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in determining the mortality of both septic and non-septic patients. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in May 2018 in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Past 200 patient records, from January 2018 to April 2018, were examined, and 20 records were discarded due to insufficient data. Sufficient observational data were collected, which was used to assess the validity of the SOFA and qSOFA in determining the mortality rate of sepsis. A comparison of the two modalities was made. Results Out of the 200 patients, 180 were enrolled. Data from their entire ICU stay were used to calculate their initial, highest, and mean SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA score up to nine correlated with a mortality rate of up to &lt;79%, while scores 10 and above predicted a 100% mortality rate. A mean qSOFA score of three predicted a 67% mortality rate. Univariate logistic analysis performed with odds ratio showed that the mean qSOFA score was in comparison more closely able to predict mortality, followed by mean SOFA score (p values &lt; 0.01). Conclusions This study concluded that both SOFA and qSOFA scores are good predictors of mortality. However, qSOFA is more closely accurate in predicting mortality than SOFA. But further analysis with larger sample size for a longer duration as well as the application of these scores in the emergency departments and general wards can prove the precision of this study.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto (CA)</cop><pub>Cureus</pub><pmid>33224665</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.11071</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2020-10, Vol.12 (10), p.e11071-e11071
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7676951
source PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Anesthesiology
Emergency Medicine
Internal Medicine
title Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A32%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20Sequential%20Organ%20Failure%20Assessment%20and%20Quick%20Sequential%20Organ%20Failure%20Assessment%20in%20Assessing%20Mortality%20Rate%20in%20the%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit%20With%20or%20Without%20Sepsis&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Basham,%20Maleeha%20Ali&rft.date=2020-10-20&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e11071&rft.epage=e11071&rft.pages=e11071-e11071&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.11071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2463602777%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2463602777&rft_id=info:pmid/33224665&rfr_iscdi=true